PTAB rankings covering petitioner-side and patent-owner-side representation across IPR, PGR, and CBM proceedings. Built on the full PTAB E2E dataset with institution and final-written-decision outcome tracking. The first edition publishes in 2026.
Methodology in draft. First edition: 2026.
Every signal is computed from the full PTAB E2E dataset across all IPR, PGR, and CBM proceedings. Petitioner and patent-owner counsel are tracked separately, with institution decisions, Fintiv denials, FWD outcomes, and rehearing patterns all extracted.
Six performance signals across both petitioner-side and patent-owner-side practice. Each signal accounts for the unique dynamics of the PTAB — discretionary denials, Sotera stipulations, MTA practice, and the appeal-to-CAFC arc.
Weighted participation across all IPR, PGR, and CBM petitions — petitioner and patent-owner sides tracked separately.
Petitioner-side: rate of institution. Patent-owner-side: rate of successful POPR denial.
Petitioner: unpatentable-claim rate at FWD. Patent owner: claim-survival rate. Both weighted by claim count.
Use of Fintiv, Sotera stipulations, General Plastic, and other discretionary mechanisms.
Joinder strategy and outcomes in multi-petitioner proceedings.
Outcomes when PTAB decisions reach the Federal Circuit — affirmance, reversal, and remand patterns.
Most rankings ask you to make a case for yourself. We already have the evidence.
When the first edition launches in 2026, firms and attorneys appearing in the Top 100 of any official PTAB category — petitioner-side or patent-owner-side — will be eligible to license the LexDana PTAB Intelligence Badge.
Signal definitions, cohort normalization, weighting, and the exact data window — all published.
Methodology →