Appellate practice rankings at the Federal Circuit covering appellant and appellee representation. Built on CAFC PACER docket data with affirmance/reversal outcomes, Rule 36 patterns, and oral argument tracking. The first edition publishes in 2026.
Methodology in draft. First edition: 2026.
Every signal is computed from CAFC PACER records across all patent appeals. Appellant and appellee representation are tracked separately, with affirmance/reversal outcomes, Rule 36 issuances, oral argument records, and cert petitions all captured.
Six performance signals covering appellate practice at the Federal Circuit. Affirmance and reversal rates are normalized for the type of appeal (DC, PTAB, ITC) and the standard of review.
Weighted participation across all CAFC patent appeals — from district court, PTAB, ITC, and the Federal Circuit's other patent dockets.
Win rates for appellants and appellees, normalized for the source court and the standard of review.
Rate of Rule 36 affirmances on cases handled — both as a litigant outcome and as a docket signal.
Cases argued versus submitted on briefs — and outcome differential.
Petitions filed to the Supreme Court and grant rate.
Substantive depth across §101, §103, §112, claim construction, and remedies.
Most rankings ask you to make a case for yourself. We already have the evidence.
When the first edition launches in 2026, firms and attorneys appearing in the Top 100 of any official CAFC category will be eligible to license the LexDana Federal Circuit Intelligence Badge.
Signal definitions, cohort normalization, weighting, and the exact data window — all published.
Methodology →