The official, publicly available rankings for the Top 250 patent prosecution firms and attorneys. No nominations. No surveys. No pay-to-enter. Just the public USPTO record — and what it reveals about who is genuinely leading.
No login required. Free to view.
Every signal is computed from publicly available USPTO patent application records. Examiner bias and technology mix are normalized within cohorts. No surveys. No peer votes. Anyone can audit the math against the public record.
Six performance signals, drawn from over 20 extracted prosecution data points. Each signal is normalized within practice cohorts so that small specialty firms compete fairly with large generalist practices.
Total number of patent applications handled and patents successfully issued over the measurement window.
How consistently a firm or attorney engages throughout the full prosecution process — from filing to issuance.
Diversity and consistency of engagement across applicants, art units, and technology areas.
Application-level and claim-level allowance rates, normalized for examiner severity and technology complexity.
Average pendency in days, number of office actions per allowance, and frequency of time extension requests.
Word-count ratios and structural deltas between original applications and issued patents — a proxy for prosecution-induced narrowing.
Most rankings ask you to make a case for yourself. We already have the evidence.
If your firm or your name appears in the Top 100 of any official Patent Prosecution category, you are eligible to license the LexDana Patent Intelligence Badge — a publicly verifiable credential backed by the same data behind the rankings.
Signal definitions, cohort normalization, weighting, and the exact data window — all published.
Methodology →