The official, publicly available rankings for the Top 250 firms and attorneys in Section 337 investigations. Built on ITC EDIS public docket records across complainant and respondent representation.
No login required. Free to view.
Every signal is derived from public ITC EDIS records across the full Section 337 docket. ALJ tendencies, technology sector mix, and complainant-versus-respondent posture are all controlled for within cohorts.
Six performance signals, each computed across the full Section 337 docket in the measurement window. Outcome scores account for ALJ tendencies, opposing counsel strength, and technology complexity.
Weighted participation across all §337 violation investigations, discounting older cases.
Scored across all terminated investigations — no-violation findings to LEO/GEO/CDO orders — with partial credit for nuanced outcomes.
Diversity of complainant and respondent representation across technology sectors.
Normalized success scores adjusted for ALJ tendencies and technology complexity via regression.
How attorneys navigate pre-hearing briefs, discovery, and motion practice through the investigation lifecycle.
Measured against actual outcomes — consent orders, settlements, final Commission determinations.
Most rankings ask you to make a case for yourself. We already have the evidence.
If your firm or your name appears in the Top 100 of any official ITC §337 category, you are eligible to license the LexDana ITC Intelligence Badge — a publicly verifiable credential backed by the same data behind the rankings.
Signal definitions, cohort normalization, weighting, and the exact data window — all published.
Methodology →