LexOne lens. Two very different disputes.
The Claim Lifecycle View shows every position taken and every ruling made on a single patent claim — across prosecution, PTAB, district court, and the Federal Circuit. Below: the same lens applied to a semiconductor patent and a pharma patent.
VLSI v. Intel
A semiconductor patent at the center of one of the largest patent verdicts of the decade. Trace claim 1 through prosecution, four IPRs, a W.D. Tex. Markman, and a pending Federal Circuit appeal.
Open the demoSalix v. Norwich
A Hatch-Waxman ANDA dispute over Salix’s blockbuster XIFAXAN (rifaximin). Trace claim 1 through prosecution into the district court trial in Delaware and the Federal Circuit’s opinion.
Open the demoA claim doesn’t live on the cover. It lives in the record.
Patent claims are reshaped every time a party takes a position and a tribunal rules. The lifecycle view makes that record legible at a glance — element by element, party by party, year by year.
One column per element.
Each column is one limitation of the claim. Events stack chronologically inside the column so you can trace how that specific element was treated independently of the others.
Positions and decisions.
Positions (dashed) are what a party asserted the claim meant. Decisions (filled) are what a tribunal ruled. Lifelines connect each position to the decision that resolved it.
Every venue. One timeline.
USPTO prosecution, PTAB IPRs, district court, ITC, the Federal Circuit — whatever forums the patent traveled through, on a single axis. Filter, scrub, drill into any cited passage.
The Claim Lifecycle View is one surface. The memory layer drives many.
Once the dispute record is stored once and stored well, different teams need different lenses on it. We’re building the next ones now.
Doctrine map
Every Festo / Omega / Phillips event the patent has triggered, mapped to the doctrine that resolves it. For appellate briefing and IPR strategy.
Cross-forum exposure
For a portfolio: where each patent has been litigated, where it’s exposed, where it has prevailed. For in-house IP and M&A diligence.
Counsel comparison
For a firm or attorney: every claim construction position they’ve taken, every outcome they’ve produced — across patents and years.
We’d love to show you how this was built.
Behind these views is a structured record of every position and every ruling, anchored to the source documents. We’re building it for high-stakes patent matters where the record actually has to be right.
Get in touchOr email info@lexdana.ai directly.