District court patent litigation rankings covering plaintiff and defendant representation across the U.S. Built on PACER docket data with full Markman, trial, and settlement outcome tracking. The first edition publishes in 2026.
Methodology in draft. First edition: 2026.
Every signal is derived from PACER court records across U.S. district court patent cases. Plaintiff and defendant representation, Markman orders, dispositive motions, jury verdicts, and settlement events are all extracted and normalized.
Six performance signals across both plaintiff-side and defendant-side practice. Outcomes are normalized for venue and judge tendencies so a W.D. Tex. specialist competes fairly against an EDTX, NDCal, or DDel-focused practice.
Weighted participation across plaintiff- and defendant-side patent cases in U.S. district courts.
Favorable construction rate at claim construction, weighted by case stakes and venue.
Mix of cases that settle pre-trial versus those that reach trial — signaling negotiation leverage.
Win rate at trial across infringement and validity, plus damages awarded versus damages sought.
Median days from complaint to final disposition, normalized for venue and case complexity.
Technology and client diversity across cases — specialist depth versus generalist breadth.
Most rankings ask you to make a case for yourself. We already have the evidence.
When the first edition launches in 2026, firms and attorneys appearing in the Top 100 of any official category will be eligible to license the LexDana Patent Litigation Badge — a publicly verifiable credential backed by the same docket data behind the rankings.
Signal definitions, cohort normalization, weighting, and the exact data window — all published.
Methodology →