USPatent applicationPatented

Dual layer hard mask for block salicide poly resistor (BSR) patterning

Granted 6 Apr 2010 · 1 office action

Life of the application

8 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20082010201220142016201820202022202420262028ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

In general, in one aspect, a method includes forming a semiconductor substrate having an N+ diffusion region, a shallow trench isolation (STI) region adjacent to the N+ diffusion region, and a blocked salicide poly resistor (BSR) region over the STI region. An oxide layer is over the substrate. A nitride layer is formed over the oxide layer and is annealed. A resist layer is patterned on the annealed nitride layer, wherein the resist layer covers a portion of the BSR region. The annealed nitride layer is etched using the resist layer as a pattern. The resist layer is removed and the oxide layer is etched using the annealed nitride layer as a pattern. Germanium pre-amorphization is implanted into the substrate, wherein the oxide and the annealed nitride layers protect a portion of the BSR region from the implanting.

Description

3 parts
›BACKGROUND

Blocked salicide poly resistor (BSR) patterning utilizes resist material during germanium pre-amorphization implant (GPI) to protect the BSR from the implant damage. The exposure of the resist material during GPI results in an interaction between the resist and the GPI that generates carbon knock-on. The carbon knock-on results in degradation in performance of N+ salicide regions in the substrate.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The features and advantages of the various embodiments will become apparent from the following detailed description in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates an example substrate having a N+ diffused region, a shallow trench isolation (STI) region, and a blocked salicide poly resistor (BSR) layer, according to one embodiment;

FIG. 2 illustrates the example substrate after a first masking layer is formed thereover, according to one embodiment;

FIG. 3 illustrates the example substrate after a second masking layer is formed over the first masking layer, according to one embodiment;

FIG. 4 illustrates the example substrate after a patterning layer is formed and patterned over the second masking layer, according to one embodiment;

FIG. 5 illustrates the example substrate after the second masking layer is etched using the patterning layer as a pattern, according to one embodiment;

FIG. 6 illustrates the example substrate after the patterning layer is removed, according to one embodiment;

FIG. 7 illustrates the example substrate after the first masking layer is etched using the second masking layer as a pattern, according to one embodiment; and

FIG. 8 illustrates the example substrate after germanium pre-amorphization implant (GPI), according to one embodiment.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In order to reduce or eliminate the effect of carbon knock-on a blocking stack that does not include resist material is utilized. The blocking stack may be made of a plurality of materials (e.g., oxide, nitride) with each layer being deposited sequentially. An upper layer may be annealed so that it can act as a hard mask. The upper layer may be etched using a resist as a pattern, and after removal of the resist the lower layer can be etched using the upper layer as a hard mask. The patterned blocking stack (e.g., nitride/oxide) can protect the BSR poly from the GPI without the use of a resist layer. Accordingly, n+ salicide degradation caused by carbon knock-on can be effectively eliminated. FIGS. 1-8 illustrate an example process to create a blocking stack for GPI protection that does not include a resist layer and effectively eliminates creation of carbon knock-on.

FIG. 1 illustrates an example substrate having a N+ diffused region 100 , a shallow trench isolation (STI) region 110 adjacent to the N+ diffused region 100 , and a blocked salicide poly resistor (BSR) layer 120 over the STI region 110 . The N+ diffused region 100 , the STI region 110 , and the BSR layer 120 making up the example substrate may be formed through any number of known processes.

FIG. 2 illustrates the example substrate after a first masking layer 130 (e.g., oxide) is formed thereover. The oxide layer 130 may be formed through any number of known processes.

FIG. 3 illustrates the example substrate after a second masking layer 140 (e.g., nitride) is formed over the oxide layer 130 . The nitride layer 140 may be formed through any number of known processes. After the oxide 130 and the nitride layers 140 are formed source drain activation anneal (SDAL) may follow to anneal the nitride layer 140 . An annealed nitride layer has a much slower etch rate so that it may be utilized as a hard mask for subsequent etching.

FIG. 4 illustrates the example substrate after a patterning layer 150 (e.g., resist) is formed and patterned over the annealed nitride layer 140 . The resist layer 150 may be formed and patterned through any number of known processes. For example, the resist layer 150 may be patterned using photolithography.

FIG. 5 illustrates the example substrate after the annealed nitride layer 140 is etched using the resist layer 150 as a pattern. The nitride layer 140 may be etched through any number of known processes (e.g., dry etch).

FIG. 6 illustrates the example substrate after the resist layer 150 is removed. The resist layer 150 may be removed through any number of known processes (e.g., ash/clean).

FIG. 7 illustrates the example substrate after the oxide layer 130 is etched using the nitride layer 140 as a pattern. The oxide layer 140 may be etched through any number of known processes (e.g., wet etch).

FIG. 8 illustrates the example substrate after germanium pre-amorphization implant (GPI). The GPI forms an implanted region 105 on top surface of the N+ diffused region 100 and implant regions 125 in the BSR layer 120 on each side of the masking layers 130 , 140 . Since the resist layer 150 is not utilized as the GPI blocker creation of carbon knock-on is effectively eliminated.

While the embodiments described above focused on the use of a blocking stack made of two layers it is not limited thereto. Rather any number of layers could be utilized without departing from the current scope. Furthermore, the embodiments described focused on the use of oxide as a first layer and nitride as a second layer but is not limited thereto. For example, depending on the etch selectivity of the second layer etch process, the type of first and second layer materials that can be used may include various dielectrics (e.g., SiC, TiN, TiO 2 ).

Although the disclosure has been illustrated by reference to specific embodiments, it will be apparent that the disclosure is not limited thereto as various changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the scope. Reference to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure or characteristic described therein is included in at least one embodiment. Thus, the appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” appearing in various places throughout the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.

The various embodiments are intended to be protected broadly within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

Claims as granted

13 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

3 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H01L21/20
USPC · US Patent Classification
438/382257/E21.006

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2008Apr 2008Jul 2008Oct 2008Jan 2009Apr 2009Jul 2009Oct 2009Jan 2010Apr 2010USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.3 y
831 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
W. David Coleman
art unit 2823 · TC 2800
Citations: 5 back · 1 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2010201220142016201820202022202420262028Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock