USPatent applicationPatented

Light weight porous structure

Granted 14 May 2002 · 1 office action

Application· this page
9626630
filed 27 Jul 2000
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,387,511
granted 14 May 2002

Life of the application

7 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

These glass bodies are light weight porous structures such as a boules of high purity fused silica or ultra-low expansion glass. More specifically, the porous structures are supports for mirror blanks. Porous glass is made utilizing flame deposition of pure silica or doped silica in a manner similar to the production of high purity fused silica. Bubbles or seeds are formed in the glass during laydown. Several means of creating and controlling these seeds are available. The processes use incomplete combustion to create the bubbles. There are a number of different steps to create the incomplete combustion. One such step is a short distance between the hydrolysis flame and the glass precursor.

Description

8 parts
›TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to light weight porous structures for glass bodies such as a boule of high purity fused silica such as HPFS® fused silica glass or ULE® ultra low expansion glass of Corning Incorporated, Corning, N.Y. 14830. More specifically, the porous structures are supports for high purity fused silica mirror blanks.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Reducing the weight of mirror supports is vital for two applications. First, they are vital for the space program which has stringent weight constraints. Second, large scale terrestrial bound mirrors (over a meter in size) also desire light weight supports in order to have better control over the maneuverability of the mirrors while in use. The mirror supports should not add any stresses to the actual mirror. One of the best ways of doing this is to make the mirror support out of the same material as the mirrors so that no stresses from thermal expansion mismatch develop. Currently, mirrors are made of either high purity fused silica such as HPFS® fused silica glass or ULE® ultra low expansion glass of Corning Incorporated, Corning, N.Y. 14830. An additional requirement is that the mirror material must also be environmentally stable.

The existing method for making supports first involves making dense glass. Secondly, the glass is machined into an intricate honeycomb-like pattern to remove most excess weight. Thirdly, the mirror is bonded to the fabricated honeycomb structure. A process for making porous glass without first making dense glass would be highly desirable.

›BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The processes in this invention describe methods, using flame hydrolysis and incomplete combustion for making porous light weight glass which can be used for mirror supports. The composition of the glass can be controlled. Even though high purity fused silica and ultra-low expansion compositions were the focus of the invention, the method is not restricted to these compositions. The process in this invention allows for the fabrication of controlled layered structures such that pore free glass can be made directly on top of the porous structure. The thickness of the layers and number of the layers are controlled in this process.

The existing manufacturing method of supports first involves making dense glass. Secondly, the glass is machined into honeycomb-like pattern to remove most excess weight. Thirdly, the mirror is bonded to the fabricated honeycomb structure. This invention describes a method of making structural supports for mirrors out of porous glass. The porous glass may still require machining, but machining of porous glass will be much less expensive than the standard dense glass. Bonding to the mirror blank should not change for the porous glass since thin layers of dense glass can be manufactured onto the porous glass.

Porous glass is made utilizing flame deposition of pure silica or doped silica in a manner similar to the production of high purity fused silica. Bubbles or seeds are formed in the glass during laydown. Several means of creating and controlling these seeds are available. Two approaches are demonstrated. The first approach involves the use of a liquid feed burner in which organic precursors such as liquid octamethyl cyclo tetra siloxane (OMCTS) or OMCTS and titanium IV tetra isopropoxide (tipox) droplets are injected into the cavity. Results suggest that unreacted OMCTS impacting the boule creates bubbles (seeds). The second approach for creating porous structures involves the use of conventional vapor fed bumers. Both of these processes use incomplete combustion to create bubbles. A number of different approaches can be used to create bubbles.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a porous glass made with liquid feed burners.

FIG. 2 shows a porous cube machined out of the glass.

FIG. 3 shows an optical micrograph of the porous surface showing spherical pores.

FIG. 4 shows porous glass made with vapor fed burners.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 2

High purity fused silica is customarily produced by a chemical vapor deposition process. In this process, oxide precursors, usually metal chlorides or organic silica precursor in vapor form, are introduced through a burner flame to produce molten oxide particles. These molten particles are deposited on a large support member to build up a body termed a boule.

In practicing the invention, a gas stream provides the vapors of at least one material that will hydrolyze to form an oxide in the flame of a combustion burner. The vaporizable material may be any of the metal halides, metal organics, or other compounds that are suitable for the conventional flame hydrolysis process of glass production. The material may be volatilized in conventional manner, for example by heating or entrainment by a carrier gas. Alternative procedures include generating vapors from a heated fluidized bed.

The glass precursors of this invention may vary widely. Relatively pure metal oxides are produced by thermal decomposition of precursors and deposition of the resulting oxides. The precursor may take the form of a vapor, or may be carried by a vapor. It may be decomposed by either flame hydrolysis or pyrolysis.

One such process is production of fused silica by hydrolysis or pyrolysis of a silica precursor. Commercially, this is an application of flame hydrolysis involving forming and depositing particles of fused silica which melt to form large bodies (boules). Such boules may be used individually, may be finished and integrated together into large optical bodies, or may be cut into small pieces for finishing as lenses and the like. In this procedure, the precursor is hydrolyzed and the hydrolyzed vapor is passed into a flame to form particles of a fused silica. The particles are continuously deposited, for example, in the cup of a refractory furnace where they melt to form a solid boule.

Besides essentially pure fused silica, this invention uses a fused silica doped with 5-11% by weight titania (TiO 2 ). Originally, chlorides of silicon and titanium were employed as precursors. Recently, primarily for environmental reasons, chloride-free precursors have been proposed. Specifically, a siloxane, octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (OMCTS), and a titanium alkoxide, titanium isopropoxide, Ti(OPri) 4 , are commercially employed.

The precursors are separately converted to vapor form and carried to a mixing manifold by a carrier gas, such as nitrogen. The mixture passes, via fume lines, into a flame where the precursors are converted into SiO 2 —TiO 2 particles. These particles are collected in a refractory where they melt to form a solid boule.

The titania compounds may be selected from the group consisting of titanium isopropoxide, Ti(OC 3 H 7 ) 4 , titanium ethoxide, Ti(OC 2 H 5 ) 4 , titanium 2-ethylhexyloxide, Ti[OCH 2 (C 2 H 5 CHCH 4 H 9 ] 4 , titanium cyclopentyloxide, Ti(OC 3 H 9 ) 4 , and the titanium amides, (Ti(NR 2 ) 4 , or a combination thereof.

A prior art furnace produces the fused silica glass. Silicon-containing gas molecules are reacted in a flame to form SiO 2 soot particles. These particles are deposited on the hot surface of a body where they consolidate into a very viscous fluid which is later cooled to the glassy (solid) state. In the art, glass making procedures of this type are known as vapor phase hydrolysis/oxidation processes or simply as flame hydrolysis processes. The body formed by the deposited particles is often referred to as a “boule”. The term includes any silica-containing body formed by a flame hydrolysis process.

FIG. 1 shows a porous high purity fused silica glass made with liquid feed burners. Bubbles or seeds are formed in the glass during laydown. This involves the use of a liquid feed burner in which either liquid octamethyl cyclo tetra siloxane (OMCTS) or OMCTS and titanium IV tetra isopropoxide (tipox) droplets are injected into the cavity. Results suggest that OMCTS had not fully reacted. This impacts the boule and creates bubbles (seeds). The porous glass was formed on top of a dense glass plate.

FIG. 2 shows a porous cube machined out of the glass.

FIG. 3 shows an optical micrograph of the porous surface revealing spherical pores that are between 100 and 200 μm. The porosity on this structure is low, only 12%, but higher porosity structures can be made.

FIG. 4 shows porous glass made with conventional vapor fed burners. In this approach, a short distance between burner and boule is maintained which results in porous glass formation. The short distance typically is less than 6 inches. Complete reaction of the OMCTS is inhibited by the short reaction zone. Unreacted OMCTS hitting the boule is thought to be the mechanism of creating pores. FIG. 4 is an example of glass machined from a boule that was fabricated using this method. This glass is 25% porous with pores ranging in size between 150 μm and 600 μm. The layered structure reflects the ability of the process to create different layers during fabrication.

In a third method, porous glasses are created by having high flow rates of the OMCTS. Rates exceeding 9 g/min were noted to produce seedy glass in the single burner furnace.

In another attempt, fuel rich conditions were found to produce porous glass. These conditions are expected to delay complete OMCTS combustion by reducing the oxygen available for the reaction.

In yet another attempt, a high nitrogen inner shield was noted to produce porosity in glass. The nitrogen shield acts as a diffusion barrier and is expected to delay OMCTS reaction.

In an additional attempt, operating the nitrogen carrier gas for the OMCTS at low rates was noted to produce porosity in glass. In this case, OMCTS precursor may actually be entering the cavity as a liquid sample or a partially decomposed organic precursor.

Two methods can be used to create a dense glass backing layer onto the porous support. This dense backing layer could be used to either adhere the porous support to the mirror or can be polished into a mirror directly. The first method involves depositing porous glass on top of a dense sheet. Glass shown in FIG. 1 was made this way. The second method involves altering the conditions during lay down so that either porous glass or dense glass can be made at will.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 2

The light weight porous glass body of this invention generally has a porosity ranging from 10 to 80 percent. Preferably, the porosity ranges from 10 to 50 percent and more preferably from 10 to 25 percent. The glass body generally has spherical pores ranging from 1 μm to 600 μm. Preferably, the pores range from 100 μm to 400 μm and more preferably from 100 μm to 300 μm. Preferably, the glass body of this invention has a closed pore structure rather than an open pore structure.

›EXAMPLE I

The run conditions for the glass of FIGS. 1 to 3 were as follows. This glass was made using a single liquid feed burner. The OMCTS flow was between 5.5 and 7.5 g/min. Oxygen was used as an atomizing gas at 25 slpm. The premixed gas contained methane at 27 slpm and oxygen at 18.9 slpm. The outer shield oxygen was run at 21 slpm with inner shield nitrogen at 6.3 slpm. The distance at the start of the run from furnace crown to the sand was 9 inches and the crown temperature was maintained at about 1670° C. FIG. 3 shows an optical micrograph of the porous surface revealing spherical pores that were between 100 and 200 μm. The porosity on the structure was 12%.

›EXAMPLE II

The run conditions for the glass of FIG. 4 utilized a standard burner with standard flow conditions. These include inner shield oxygen at 9.1 slpm, outer shield oxygen at 15 slpm, premixed oxygen and methane (oxygen at 20 slpm and methane at 19.8 slpm), a 2.8 slpm nitrogen gas flow as a carrier gas for the vaporized OMCTS and OMCTS flow rate of 7.5 g/min. The cup diameter was 4 inches at the bottom and 5 inches at the top while the distance from the top of the crown to the glass was 1{fraction (13/16)} inch at the end of the run. FIG. 4 shows the results of this porous glass body. This glass was 25% porous with pores ranging in size between 150 μm and 600 μm.

In addition to these embodiments, persons skilled in the art can see that numerous modifications and changes may be made to the above invention without departing from the intended spirit and scope thereof.

Claims as granted

13 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

6 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section C — Chemistry; metallurgy
  • C03C11/00
  • C03B19/08
  • C03B19/14
USPC · US Patent Classification
428/426428/704428/912.2

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2000Oct 2000Jan 2001Apr 2001Jul 2001Oct 2001Jan 2002Apr 2002Jul 2002USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
1.8 y
656 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
Deborah Jones
art unit 1775 · TC 1700
Citations: 10 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock