USPatent applicationPatented

Image alignment with global translation and linear stretch

Granted 10 Feb 2004 · 1 office action

Current assignee: Tektronix Inc. · originally Fortive

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Shane Ching-Feng Hu, Bozidar Janko · Examiner: Bhavesh M. Mehta · AU 2625 · TC 2600

Application· this page
9499886
filed 8 Feb 2000
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,690,840
granted 10 Feb 2004

Life of the application

7 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A technique for image alignment with global translation and linear stretch determines translation parameters for three corresponding linearly displaced blocks in a reference image and a corresponding distorted test image. From the differences between the translation parameters for the three blocks the presence of stretch is detected and, if detected, a stretch factor is estimated. The estimated stretch factor is used as a starting point to stretch the reference image to overlap the distorted test image as a refinement process. The resulting refined stretch factor is then used in a reverse stretch process to shrink the distorted test image, and the distorted test image is then aligned with the reference image to obtain picture quality metrics.

Description

4 parts
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to image alignment, and more particularly to image alignment with global translation and linear stretch which is detected and corrected.

Accurate spatial alignment of digital images is of fundamental importance to many applications. “Computer Image Processing and Recognition” by Ernest Hall, Academic Press 1979, pp. 480-484, describes a basic correlation method for template matching which may be used for image alignment. “The Phase Correlation Image Alignment Method” by C. D. Kuglin et al, Proceedings of the IEEE 1975 Internal Conference on Cybernetics and Society, September 1975, pp. 163-165, describes a variant of the basic correlator that uses phase information. These methods are appropriate for global translation, such as shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B, and can be very accurate. However for digital images that also are distorted with a linear stretch, as shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B, these correlation methods alone are not capable of handling such a complex model.

A more general approach is taken by James R. Muller et al., “Adaptive-Complexity Registration of Images”, Technical Report 941, University of Rochester, May 1994. The model complexity for local regions may be adaptively expanded to include global translation as well as higher order models, such as linear (affine) to quadratic. However the sizes of the subregions must be substantial to avoid aliasing problems so that, when stitched together, the boundaries between subregions usually pose a problem. In addition there is no global stretch parameter derived.

What is desired is an image alignment method that compensates both for global translation and linear stretch.

›BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Accordingly the present invention provides an image alignment method that compensates for global translation and linear stretch. Using left, center and right correlation blocks, translation parameters are determined between a reference image and a corresponding distorted test image. Based upon the differences between the translation parameters for the blocks, linear stretch is detected and a rough estimate of a stretch factor is determined. The estimated stretch factor is fine tuned by centering the reference image relative to the distorted test image and then stretching the reference image linearly using a linear interpolation operation starting with the estimated stretch factor until the two images overlap as closely as possible, the final stretch factor being that which results in the closest overlap. Then the distorted test image is unshrunk using the refined stretch factor and translated so that the distorted test image is aligned with the reference image for picture quality analysis, for example.

The objects, advantages and other novel features of the present invention are apparent from the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the appended claims and attached drawing.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING

FIGS. 1A and 1B are illustrations of an image that is translated only.

FIGS. 2A and 2B are illustrations of an image that is translated and stretched.

FIGS. 3A-E are illustrations of determining a stretch factor for an image that is translated and stretched according to the present invention.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The basic structure of the present invention augments the basic block correlation methods described by Hall and Kuglin et al above to detect the potential presence of linear stretch between a reference image and a corresponding distorted test image. Once detected, a linear interpolation operator is applied to search for a stretch factor between the images. After the stretch factor is found, the linear interpolation operator performs the inverse (shrink) operation on the distorted test image. A detailed description of the method for detecting and correcting one dimensional (horizontal) stretch and global translation follows, which may be expanded to handle two dimensional stretch as well.

First, three correlation blocks or subregions are located in center, left and right positions of a digital image, and spatial registrations are performed within each block to determine translation parameters, as shown in FIGS. 1A, 1 B, 2 A and 2 B. Details may be found in U.S. Pat. Ser. No. 6,483,538 “High Precision Sub-Pixel Spatial Alignment of Digital Images”.

Second, if the translation parameters (ΔX 13 L, ΔX_C, ΔX_R) found in the first step are nearly identical for the left, center and right blocks, then there is no stretch. Otherwise, if compared with the translation parameters of the center block, the left block translates more toward the left direction and the right block translates more toward the right direction, then a linear expansion stretch is detected. In a similar fashion linear shrinkage is detected if the left block translates more towards the right and the right block translates more towards the left with respect to the center block.

In the next step, the differences in the translation parameters with respect to the center block provides a rough estimate of the range of the stretch (shrinkage) factor. Let (X_L, Y_L), (X_R, Y_R) denote the center coordinates of the left and right blocks. For horizontal stretch let ΔXl and ΔXr denote the difference of the translation parameters with respect to the center block, i.e., the amount of stretch in the left and right blocks relative to the center block where ΔXl=ΔX_C−ΔX_L and ΔXr=ΔX_R−ΔX_C. Then Range_L=(ΔXl/(W 2 −X_L))*K;

Range_R=(ΔXr/(X_R−W 2 ))*K;

Range=(Range —L+Range _R)/ 2 where W 2 is the value of one-half the width of the image, K is a constant, (W 2 −X_L) is the distance between the left block and the center of the image, and (X_R−W 2 ) is the distance between the center of the image and the right block. This provides a rough approximation of the shrink factor. However, due to the sensitivity of the alignment between the reference image and the distorted image in order to obtain accurate picture quality metrics, for example, further tuning of the shrink factor is necessary, as illustrated in FIGS. 3A, 3 B, 3 C and 3 D.

Fourth, an exhaustive search is done using a linear interpolative operation to fine tune the stretch (shrinkage) factor. A linear stretch (shrinkage) operation of the reference image over the range (1.0 to Range estimated above) with the step size desired is performed and the result is matched against the distorted test image. The linear stretch (shrinkage) may be done by any method well known in the art, such as that described in “Software Pixel Interpolation for Digital Still Cameras Suitable for a 32-Bit MCU” by T. Sakamoto et al, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, Vol. 44, No. 4, November 1998. The search to find the stretch (shrinkage) factor is iterative until a minimum error is achieved. A typical error measure is the mean squared difference between the reference and distorted test images.

Finally after the stretch factor is found, an inverse stretch operation is performed on the distorted test image using the linear interpolation operation and the distorted test image is translated to be essentially in alignment with the reference image. The resulting corrected distorted test image may now be compared with the reference image to obtain accurate picture quality metrics, for example.

Thus the present invention provides a technique for image alignment with global translation and linear stretch correction of a distorted image by obtaining translation parameters for left, center and right correlation blocks of the distorted image relative to a corresponding reference image, determining from the translation parameters and a linear interpolation operation what the stretch factor is between the images, and then reverse stretching using the stretch factor and the linear interpolation operation and translating the corrected distorted image to be aligned with the reference image to obtain picture quality metrics.

Claims as granted

4 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

6 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G06T7/00
  • G06T3/00
  • G06T7/60
Section H — Electricity
  • H04N1/40
USPC · US Patent Classification
382/294382/300

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2000Jul 2000Jan 2001Jul 2001Jan 2002Jul 2002Jan 2003Jul 2003Jan 2004USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
4.0 y
1,463 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
Bhavesh M. Mehta
art unit 2625 · TC 2600
Citations: 27 back · 7 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom200420062008201020122014201620182020Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock