USPatent applicationPatented

Micropatterning method

Granted 7 May 2002 · 1 office action

Application· this page
9417088
filed 13 Oct 1999
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,383,944
granted 7 May 2002

Life of the application

7 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

By forming a lift-off resist pattern on a surface of a first layer, forming a second layer over the first layer surface including the resist pattern, removing the resist pattern to partially expose the first layer surface, and etching the exposed area of the first layer, a micropattern having a high resolution of 0.3 m or less and improved dimensional control is obtained.

Description

6 parts
›This invention relates to a micropatterning method using…

This invention relates to a micropatterning method using a resist composition designed to lend itself to the lift-off procedure.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The recently increasing degree of integration in semiconductor devices requires a method capable of forming at high precision a pattern having an extremely small line width of less than 0.3 μm. The demand for high integration can be met by increasing resolution or optimizing a resist composition. In connection with the resolution increasing technology, studies have been made on the exposure method having incorporated therein ultrahigh resolution techniques such as modified illumination and phase shifting in compliance with the increased numerical aperture and reduced wavelength. With respect to the resist composition, a change from i-line sensitive novolac compositions to chemical amplification systems is made to match with the reduced wavelength of light sources.

However, with respect to the control of line width, the performance level of positive novolac resist compositions to be exposed to g and i-lines has not been fully reached.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An object of the invention is to provide a novel and improved micropatterning method capable of processing to a controlled line width of less than 0.3 μm while taking advantage of a positive novolac resist composition to be exposed to g and i-lines.

The invention provides a micropatterning method comprising the steps of forming a lift-off resist pattern on a surface of a first layer, forming a second layer over the first layer surface including the resist pattern, removing the resist pattern to partially expose the first layer surface, and etching the exposed area of the first layer. The micropatterning method of the invention has the advantages of a high resolution of 0.3 μm or less and improved dimensional control.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 schematically illustrates in cross-section a micropatterning method, showing the state after a resist pattern is formed on a first layer.

FIG. 2 schematically illustrates the state after a second layer is deposited thereon.

FIG. 3 schematically illustrates the state after the resist pattern has been peeled off.

FIG. 4 schematically illustrates the state after etching.

›DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In the micropatterning method of the invention, a lift-off resist pattern is first formed on a surface of a first or base layer, a second layer is then formed over the first layer surface including the resist pattern, the resist pattern is lifted off to partially expose the first layer surface, and finally, the exposed area of the first layer is etched.

The first or base layer used herein may be a metal substrate such as a silicon substrate which optionally has formed thereon a metal layer such as a copper or aluminum layer or an organic layer such as a resist layer. The material of which the resist layer involved in the first layer is made may be a commercially available one such as SIPR-9351 from Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. When the metal or organic layer is formed on the metal substrate, the overlay preferably has a thickness of 0.5 to 20 μm, especially 1 to 10 μm.

As shown in FIG. 1, a lift-off resist pattern is formed on one surface of the first layer 1 . The resist pattern includes undercut line sections, one of which is depicted at 2 in FIG. 1 . Each line section at its root has undercut zones extending along transversely opposed edges thereof. The resist pattern can be formed by a dual-layer resist process or a single-layer resist process using a novolac resist composition. As long as appropriate undercuts are formed, there may be used any desired resist composition, for example, a commercially available one such as SIPR-9691 from Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.

More particularly, the resist composition is applied to form a resist film, which is baked at a temperature of 90 to 130° C. prior to exposure or development or both because undercuts are more effectively created. The resist film is then exposed and developed in a conventional manner.

For exposure, such radiation as i-line (365 nm), h-line (405 nm), g-line (436 nm) or broad band may be used.

Appropriate developers used herein are aqueous solutions of organic alkalis such as tetramethylammonium hydroxide and aqueous solutions of inorganic alkalis such as sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide and potassium meta-borate.

As shown in FIG. 1, the line section 2 of the lift-off resist pattern has a line width of L μm and a thickness of T μm. Each undercut has a penetration height of A μm and a penetration depth of B μm. The root of the line section 2 interposed between the undercuts has a width of C μm in contact with the first layer (C=L−2B). In one preferred embodiment, these parameters are in the following ranges. The line width L is from 0.1 to 10 μm, and especially 0.1 to 7 μm. The line thickness T is 0.5 to 20 μm, and especially 1 to 5 μm. The undercut height A is 0.05 to 2.0 μm, and especially 0.1 to 1.0 μm. The undercut depth B is 0.05 to 3.0 μm, and especially 0.1 to 1.0 μm. The root width C (=L−2B) is 0.05 to 9.5 μm, and especially 0.1 to 5.0 μm. Further, T, A and B satisfy the following relationship.

0.05≦A/T≦0.4, especially 0.1≦A/T≦0.2

0.05≦A/B≦4, especially 0.25≦A/B≦2

If A/T is outside the above range, the lift-off resist pattern would become less smooth to lift off. If A/B is outside the above range, the second layer would become inferior in dimensional control after removal of the resist (as will be described later).

Next, as shown in FIG. 2, a second layer 3 is formed over the entire surface of the first layer 1 including the lift-off resist pattern 2 . For the second layer, metals such as aluminum, copper and gold may be used. The second layer may be formed by gas phase deposition methods such as sputtering, vacuum evaporation and ion plating. The second layer may have an appropriate thickness although a thickness of 0.01 to 1.0 μm, and especially 0.05 to 0.2 μm is preferred. As seen from FIG. 2, the second layer 3 deposits on top of the resist pattern 2 and the exposed area of the first layer 1 and spreads into the undercuts as well.

Next, as shown in FIG. 3, the lift-off resist pattern 2 is removed using a stripping solution such as SIPR-NMP from Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. The second layer 3 is left behind on the first layer 1 while the area la of the first layer 1 surface which has been covered with the resist pattern is exposed.

Finally, the exposed area 1 a of the first layer 1 is etched as shown in FIG. 4 . To this end, dry etching with an oxygen plasma (known as oxygen reactive-ion etching O 2 RIE) is carried out on the first layer 1 using the second layer 3 as a mask, thereby etching the first layer 1 to a desired shape. When the first layer 1 is an organic layer, the shape of the first layer being etched can be controlled in terms of the oxygen gas pressure (P 02 ) of O 2 RIE. For a rectangular profile having a high aspect ratio, a relatively low oxygen pressure (P 02 <several mTorr) is desirable. With a relatively high oxygen pressure (P 02 <several 10 mTorr), a tapered shape can be etched. When the first layer is a metal layer, the etched shape can be similarly controlled by a choice of an etching gas having a selectivity between the layers 1 and 3 .

Referring to FIG. 1 again, the line width L is about 0.4 μm to about 0.5 μm which is equal to the conventional resolution achieved with g or i-line. The finally worked size is the size C in FIGS. 1 and 4, that is, the size of the resist of the lift-off configuration in contact with the substrate or first layer. The size C can be worked to 0.3 μm or less. That is, a micropattern can be processed with the advantages of high resolution and improved dimensional control. The micropatterning method of the invention can process to a controlled line width of 0.3 μm or less while taking advantage of a positive novolac resist composition which can be exposed to g and i-lines.

The micropatterning method using a resist pattern of the lift-off configuration can follow the novolac type resist process, use as the light source such radiation as i-line (365 nm), h-line (405 nm), g-line (436 nm) or broad band, and form a micropattern having a high resolution of 0.3 μm or less and improved dimensional control.

›EXAMPLE

Examples of the invention are given by way of illustration and not by way of limitation.

On a silicon wafer, SIPR-9351 (Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.) was spin coated as a first layer to a thickness of 3 μm and baked at 130° C. for 30 minutes, then at 180° C. for 90 minutes. This is designated “hard baked SIPR-9351.”

Next, SIPR-9691 (single-layer positive novolac liftoff resist by Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.) as a resist composition capable of forming the lift-off configuration was spin coated onto the hard baked SIPR-9351 to a thickness of 1 μm and pre-baked at 90° C. for 90 seconds.

Using an i-line stepper (NSR-1755i7A by Nikon K.K.), the resist film was exposed in a line-and-space pattern at an exposure of 150 mJ. It was post-exposure baked at 110° C. for 90 seconds and developed for 50 seconds with a 2.38% aqueous solution of tetramethylammonium hydroxide. In this way, a line-and-space pattern of SIPR-9691 was formed on the hard baked SIPR-9351.

The thus obtained lift-off resist pattern had the following dimensions.

L=0.45 μm

T=1 μm

A=0.2 μm

B=0.13 μm

C=0.2 μm

A/T=0.2

A/B=1.54

The root of the lift-off resist profile SIPR-9691 in contact with the hard baked SIPR-9351 had a size of 0.2 μm.

Next, by using a sputtering system L-313S-FHL (Anerba K.K.) and operating it at a vacuum of 5.0×10 −5 Pa, an argon flow of 3.5 sccm for 90 seconds, a DC discharge power of 500 W, aluminum was sputtered on the line-and-space pattern to a thickness of 1,000 Å. Using a stripping solution SIPR-NMP (Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.), the resist pattern (SIPR-9691) was lifted off.

After the removal of the resist pattern, etching was carried out using a parallel plate type RIE apparatus. That is, the hard baked SIPR-9351 was etched for 20 to 30 minutes by O 2 RIE under conditions: O 2 pressure 3 mTorr and RF power 0.64 mW/cm 2 (7 MHz) while the aluminum layer served as a mask. As a result, a micropattern having a C size of 0.23 μm as shown in FIG. 4 was obtained.

Japanese Patent Application No. 10-314083 is incorporated herein by reference.

Although some preferred embodiments have been described, many modifications and variations may be made thereto in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described without departing from the scope of the appended claims.

1 of 6 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims as granted

16 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

11 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G03F7/26
  • G03F7/40
Section H — Electricity
  • H01L21/027
  • H01L21/308
  • H01L21/302
  • H01L21/3065
USPC · US Patent Classification
438/725216/40438/719430/5438/694

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomOct 1999Jan 2000Apr 2000Jul 2000Oct 2000Jan 2001Apr 2001Jul 2001Oct 2001Jan 2002Apr 2002Jul 2002USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.6 y
937 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
George Goudreau
art unit 1763 · TC 1700
Citations: 5 back · 11 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock