USPatent applicationPatented

Method for manufacturing BAW resonators on a semiconductor wafer

Granted 9 May 2017 · 4 office actions

Life of the application

15 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20142016201820202022202420262028203020322034ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A method for manufacturing a wafer on which are formed resonators, each resonator including, above a semiconductor substrate, a stack of layers including, in the following order from the substrate surface: a Bragg mirror; a compensation layer made of a material having a temperature coefficient of the acoustic velocity of a sign opposite to that of all the other stack layers; and a piezoelectric resonator, the method including the successive steps of: a) depositing the compensation layer; and b) decreasing thickness inequalities of the compensation layer due to the deposition method, so that this layer has a same thickness to within better than 2%, and preferably to within better than 1%, at the level of each resonator.

Description

8 parts
BACKGROUND
›Technical Field

The present disclosure relates to bulk acoustic wave resonators, currently designated as BAW resonators in the art. It is more specifically directed to a method for manufacturing BAW resonators in which a compensation layer, capable of guaranteeing a temperature-stable behavior of its operating frequency, is provided.

›Description of the Related Art · 1 of 2

A BAW resonator comprises a resonant core, or piezoelectric resonator, formed of two electrodes between which is arranged a layer of a piezoelectric material. When an electric field is applied to the piezoelectric layer by application of a potential difference between electrodes, this results in a mechanical disturbance in the form of an acoustic wave. This wave propagates within the BAW resonator. The fundamental resonance establishes when the acoustic wavelength in the piezoelectric material substantially corresponds to twice the thickness of the piezoelectric layer. Schematically, a BAW resonator behaves as an on switch at the resonance frequency and as an off switch at a so-called antiresonance frequency.

BAW resonators are currently formed above a semiconductor substrate, for example, on a silicon wafer. An acoustic isolation device is then provided between the resonant core and the substrate to avoid a leakage of the acoustic waves into the substrate. There mainly exist two types of BAW resonators: BAW resonators suspended on a membrane and BAW resonators isolated from the substrate by a Bragg mirror.

Suspended BAW resonators, better known as FBARs (Film Bulk Acoustic Wave Resonators) or TFRs (Thin Film Resonators), comprise an isolating air layer between the resonant core and the substrate. Thus, a cavity is provided in the substrate or an air bridge is provided above the substrate. Such resonators have the disadvantage of being difficult to form due to the mechanical fragility of such a device.

BAW resonators with a Bragg mirror, better known as SMRs (Solidly Mounted Resonators), are isolated from the substrate by a reflector, currently a Bragg mirror. They have a stronger structure, better adapted to standard manufacturing methods in microelectronics.

BAW resonators with a Bragg mirror are considered herein.

FIG. 1 is a cross-section view schematically showing a BAW resonator 1 with a Bragg mirror formed on a semiconductor substrate 3 . Although FIG. 1 shows a single resonator, in practice, many resonators are formed simultaneously on a same semiconductor wafer.

Resonator 1 comprises a piezoelectric resonator 5 formed of the stacking of a lower electrode 5 a , of a layer 5 b of a piezoelectric material, and of an upper electrode 5 c . As an example, the piezoelectric material may be aluminum nitride (AlN), lead zirconate titanate (PZT), or zinc oxide (ZnO). Electrodes 5 a and 5 c may be made of molybdenum (Mo), tungsten (W), or aluminum (Al).

An isolation structure 7 , for example, a Bragg mirror, forms an interface between piezoelectric resonator 5 and substrate 3 . Reflector 7 is an alternated stack of layers 7 a of a material with a high acoustic impedance, for example, tungsten (W), and of layers 7 b of a material with a low acoustic impedance, for example, silicon oxide (SiO 2 ). The thickness of each layer 7 a , 7 b is selected to be substantially equal to one quarter of the resonance acoustic wavelength in the material forming it. At the operating frequency, for example, the resonance frequency, the reflector behaves as an acoustic mirror and the waves are confined within the resonator. To obtain a good acoustic isolation, the difference in acoustic impedance between the materials forming layers 7 a and 7 b must be high. Further, the quality of the acoustic isolation increases along with the number of layers 7 a , 7 b of the alternated stack.

The methods of deposition of the different layers of resonator 1 do not provide resonance frequencies with the desired accuracy. Substantial variations of the resonance frequency can especially be observed between resonators formed on the same semiconductor wafer.

For this reason, a frequency adjustment layer 9 , for example, made of silicon nitride, is provided at a surface of resonator 1 . The presence of this layer 9 modifies the behavior of the resonator 1 and especially its operating frequency (for example, the resonance frequency). In a final manufacturing step, a thickness of layer 9 is adjusted by local etching, until the desired frequency is accurately obtained. As an example, an ion etching may be used.

A disadvantage of BAW resonators with a Bragg mirror of the type described in relation with FIG. 1 is the strong dependence of their resonance frequency on temperature. This results from the influence of temperature on the velocity of acoustic waves in the different layers of the resonator 1 and especially in the piezoelectric layer 5 b . The temperature coefficient of frequency, or TCF, expresses, in parts per million per degree Celsius (ppm/° C.), the temperature drift of the resonator frequency. In each of the materials forming the resonator 1 , the acoustic waves have a certain propagation velocity, and for each material, this propagation velocity has a certain temperature coefficient of velocity, or TCV. All the TCVs of the various materials determine the TCF of the BAW resonator. Generally, the materials of the piezoelectric layers and of the electrodes have a negative temperature coefficient of velocity (TCV). Conversely, materials such as silicon oxide have a positive temperature coefficient of velocity (TCV).

It has been suggested to provide, in the stack of layers forming the BAW resonator, at least one temperature compensation layer having a temperature coefficient of velocity (TCV) of a sign opposite to the TCV of all or of the majority of the other layers, for example, silicon oxide. It is thus attempted to decrease the temperature drift of the BAW resonator, that is, to decrease the absolute value of the TCF.

Several locations have been suggested for the temperature compensation layer, and especially between upper electrode 5 c and piezoelectric layer 5 b . This layer being placed in the resonance region, it has a strong influence upon the behavior of the resonator. A very small thickness, for example, from 10 to 50 nm, is thus sufficient to provide the desired thermal stabilization behavior. However, a disadvantage of such a layout is that the compensation layer has a significant influence upon the acoustic behavior. This results in a degradation of the quality factor and of the electromechanical coupling of the resonator.

›Description of the Related Art · 2 of 2

It has also been suggested to provide a compensation layer between upper electrode 5 c and frequency adjustment layer 9 . A disadvantage of this structure is that the compensation layer makes the step of frequency adjustment by etching of layer 9 more complex. Indeed, the sensitivity of the resonator frequency to the thickness of layer 9 is modified by the presence of the compensation layer. Another disadvantage associated with the provision of this additional layer is the degradation of electric performances, and especially of the electromagnetic coupling and of the quality factor.

In addition to the above-mentioned disadvantages, the above-described temperature compensation modes have the disadvantage of being rather inaccurate. They introduce a strong TCF dispersion in BAW resonators. In particular, substantial variations of the TCF can be observed between BAW resonators manufactured from a same wafer, and all the more from different wafers.

›BRIEF SUMMARY

One embodiment of the present disclosure overcomes all or part of the disadvantages of BAW resonators with conventional Bragg mirrors.

One embodiment of the present disclosure is a method for forming a BAW resonator with a Bragg mirror having a frequency response with a better temperature stability than conventional resonators.

One embodiment of the present disclosure is a method enabling to obtain BAW resonators having a temperature behavior with a small dispersion at the scale of a silicon wafer.

One embodiment of the present disclosure is a method which does not degrade the electric performances of the BAW resonator, and especially the electromechanical coupling and the quality factor with respect to conventional resonators, or only slightly does so.

One embodiment of the present disclosure is a method which enables to obtain BAW resonators for which the frequency drift according to temperature is linear.

One embodiment of the present disclosure is a method which is easy to implement.

Thus, an embodiment of the present disclosure provides a method for manufacturing a wafer on which are formed resonators, each resonator comprising, above a semiconductor substrate, a stack of layers comprising, in the following order from a surface of the substrate: a Bragg mirror; a compensation layer made of a material having a temperature coefficient of the acoustic velocity of a sign opposite to that of all the other stack layers; and a piezoelectric resonator, the method comprising the successive steps of: a) depositing the compensation layer; and b) decreasing thickness inequalities of the compensation layer due to the deposition method, so that this layer has a same thickness to within better than 2%, and preferably to within better than 1%, at the level of each BAW resonator.

According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, step b) is carried out by ion etching of overthicknesses due to the deposition method.

According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, the upper layer of the Bragg mirror and the compensation layer form a single layer of a same material.

According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, the compensation layer is made of silicon oxide.

According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, the piezoelectric resonator is formed by the stacking of a lower electrode, of a layer of a piezoelectric material, and of an upper electrode.

According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, the electrodes are made of molybdenum.

According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, the piezoelectric layer is made of aluminum nitride.

According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, the Bragg mirror is formed by the alternated stacking of layers of a material having a first acoustic impedance and of layers of a material having a second acoustic impedance smaller than the first acoustic impedance.

According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, the material having the first acoustic impedance is tungsten and the material having the second acoustic impedance is silicon oxide.

According to an embodiment of the present disclosure, each resonator further comprises, at its surface, a frequency adjustment layer having a thickness capable of compensating for the frequency shift due to manufacturing dispersions.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing objects, features, and advantages of the present disclosure will be discussed in detail in the following non-limiting description of specific embodiments in connection with the accompanying drawings.

FIG. 1 , is a cross-section view schematically showing a known BAW resonator;

FIG. 2 is a cross-section view schematically showing an example of a temperature-compensated BAW resonator according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 3 illustrates a step of an example of a method for forming temperature-compensated BAW resonators of the type described in relation with FIG. 2 ; and

FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate the variation of the resonance frequency of BAW resonators according to temperature.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 1 of 2

For clarity, the same elements have been designated with the same reference numerals in the different drawings and, further, as usual in the representation of microcomponents, the various drawings are not to scale.

FIG. 2 is a cross-section view a BAW resonator 11 having a temperature-compensated frequency response according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.

BAW resonator 11 of FIG. 2 is identical to resonator 1 of FIG. 1 , but for the fact that a temperature compensation layer 13 , for example, made of silicon oxide, is provided between upper layer 7 b of reflector 7 and lower electrode 5 a.

By analyzing current temperature compensation modes, the present inventors have determined that, among the different layers forming a BAW resonator, the silicon oxide temperature compensation layer 13 is one of the layers with the most inaccurate deposition. As an example, thickness variations on the order of 9% (maximum-minimum) can be observed on this layer, at the scale of a semiconductor wafer, which amounts to a standard deviation on the order of 2%. As a comparison, the thickness variations of piezoelectric layer 5 b for example are on the order of 2% (standard deviation on the order of 0.4%) for aluminum nitride.

The inventors have further observed that, among the different layers of BAW resonator 11 , silicon oxide layer 13 is that for which thickness variations have the greatest influence upon the resonator TCF. As an example, a thickness variation of 1% of this layer can shift the TCF of the resonator by 0.8 ppm/° C. As a comparison, a thickness variation of 1% of piezoelectric layer 5 b only causes a small TCF variation, on the order of 0.2 ppm/° C. Similarly, a thickness variation of 1% of electrodes 5 a and 5 c causes a TCF variation on the order of 0.1 ppm/° C.

An aspect of an embodiment of the present disclosure is to provide, on manufacturing, a step of leveling of the thickness of temperature compensation layer 13 , so that this layer has a constant thickness to within better than 2% (standard deviation on the order of 0.5%) at the level of each resonator. According to a preferred embodiment of the present disclosure, layer 13 has a same thickness to within better than 1% (standard deviation on the order of 0.2%) at the level of each BAW resonator.

FIG. 3 illustrates a step of an example of a method for forming temperature-compensated BAW resonators of the type described in relation with FIG. 2 . FIG. 3 is a cross-section view schematically showing a portion of a semiconductor wafer on which are formed elements 7 a , 7 b of the Bragg mirror and the temperature compensation layer 13 .

After the deposition of the compensation layer 13 , a step where the thickness of this layer is made even by etching of the overthicknesses due to the deposition method is provided. This thickness leveling step may advantageously be performed by ion etching, like the final frequency adjustment step described in relation with FIG. 1 . As an example, the semiconductor wafer on which the resonators are formed is scanned by an ion beam 21 . The scan speed is locally controlled on this wafer to etch the compensation layer more or less strongly. At the end of the leveling step, temperature compensation layer 13 has a same thickness to within better than 2% (standard deviation on the order of 0.5%), and preferably to within better than 1% (standard deviation on the order of 0.2%), at the level of each BAW resonator.

FIGS. 4A and 4B show the variation of frequency drift (Δf/f) of the BAW resonators, expressed in parts per million (ppm), according to the temperature in the operating temperature range [Tmin, Tmax].

FIG. 4A shows the variation of the frequency drift according to temperature for BAW resonators of the type described in relation with FIG. 2 , but for which the step of leveling of the temperature compensation layer has not been carried out. In such resonators, the thickness of temperature compensation layer 13 is tainted with an uncertainty on the order of 9% (standard deviation on the order of 2%).

Curve 31 , in dotted lines, shows the ideal temperature behavior, that is, the temperature behavior of a resonator in which the different layers, and especially temperature compensation layer 13 , would exhibit no thickness uncertainty.

Curves 33 and 35 illustrate the temperature behavior of two resonators formed from a same semiconductor wafer. Curve 33 for example corresponds to the case of a resonator formed in an area of the semiconductor wafer where the thickness of the temperature compensation layer 13 is maximum. Curve 35 for example corresponds to the case of a resonator formed in an area of the semiconductor wafer where the thickness of the temperature compensation layer 13 is minimum.

Significant differences of the temperature behavior of the resonance frequency can be observed. It can further be observed on curve 35 that for certain resonators, the resonance frequency variation according to temperature is not linear.

FIG. 4B shows the variation of the resonance frequency according to temperature for BAW resonators of the type described in relation with FIG. 2 . In such resonators, the thickness of temperature compensation layer 13 exhibits an uncertainty smaller than 2% (standard deviation of 0.5%).

Curve 41 , in dotted lines, shows the ideal temperature behavior, that is, the temperature behavior of a resonator in which the different layers, and especially the temperature compensation layer, would exhibit no thickness uncertainty.

Curves 43 and 45 illustrate the temperature behavior of resonators formed from a same semiconductor wafer. Curve 43 for example corresponds to the case of a resonator formed in an area of the semiconductor wafer where the thickness of the temperature compensation layer 13 is maximum. Curve 45 for example corresponds to the case of a resonator formed in an area of the semiconductor wafer where the thickness of the temperature compensation layer 13 is minimum.

It can be observed that the temperature behavior of the operating frequency is substantially the same for all resonators and close to the ideal behavior. It can further be observed that the temperature behavior of the operating frequency is substantially linear across the entire wafer.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 2 of 2

Of course, the slopes of the dotted lines and of the tangents to the curves of FIGS. 4A and 4B may be inverted (thus corresponding to a TCF of opposite sign).

An advantage of the provided embodiment is that it enables to obtain a particularly accurate and linear temperature compensation. In particular, it can be observed that resonators manufactured identically on one or several semiconductor wafers have a TCF which is substantially identical and constant in the range of use temperatures of the resonator. Thus, an accurate linear drift of the frequency according to temperature is guaranteed at the scale of a substrate wafer. This especially enables to simplify the steps of calibration of the circuits comprising BAW resonators. This is particularly advantageous in the case of time reference oscillators based on BAW resonators.

Further, if upper layer 7 b of the Bragg mirror is made of silicon oxide, it may in practice, advantageously, form one and the same layer with temperature compensation layer 13 .

Specific embodiments of the present disclosure have been described. Various alterations and modifications will occur to those skilled in the art. In particular, the present disclosure is not limited to the materials mentioned in the above description. In particular, it is within the abilities of those skilled in the art to implement the desired operation by using other piezoelectric materials, for example, potassium niobate or zinc oxide, and other conductive materials, for example, copper, tungsten, or aluminum to form the resonant core. It will further be within the abilities of those skilled in the art to use other materials having high and low acoustic impedances, for example, silicon nitride or aluminum nitride, capable of forming an isolation reflector between the resonant core and the substrate. Finally, other materials than silicon oxide may be used to form the frequency adjustment and temperature compensation layers, for example, SiON.

Further, the present disclosure is not limited to the use of a local ion beam to make the thickness of the temperature compensation layer even. It will be within the abilities of those skilled in the art to implement the desired operation by using other adapted leveling methods.

Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be part of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit and the scope of the present disclosure. Accordingly, the foregoing description is by way of example only and is not intended to be limiting.

These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.

Claims as granted

15 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

8 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G02F1/1337
  • G01N29/02
Section H — Electricity
  • H03H9/02
  • H03H9/00
  • H03H3/02
  • H03H3/04
  • H03H9/17
  • H10N30/01

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2014Jul 2014Jan 2015Jul 2015Jan 2016Jul 2016Jan 2017Jul 2017USPTOApplicantRestriction requirementNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalFinal rejectionRequest for continued examinationResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.5 y
1,267 days filing → grant
Office actions
3
after a restriction
Responses
3
1 RCE
Examiner
A. Dexter Tugbang
art unit 3729 · TC 3700
Citations: 50 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20242025202620272028202920302031203220332034Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock