USPatent applicationPatented

Apparatus and method for reducing leakage of unused buffers in an integrated circuit

Granted 9 Dec 2008 · 4 office actions

Current assignee: Microsemi SoC Corp. · originally Actel Corporation

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Vidya Bellippady, Jonathan W. Greene · Examiner: Vibol Tan · AU 2819 · TC 2800

Application· this page
11/185,426
filed 19 Jul 2005
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 7,463,061
granted 9 Dec 2008

Life of the application

21 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20062008201020122014201620182020202220242026ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A reduced-leakage interconnect circuit includes a buffer having an input and an output, at least one multiplexer transistor coupled between a multiplexer input node and the input of the buffer, and a fixed-state multiplexer transistor coupled between a fixed-state multiplexer input node and the input of the buffer, the fixed-state multiplexer input node having a potential of either less than zero volts or more than V CC present on it.

Description

5 parts
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to integrated circuits. More particularly, the present invention relates to apparatus and methods for reducing leakage in unused ones of the buffers employed for making interconnections in integrated circuits such as field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) and other programmable logic devices (PLDs).

2. The Prior Art

Configurable integrated circuits such as FPGAs and other programmable logic devices require numerous inverting or non-inverting buffers to implement interconnections. Because the buffers may drive substantial capacitive loads in some cases, they are usually designed using relatively large transistors. FPGA routing typically consists of a multiplexer whose select inputs are set at configuration time and a buffer driven by the output of the multiplexer. Most multiplexer inputs are driven by ordinary variable logic signals. An additional input may be present to force an unused buffer into a known fixed state; this is done by providing a way to “tie off” the input of an unused buffer to either 0V or V CC .

With submicron VLSI processes, leakage current through the large transistors used in the interconnection buffers can be substantial even when they are turned off. This wastes power.

Various techniques have been proposed to reduce leakage of used or unused buffers in FPGAs, including altering the bias of the wells containing the buffer transistors, and selective use of transistors with different threshold voltages. Other methods have also been proposed.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

An interconnect circuit includes a buffer having an input and an output, at least one multiplexer transistor coupled between a multiplexer input node and the input of the buffer, and a fixed-state multiplexer transistor coupled between a fixed-state multiplexer input node and the input of the buffer, the fixed-state multiplexer input node having a potential of either less than zero volts or more than V CC present on its input terminal.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIGURES

FIGS. 1A and 1B are schematic diagrams of two examples of an apparatus for reducing leakage in an unused buffer employed for making interconnections in FPGAs in which FIG. 1A employs MOS transistors and FIG. 1B employs nonvolatile transistors.

FIGS. 2A and 2B are schematic diagrams of two examples of an apparatus for reducing leakage in an unused 2-stage buffer employed for making interconnections in FPGAs in which FIG. 2A employs MOS transistors and FIG. 2B employs nonvolatile transistors.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 2

Persons of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the following description of the present invention is illustrative only and not in any way limiting. Other embodiments of the invention will readily suggest themselves to such skilled persons.

Inverting and non-inverting buffers are used to route signals and implement interconnections in configurable integrated circuits such as FPGAs and other PLDs. FPGA routing typically consists of a multiplexer whose select inputs are set at configuration time and a buffer driven by the output of the multiplexer. Most multiplexer inputs are driven by ordinary variable logic signals. An additional input may be present to force an unused buffer into a known fixed state; this is done by providing a way to “tie off” the input of an unused buffer to either 0V or V CC .

Instead of connecting the tie-off input to 0 or V CC , it is connected to a voltage slightly below 0 or slightly above V CC (e.g., a 0.1 volt differential). This has the effect of greatly reducing the leakage of either the N or P device, respectively, in the first (or sole) stage of the buffer.

Such an arrangement is depicted in FIGS. 1A and 1B . In FIG. 1A , inverting buffer 10 is driven by the output of a multiplexer formed from n-channel MOS transistors 12 , 14 , and 16 that passes the input at node 18 to the input of inverting buffer 10 when n-channel multiplexer transistor 12 is turned on by presenting an appropriate input to its gate and passes the input at node 20 to the input of inverting buffer 10 when n-channel MOS multiplexer transistor 14 is turned on by presenting an appropriate input to its gate. In FIG. 1B , the same circuit is shown employing nonvolatile transistors 12 n, 14 n, and 16 n in place of n-channel MOS transistors 12 , 14 , and 16 . Nonvolatile transistors 12 n, 14 n, and 16 n in place of n-channel MOS transistors 12 , 14 , and 16 may be programmed using well-known circuits and methods.

If neither multiplexer transistor 12 nor multiplexer transistor 14 is turned on, fixed-state multiplexer transistor 16 may be turned on to place the input to inverting buffer 10 to a fixed state. According to the present invention, the voltage at fixed-state multiplexer input node 22 may be set at either a value that is less than zero (e.g., about −0.1V) or more than V CC (e.g., about 0.1 volts greater than V CC , i.e., about 1.6V if V CC is 1.5V). If n-channel MOS fixed-state multiplexer transistor 16 is a normal transistor, its gate should be driven by a voltage greater than the voltage at fixed-state multiplexer input node input node 22 (at least one V t larger) as is known in the art.

In a programmable logic device such as an FPGA, placement and routing software is used to map an end-user design into a particular configurable logic device. As part of this task the software identifies which buffers are used and which are unused. It can then set appropriate bits in the bitstream used to configure the device to connect muxes driving unused buffers to the sub-ground or super-V CC input.

The choice of the state into which the input of an unused inverting buffer should be placed can depend on several factors. For an SRAM-based FPGA using ordinary NMOS multiplexer transistors, it may be preferable to place a voltage below ground at the input to transistor 16 . On the other hand, for a flash-based FPGA, where transistor 16 can pass voltages above V CC , a voltage greater than V CC may be preferable. In addition, the use of the voltage greater than V CC has the added advantage of reducing the leakage through transistors 12 , 14 and 16 when they are off.

If a non-inverting buffer is required in the design, persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that it may easily be implemented using two cascaded inverters. According to the present invention, an additional 2-input multiplexer may be inserted between the inverter stages so that the second buffer stage can be similarly controlled. Two examples of such an arrangement are illustrated in FIGS. 2A and 2B . FIG. 2A depicts a circuit utilizing n-channel MOS transistors and FIG. 2B depicts the same circuit employing n-channel MOS nonvolatile transistors.

Referring now to FIGS. 2A and 2B , a portion of the circuit is the same as the circuit depicted in FIGS. 1A and 1B . Accordingly, inverting buffer 10 is driven by the output of a multiplexer that passes the input at node 18 to the input of inverting buffer 10 when transistor 12 is turned on by presenting an appropriate input to its gate and passes the input at node 20 to the input of inverting buffer 10 when n-channel MOS transistor 14 is turned on by presenting an appropriate input to its gate.

In addition to the aforementioned elements of FIG. 2A that are present in FIG. 1A , the circuit of FIG. 2A also includes a second inverting buffer 24 . N-channel MOS transistor 26 passes the output of inverting buffer 10 to the input of inverting buffer 24 when an appropriate voltage is presented at its gate. If, however, the two-stage buffer including inverting buffer 10 and inverting buffer 24 is not to be used, n-channel MOS transistor 26 is turned off and n-channel MOS transistor 28 is turned on, and the potential at fixed-state multiplexer input node 30 is presented to the input of inverting buffer 24 . According to the present invention, that potential may be set at either a value that is less than zero (e.g., about −0.1V) or more than V CC (e.g., about 0.1 volts greater than V CC , i.e., about 1.6V if V CC is 1.5V). The circuit of FIG. 2B operates in the same manner as the circuit of FIG. 2A with the exception that nonvolatile transistors 12 n, 14 n, 16 n, 26 n, and 28 n are employed in place of n-channel MOS transistors 12 , 14 , 16 , 26 , and 28 .

As persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate, other circuits normally present in an FPGA integrated circuit (not shown) are used to provide the potentials at nodes 22 and 30 of the circuits of FIGS. 1A , 1 B, 2 A, and 2 B. These circuits, such as charge pump circuits, are well known and disclosure of them is not necessary to understand the concepts of the present invention. In addition, such skilled persons will also appreciate that circuits capable of generating the inputs presented to nodes 18 and 20 are present in the integrated circuit. Circuits for performing this function are also known and disclosure of them is not necessary to understand the concepts of the present invention.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 2

The use of either the sub-ground or super-V CC voltage to the gates of unused buffers may be different for different types of circuit configurations. These differences will be apparent to persons skilled in the art. For example, depending on what type of switch device is used, one or the other voltage might be more easily tolerated. For instance, switches fabricated using floating gate or other non-volatile memory transistor technology would be able to tolerate and pass voltages greater than V CC through to the buffer. Low-voltage switches controlled by SRAM might not be able to tolerate these voltages, making sub-ground voltage the appropriate choice.

Assuming NMOS pass gates or flash devices are used to implement the switches, use of greater-than-V CC voltage according to the present invention has the added advantage of reducing leakage through the turned off switches. (The turned off switches are the ordinary switches connected to normal inputs when the buffer is unused, or the added switch connected to greater-than-V CC voltage when the buffer is used.)

The present invention may be especially useful when then multiplexers preceding buffers 10 and 24 are made of flash devices or are transistors with a thicker-than-normal oxide and/or driven by a gate voltage exceeding V CC when on. This is typical for flash-based FPGAs.

The buffer 10 (or 24 ) may be implemented as an ordinary two-transistor inverter. However it could also be a more complicated inverting or non-inverting buffer circuit. As long as it has the characteristic that its leakage is reduced when the input is set to a sub-ground or super-VCC potential, the goal of the invention will be achieved.

While embodiments and applications of this invention have been shown and described, it would be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications than mentioned above are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The invention, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the appended claims.

Claims as granted

9 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

4 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H03K19/20
USPC · US Patent Classification
326/41326/113326/38

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2005Jan 2006Jul 2006Jan 2007Jul 2007Jan 2008Jul 2008Jan 2009USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalResponse after finalRequest for continued examinationResponse after non-finalRequest for continued examination
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.4 y
1,239 days filing → grant
Office actions
4
non-final + final
Responses
3
2 RCE
Examiner
Vibol Tan
art unit 2819 · TC 2800
Citations: 4 back · 4 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2008201020122014201620182020202220242026Owner 1Owner 3liens, releases & corrections
TitleLienReleasehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock