USPatent applicationPatented

Low supply voltage bias circuit, semiconductor device, wafer and system including same, and method of generating a bias reference

Granted 4 Jul 2006 · 1 office action

Assignee: Micron Technology, Inc.

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Chul Min Jung · Examiner: Jeffrey Zweizig · AU 2816 · TC 2800

Life of the application

15 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20042006200820102012201420162018202020222024ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A bias generator and a method of generating a bias reference are disclosed. A reference transistor is connected in a diode configuration. An n-channel transistor connects in series with the reference transistor. A resulting reference current through the two transistors is controlled by the gate voltage on the n-channel transistor. A p-channel transistor configured as a first current mirror of the reference transistor generates a mirrored current. A voltage is developed across an impedance element connected in the path of the mirrored current. A feedback buffer connects between the voltage and the gate of the n-channel transistor to close a feedback loop stabilizing at a point where the reference current and mirrored current are proportional. A second current mirror supplies an output current. An optional n-channel transistor, configured in series with the second current mirror, may generate an output voltage proportional to the output current.

Description

7 parts
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 2

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to bias circuits for generating bias voltages and currents. More specifically, the present invention relates to the generation of low voltages using a low supply voltage.

2. Description of Related Art

Many systems that manipulate and generate analog and digital signals need precise, stable voltage and current references defining bias points for these signals. In many cases, these voltage references must be in addition to and independent of a supply voltage for the circuit. In Dynamic Random Access Memories (DRAM), as well as other semiconductor devices, some of these applications are in areas such as, sense amplifiers, input signal level sensors, phase locked loops, delay locked loops, and various other analog circuits.

Various techniques exist for generating these supply voltages. Traditional bias generation techniques vary from a simple resistor voltage divider to complex bandgap reference circuits. These reference voltages may typically need to be independent from a source supply voltage. Unfortunately, as supply voltages become lower in modern low power and deep submicron designs, bias generating techniques become more difficult. Many traditional techniques require a supply voltage significantly higher than the desired reference voltage and do not scale proportionally as the supply voltage decreases.

A voltage reference may be created from a traditional and simple voltage divider circuit using resistors in series or diode-connected metal-oxide semiconductor (MOS) transistors in series. Unfortunately, the resultant reference voltage is a function of the supply voltage and controlling the resistance precision of the resistors or transistors may be difficult. Voltage dividers are, therefore, not an adequate solution when supply independence is required.

Bandgap reference sources are quite flexible and may generate supply independent reference voltages, sometimes even with a relatively low supply voltage. However, bandgap reference circuits tend to be complex requiring complicated analog amplifier feedback, significant area on a semiconductor die, and relatively high operating currents. As a result, bandgap references have significant disadvantages in low power applications.

Complementary MOS (CMOS) circuits are often used to generate supply independent reference voltages using transistor threshold voltages (Vt) to generate a reference. These circuits typically have the advantage of being small in area, relatively simple, and relatively independent from the supply voltage. However, Vt referenced bias sources typically require a relatively high supply voltage to generate the reference voltage. FIG. 1 illustrates a conventional Vt referenced bias circuit.

The FIG. 1 circuit, as well as the present invention, contains two well-known circuit configurations known as diode-connected transistors and current mirrors.

A diode-connected transistor is formed when the gate and drain of the transistor are connected together. For example, in the bias circuit shown in FIG. 1 , the p-channel transistor P 11 is connected in a diode configuration. The P 21 transistor operates in the saturation region because the gate and drain are connected to the same potential. As a result, the transistor operates with voltage to current properties similar to a p-n junction diode.

A current mirror is a configuration comprising two transistors of the same type (e.g., both p-channels or both n-channels) in which the sources of the transistors are connected together and the gates of the transistors are connected together. Current mirrors operate on the theory that if the two transistors are similarly processed and have sizes W/L (i.e., width/length) in a defined proportion N, then the current relationship through the two transistors will have the same proportion N. For example, in bias circuit shown in FIG. 1 , if the reference transistor P 11 and the first current mirror P 12 have the same W/L, they will have substantially the same amount of current flowing through them. This is so because both transistors are connected to the same source, and have the same gate-to-source voltage, which defines the magnitude of the drain current. Typically, current mirrors are designed with the two transistors having the same size (i.e., the proportion N=1). However, other proportions may be used.

Referring to the bias circuit 10 in FIG. 1 , the current mirror configuration of p-channel transistor P 11 and first current mirror P 12 causes the currents I 11 and 12 through P 11 and P 12 , respectively, to be proportional to each other. In most applications, P 11 and P 12 are the same size resulting in substantially the same currents for I 11 and 112 . The I 11 current flowing through p-channel P 11 also flows through n-channel transistor N 11 . For current to flow through N 11 , the gate-to-source voltage on N 11 must be at or above a threshold voltage. This gate voltage is supplied by the voltage drop across resistor R 12 . However, the n-channel transistor N 12 in series with R 12 regulates the amount of current flowing through R 12 . For current to flow in N 12 , the gate-to-source voltage of N 12 must also be at or above a threshold voltage. However, the source of N 12 is already at least a threshold voltage above ground due to the voltage drop through R 12 . Therefore, the gate voltage of N 12 must be at least two threshold voltages above ground for N 12 to conduct. This stacked configuration of R 12 , N 11 , and N 12 , creates a feedback loop wherein increased current through N 12 raises the gate voltage on N 11 , increasing the current through N 11 . However, increased current through N 11 reduces the gate voltage on N 12 , thereby reducing the current through N 12 . The feedback loop reaches an equilibrium defining the amount of current flowing through N 11 and, as a result, P 11 . This feedback configuration is often termed a “cascade” arrangement due to the stacked nature of the n-channel transistors. Unfortunately, the cascade arrangement increases the required supply voltage.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 2

The lowest possible supply voltage is equal to the sum of the threshold voltages of N 11 , N 12 , and P 11 . In the FIG. 1 bias ciruit 10 , a third p-channel transistor P 13 is typically configured as another current mirror to generate a stable buffered current I 13 through P 13 , which is proportional to the current through P 11 .

Because the FIG. 1 bias circuit generates a reference voltage across multiple stacked gate-to-source voltage drops, it requires the supply voltage to be higher than the gate-to-gate source voltage of the stacked transistors. As a result, the circuit in FIG. 1 is not suitable for low supply voltage applications.

There is a need for a simple Vt threshold referenced bias circuit for generating low reference voltages in a system using a low supply voltage.

›BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

One embodiment of the present invention comprises a bias generator comprising a number of CMOS circuit components. A first p-channel transistor (also referred to as a reference transistor) is connected in a diode configuration. A first n-channel transistor (also referred to as a current sink transistor) connects in series with the reference transistor. As a result, the gate voltage on the first n-channel transistor controls a reference current through the first p-channel transistor and the first n-channel resistor. A second p-channel transistor configured as a first current mirror of the first p-channel transistor mirrors current flowing through the second p-channel transistor. The mirrored current flowing through the second p-channel transistor will be proportional to the reference current flowing through the first p-channel transistor. An impedance element connected in series with the second p-channel transistor develops a second voltage across the impedance element proportional to the current through the impedance element and the second p-channel transistor. A cascade feedback buffer's input connects to the second voltage, and its output connects to the gate of the first n-channel transistor. The cascade feedback buffer closes a feedback loop wherein the bias generator stabilizes to a point where the reference current and mirrored current are proportional to each other having the same proportion as the reference transistor size to the second p-channel transistor size. A third p-channel transistor configured as a second current mirror supplies an output current for use by other circuitry (not shown). A third n-channel transistor may be optionally configured in series with the second current mirror for generating a reference output voltage proportional to the output current.

Another embodiment of the present invention comprises a method of generating a bias reference. The method comprises providing a supply voltage level of at least one transistor threshold voltage plus one transistor saturation voltage. A reference current may be generated from the supply voltage as a function of a feedback voltage. The reference current may be mirrored to a proportional mirrored current generated from the supply voltage. A first voltage may be generated as a function of the mirrored current by creating a voltage drop across an impedance element configured in the path of the mirrored current. The feedback voltage may be modified in proportion to the first voltage by a cascade feedback buffer. The resultant feedback voltage may modify the reference current and, as a result, the mirrored current until the reference current and mirrored current reach stable and proportional levels. Additionally, the reference current may be mirrored to an output current generated from the supply voltage. Finally, a reference output voltage may be generated as a function of the output current by creating a voltage drop across a second impedance element configured in the path of the output current.

Another embodiment of the present invention includes at least one bias generator according to the invention described herein on a semiconductor device.

Another embodiment of the present invention includes a plurality of semiconductor devices incorporating at least one bias generator according to the invention described herein fabricated on a semiconductor wafer.

Yet another embodiment, in accordance with the present invention comprises an electronic system comprising an input device, an output device, a processor, and a memory device. The memory device comprises at least one semiconductor memory incorporating the bias generator described herein.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the drawings, which illustrate what is currently considered to be the best mode for carrying out the invention:

FIG. 1 is a circuit diagram of a conventional bias circuit;

FIG. 2 depicts an exemplary bias circuit according to the present invention;

FIG. 3 depicts another exemplary bias circuit according to the present invention;

FIG. 4 depicts yet another exemplary bias circuit according to the present invention;

FIG. 5 is a graph of AC simulation results showing the settling time and voltage characteristics of a reference voltage and voltages on other intermediate nodes;

FIG. 6 is a graph of DC simulation results depicting the reference voltage at various Vcc supply voltages;

FIG. 7 is a semiconductor wafer containing a plurality of semiconductor devices containing a bias circuit according to the present invention; and

FIG. 8 is a computing system diagram showing a plurality of semiconductor memories containing a bias circuit according to the present invention.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 3

In the following description, for the most part, details concerning timing considerations and the like have been omitted inasmuch as such details are not necessary to obtain a complete understanding of the present invention and are within the ability of persons of ordinary skill in the relevant art.

FIG. 2 shows a reference bias generator 20 according to the present invention. A reference transistor P 21 , also referred to as a first p-channel transistor P 21 , is shown connected in a diode configuration wherein the gate and drain are connected together. The source of the reference transistor P 21 connects to a supply voltage 40 (also referred to as Vcc), and the gate and drain of the reference transistor P 21 are connected together at node ND 1 . A first current mirror P 22 , also referred to as second p-channel transistor P 22 , connects through its source to the supply voltage 40 , and connects through its gate to the gate of the reference transistor P 21 at node ND 1 . A second current mirror P 23 , also referred to as a third p-channel transistor P 23 , connects through its source to the supply voltage 40 and connects through its gate to the reference transistor's P 21 gate at node ND 1 . The drain of the second current mirror P 23 forms an output current I 23 for utilization by other circuitry (not shown) at node ND 3 . The exemplary embodiment shown in FIG. 2 shows the reference transistor P 21 connected in a diode configuration and the first current mirror P 22 configured to proportionally mirror the current through the reference transistor. However, this configuration may be reversed. In other words, the first current mirror P 22 may be connected in a diode configuration and the reference transistor P 21 configured to proportionally mirror the current through the first current mirror P 22 . In addition, as stated earlier, current mirrors are typically desigued with the two transistors having the same size (i.e., the proportion N=1). However, other proportions are contemplated within the scope of the invention. Particularly, proportions with N as integer multiples, such as, for example, 2, 3 and 4 are used in many current mirror applications and are within the scope of the present invention.

Also in the FIG. 2 embodiment, a current sink transistor N 21 connects in series with the reference transistor P 21 such that the source of the current sink transistor N 21 connects to a ground voltage 50 (also referred to as Vss), the gate of the current sink transistor N 21 connects to an output from a cascade feedback buffer 24 , and the drain of the current sink transistor N 21 connects to the drain of the reference transistor P 21 at node ND 1 . An impedance element 22 connects in series with the first current mirror P 22 such that one terminal connects to the ground voltage 50 and the other terminal connects to the drain of the first current mirror P 22 at node ND 2 . An optional second impedance element 23 (shown with a broken line) connects in series with the second current mirror P 23 such that one terminal connects to the ground voltage 50 and the other terminal connects to the drain of the second current mirror P 23 .

The cascade feedback buffer 24 creates a feedback loop by connection of the cascade feedback buffer's 24 input to the drain of the first current mirror P 22 at node ND 1 and the cascade feedback buffer's 24 output to the gate of the current sink transistor N 21 at node ND 4 .

FIG. 3 shows another exemplary embodiment of a bias generator 20 ′. In FIG. 3 , the cascade feedback buffer 24 is shown as a buffer current source P 24 in series with a fourth n-channel transistor N 24 . The buffer current source P 24 is configured as a fourth p-channel transistor P 24 configured to be always conducting by connecting its source to the supply voltage 40 and its gate to the ground voltage 50 . The drain of the fourth p-channel transistor P 24 connects to the drain of the fourth n-channel transistor N 24 forming the output of the cascade feedback buffer at node ND 4 . The gate of the fourth n-channel transistor N 24 forms the input of the cascade feedback buffer 24 and connects to node ND 2 . The source of the fourth n-channel transistor N 24 connects to the ground voltage 50 . The buffer current source P 24 may be formed by other means. For example, a relatively high impedance resistor (not shown) may be used to ensure that the current through the resistor remains small to reduce overall power consumption. Reasons for selecting various types of buffer current sources P 24 are explained below in the section dealing with operation of the bias generator 20 ′.

Additionally, FIG. 3 shows the impedance element 22 ′ as a resistor. The impedance element 22 ′ may also be formed using various circuit elements and connections to generate a relatively constant resistance value. Some possible resistor implementations include, for example, using a length of N+ doped region as a resistor element, using a length of polysilicon as a resistor element, and connecting an n-channel transistor such that it operates in the saturation region.

Finally, FIG. 3 shows the second impedance element 23 as a third n-channel transistor N 23 in a diode-connected configuration and connected in series with the second current mirror P 23 . The source of the third n-channel transistor N 23 connects to the ground voltage 50 . The gate and drain of the third n-channel transistor N 23 connect to the drain of the second current mirror P 23 at node ND 3 . This third n-channel transistor N 23 in the path of the output current I 23 through the second current mirror P 23 creates a reference output voltage 33 proportional to the second current for utilization by other circuitry (not shown) at node ND 3 . As with the impedance element 22 ′, the second impedance element N 23 may be formed using various circuit elements and connections to generate a relatively constant resistance value. Some possible resistor implementations include, for example, using a length of N+ doped region as a resistor element, using a length of polysilicon as a resistor element, and connecting an n-channel transistor such that it operates in the saturation region as shown in FIG. 3 .

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 3

In operation, referring to FIGS. 3 and 5 , assume node ND 2 starts out at a potential equal to the ground voltage 50 . The fourth n-channel transistor N 24 in the cascade feedback buffer 24 is off and the fourth p-channel transistor P 24 will generate a high at node ND 2 because it is configured to be in a conducting state. The high at node ND 2 causes the current sink transistor N 21 to conduct, generating a reference current I 21 through the reference transistor P 21 and current sink transistor N 21 . This reference current I 21 is mirrored to a mirrored current I 22 flowing through the first current mirror P 22 as a result of the current mirror configuration between the reference transistor P 21 and the first current mirror P 22 . If the reference transistor P 21 and the first current mirror P 22 are substantially the same size, the reference current I 21 and mirrored current I 22 may be substantially equal. The mirrored current I 22 flows through the impedance element 22 ′. A first voltage 32 at node ND 2 moves up to a voltage equal to the voltage drop across the impedance element 22 , represented as the mirrored current I 22 multiplied by the resistance (R) of the impedance element 22 ′ (i.e., I 22 *R)

The rise in the first voltage 32 at ND 2 causes the fourth n-channel transistor N 24 to begin sinking current once the first voltage 32 reaches or goes above the threshold voltage of the fourth n-channel transistor N 24 . The current flowing through the fourth p-channel transistor P 24 and fourth n-channel transistor N 24 causes the feedback voltage at node ND 4 to go to an intermediate level between the supply voltage 40 and the ground voltage 50 . This intermediate level on the gate of the current sink transistor N 21 reduces the drain current through the current sink transistor N 21 and, as a result, the drain current through the reference transistor P 21 (i.e., the reference current I 21 ). The reduced reference current I 21 mirrors on to the mirrored current I 22 through the first current mirror P 22 . The reduced second current causes the voltage drop across the impedance element 22 ′ (i.e., the first voltage 32 ) to fall. The falling first voltage 32 reduces the drain current through the fourth n-channel transistor N 24 , completing the self-biasing feedback loop. Because of the self-biasing feedback loop, the bias generator 20 ′ will settle at a first voltage 32 substantially near the threshold voltage of the fourth n-channel transistor N 24 (Vt). As a result, the mirrored current I 22 will substantially equal Vt/R. If the first current mirror P 22 and reference transistor P 21 are substantially the same size, the reference current I 21 will substantially equal the mirrored current I 22 . Finally, if the second current mirror P 23 and first current mirror P 22 are substantially equal, the output current I 23 will substantially equal the mirrored current I 22 (i.e., Vt/R).

The cascade feedback buffer 24 in the exemplary embodiment shown in FIG. 3 is implemented with the fourth p-channel transistor P 24 configured to always conduct. In operation, the self-biasing feedback circuit may actually have two stable operating points. Implementing the cascade feedback buffer as a simple CMOS inverter may allow node ND 4 to startup at the ground voltage 50 . In this case, no reference current I 21 will flow through the current sink transistor N 21 . With no reference current I 21 flowing through the current sink transistor N 21 or, as a result, through the reference transistor P 21 , no mirrored current I 22 will flow through the first current mirror P 22 . The bias generator 20 ′ becomes locked at a point with no reference current I 21 or mirrored current I 22 . By implementing a buffer current source P 24 supplying a relatively constant current from the supply voltage 40 , the bias circuit will start up in a state allowing reference current I 21 and mirrored current I 22 to flow. On the other hand, the buffer current source P 24 may be very weak. Once the bias generator 20 ′ starts, the feedback is controlled primarily through the feedback n-channel transistor N 24 . As a result, when the buffer current source P 24 is implemented with a transistor, the buffer current source P 24 transistor may be substantially smaller than the feedback n-channel transistor N 24 . Similarly, if the buffer current source P 24 is implemented as a resistor, the resistor may have a relatively high resistance. Using a high resistance for the buffer current source reduces power consumption without unduly influencing bias generator 20 ′ operation.

FIG. 4 depicts the present invention with another exemplary embodiment of the cascade feedback buffer 24 . In the FIG. 4 , embodiment, the gate of the fourth p-channel transistor P 24 is connected to node ND 1 , rather than ground. This embodiment still ensures that the self-biasing feedback circuit starts up in the state allowing the flow of reference current I 21 and mirrored current I 22 . Additionally, this embodiment may reduce power consumption and power variation because the buffer current source P 24 may conduct a smaller current to the higher gate voltage on the fourth p-channel transistor P 24 .

Finally, if a reference output voltage 33 is desired, the third n-channel transistor N 23 in a diode-connected configuration may be added in series with the second current mirror P 23 , generating the reference output voltage 33 substantially equal to the voltage drop across the third n-channel transistor N 23 .

As may be seen, the final current at which the bias generator 20 ′ settles is dependent upon the resistance of the impedance element 22 ′. This element may be chosen to generate a desired current level. However, to ensure that the fourth n-channel transistor N 24 operates in the saturation mode, the resistance should be chosen, in conjunction with the size of the second current mirror P 23 , to be at least high enough to generate a voltage drop of at least the threshold voltage of the fourth n-channel transistor N 24 .

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 3 of 3

FIG. 5 is an AC simulation graph of the start up conditions for the exemplary embodiment of the invention shown in FIG. 3 . The simulation graph shows the feedback response and stabilization described above. As described above, the simulation graph shows the first voltage 32 beginning near the ground voltage 50 and rising as a response to the mirrored current I 22 flowing through the impedance element 22 . The feedback voltage 34 , as an output of the cascade feedback buffer 24 , is shown beginning near the supply voltage 40 (not shown) and dropping in response to the rising first voltage 32 . The reference output voltage 33 is also shown. As may be seen from the graph, the bias generator 20 ′ (not shown in FIG. 5 ) possesses a fast settling time, settling to a stable voltage in less than 15 nanoseconds.

The theoretical minimum supply voltage 40 at which the bias generator 20 ′ may operate is defined as the threshold voltage (Vt) of the fourth n-channel transistor N 24 plus the saturation voltage of the first current mirror P 22 . This supply voltage 40 is significantly lower than the three threshold voltages required in the prior art. For an exemplary process, the threshold voltage of the fourth n-channel transistor N 24 plus the saturation voltage of the second current mirror P 23 may be approximately 0.5 volts. Therefore, the supply voltage 40 for the exemplary process may be theoretically as low as about 0.5 volts. In practice, the supply voltage 40 may need to be slightly higher, such that the fourth n-channel transistor N 24 is operating slightly above its threshold voltage. FIG. 6 depicts a DC simulation of the generated reference output voltage 33 in relation to various Vcc supply voltages 40 . In this exemplary process, the reference output voltage 33 flattens at the point where the supply voltage 40 has risen to a point where the bias generator 20 ′ begins stable operation. As shown in FIG. 5 , the reference voltage flattens at a supply voltage 40 of about 0.65 volts for the simulated exemplary embodiment.

It will be clear to a person of ordinary skill in the art that a bias generator creating a current sink reference or a voltage reference relative to the supply voltage may be obtained by inverting the circuit. In other words, replacing p-channel transistors with n-channel transistors and vice versa, with the supply voltage and ground voltage connections also reversed.

As mentioned earlier, embodiments of the present invention, while mostly described in relation to semiconductor memories, are applicable to many semiconductor devices. By way of example, any semiconductor device requiring a bias voltage or bias current source for applications such as sense amplifiers, input signal level sensors, phase locked loops, and delay locked loops, may use the present invention.

As shown in FIG. 7 , a semiconductor wafer 400 , in accordance with the present invention, includes a plurality of semiconductor devices 100 incorporating the bias generator 20 (not shown) described herein. Of course, it should be understood that the semiconductor devices 100 may be fabricated on substrates other than a silicon wafer, such as, for example, a Silicon On Insulator (SOl) substrate, a Silicon On Glass (SOG) substrate, and a Silicon On Sapphire (SOS) substrate.

As shown FIG. 8 , an electronic system 500 , in accordance with the present invention, comprises an input device 510 , an output device 520 , a processor 530 , and a memory device 540 . The memory device 540 comprises at least one semiconductor memory 100 ′ incorporating the bias generator 20 described herein in a DRAM device. It should be understood that the semiconductor memory 100 ′ might comprise a wide variety of devices other than a DRAM, including, for example, Static RAM (SRAM) devices, and Flash memory devices.

Although this invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, the invention is not limited to these described embodiments. Rather, the invention is limited only by the appended claims, which include within their scope all equivalent devices or methods that operate according to the principles of the invention as described.

Claims as granted

26 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

4 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G05F1/10
  • G05F3/20
Section H — Electricity
  • H03K5/153
USPC · US Patent Classification
327/543

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomApr 2004Jul 2004Oct 2004Jan 2005Apr 2005Jul 2005Oct 2005Jan 2006Apr 2006Jul 2006USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.2 y
788 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
2
no RCE
Examiner
Jeffrey Zweizig
art unit 2816 · TC 2800
Citations: 21 back · 6 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20042006200820102012201420162018202020222024Owner 1liens, releases & corrections
TitleLienReleasehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock