USPatent applicationPatented

Dense SRAM cells with selective SOI

Granted 5 Apr 2005 · 1 office action

Assignee: International Business Machines

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: An Steegen, Robert C. Wong, Ying Zhang, Hsingjen Wann · Examiner: Ngân V. Ngô · AU 2814 · TC 2800

Application· this page
10/735,169
filed 12 Dec 2003
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,876,040
granted 5 Apr 2005

Life of the application

7 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20042006200820102012201420162018202020222024ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A SRAM cell fabricated in SSOI (selective silicon on insulator) comprises cross coupled PFET pull-up devices P 1 , P 2 and NFET pull-down devices N 1 , N 2 , with the P 1 , P 2 devices being connected to the power supply and the N 1 , N 2 devices being connected to the ground. A first passgate NL is coupled between a first bitline and the junction of the devices P 1 and N 1 , with its gate coupled to a wordline, and a second passgate NR is coupled between a second bitline and the junction of devices P 2 and N 2 , with its gate coupled to the wordline. Each of the pull-up devices P 1 , P 2 , the pull-down devices N 1 , N 2 , and the first and second passgates NL, NR are fabricated with selective SOI, with buried oxide being selectively provided under the drains of the pull-up devices P 1 and P 2 , the drains of the pull-down devices N 1 and N 2 , and the sources and drains of the passgate devices NL and NR.

Description

6 parts
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 2

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates generally to dense SRAM (Static Random Access Memory) cells fabricated with selective SOI (Silicon On Insulator) which involves the selective placement of buried oxide only in the areas where it is needed, and more particularly pertains to soft error hardened, high speed, low power, dense SRAM cells fabricated with selective SOI and their method of fabrication.

2. Discussion of the Prior Art

SRAM (Static Random Access Memory) cells fabricated with blanket SOI (Silicon On Insulator) provide better soft error immunity (immunity from errors caused by cosmic radiation such as alpha and gamma rays) and faster performance than SRAM cells fabricated in bulk silicon. SRAM cells fabricated with blanket SOI also advantageously allow tighter/closer n+/p+ spacing, as shown in FIGS. 1-3 herein, for more compact memory cell layouts. However, the SRAM cell size is not reduced when the SRAM cell design in bulk silicon is migrated or transferred to a SRAM cell design in SOI, as shown in FIGS. 1-3 . Moreover, the effect of the floating (not coupled to a reference voltage or ground) bodies of the passgate devices (the silicon above the insulator is not coupled to ground in SOI as in bulk silicon) of the SRAM memory cells in SOI make the SRAM cells more susceptible to access disturbs than SRAM cells fabricated in bulk silicon. The floating bodies of the passgate devices in SOI degrade the cell stability because the passgate devices are more conductive in SOI than in bulk silicon. The unselected SRAM memory cells along a selected wordline in SOI can erroneously change states more easily because the down node (connected to ground) can be pulled up more easily through the passgate devices. The floating bodies of the pull-up and pull-down devices also tend to make the off devices turn on more easily in SOI than in bulk silicon.

Thus SRAM cells fabricated in bulk silicon may have a beta ratio <1.5, while SRAM cells fabricated in blanket SOI must have a beta ratio >2.1. The beta ratio here refers to the ratio of electrical W/L (Width/Length ratio) of the pull-down NFETs compared to the electrical W/L of the passgate NFETs. When the design of a SRAM cell fabricated in bulk silicon is migrated or transferred to the design of a SRAM cell fabricated in SOI, the flexibility of an active well is also lost. An active well is necessary for control of the SRAM cell circuit speed and off currents. An active well can be moved/biased up and down in voltage to control the circuit speed and off currents, whereas in SOI the well floats and cannot be moved/biased up and down in voltage.

FIG. 1 illustrates the layout of a SRAM cell fabricated in bulk silicon, and shows the PC (polysilicon conductor) and RX (active silicon conductor regions which are isolated by trench isolation regions) areas and regions of the chip and the M 1 metal level (the first and lowest metal level). FIG. 2 illustrates the layout of a SRAM cell fabricated in blanket SOI, and shows the PC and RX areas and regions of the chip and the M 1 metal level. FIG. 3 illustrates a simplified version of FIG. 2 , and shows only the PC and RX areas and regions of the chip, and the M 1 metal level is not shown.

All dimensions shown in FIGS. 1-5 are in microns, and the bottom of FIGS. 1-4 also show the dimensions in microns of the overall layout dimensions of each SRAM cell.

FIG. 1 illustrates a top plan view of a circuit layout of a prior art 90 nm node technology SRAM cell fabricated in bulk silicon. FIG. 1 illustrates only the PC (polysilicon conductor) areas, the RX (active silicon conductor regions which are isolated by trench isolation regions) regions, and the M 1 (first metal) level of the chip, and the M 2 and M 3 (second and third metal) levels are not shown.

The prior art 90 nm node technology SRAM cell is fabricated in a base PC (Polysilicon Conductor) level, the overlying bottom M 1 metal level, the next higher metal level M 2 , and the next higher metal layer M 3 . The prior art 90 nm node technology SRAM cell is fabricated with a PC level wordline WL and an M 2 metal level ground, VDD power supply and bitlines BLs. For large SRAM cell arrays, the PC level is not an efficient enough conductor for the global wordlines, and the M 3 metal level must be used for the global wordlines.

FIG. 5 illustrates a circuit schematic of a SRAM cell fabricated in either bulk silicon, blanket SOI or SSOI. The circuit of the SRAM cell is well known and includes cross coupled pnp pull-up devices P 1 , P 2 and npn pull-down devices N 1 , N 2 , with the P 1 , P 2 devices being connected to the power supply VDD, and the N 1 , N 2 devices being connected to ground GND. The left npn passgate device NL is coupled between the left bitline BL and the junction of devices P 1 and N 1 , with its gate coupled to the wordline WL. The right npn passgate device NR is coupled between the right bitline BR and the junction of devices P 2 and N 2 , with its gate coupled to the wordline WL.

Referring to FIG. 1 which illustrates a SRAM cell fabricated in bulk silicon and to FIG. 2 which illustrates a SRAM cell fabricated in SOI, the PC level wordline WL extends generally horizontally across the lower portion of the chip and crosses left and right legs of a bottom M shaped RX (active silicon conductor) region, with the crossing on the left defining the passgate device NL, with the WL defining the gate G and the RX region defining the source S and drain D regions of the passgate NL, and with the crossing on the right defining the passgate device NR, with the WL defining the gate G and the RX region defining the source S and drain D regions of the passgate device NR.

Left and right PC (Polysilicon Conductor) regions extend vertically on opposite left and right portions of the chip as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 .

The top horizontal portion of the bottom M shaped RX region crosses the left PC region and defines the pulldown device N 1 , with the left PC region defining the gate G and the RX region defining the drain D and source S regions of the pulldown device N 1 . The top horizontal portion of the M shaped RX region crosses the right PC region and defines the pulldown device N 2 , with the right PC region defining the gate G and the RX region defining the source S and drain D regions of the pulldown device N 2 , with a common source region S between the pulldown devices N 1 and N 2 .

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 2

A horizontal base of a top W shaped RX (active silicon conductor) region crosses the upper portions of the left and right PC regions.

The bottom horizontal portion of the top W shaped RX region crosses the left PC region and defines the pullup device P 1 , with the left PC region defining the gate G and the RX region defining the drain D and source S regions of the pullup device P 1 . The bottom horizontal portion of the W shaped RX region crosses the right PC region and defines the pullup device P 2 , with the right PC region defining the gate G and the RPX region defining the source S and drain D regions of the pullup device P 2 , with a common source region S between the pullup devices P 1 and P 2 .

In the design and layout of FIG. 2 , the beta ratio has been increased, relative to the design and layout of FIG. 1 , from 1.67 to 2.32, with the pull down device width labeled PDW, being increased from 0.266 to 0.364 microns. To maintain the same cell size, the n+/p+ spacing, labeled n+p+S, is reduced to 0.406 from 0.504 microns, while also reducing the M 1 metal level dimensions somewhat. The smaller n+/p+ spacing is possible because SOI helps to isolate the deep well leakage.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides dense SRAM cells fabricated with selective SOI (SSOI) that involves the selective placement of buried oxide only in the areas where it is needed, as opposed to blanket SOI that provides SOI everywhere across the chip. A SRAM cell fabricated in SSOI comprises cross coupled PFET pull-up devices P 1 , P 2 and NFET pull-down devices N 1 , N 2 , with the P 1 , P 2 devices being connected to the power supply and the N 1 , N 2 devices being connected to the ground. A first passgate NL is coupled between a first bitline and the junction of the devices P 1 and N 1 , with its gate coupled to a wordline, and a second passgate NR is coupled between a second bitline and the junction of devices P 2 and N 2 , with its gate coupled to the wordline. Each of the pull-up devices P 1 , P 2 , the pull-down devices N 1 , N 2 , and the first and second passgates NL, NR are fabricated with selective SOI, with buried oxide being selectively provided under the drains of the pull-up devices P 1 and P 2 , the drains of the pull-down devices N 1 and N 2 , and the sources and drains of the passgate devices NL and NR.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing objects and advantages of the present invention for dense SRAM cells with selective SOI may be more readily understood by one skilled in the art with reference being had to the following detailed description of several embodiments thereof, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein like elements are designated by identical reference numerals throughout the several views, and in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates the layout of a prior art SRAM cell fabricated in bulk silicon, and shows the PC and RX areas and regions of the chip and the M 1 metal level.

FIG. 2 illustrates the layout of a prior art SRAM cell fabricated in blanket SOI, and shows the PC and RX areas and regions of the chip and the M 1 metal level.

FIG. 3 illustrates a simplified version of FIG. 2 , and shows only the PC and RX areas and regions of the chip, and the M 1 metal level is not shown.

FIG. 4 illustrates an embodiment of a SRAM cell in SSOI pursuant to the present invention that is similar to FIG. 2 by showing the PC and RX areas and regions and the M 1 metal level.

FIG. 5 illustrates a circuit schematic of a SRAM cell fabricated in either bulk silicon, blanket SOI or SSOI.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 2

The present invention provides improved SRAM cell designs fabricated in SSOI (selective SOI). Selective SOI involves the selective placement of buried oxide selectively only in the areas where it is needed, as opposed to blanket SOI that provides SOI everywhere across the chip. There are many ways to achieve selective SOI. One example is to use a masked SIMOX (separation by implantation of oxygen) implant as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,333,532 for Patterned SOI Regions in Semiconductor Chips. Another example is to grow amorphous Si over the substrate already with oxide patterns, and then recrystalize the amorphous Si to make FETs as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,214,653 for Method for Fabricating CMOS Devices on a Mixed Bulk and SOI Substrate.

Pursuant to the teachings of the present invention, these SSOI selective SOI processes are utilized to provide SRAMs in SSOI which are more stable, and provide faster and cooler operations at a higher density than SRAMs in either bulk silicon or in blanket SOI.

FIG. 4 illustrates the layout of an embodiment of a SRAM cell in SSOI pursuant to the present invention that is similar to the layout of FIG. 2 in that it shows the PC and RX areas and regions and the M 1 metal level. The layout of the SRAM cell fabricated in SSOI is similar to the layouts of the SRAM cells fabricated in bulk silicon and in SOI. Referring to FIG. 4 , in that layout, a PC level wordline WL extends generally horizontally across the lower portion of the chip and crosses left and right legs of a bottom M shaped RX (active silicon conductor) region, with the crossing on the left defining the passgate device NL, with the WL defining the gate G and the RX region defining the source S and drain D regions of the passgate NL, and with the crossing on the right defining the passgate device NR, with the WL defining the gate G and the RX region defining the source S and drain D regions of the passgate device NR.

Left and right PC (Polysilicon Conductor) regions extend vertically on opposite left and right portions of the chip.

The top horizontal portion of the bottom M shaped RX region crosses the left PC region and defines the pulldown device N 1 , with the left PC region defining the gate G and the RX region defining the drain D and source S regions of the pulldown device N 1 . The top horizontal portion of the M shaped RX region crosses the right PC region and defines the pulldown device N 2 , with the right PC region defining the gate G and the RX region defining the source S and drain D regions of the pulldown device N 2 , with a common source region S between the pulldown devices N 1 and N 2 .

A horizontal base of a top W shaped RX (active silicon conductor) region crosses the upper portions of the left and right PC regions.

The bottom horizontal portion of the top W shaped RX region crosses the left PC region and defines the pullup device P 1 , with the left PC region defining the gate G and the RX region defining the drain D and source S regions of the pullup device P 1 . The bottom horizontal portion of the W shaped RX region crosses the right PC region and defines the pullup device P 2 , with the right PC region defining the gate G and the RX region defining the source S and drain D regions of the pullup device P 2 , with a common source region S between the pullup devices P 1 and P 2 .

FIG. 4 illustrates an upper rectangle labeled NW which indicates that all areas within the NW rectangle have a blanket of N well diffusion under the SRAM cell, with the blanket of N well diffusion having periodic contacts to VDD, and all areas outside of the NW rectangle have a blanket of P well diffusion under the SRAM cell, with the blanket of P well diffusion having periodic contacts to ground GND.

The selective SOI areas are shown in FIG. 4 as the shaded BX areas, where BX stands for Buried Oxide.

The SOI for the pull-up and pull-down devices is one-sided. The VDD voltage supply, source S sides of the pull-up PFETs P 1 and P 2 and the GND ground, source S sides of the pull-down NFETs N 1 and N 2 are not not moving nodes, and so need not be sealed by the SOI. Node capacitance at those non-moving nodes will not adversely affect circuit performance, and in fact contributes to the stability of the circuit.

All six FETs of the SRAM cell fabricated in SSOI technology have bodies that can be biased by being coupled to the voltage supply VDD or to ground GND through the underlying N well or the underlying P well. The sources S of the pull-up devices P 1 and P 2 are coupled to the voltage supply VDD, the sources S of the pull-down devices N 1 and N 2 are coupled to ground GND, and the channels under the gates G of the passgates NL and NR are biased/touched to GND through the underlying P well,

Both the pull-up devices P 1 and P 2 and the pull-down devices N 1 and N 2 are provided with selective SOI under the drain D regions as the SOI reduces the capacitance of the drain D to allow the potential on the drain D to be moved/changed faster to increase the circuit speed. The sources S of the pull-up devices P 1 and P 2 are biased/coupled to VDD, while the sources S of the pull-down devices P 1 and P 2 are biased/coupled to ground GND, and so the potential of the sources S does not move/change, and so a lesser capacitance is not required. Moreover, a greater capacitance at the sources S aids the stability of the SRAM cell, and so selective SOI is not provided under the sources S of both the pull-up devices P 1 and P 2 and the pull-down devices N 1 and N 2 . The channels under the gates G of the pull-up devices P 1 and P 2 should be biased/touched to VDD of the underlying N well, and the channel under the gates G of the pull-down devices N 1 and N 2 should be biased/touched to GND of the underlying P well, and so selective SOI is also not provided under the gates G of both the pull-up devices P 1 and P 2 and the pull-down devices N 1 and N 2 .

The passgates NL and NR are provided with selective SOI under the drain D regions and source S regions as the SOI reduces the capacitance of the drain D and source S to allow the potential on the drain D and source S to be moved/changed faster to increase the circuit speed. The channels under the gates G of the passgates NL and NR should be biased/touched to GND of the underlying P well, and so selective SOI is not provided under the gates G of the passgates NL and NR.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 2

The SRAM cell illustrated in FIG. 4 and fabricated in SSOI technology shows that if the floating bodies of the six FET devices of the SRAM cell can be biased by being coupling to either the voltage supply VDD or ground GND, the cell beta ratio can be low, while the n+/p+ spacing can be small because of the isolation provided by the SOI.

The pull-down NFETs N 1 and N 2 are now smaller than the pull-down NFETs N 1 and N 2 in SOI, having a width of 0.266 microns as opposed to 0.364 microns, similar to the case of the bulk silicon layout of FIG. 1 , since there are no concerns of floating bodies. The n+/p+ spacing is reduced relative to FIG. 1 , from 0.504 to 0.406 microns, since there is SOI isolation.

The present invention provides an SRAM design that offers the benefits of both bulk silicon and SOI by selectively placing buried oxide Bx only in those areas where it is needed, in the drain D regions of the pull-up devices P 1 and P 2 , in the drain D regions of the pull-down devices N 1 and N 2 , and in the source S and drain D regions of the passgate devices NL and NR.

The SRAM cells fabricated in SSOI pursuant to the present invention:

provide additional possible benefits because the floating bodies can now be the active wells;

are more hardened against radiation or soft errors than SRAM cells in bulk silicon since the moving nodes are mainly shielded by SOI;

provide faster operation than SRAM cells in bulk silicon because of the reduced capacitance;

can provide even faster operation than SRAM cells in SOI since the device bodies can now be biased for higher device currents (the N well can be biased to a voltage above VDD, and the P well can be biased to a voltage below GND);

have lower power dissipation than SRAM cells in bulk silicon and SOI because the voltage bias of the device bodies can be adjusted to minimize off currents;

are denser than SRAM cells in bulk silicon or SOI, since the n+/p+ spacing can be reduced while the beta ratio is kept small. In the example of FIG. 4 , the density gain is about 5% (2.34 microns 2 with respect to 2.47 microns 2 ) relative to bulk silicon or SOI.

While several embodiments and variations of the present invention for dense SRAM cells with selective SOI are described in detail herein, it should be apparent that the disclosure and teachings of the present invention will suggest many alternative designs to those skilled in the art.

Claims as granted

9 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

6 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H10B10/00
  • H01L27/12
  • H01L21/84
USPC · US Patent Classification
257/351257/903257/369

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2004Apr 2004Jul 2004Oct 2004Jan 2005Apr 2005USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
1.3 y
480 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
Ngân V. Ngô
art unit 2814 · TC 2800
Citations: 10 back · 4 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20042006200820102012201420162018202020222024Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock