USPatentGranted
B2

Correction of optical elements by correction light irradiated in a flat manner

Granted 24 Dec 2013 · 8 office actions

Current assignee: Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH · originally Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Sascha Bleidistel, Manfred Maul · Examiner: Jennifer L. Doak · AU 2872 · TC 2800

Life of the patent

24 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20102012201420162018202020222024202620282030ProsecutionTerm & fees
ProsecutionTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

The disclosure relates to a correction light device for the irradiation of optical elements of an optical arrangement, in particular a lens, such a microlithography lens having a correction light, which include at least one correction light source and at least one mirror arrangement that deflects the light from the correction light source in the beam path to the optical element such that at least part of at least one surface of at least one optical element of the optical arrangement are irradiated in a locally and/or temporally variable fashion. The correction light strikes the surface of the optical element at a flat angle such that the obtuse angle between the optical axis of the optical arrangement at the location of the optical element and the correction light beam is less than or equal to 105°.

Claims

27 · 3 independent · depth 3
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627
27 granted claims

Classifications

2 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G02B26/08
USPC · US Patent Classification
359/201.2

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2009Jan 2010Jul 2010Jan 2011Jul 2011Jan 2012Jul 2012Jan 2013Jul 2013Jan 2014USPTOApplicantRestriction requirementResponse after non-finalRequest for continued examinationNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalRequest for continued examinationRequest for continued examination
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
4.3 y
1,553 days filing → grant
Office actions
4
after a restriction
Responses
3
5 RCE
Interviews
2
examiner interview summaries
Examiner
Jennifer L. Doak
art unit 2872 · TC 2800
Citations: 21 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Term & fees

See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.

Log in to unlock

Priority chain

1 priority documents
›Priority documents — 1
TypeDocumentDate
related publicationUS 20100060988 A111 Mar 2010

Validity challenges

See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.

Log in to unlock

Citations

See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.

Log in to unlock