USPatentGranted
B2

Methodology for improving device performance prediction from effects of active area corner rounding

Granted 19 Oct 2010 · 2 office actions

Life of the patent

11 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20082010201220142016201820202022202420262028ProsecutionTerm & fees
ProsecutionTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A system and method for modeling a semiconductor transistor device structure having a conductive line feature of a designed length connected to a gate of a transistor device in a circuit to be modeled, the transistor including an active device (RX) area over which the gate is formed and over which the conductive line feature extends. The method includes providing an analytical model representation including a function for modeling a lithographic flare effect impacting the active device area width; and, from the modeling function, relating an effective change in active device area width (deltaW adder) as a function of a distance from a defined edge of the RX area. Then, transistor model parameter values in a transistor compact model for the device are updated to include deltaW adder values to be added to a built-in deltaW value. A netlist used in a simulation includes the deltaW adder values to more accurately describe the characteristics of the transistor device being modeled including modeling of lithographic corner rounding effect on transistor device parametrics.

Claims

24 · 3 independent · depth 4
123456789101112131415161718192021222324
24 granted claims

Classifications

11 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G06G7/48
  • G06F9/45
  • G06F17/50
USPC · US Patent Classification
716/2716/8716/5703/13716/4703/4703/15716/19

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this patent are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2008Jul 2008Jan 2009Jul 2009Jan 2010Jul 2010USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalRequest for continued examination
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.8 y
1,015 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
2 RCE
Interviews
1
examiner interview summaries
Examiner
Helen Rossoshek
art unit 2825 · TC 2800
Citations: 11 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Term & fees

See the term timeline — pendency span, in-force span, the maintenance fees paid and both computed expiry dates.

Log in to unlock

Priority chain

1 priority documents
›Priority documents — 1
TypeDocumentDate
related publicationUS 20090178012 A19 Jul 2009

Validity challenges

See the validity challenges on record — reexaminations, IPRs and PGRs, with their institution decisions and outcomes.

Log in to unlock

Citations

See every patent this one cites and every patent that cites it back — publication, assignee, and how each one was found.

Log in to unlock