USPatent publicationPublished

MOSFET rectifier circuit with operational amplifier feedback

Published 4 Jul 2002 · application patented

Application
9753311
filed 29 Dec 2000
Publication· this page
US 20020085401 A1
published 4 Jul 2002
Patent
US 6,442,053
granted 27 Aug 2002
4 Jul 2002
Published
US pre-grant publication
16
Claims as published
1 independent
3
Classifications
H02M7/217
2
Inventors
Scott K. Reynolds
Patented
Application status
granted 27 Aug 2002
26
File wrapper
transactions

Life of the application

7 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom2002200420062008201020122014201620182020ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A circuit arrangement for rectifying alternating current (AC) signals in solid-state technologies that have gain devices with low transconductance. A contemplated circuit uses operational amplifiers connected in feedback mode to enhance the effective transconductance of the gain devices.

Description

5 parts
›FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to circuitry used to obtain rectified signals in any application requiring the derivation of such signals from AC signals.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Generally, the function of a rectifier circuit, as contemplated herein, is to take a signal which has both positive and negative varying amplitudes about some reference, and convert that signal into one which has only positive varying amplitudes about the same or other reference. If the circuit preserves the positive signal and also mirrors the negative signal to be positive with respect to the reference, it is called a full-wave rectifier. If the circuit preserves only the positive signal and deletes the negative signal, it is called a half-wave rectifier. Examples of a sinusoidal input waveform, and ideal half-wave and full-wave rectified waveforms are shown in FIG. 1 ( a ), FIG. 1 ( b ), and FIG. 1 ( c ), respectively.

The general principle in a rectifier circuit is to first compare the input signal with a reference signal. If the input signal is positive with respect to the reference, then it is simply passed through to the output of the circuit. If the input signal is negative with respect to the reference, then it is inverted with respect to the reference and passed through to the output in the case of a full-wave rectifier. In the case of a half-wave rectifier, the negative signal is simply deleted or blocked from passing through to the output of the rectifier. FIG. 2 ( a ) shows a conventional half-wave rectifier circuit (Rectifier A) which is based on this principle, using metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) devices in the rectifying stage. The circuit includes a transistor M 1 which has the input voltage (Vin) applied to the gate, a transistor M 2 which has the reference voltage (Vref) applied to the gate, and a transistor M 3 which has a bias voltage Vbias applied to the gate. The transistors M 1 and M 2 are coupled at the source and drain. The common drain is connected to the positive supply. The common source is connected to the drain of the current source FET (M 3 ). The current source FET (M 3 ) ensures that the sum of currents in M 1 and M 2 remains a constant, independent of Vin and Vref The output voltage (Vout) is measured at the common source node of M 1 and M 2 .

The conventional circuit illustrated in FIG. 2 ( a ) (and as described in more detail in Z. Wang, “Full-wave rectification that is performed in current domain and very suitable for CMOS implementation”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems—I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 456-463, June 1992), operates on the principle that the source of a FET tracks the drain voltage if the device remains biased in the saturation region of its operation. As Vin approaches Vref and crosses it, there is a region of transition when both devices M 1 and M 2 are on. This transition region affects the performance of the rectifier adversely. The extent of this region depends on the gain in devices M 1 and M 2 .

In certain semiconductor technologies, particularly those with minimum feature sizes of 0.2 micrometer or less, the field effect transistors (FETs) have low transconductance (a measure of gain through the device) for low values of the gate overdrive voltage. FIG. 2 ( b ) is the simulated output waveform when the sinusoidal input shown in FIG. 1 ( a ) is applied to the circuit schematic shown in FIG. 2 ( a ), the circuit having been designed in a deep submicron complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) semiconductor technology. The MOSFET device performance in this technology is typical of those that have been optimized for performance in digital circuits. As the waveform in FIG. 2 ( b ) shows, the half-wave rectifier does not adequately block the negative-going part of the waveform. This is because the low gain in the MOSFETs M 1 and M 2 cause them to turn off very slowly when the input sinusoidal waveform is applied.

A need has thus been recognized in connection with overcoming the problem described above and with designing rectifier circuits using FETs or other similar devices with low gain.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with at least one presently preferred embodiment of the present invention, a circuit arrangement is contemplated for rectifying alternating current (AC) signals in solid-state technologies that have gain devices with low transconductance. A contemplated circuit uses operational amplifiers connected in feedback mode to enhance the effective transconductance of the gain devices.

In one aspect, the present invention provides a rectifier circuit comprising: a current source; at least one transistor connected with the current source; and an operational amplifier connected with the at least one transistor.

For a better understanding of the present invention, together with other and further features and advantages thereof, reference is made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, and the scope of the invention will be pointed out in the appended claims.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 ( a ) is a graph of signal voltage vs. time for a sinusoidal input waveform.

FIG. 1 ( b ) is a graph of simulated output signal voltage vs. time for an ideal half-wave rectifier.

FIG. 1 ( c ) is a graph of simulated output signal voltage vs. time for an ideal full-wave rectifier.

FIG. 2 ( a ) illustrates a conventional half-wave rectifier circuit using FET devices (“Rectifier A”).

FIG. 2 ( b ) is a graph of simulated output signal voltage vs. time for the rectifier of FIG. 2 ( a ).

FIG. 3 ( a ) illustrates a half-wave rectifier circuit with operational amplifier feedback (“Rectifier B”).

FIG. 3 ( b ) is a graph of simulated output signal voltage vs. time for the rectifier of FIG. 3 ( a ).

FIG. 4 illustrates an operational amplifier connected to improve MOSFET transconductance.

FIG. 5 illustrates a full-wave rectifier circuit with operational amplifier feedback (“Rectifier C”).

FIG. 6 ( a ) illustrates a half-wave rectifier circuit with improved signal gain (“Rectifier D”).

FIG. 6 ( b ) is a graph of the simulated output signal voltage vs. time for the rectifier of FIG. 6 ( a ).

FIG. 7 illustrates a rectifier circuit with improved signal gain and differential output (Rectifier E).

›DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In accordance with at least one presently preferred embodiment of the present invention, a circuit modification is contemplated which overcomes the limitations of the conventional circuit shown in FIG. 2 ( a ) (“Rectifier A”). Accordingly, FIG. 3 ( a ) shows a circuit schematic of a rectifier circuit (“Rectifier B”) in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention described here. It preferably includes a source-coupled pair of transistors (M 1 and M 2 ), connected to the drain of a current source transistor (M 3 ) as in the case of Rectifier A (FIG. 2 ( a )). The input voltage (Vin) is not connected directly to the gate of M 1 . It is connected to the positive input of an operational amplifier (O 1 ). The negative input of O 1 is connected to the common source-coupled node of M 1 and M 2 . The output of O 1 is connected to the gate of transistor M 1 .

The simulated output waveform of the circuit in FIG. 3 ( a ), when the input signal of FIG. 1 ( a ) is applied, is shown in FIG. 3 ( b ). As seen in FIG. 3 ( b ), the circuit performs the half-wave rectification function, effectively blocking the negative part of the sinusoidal input waveform from passing to the output. The effect of putting the operational amplifier O 1 in between the input voltage Vin and the gate of M 1 is described by the following equations (based on the schematic in FIG. 4, which is a close-up of the operational amplifier of FIG. 3 ( a ) and also indicates some variables used below).

From the equation for the operational amplifier with voltage gain A,

Vg=A* ( Vin−Vs )

Vg−Vs= ( A*Vin )−( Vs* ( A+ 1 ))

If A>> 1 ,

Vg−Vs=A* ( Vin−Vs )

From the simplified equation for the MOSFET device, the drain current, Id, is given by,

Id=K* ( Vg−Vs−Vth ) 2

where K is a device dependent parameter, and Vth is the threshold voltage of the device.

The transconductance of the device (gm) is obtained by differentiating the drain current (Id) with respect the gate-to-source voltage (Vg−Vs),

gm =2* K* ( Vg−Vs−Vth )

Writing (Vg−Vs) in terms of Vin from above,

gm =2 *K* ( A* ( Vin−Vs ) −Vth )

By adding the operational amplifier between the input voltage and the MOSFET device as shown in FIGS. 3 ( a ) and 4 , the effective transconductance of the MOSFET device is increased by a factor proportional to the gain of the operational amplifier. This in turn means that a smaller change in Vin is required to change the current in the MOSFET M 1 from zero to the maximum possible value (which is determined by the magnitude of current in the current source MOSFET M 3 ).

FIG. 5 shows a full-wave rectifier based on the same principle. Vin+ is the input waveform and Vin− is the inverted version of the input waveform.

The schematic of another circuit that benefits from the same improvement when the operational amplifier feedback is used, is shown in FIG. 6 ( a ). This circuit is similar to the one in FIG. 3 ( a ) in that it has two source-coupled MOSFETs (M 1 and M 2 ) which are connected to the current source MOSFET (M 3 ), and the input voltage drives the gate of MOSFET M 1 through the operational amplifier O 1 . The difference between this circuit and the one in FIG. 3 ( a ) is that the output here is taken from the drain node of MOSFET M 1 , instead of the source-coupled node. This allows the use of the resistor R 1 to provide additional gain in the circuit. The simulated output waveform of the circuit in FIG. 6 ( a ), obtained when the input from FIG. 1 ( a ) is applied, is shown in FIG. 6 ( b ). Again, it can be seen that the half-wave rectification function has been effectively implemented. A differential version of the rectifier circuit of FIG. 6 ( a ) is shown in FIG. 7 .

If not otherwise stated herein, it is to be assumed that all patents, patent applications, patent publications and other publications (including web-based publications) mentioned and cited herein are hereby fully incorporated by reference herein as if set forth in their entirety herein.

Although illustrative embodiments of the present invention have been described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to those precise embodiments, and that various other changes and modifications may be affected therein by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.

Claims as published

11 claims

Log in to read the claims of this publication.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

3 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H02M7/217
USPC · US Patent Classification
363/127327/538

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this publication are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2001Apr 2001Jul 2001Oct 2001Jan 2002Apr 2002Jul 2002Oct 2002USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
1.7 y
606 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
Adolf Deneke Berhane
art unit 2838 · TC 2800
Citations: 3 back · 2 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2002200420062008201020122014201620182020Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock