USPatent applicationPatented

Reduction of aberrations produced by Wien filter in a scanning electron microscope and the like

Granted 6 Apr 2004 · 1 office action

Current assignee: SNU PRECISION CO., LTD. · originally SLB

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: John A. Rouse, Neal T. Sullivan, Ira Rosenberg · Examiner: John R. Lee · AU 2881 · TC 2800

Application· this page
9994563
filed 27 Nov 2001
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,717,141
granted 6 Apr 2004

Life of the application

9 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20022004200620082010201220142016201820202022ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

In order to improve the resolution of an electron beam in a scanning electron microscope or the like in which a Wien filter is employed for particle detection purposes, the beam is caused to have an envelope with a crossover point within, and preferably centrally located with respect to, the Wien filter.

Description

5 parts
›FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to improving the resolution of an electron beam that impacts a sample being imaged by a scanning electron microscope or comparable instruments and, in particular, to minimize aberrations caused by using a Wien filter in the beam column.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Various instruments are known which rely on the detection of charged particles emitted from a sample (also commonly referred to as a target) to derive characteristics of the sample. Examples of such instruments are scanning electron microscopes and focused ion beam microscopes.

For facilitating the description of the present invention, it will be explained in connection with a scanning electron microscope (“SEM”). However, it should be understood that the invention is not limited to an SEM and can be applied by one with ordinary skill in the art in other instruments and machines that require a focused beam of charged particles.

An SEM operates by generating a primary, or incident, scanning electron beam that impacts a sample, a surface of which is being imaged. As a result, backscattered and secondary electrons are emitted from the sample surface and collected by a detector which is arranged near the surface of the sample. The detector generates a signal from the electron emission collected from the sample surface as it is exposed to the electron beam. The signal from the detector is typically processed to create an image of the surface which is then displayed on a video screen.

On its way between the electron source and the sample, the incident beam is deflected by various electromagnetic and electrostatic elements that are used to, for example, align, focus and scan the beam, as well as correct its shape. A typical arrangement of the main components of an SEM is schematically shown in FIG. 1 . Electron source 1 generates an electron beam 2 , shown as having an envelope 3 spread about axis 4 , and which is directed toward sample 5 . Beam 2 is controlled by gun condenser lens 7 , beam aligners 9 , aperture 11 , and objective lens 13 . A Wien filter 15 may be located between the aperture 11 and the objective lens 13 so as to deflect the charged particle emitted from the target 5 to a detector 17 , which may be located between the aperture 11 and the Wien filter 15 . The function of these components is well known. SEMs contain many other well known components to control the beam and perform other vital functions that are not described herein to avoid unduly lengthening and complicating the description of the present invention. It is to be understood that SEMs can contain more than one of any of the components described herein. Also, the positions of the various components need not be as shown in FIG. 1, which is presented for illustrative purposes rather than accuracy.

The envelope 3 of beam shown in FIG. 1 is a typical envelope. Crossover point 19 is controlled by gun condenser lens 7 . (The term “crossover” is used herein to refer to where the majority of electrons cross axis 4 , which occurs where envelope 3 shrinks to a minimal diameter.) The vertical location of crossover point 19 can be set anywhere all the way down to the sample 5 . However, it typically appears generally as illustrated in FIG. 1 . It is readily apparent that the beam envelope spreads out from the crossover point 19 until it is focused onto sample 5 by the powerful objective lens 13 .

It is known that Wien filters can be used to advantage in an SEM for deflecting the otherwise difficult to detect on-axis and near-on-axis secondary electrons toward the detector, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,658,136. Briefly, a Wien filter utilizes electrodes to create an electric field and magnetic poles to create a magnetic field. The two fields apply equal and opposite forces to electrons in the incident beam, so that it is not deflected. However, due to its opposite direction of travel, a secondary electron is affected by the magnetic field force in the same direction as the electric field force and, thus, is deflected. In practice, however, Wien filters have not been widely used for this purpose in an SEM because known designs “degrade the resolution due to the aberrations which are caused to the primary beam”, (Murack, et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. Vol. 17, No. 6).

FIG. 1 shows a Wien Filter at the approximate relative position in the beam column where it would be placed in order to deflect emitted particles to the detector 17 . When particles pass through the Wien filter 15 with the envelope 3 shaped as shown in FIG. 1, the incident beam resolution is adversely affected by two factors. Firstly, the electric and magnetic fields are not uniform away from axis 4 . Consequently, the off-axis electrons within envelope 3 are subject to aberrations which are manifested by creating a larger spot size and, therefore, lower resolution. Secondly, the electrons that pass through the Wien filter 15 at a relatively substantial angle, which occurs with a beam envelope 3 shaped as shown, have a transverse velocity component that creates deflections by the magnetic field that are not in the direction of the electric field, and therefore cannot be canceled by it, which also acts to undesirably increase the spot size and decrease resolution. Although the objective lens 13 is quite strong, it cannot compensate for the aberrations caused by the Wien filter 15 in the typical system shown in FIG. 1 .

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

One object of the present invention is to improve the resolution of an electron beam that impacts a sample being imaged where a Wien filter is employed to facilitate detecting emitted particles.

A further object of the present invention is to provide improved resolution for SEMs or the like which use the Wien filter.

Another object of the present invention is to minimize aberrations caused by a Wien filter in an SEM or the like.

Still another object of the present invention is to locate a crossover point in a particle beam envelope so as to improve the detection characteristics of the instrument involved.

These and other objects are attained in accordance with one aspect of the invention directed to an apparatus for utilizing a focused beam of charged particles. A beam of charged particles is produced and directed toward a target. The beam is controlled to form an envelope of predetermined configuration having at least one crossover point. A filter means, such as a Wien filter, is provided through which the beam passes. The beam is controlled such as to position the crossover point within the filter means.

Another aspect of the invention is directed to an apparatus for utilizing focused beams of charged particles, including a target and a particle source directing a beam of the particles to travel from the source to the target and forming a beam envelope. A Wien filter is provided through which the beam passes, and an objective lens, through which the beam passes, is located between the Wien filter and the target. At least one deflector, through which the beam passes, is between the particle source and the Wien filter, and it is effective to produce in the envelope a beam crossover point within the Wien filter.

Yet another aspect of the invention is directed to a method for imaging a target utilizing a focused beam of charged particles. A beam of charged particles is produced and directed toward the target. A filter is provided through which the beam passes. The beam is controlled to form an envelope of predetermined configuration having at least one crossover point, and the crossover point is positioned within the filter.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

To the accomplishment of the above, and to such other objects as may hereinafter appear, the present invention relates to the arrangement of a beam deflection system including a Wien filter, as defined in the appended claims and as described in this specification, taken together with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 schematically depicts a typical SEM system of the prior art utilizing a Wien filter; and

FIG. 2 schematically depicts an SEM system, including a Wien filter, improved in accordance with the present invention.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

We have discovered that the resolution problem produced by the Wien filter in systems of the type under discussion can be greatly ameliorated by causing the envelope of the emitted beam, as it passes from electron source 1 to sample 5 , to have a crossover point within, and preferably centered within, the Wien filter itself. When that is done, the aberrations produced by the Wien filter are so attenuated that the objective lens 13 is strong enough to substantially compensate for them. By adding an additional beam-focusing instrumentality, and appropriately energizing it, a greatly improved system resolution is obtained.

As shown in FIG. 2, an intermediate lens 21 is added to the system of FIG. 1 . Intermediate lens 21 is preferably an electrostatic lens because the field of such a lens is easier to isolate from the field in the region of the detector 17 , even if the detector is close to the lens 21 , thereby preventing dispersion of the emitted electrons. However, a magnetic lens can be used for lens 21 when a higher resolution is desired, although a larger separation is necessary between such a magnetic lens and the detector 17 .

The gun condenser lens 7 and the intermediate lens 21 are so energized, and the aperture 11 is so located between the lenses 7 and 21 , that the beam envelope 3 A is caused to assume a different shape (generally referred to as deflected by a deflector) from that shown in FIG. 1, with a crossover point 19 A located in the vicinity of the aperture 11 , but with an additional crossover point 19 B located within the vertical confines of the Wien filter 15 . The crossover point 19 B is preferably located on axis 4 and essentially midway between the upper and lower ends of the passage which is traversed by the incident beam through the Wien filter 15 . Alternatively, crossover point 19 B should be positioned on axis 4 in the lower half of the Wien filter, but as close as possible to the midway point.

It has been found that using the lens 21 to produce the crossover 19 B within the Wien filter 15 has the overall effect of keeping the electron beam envelope closer to the axis 4 , which in itself minimizes aberration.

There is another significant advantage to the system of the present invention in locating the crossover point 19 B in the middle of the Wien filter 15 . Since the Wien filter is essentially a set of deflectors, the deflection of an axial incoming beam appears to originate at the center of the filter. In an idealized scenario, the crossover point 19 B in the Wien filter 15 is a virtual object for the final image, namely the spot on the sample formed by the primary beam. As a result, the Wien filter can be adjusted to optimize the path of the beam through the objective lens, to maximize intensity and minimize aberrations, without shifting the position of the final image on the sample.

It is recognized that producing the crossover point 19 B within the Wien filter will produce some beam dispersion below the Wien filter. However, the objective lens 13 , which is the most powerful lens in the column, is strong enough to refocus the beam and provide the required resolution.

It will be appreciated that what is shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 is not only schematic but also not done to scale, that not all of the elements of an SEM are illustrated but only those truly relevant to the instant invention and that it is well within the ability of those with ordinary skill in the SEM art to determine and design the particular structural arrangement and electrical instrumentalities to produce the lens, deflection and aperture functions of the elements disclosed. Indeed, although the description of the invention presented above describes only three deflectors or lenses ( 7 , 9 and 13 ) in addition to the Wien filter as shown, proper beam deflection could be attained with a smaller or greater number of deflectors, or with deflectors differently positioned than shown in the figures. It is the location of the crossover point 19 B within the Wien filter 15 that produces the desired improvement in system resolution, and those skilled in the art know many ways for producing and locating that crossover point.

Although only a single embodiment of the present invention has been specifically disclosed above, various modifications thereto will be readily apparent to anyone with ordinary skill in the art. All such modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the present invention as defined in the following claims.

Claims as granted

31 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

14 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H01J37/153
  • H01J37/28
  • H01J37/147
USPC · US Patent Classification
250/306250/396.R250/492.1250/305250/397250/310250/307250/492.3250/311250/398250/396.ML

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomOct 2001Jan 2002Apr 2002Jul 2002Oct 2002Jan 2003Apr 2003Jul 2003Oct 2003Jan 2004Apr 2004USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.4 y
861 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
John R. Lee
art unit 2881 · TC 2800
Citations: 8 back · 6 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20022004200620082010201220142016201820202022Owner 1Owner 2Owner 3
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock