A process for preparing a hydrocyanation catalyst comprising contacting a bidentate phosphorous-containing ligand with a molar excess of nickel chloride in the presence of a nitrile solvent and a reducing metal which is more electropositive than nickel. Preferably, the nickel chloride is dried before use.

Description

28 parts

›FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a process for the preparation of a hydrocyanation catalyst which is a complex of nickel and a bidentate phosphorous compound.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

It is well known in the art that complexes of nickel with phosphorous-containing ligands are useful as catalysts in hydrocyanation reactions. Such nickel complexes using monodentate phosphites are known to catalyze hydrocyanation of butadiene to produce a mixture of pentenenitriles. These catalysts are also useful in the subsequent hydrocyanation of pentenenitriles to produce adiponitrile, an important intermediate in the production of nylon. It is further known that bidentate phoshite and phosphinite ligands can be used to form nickel-based catalysts to perform such hydrocyanation reactions.

U.S. Pat. No. 3,903,120 discloses a process for preparing zerovalent nickel complexes by reacting elemental nickel with a monodentate phosphorous ligand of the formula PZ 3 where Z is an alkyl or alkoxy group, preferably an aryloxy group. The process uses finely divided elemental nickel and is preferably carried out in the presence of a nitrile solvent. The reaction is taught to be carried out in the presence of excess ligand.

U.S. Pat. No. 3,846,461 discloses a process for preparing zerovalent nickel complexes of triorganophosphites by reacting triorganophosphite compounds with nickel chloride in the presence of a finely divided reducing metal which is more electropositive than nickel, and in the presence of a promoter selected from the group consisting of NH 3 , NH 4 X, Zn(NH 3 ) 2 X 2 , and mixtures of NH 4 X and ZnX 2 , where X is a halide. Reducing metals include Na, Li, Mg, Ca, Ba, Sr, Ti, V, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn, Cd, Al, Ga, In, Sn, Pb, and Th, with Zn being preferred.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,523,453 discloses a method of preparing nickel hydrocyanation catalysts containing bidentate phosphorous ligands. Zero-valent nickel compounds that contain ligands that can be displaced by the bidentate phosphorous ligand are a preferred source of nickel. Two such compounds are Ni(COD) 2 , where COD is 1,5-cyclooctadiene, and (oTTP) 2 Ni(C 2 H 4 ), where OTTP is P(O-ortho-C 6 H 4 CH 3 ) 3 . Alternatively, divalent nickel compounds may be combined with reducing agents to produce a suitable nickel source. In the latter method of preparing catalyst, as the temperature of the catalyst preparation increases, the catalyst formation rate increases, but the amount of degradation product also increases. Accordingly, there is a need in the art for a process that allows for high reaction rates and low degradation.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is a process for preparing a hydrocyanation catalyst by contacting a bidentate phosphorus-containing ligand with nickel chloride in the presence of a nitrile solvent and a reducing metal which is more electropositive than nickel, the nickel chloride being in molar excess with respect to the reducing metal.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 2

The catalysts of the present invention may be prepared by contacting nickel chloride with a bidentate phosphorous-containing ligand in the presence of a reducing metal, the nickel chloride being in molar excess with respect to the reducing metal. The reducing metal can be any metal which is more electropositive than nickel. Such metals include Na, Li, K, Mg, Ca, Ba, Sr, Ti, V, Fe, Co, Cu, Zn, Cd, Al, Ga, In, Sn, Pb, and Th. Most preferred are Fe and Zn. The reducing metal (hereinafter “MET”) is preferably finely-divided. The expression “finely-divided” means that the metal is of a particle size of less than 20 mesh.

Surprisingly, the rate of reaction is substantially independent of the concentration of the phosphorus-containing ligand or the amount of reducing metal, but, rather, depends on the amount of NiCl 2 present and the reaction temperature. Accordingly, increasing the amount of NiCl 2 increases the reaction rate. Since undesirable side reactions, especially degradation, increase with temperature, using excess nickel chloride to increase the catalyst formation rate may allow a decrease in reaction temperature which will decrease undesirable side reactions. The reaction is usually carried out such that the reducing metal is the limiting reagent. In other words, the amount of the NiCl 2 converted to catalyst is controlled by the amount of reducing metal added.

The source of nickel for this invention is preferably nickel (II) chloride, NiCl 2 . Either hydrated or anhydrous forms of NiCl 2 may be used. Anhydrous NiCl 2 is preferred in order to minimize the hydrolytic degradation of the ligand. The expression “anhydrous” means that the nickel chloride contains less than 2% by weight water. Nickel chloride containing 1% or less water is preferred. Anhydrous nickel chloride may be obtained by heating hydrated forms of NiCl 2 to temperatures of about 200° C. to about 240° C. Heating the NiCl 2 above about 240° C. produces NlCl 2 that is less reactive in the catalyst preparation and is not preferred. Also, heating the NiCl 2 for an extended period of time will also produce lower reactivity product. Accordingly, the NiCl 2 should not be heated above about 200° C. for more than about 12 hours.

The expression “hydrated NiCl 2 ” means NiCl 2 containing 2% or more water by weight. Examples of hydrated NiCl 2 include the dihydrate, the hexahydrate and aqueous solutions of NiCl 2 . Preferred sources for producing anhydrous NiCl 2 are the hexahydrate product and an aqueous solution. NiCl 2 as an aqueous solution is particularly preferred. The aqueous solution is available commercially as an approximately 29 weight percent NiCl 2 aqueous solution. However, it is believed that the invention is not limited to this weight percentage and aqueous solutions with different weight percent NiCl 2 will work. For practical reasons, the preferred aqueous solution contains 20 to 31 weight percent NiCl 2 . The lower limit is due to cost effectiveness of dehydrating a dilute solution. The upper limit is due to NiCl 2 solubility at ambient temperature, particularly due to the precipitation of NiCl 2 (H 2 O) 6 .

A preferred method of drying hydrated NiCl 2 is to first dry the NiCl 2 by spray or flash drying and then further dry the resulting product by thermal drying. A number of types of spray or thermal dryers are known to one skilled in the art. Pneumatic conveying dryers and flash dryers are known to be interchangeable terminology in the drying trade. The choice of which type to use is not critical. Examples of spray dryers are co-current flow, counter current, and mixed flow. In this preferred process, the spray dryer should have an exit temperature of 120 to 150° C., preferably 130 to 135° C. Mean residence time of heat exposure with the spray dryer should be 1 to 75 seconds, preferably 1 to 45 seconds. The resulting product is typically the dihydrate product which contains approximately 22 weight percent water.

Following spray or flash drying, the product is preferably further dried by thermal drying. Choice of dryer type is not critical. The thermal drying may be by direct or indirect drying in which the heat is primarily by conduction or convection. Thermal drying may occur under reduced pressure or with a dry inert gas flow. For economic reasons, the dry inert gas is preferably nitrogen. Thermal drying should occur at a temperature between about 200 and about 240° C. The time of drying should not exceed about 12 hours.

The catalyst formation reaction is carried out in the presence of a nitrile solvent, preferably 3-pentenenitrile or 2-methyl-butenenitrile. The concentration of ligand may range from about 1% to 90% by weight. For practical reasons the preferred range of ligand concentration is 5% to 50%. The amount of reducing metal (MET) is determined by the desired nickel catalyst product concentration. The preferred amount of reducing metal (MET) will generally fall in the range of 0.1% to 5% of the reaction mass. The amount of NiCl 2 will be in molar excess to the reducing metal. The molar ratio of NiCl 2 to MET ranges from 1.1:1 to 100:1. The preferred ratio of NiCl 2 :MET ranges from 2:1 to 50:1. The reaction temperature may range from 0° C. to 120° C. The preferred temperature range is dependent on the NiCl 2 form. Hydrated forms of NiCl 2 react rapidly at lower temperatures than anhydrous NiCl 2 . For NiCl 2 .2H 2 O, the preferred temperature range is 0° C. to 60° C., and the most preferred range is 25° C. to 50° C. For anhydrous NiCl 2 , the preferred temperature range is 30° C. to 100° C., and the most preferred range is 50° C. to 90° C. The reaction may be run within a wide pressure range. For practical reasons, the preferred pressure ranges from about 5 psia to 50 psia (34 to 340 kPa). The reaction may be run in batch or continuous mode.

Suitable ligands for the present invention are bidentate phosphorous-containing ligands selected from the group consisting of bidontate phosphites, bidentate phosphinites, and bidentate phosphines. Most preferred ligands are bidentate phosphite ligands.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 2

The most preferred bidentate phosphite ligands are of the following structural formulae:

(R 1 O) 2 P(OZO)P(OR 1 ) 2 ,

In these formulae, R 1 is phenyl, unsubstituted or substituted with one or more C 1 to C 12 alkyl or C 1 to C 12 alkoxy groups; or naphthyl, unsubstituted or substituted with one or more C 1 to C 12 alkyl or C 1 to C 12 alkoxy groups; and Z and Z 1 are independently selected from the groups consisting of structural formulae I, II, III, and IV:

wherein:

R 2 and R 9 are the same and are selected from H, C 1 to C 12 alkyl, and C 1 to C 12 alkoxy; R 3 and R 8 are the same and are selected from H, C 1 to C 12 alkyl, and C 1 to C 12 alkoxy; R 4 and R 7 are the same and are selected from H, C 1 to C 12 alkyl, and C 1 to C 12 alkoxy; R 5 and R 6 are the same and are selected from H, C 1 to C 12 alkyl, and C 1 to C 12 alkoxy;

wherein:

X is O, S, or CH(R 18 ); R 10 and R 17 are the same and are selected from H, C 1 to C 12 alkyl, and C 1 to C 12 alkoxy; R 11 and R 16 are the same and are selected from H, C 1 to C 12 alkyl, and C 1 to C 12 alkoxy; R 12 and R 15 are the same and are selected from H, C 1 to C 12 alkyl, and C 1 to C 12 alkoxy; R 13 and R 14 are the same and are selected from H, C 1 to C 12 alkyl, and C 1 to C 12 alkoxy; and R 18 is H or C 1 to C 12 alkyl;

wherein:

R 19 and R 20 are the same and are selected from H, C 1 to C 12 alkyl, and C 1 to C 12 alkoxy; and CO 2 R 21 , R 21 is C 1 to C 12 alkyl or C 6 to C 10 aryl, unsubstituted or substituted with C 1 to C 4 alkyl groups. The aryl groups are preferably phenyl or naphthyl.

wherein:

A is O, S, CH(R 24 ); R 22 and R 23 are the same and are selected from H and CO 2 R 25 ; R 24 is H or C 1 to C 12 alkyl; and R 25 is C 1 to C 12 alkyl.

In the above structural formulae, the C 1 to C 12 alkyl, and C 1 to C 12 alkoxy groups may be straight chains or branched.

Examples of diorganophosphite compounds that can be made by the present process include those having the formulae V to XXVI, shown below.

Suitable bidentate phosphites are of the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,512,695, 5,512,696, 5,663,369, and 5,723,641, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. Suitable bidentate phosphinites are of the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,523,453 and 5,693,843, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

The reaction may be carried out in a manner such that unreacted excess NiCl 2 may be separated from the reaction product by filtration or centrifugation. The collected excess nickel chloride can then be recycled back to a catalyst preparation reactor.

›EXAMPLES

The invention is illustrated by the following non-limiting examples. In the following examples, the reducing metal is the limiting reagent in each reaction and therefore the extent of reaction (conversion) is expressed as the percentage of the reducing metal reacted. Unless otherwise noted, the extent of reaction (conversion) is determined by analyzing for the amount of active nickel produced by the catalyst synthesis reaction. The analysis is carried out by treating a solids-free aliquot of the reaction solution with dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (DMAD), which forms a stable nickel complex, (Ligand)Ni(DMAD), and analyzing quantitatively for this complex by High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC).

Examples 1-6, and 11-18 utilize anhydrous NiCl 2 as produced in Example 20. NiCl 2 .2H 2 O utilized in Examples 7-10 was produced by heating nickel chloride hexahydrate to about 130° C. under reduced pressure.

Examples 1-6 illustrate that the catalyst synthesis reaction rate depends on the amount of anhydrous NiCl 2 charged to the reaction.

›Examples22

›Example 1

A 100 mL reaction vessel fitted with a mechanical stirrer was charged under a nitrogen atmosphere blanket with 3-pentenenitrile (80 mL; 830 mmol), ligand V (18 g; 19 mmol), NiCl 2 (3.22 g; 24.8 mmol), and zinc powder (0.61 g; 9.3 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 100° C. for 3 hours, and samples were withdrawn every 30 minutes for analysis. After 2 hours, 70% conversion of NiCl 2 to catalyst had occurred, and after 3 hours, greater than 95% conversion of NiCl 2 to catalyst had occurred.

›Example 2

A reaction was executed in the manner of example 1, except that the amount of NiCl 2 charged (1.61 g; 12.4 mmol) was half as much. After 2 hours, about 37% conversion of NiCl 2 to catalyst had occurred, and after 3 hours, about 60% conversion of NiCl 2 to catalyst had occurred.

In the following examples 3 to 10, a catalyst source which was depleted in active nickel, called “recycle catalyst,” was recharged. In these cases, “recycle catalyst” contained 11 weight percent (wt %) Ligand V in 3-pentenenitrile.

›Example 3

A 100 mL reaction vessel fitted with a mechanical stirrer was charged under a nitrogen atmosphere blanket with recycle catalyst (100 g, containing 11 wt % ligand V), NiCl 2 (1.21 g; 9.3 mmol), and zinc powder (0.61 g; 9.3 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 80° C. for 4 hours, and samples were withdrawn every 30 minutes for analysis. After 4 hours, less than 2% conversion NiCl 2 to catalyst had occurred.

›Example 4

A reaction was executed in the manner of example 3, except that the amount of NiCl 2 charged (2.42 g; 18.6 mmol) was twice as much as in example 3. After 4 hours, 35% conversion of NiCl 2 to catalyst had occurred.

›Example 5

A reaction was executed in the manner of example 3, except that the amount of NiCl 2 charged (4.84 g; 37.2 mmol) was four times as much as in example 3. After 4 hours, 75% conversion of NiCl 2 to catalyst had occurred.

›Example 6

A reaction was executed in the manner of example 3, except that the amount of NiCl 2 charged (7.26 g; 56.0 mmol) was six times as much as in example 3. After 2 hours, 77% conversion of NiCl 2 to catalyst had occurred, and after 4 hours, 83% conversion of NiCl 2 to catalyst had occurred.

The following examples 7 to 10 show that the use of hydrated NiCl 2 (NiCl 2 .2H 2 O) produces the same rate dependence on nickel chloride concentration as anhydrous NiCl 2 , but at a lower temperature.

›Example 7

A 100 mL reaction vessel fitted with a mechanical stirrer was charged under a nitrogen atmosphere blanket with recycle catalyst (100 g, containing 11 wt % ligand V), NiCl 2 .2H 2 O (1.21 g; 7.3 mmol), and zinc powder (0.61 g; 9.3 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 25° C. for 4 hours, and samples were withdrawn every 30 minutes for analysis. After 4 hours, about 13% conversion NiCl 2 to catalyst had occurred.

›Example 8

A reaction was executed in the manner of example 7, except that the amount of NiCl 2 .2H 2 O charged (2.42 g; 14.6 mmol) was twice as much as in example 7. After 4 hours, 27% conversion of NiCl 2 to catalyst had occurred.

›Example 9

A reaction was executed in the manner of example 7, except that the amount of NiCl 2 .2H 2 O charged (4.84 g; 29.2 mmol) was four times as much as in example 7. After 4 hours, 93% conversion of NiCl 2 to catalyst had occurred.

›Example 10

A reaction was executed in the manner of example 7, except that the amount of NiCl 2 .2H 2 O charged (7.26 g; 43.8 mmol) was six times as much as in example 7. After 30 minutes, greater than 95% conversion of NiCl 2 to catalyst had occurred.

Comparative Example 1 illustrates that increasing the molar ratio of the reducing metal relative to NiCl 2 does not increase the reaction rate. In this example, NiCl 2 is the limiting reagent, and the extent of reaction is reported as the conversion of NiCl 2 . The NiCl 2 was that produced as in Example 20.

Comparative Example 1

A “recycle catalyst” solution (9 grams of 30 wt % Ligand V) was treated with NiCl 2 (0.11 grams) and zinc (0.10 g). The mixture was agitated and heated at about 100° C. Analysis of a clear-liquid sample after 2 hours revealed 54% conversion of the NiCl 2 . Reactions executed in a similar manner, except that the zinc charged was 0.20 grams and 0.40 grams, resulted in conversions of 54% and 50%, respectively.

The following examples 11 to 17 show that the process of the present invention is applicable to additional phosphorous-containing ligands, and that the same effects are observed when iron is used as the reducing agent. In these examples, the extent of reaction was determined by measuring nickel in solution by Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP).

›Example 11

A solution of Ligand XXIV was prepared by dissolving 2.497 grams of Ligand XXIV in 24.008 grams of dry 3-pentenenitrile. An aliquot of this solution (13.0 grams) was mixed with anhydrous NiCl 2 (1.22 grams) and zinc (0.102 grams). The mixture was agitated and heated at a temperature of about 80° C. Analysis of a clear liquid-only sample taken after 2 hours revealed 56% conversion in a similar reaction, except that only 0.20 grams of NiCl 2 was charged to the mixture, only 10% conversion was found after 2 hours.

›Example 12

A solution of Ligand XXI was prepared by dissolving 3.03 grams of Ligand XXI in 24.16 grams of dry 3-pentenenitrile. An aliquot of this solution (13.38 grams) was mixed with 1.20 grams of anhydrous NiCl 2 and 0.10 grams of zinc. The mixture was agitated and heated at a temperature of about 81° C. Analysis of a clear liquid-only sample taken after 2 hours revealed 41% conversion. In a similar reaction, except that only 0.20 grams of NiCl 2 was charged to the mixture, only 10% conversion was found after 2 hours.

›Example 13

A solution of Ligand XVIII was prepared by dissolving 2.59 grams of Ligand XVIII in 24.0 grams of dry 3-pentenenitrile. An aliquot of this solution (13.38 grams) was mixed with 1.20 grams of anhydrous NiCl 2 and 0.10 grams of zinc. The mixture was agitated and heated at a temperature of about 80° C. Analysis of a clear liquid-only sample taken after 2 hours revealed 73% conversion. In a similar reaction, except that only 0.20 grams of NiCl 2 was charged to the mixture, only 14% conversion was found after 2 hours.

›Example 14

A solution of Ligand XIX was prepared by dissolving 2.85 grams of Ligand XIX in 24.0 grams of dry 3-pentenenitrile. An aliquot of this solution (13.4 grams) was mixed with 1.20 grams of anhydrous NiCl 2 and 0.10 grams of zinc. The mixture was agitated and heated at a temperature of about 78° C. Analysis of a clear liquid-only sample taken after 2 hours revealed 38% conversion. In a similar reaction, except that only 0.20 grams of NiCl 2 was charged to the mixture, only 10% conversion was found after 2 hours.

›Example 15

A solution of Ligand XX was prepared by dissolving 2.67 grams of Ligand XX in 24.0 grams of dry 3-pentenenitrile. An aliquot of this solution (13.0 grams) was mixed with 1.23 grams of anhydrous NiCl 2 and 0.10 grams of zinc. The mixture was agitated and heated at a temperature of about 81° C. Analysis of a clear liquid-only sample taken after 2 hours revealed 59% conversion. In a similar reaction, except that only 0.20 grams of NiCl 2 was charged to the mixture, only 10% conversion was found after 2 hours.

›Example 16

A solution of Ligand XXV was prepared by dissolving 2.68 grams of Ligand XXV in 24.0 grams of dry 3-pentenenitrile. An aliquot of this solution (13.1 grams) was mixed with 1.20 grams of anhydrous NiCl 2 and 0.10 grams of zinc. The mixture was agitated and heated at a temperature of about 81° C. Analysis of a clear liquid-only sample taken after 2 hours revealed 45% conversion. In a similar reaction, except that iron powder (0.43 grams) was charged to the mixture instead of zinc, 34% conversion was found after 2 hours.

›Example 17

A solution of Ligand XXVI was prepared by dissolving 2.77 grams of Ligand XXVI in 24.0 grams of dry 3-pentenenitrile. An aliquot of this solution (12.6 grams) was mixed with 1.20 grams of anhydrous NiCl 2 and 0.10 grams of zinc. The mixture was agitated and heated at a temperature of about 80° C. Analysis of a clear liquid-only sample taken after 2 hours revealed 37% conversion. In a similar reaction, except that iron powder (0.42 grams) was charged to the mixture instead of zinc, 38% conversion was found after 2 hours.

›Example 18

A solution of Ligand V was prepared by dissolving 3.03 grams of Ligand V in 24.0 grams of dry 3-pentenenitrile. An aliquot of this solution (13.3 grams) was mixed with 1.20 grams of anhydrous NiCl 2 and 0.44 grams of iron. The mixture was agitated and heated at a temperature of about 81° C. Analysis of a clear liquid-only sample taken after 2 hours revealed 16% conversion. In a similar reaction, except that only 0.2 grams of NiCl 2 was charged to the mixture, only 7% conversion was found after 2 hours.

Examples 19-24 demonstrate preferred methods of drying NiCl 2 . Comparative Examples 2-3 are presented for comparison to the present invention and show that overheating while drying will lead to a less reactive material. “BET surface area” analysis refers to an analytical technique, well known to those skilled in the art, for measuring surface area of a solid material. The letters “BET” refer to Brunauer Emmett Teller, who developed the theory of multilayer gas adsorption/absorption onto solid surfaces. For example, using nitrogen gas at 77° K., the surface area of a solid material may be estimated by measuring the number of moles of nitrogen adsorbed as a function of the partial pressure of the gas for a given weight of solid. By applying the sorption theory of BET to the resulting isotherm absorption curve, it is easy to determine an effective surface area for the solid.

›Example 19

10 g of nickel chloride hexahydrate was spread thinly in a clean quartz boat in a quartz-lined tube furnace equipped with a flow of 100 mL/min dry nitrogen. The exit nitrogen stream was passed through a mineral oil bubbler and vented to a hood. The sample was then heated to 240° C. over 15 minutes and held there for a total of 60 minutes. The sample was then cooled and sealed and taken into a nitrogen-flushed glove box for collection and storage prior to catalyst preparation experiments. A small portion of the material was analyzed for water content by Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) by heating it to 400° C. at 10° C./min. The weight loss at approximately 200° C. provided the measure of water in the sample.

This sample contained 0.3 weight percent water and had a BET surface area of 35 m 2 /g and an estimated crystallite size of 9 nm. When used in a catalyst preparation similar to that of Example 1, this material generated 76% conversion.

Comparative Example 2

The procedure of Experiment 19 was repeated, except that the nickel chloride was additionally heated to 350° C. for 30 minutes in nitrogen. The recovered sample had for less than 0.05 weight percent water, BET surface area of 13 m 2 /g and estimated crystallite size of 22 nm. When used in a catalyst preparation similar to that of Example 1, this material generated 36% conversion.

Comparative Example 3

The procedure of Experiment 19 was repeated, except that the nickel chloride was additionally heated to 500° C. for 30 minutes in nitrogen. The recovered sample had less than 0.05 weight percent water, BET surface area of 2 m 2 /g and estimated crystallite size of 44 nm. When used in a catalyst preparation similar to that of Example 1, this material generated 1% conversion.

›Example 20

A 9.1 kg of NiCl 2 hydrate, containing 10.9 weight percent H 2 O, was loaded into a rotary vacuum dryer. 20 kg of NiCl 2 hexahydrate was added to the dryer, resulting in an equivalent NiCl 2 charge containing 34.7 weight percent H 2 O. The pressure in the dryer was reduced to 100 torr (690 kPa), and the temperature in the dryer was gradually increased to 100° C. over a 5 hour period. The expression “temperature in the dryer” refers to the temperature of the bulk contents. The vacuum dryer was indirectly heated with a hot oil supply at a temperature no higher than 20° C. higher than the measured bulk temperature. TGA tests confirmed that the dryer contents were dehydrated to a residual moisture of 21.5 weight percent H 2 O, equivalent to a dihydrate state. The temperature in the dryer was then raised to 200° C. over a 4 hour period, and subsequently raised to 240° C. over a 2 hour period. TGA tests showed than the residual moisture was reduced to less than 0.1 weight percent H 2 O. It had a BET surface area of 24 m 2 /g and had an estimated crystallite size of 17 nm. Approximately 17 kg of anhydrous NiCl 2 product was recovered. When used in a catalyst preparation similar to that of Example 1, this material generated 79% conversion.

›Example 21

An aqueous solution containing approximately 29 weight percent NiCl 2 was pumped into a spray dryer at an average rate of 33.5 kg/hr. Filtered ambient air was indirectly heated to 400° C. and injected co-currently at an average rate of 327 kg/hr. Under these conditions, the average outlet temperature of the air exiting the spray dryer was 135° C. During a 4 hour tests, 50 kg of NiCl 2 dihydrate was produced containing about 22 weight percent H 2 O.

About 30 kg of the spray dried product was loaded into the same rotary vacuum dryer as in Example 20. The pressure in the rotary dryer was reduced to 50 torr (345 kPa), and the temperature in the dryer was increased to 220° C. over a 2 hour period, and maintained for another 3 hours. TGA tests showed than the residual moisture was reduced to less than 0.1 weight percent H 2 O, and had an estimated crystallite size of 18 nm. When used in a catalyst preparation similar to that of Example 1, this material generated 82% conversion. When used in a similar catalyst preparation, except at a reaction temperature of about 80° C., the conversion was 64% after 2 hours.

›Example 22

This Example 22 shows that the spray drier product may be fed continuously to a thermal processor and that low pressure in the thermal processor is not required to obtain satisfactory results.

The procedure in Example 21 was repeated, except that the NiCl 2 dihydrate isolated from the spray dryer was then fed continuously into a thermal processor that was heated indirectly by a hot oil supply at 244° C., resulting in the bulk temperature being about 10° C. lower. The pressure in the thermal processor was maintained slightly below atmospheric. The anhydrous product discharged from the thermal processor contained a residual moisture of less than 1 weight percent H 2 O. When used in a catalyst preparation similar to that of Example 1, except at a reaction temperature of about 80° C., this material generated 62% conversion.

Claims as granted

18 claims

Classifications

15 codes

IPC · International Patent Classification

Section B — Performing operations; transporting

B01J31/24
B01J31/18
B01J31/16
B01J27/128
B01J31/22
B01J31/30
B01J37/16

Section C — Chemistry; metallurgy

C01G53/09
C07C253/10
C07F15/04
C07F9/12

USPC · US Patent Classification

502/167502/167502/169502/213

Claim changes

Soon

Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoom

USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open

Pendency

3.5 y

1,268 days filing → grant

Office actions

non-final + final

Responses

no RCE

Interviews

examiner interview summaries

Examiner

Mark L. Bell

art unit 1755 · TC 1700

Law firm

Law firm · Log in to unlock

Citations: 22 back · 23 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom

TitleLienReleasehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.