USPatent applicationPatented

Pesticidal composition

Granted 17 Dec 2002 · 2 office actions

Current assignee: Nippon Soda Co., Ltd. · originally Aventis CropScience GmbH

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Gerald Michel Yvon Huart, Werner Knauf, Kay Christoph Grosser · Examiner: Allen J. Robinson · AU 1616 · TC 1600

Life of the application

11 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20022004200620082010201220142016201820202022ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

Pesticidal compositions comprising deltamethrin and acetamiprid.

Description

2 parts
›This invention relates to pesticidal compositions containing acetamiprid…

This invention relates to pesticidal compositions containing acetamiprid.

In FR 2784011 there are described mixtures of pyrethroids with a chloronicotinyl insecticide, such as imidacloprid, acetamiprid or nitenpyram. The only pyrethroid specifically disclosed is cypermethrin. U.S. Pat. No. 5,880,142 describes mixtures of chloronicotinyl insecticides and pyrethroids for termite control and discloses a mixture of acetamiprid and cyfluthrin.

We have now found that a mixture of another pyrethroid, deltamethrin, with acetamiprid has advantageous properties over the individual components and that synergism is often demonstrated.

Accordingly the present invention provides a pesticidal composition comprising

a) deltamethrin and

b) acetamiprid.

Deltamethrin is the common name for (S)-α-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl (1R,3R)-3-(2,2-dibromvinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate and acetamiprid is the common name for E-N 1 -[(6-chloro-3-pyridylmethyl)]-N 2 -cyano-N 1 -methylacetamidine.

The ratios of the deltamethrin to acetamiprid vary over a wide range but are usually in the range 5:1 to 1:10, especially 1:1 to 1:5.

In addition, other pesticides may be employed in conjunction with the active ingredients described above providing they do not adversely affect the interaction between the components a) and b). For example it is sometimes useful to include additional insecticides or acaricides to extend the range of activity in order to control a wider spectrum of pests.

The combination is also useful in overcoming reduced sensitivity by a pest to either of the individual components.

The compositions of the invention are active against a wide range of pests, especially sucking pests such as Thrips spp., e.g. Ttabaci and Tpalmi , Homoptera, including aphids such as Megoura viciae and plant hoppers,such as Nilaparvata lugens and Nephotettix cincticeps , whiteflies, such as Trialeurodes vaporarorum and Bemisia tabaci , and Psylla spp., Heteroptera. e.g. bed bugs such as Cimex lectularius , and capsids, Lepidoptera, including Spodoptera spp, eg S.littoralis , Heliothis spp., eg H. armigera and H. viriscens , and Pieris brassicae ; Diptera, including Musca domestica, Ceratitis capitata, Erioischia brassicae, Lucilia sericata and Aedes aegypti ; Coleoptera, including Phaedon cochleariae, Anthonomus grandis and corn rootworms (Diabrotica spp. e.g. D. undecimpunctata ); Orthoptera, including cockroaches, such as Blattella germanica ; ticks, e.g. Boophilus microplus ; lice, including Damalinia bovis and Linognathus vituli ; as well as spider mites such as Tetranychus urticae and Panonychus ulmi.

The compositions of the invention may be employed in many forms and are often most conveniently prepared in aqueous form immediately prior to use. One method of preparing such a composition is referred to as “tank mixing” in which the ingredients in their commercially available form are mixed together by the user in a quantity of water.

In addition to tank mixing immediately prior to use the compositions containing deltamethrin and acetamiprid may be formulated into a more concentrated primary composition which is diluted with water or other diluent before use. Such compositions may comprise a surface active agent in addition to the active ingredients and examples of such compositions are as follows.

It can be a dispersible solution which comprises the active ingredients dissolved in a water-miscible solvent with the addition of a dispersing agent. Alternatively it can comprise the ingredients in the form of a finely ground powder in association with a dispersing agent and intimately mixed with water to give a paste or cream which can if desired be added to an emulsion of oil in water to give a dispersion of active ingredients in an aqueous oil emulsion.

An emulsifiable concentrate comprises the active ingredient dissolved in a water-immiscible solvent which is formed into an emulsion with water in the presence of an emulsifying agent.

A granular solid comprises the active ingredients associated with powder diluents such as kaolin, which mixture is granulated by known methods. Alternatively it comprises the active ingredients adsorbed or absorbed on a pre-granular diluent, for example Fuller's earth, attapulgite or limestone grit.

A dispersible or wettable powder usually comprises the active ingredients in admixture with a suitable surfactant and an inert powder diluent such as china clay.

Another suitable concentrate is a flowable suspension concentrate which is formed by grinding the active ingredients with water, a wetting agent and a suspending agent.

In some circumstances it may be desirable to combine two types of formulation e.g. one of the components is present in an emulsifiable concentrate and the second components is dispersed as a powder in this concentrate.

The concentrate of the active ingredients (when used as the sole active components) in a composition for direct application to the crop by conventional ground methods is preferably within the range of 0.001 to 10 per cent by weight of the composition, especially 0.005 to 5 per cent by weight, but more concentrated compositions containing up to 40 per cent may be desirable in the case of aerial sprays.

The invention thus includes a method for controlling a pest, especially an arthropod pest, e.g. an insect pest or an Acarina pest, which comprises applying to the pest or its locus, deltamethrin and acetamiprid either together or in sequence.

Further there is provided the use of a mixture comprising deltamethrin and acetamiprid for controlling pests.

The disclosures in European patent application No. 00121924.5 from which this application claims priority, and in the abstract accompanying this application are incorporated herein by reference.

The invention is illustrated in the following Example which describe experiments in which a synergistic effect was observed. The desired concentration of the active ingredients was achieved by diluting, with water, the commercially available 25% by volume emulsifiable concentrate of deltamethrin and 20% by weight water soluble powder of acetamiprid, each of which contained conventional surfactants.

›EXAMPLE

Two plants of two week old French beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris ) were infested with adult whitefly ( Trialeurodes vaporariorum ) for oviposition in a closed chamber. After 48 hours, the adults were blown off the plants so that only the eggs stayed at the surface of the leaves. The plants were placed in a greenhouse for 7 days to complete the development of the eggs to the larval stage L 1/2. The plants were then sprayed with the individual compounds and mixtures of the two, by hand with a spray gun, until complete coverage of the plant surfaces with the spray liquid was obtained. The plants were then placed in the greenhouse for a further 10 days. Two replicates of each test was carried. The mortality of the nymphs of Trialeurodes vaporadorum was estimated 10 days after application and the average of the two replicates calculated.

To indicate the existence of synergism between the active components, the results were treated in the manner described by Colby S. R., “Calculating Synergistic and Antagonistic Responses of Herbicide Combinations,” Weeds , 1967, 15, 20-22. In this method, the “expected” percent control, E, of the combination is given by the equation: E = X + Y - XY 100

in which

X=the percentage of control with substance A at a given rate (p),

Y=the percentage of control with substance B at a given rate (q), and

E=expected control by A+B at a rate p+q.

If the observed control of the mixture is greater than E the results indicate synergism.

The results were as follows:

The LC 50 in ppm of the mixtures was calculated and compared with the expected LC 50 from the expected mortalities according to Colby.

The results were as follows:

›Tables in the description — 2
Expected mortality (E)
deltamethrin (D)acetamiprid (A)mortalityaccording to
(ppm)(ppm)in (%)Colby
1—73,75
0,6—47,5
0,33—47,5
0,2—36,25
0,1—25
0,06—15
0,033—8,75
0,02—2,5
0,01—0,75
0,006—0
—356,25
—123,75
—0,37,5
—0,11,25
—0,030
1382,588,5
0,33182,560
0,10,35530,6
0,0330,1359,9
0,010,038,750,75
0,6393,7577,0
0,2163,7551,4
0,060,333,7521,4
0,020,110,53,7
0,0060,032,250
LC 50 (ppm), expected
RatioLC 50according to
of D:A(ppm)Colby
1:30,2610,631
1:50,5231,000
1 of 2 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims as granted

4 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

6 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section A — Human necessities
  • A01N53/08
  • A01N53/14
  • A01N53/00
  • A01N47/40
USPC · US Patent Classification
514/357514/521

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomOct 2001Jan 2002Apr 2002Jul 2002Oct 2002Jan 2003USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalFinal rejectionNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
1.2 y
439 days filing → grant
Office actions
2
non-final + final
Responses
2
no RCE
Examiner
Allen J. Robinson
art unit 1616 · TC 1600
Citations: 3 back · 1 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20022004200620082010201220142016201820202022Owner 1Owner 2
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock