Power efficient line driver with 4X supply voltage swing and active termination

This application claims priority under 35 USC §119 (e) (1) of provisional application No. 60/229,285 filed Aug. 31, 2000.

This invention generally relates to electronic systems, and more particularly it relates to power efficient line drivers.

Analog front-ends for Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) and Local Area Network (LAN) increasingly require to operate at lower supply voltages while larger output line driver voltages are required for operation on longer loops as well as enabling multilevel modulation for higher bit rate transmissions. At the lower supply voltage levels power efficiency is even more critical and hence 6 dB signal loss in terminating/matching resistors is significant. One solution to raise the output signal level would be to use a higher turn ratio transformer. The problem with this apart from the cost is that the receiver input noise specification would need to be reduced by the same ratio. Prior art References [1] B. Nauta and M. Dijkstra, “Analog Video Line Driver with Adaptive Impedance Matching” ISSCC Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 318-319, February 1998 and [2] Rajeevan Mahadevan and David Johns, “A Differential 160 MHz Self-Terminating Adaptive CMOS Line Driver” ISSCC Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 436-437, February 2000 discuss single-ended and differential methods of synthesizing the terminating impedances respectively. FIG. 1 shows the simplified prior art circuit in Reference [1]. Amplifier OP 1 in conjunction with transistors M 1 and M 2 , and resistor R 2 provide an output impedance of R 2 /(1+N) due to the feedback. Amplifier OP 3 forces input TXin and output TXout to be equal and hence sets the driver gain to one. Amplifiers OP 1 ′ and OP 3 ′, transistors M 1 ′ and M 2 ′, and resistor R 2 ′ perform the same for the negative input. This ensures that the impedance matches that of the output line. Amplifier OP 2 stops DC loss in the outputs, as the output common mode is forced to the same voltage. The circuit can be used as an impedance synthesizer by disabling the loop which forces TXin=TXout. This allows gain to be achieved in the driver stage.

The major draw backs of this method is the limited output swing, the extra trimming needed for the correct synthesized impedance, and the extra low frequency tuning loop needed to avoid DC loss in the termination.

Generally, and in one form of the invention, a line driver circuit includes: a differential circuit having first and second input nodes, first and second output nodes, and a supply voltage node; a transformer having a first coil coupled between the first and second output nodes; and a center tap of the first coil coupled to the supply voltage node.

In the drawings:

FIG. 1 is a circuit diagram of a prior art line driver;

FIG. 2 is a circuit diagram of a preferred embodiment power efficient line driver with active termination synthesizer.

A preferred embodiment power efficient line driver with terminating impedance synthesis circuit is shown in FIG. 2 . The device of FIG. 2 includes amplifier 20 ; transistors Q 1 , Q 1 ′, Q 2 , and Q 2 ′; resistors R 1 , R 1 ′, R 3 , R 3 ′, R 4 , R 4 ′, R 5 , and R 5 ′; current sources G 1 and G 1 ′; transformer 22 ; resistance RL; temperature/process adjustment device 24 ; supply voltage VDD; and common node 26 . Transformer 22 is a 1:1 transformer. Resistance RL represents the line impedance of a transmission line such as a coaxial cable or twisted pair. The preferred embodiment line driver of FIG. 2 achieves two times the voltage swing as compared to prior art systems which use the same transformer turns ratio. With a single ended voltage supply of 5 volts, a theoretical differential peak-to-peak swing of 20 volts is possible with this circuit. This is achieved by the transformer center tap 50 biased to the supply voltage VDD which allows the driver output at nodes 52 and 54 to swing on the positive supply in effect doubling its output voltage range. As the output voltage TXOUT+ is pulled low by transistor Q 1 ′ transistor Q 1 is driven in anti-phase and output voltage TXOUT− rises by the same amount due to the transformer effect.

The synthesized impedance is calculated as follows:

Rout= 2*(R 1 + Re )*(R 3 +(R 4 ||R 5 ))/ A (R 4 ||R 5 )

If R 1 is >>Re, then the above equation simplifies to:

Rout= 2* R 1 *(R 3 +(R 4 ||R 5 ))/ A (R 4 ||R 5 )

Where resistor R 1 is an external resistor used for accurate impedance synthesis, Re is the dynamic resistance of transistor Q 1 , and R 1 =R 1 ′, R 3 =R 3 ′, R 4 =R 4 ′, R 5 =R 5 ′, and G 1 =G 1 ′. In low power applications where Re is not negligible the best performance is achieved by matching Re to R 1 .

Several advantages are provided by the preferred embodiment circuit of FIG. 2 . This solution produces a peak-to-peak signal swing equal to 4 times the supply voltage which provides an excellent solution for low voltage systems. The need for series terminating resistors is eliminated with this circuit. This eliminates power dissipation across those resistors thereby increasing the efficiency of the circuit. This solution also eliminates the need for external resistors or capacitors thereby reducing the external component count.

While this invention has been described with reference to an illustrative embodiment, this description is not intended to be construed in a limiting sense. Various modifications and combinations of the illustrative embodiment, as well as other embodiments of the invention, will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reference to the description. It is therefore intended that the appended claims encompass any such modifications or embodiments.