USPatent applicationPatented

Idler wheel axle for rail vehicles

Granted 14 Oct 2003 · 1 office action

Life of the application

9 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20022004200620082010201220142016201820202022ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

An idler wheel axle for single-axle or double-axle chassis of rail vehicles having individually mounted wheels and U-shaped, dropped-framed vehicles with lateral carrying legs, wherein each wheel is rotatably mounted on the inside of the associated carrying leg, and on an axle stub of the carrying leg via a wheel mounting, and wherein each wheel is torsionally connected on an inside thereof to a shaft that extends outward through orifices within the wheel and the carrying leg.

Description

5 parts
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an idler wheel axle, and more specifically to an idle wheel axle assembly for individually mounted wheels.

An idler wheel axle is described in WO 98/24674. This known idler wheel axle is designed in actual fact as a driven axle, a drive being fastened to the outside of the chassis frame on each longitudinal side of the chassis. By virtue of a primary suspension provided between the carrying frame and a chassis frame carrying the drive, the drive is connected to the wheel via a cardanic double coupling. In this case, a first drive-side coupling plane is arranged on the outside of the drive and a second driven-side coupling plane lies directly on the inside of the wheel. The shaft, thereby functioning as a cardan shaft, runs continuously, with a corresponding length, between the two coupling planes of the cardanic double coupling. The advantage of this known idler wheel axle is that the axle and the drive can have a small construction width, in order, for example, to make it possible to have even narrow-gage vehicles, at the same time with a small car body width, without the chassis projecting in a disturbing way. A further advantage is that the mounting of the wheel is arranged within the latter, with the result that a good load-bearing capacity and a long useful life are achieved. This solution has a disadvantage, however, when it is necessary to have a maximum central-aisle width (as is customary, for example, in dropped-frame cars) limited only by the spacing of the wheels and necessary transverse-spring travels and transverse-spring free spaces, since this central-aisle width is restricted by the coupling plane arranged on the inside of the wheel. The fact that access to wheel components, such as, for example, the wheel mounting, for maintenance work is impeded by the coupling plane may likewise be a disadvantage. Moreover, in the case of adaption to further, for example even smaller gages, virtually the entire construction would have to be changed.

DE 44 29 889 A1 describes another chassis, in which the wheels, together with the outside drive, are arranged externally on the frame. Here, too, the wheels are connected to the drive in each case via a cardanic double coupling, but the driven-side coupling plane lies directly on the outside of the wheel and the wheel carrying frame is arranged between the insides of the two wheels of an axle. Adaption to different, in particular smaller gages consequently presents a particular problem.

In the applicant's previous German patent application DE 199 30 424.6, it was proposed, on the basis of WO 98/24674, that the shaft terminate in a coupling plane formed directly on the outside of the carrying leg. This results in particularly high variability in application, especially with regard to adaption to smaller gages, while at the same time preserving the advantage of an optimum design of the wheel mounting by the latter being arranged within the wheel. Maintenance work is also made easier. To adapt the axle to a different, for example smaller gage (for example, 900 mm), it is necessary merely for the length of the wheel-carrying axle stub of the carrying leg and of the shaft to be adapted to the desired wheel position corresponding to the gage. As regards a driven axle, however, all the drive components can be left unchanged, because the shaft then forms an intermediate drive shaft which is connected to an actual drive shaft in the coupling plane. As a result, a version, such as is known from the abovementioned DE 44 29 889 A1, may be used as a drive unit. All the advantages according to WO 98/24674 are nevertheless maintained. Furthermore, in the case of a nondriven axle, the shaft may be utilized as a braking shaft by being connected to a braking device in the coupling plane.

Moreover, in the proposed idler wheel axle according to DE 199 30 424.6, this provision, in addition to the wheel mounting arranged completely with two part bearings within the orifice of the wheel, for the shaft to be mounted in the orifice of the carrying leg via a further rotary bearing which therefore, as a whole, forms a third part bearing. However, in order to avoid tolerance-related errors of alignment between the three part bearings, this version is highly complicated in manufacturing terms.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The object on which the present invention is based is to provide such an idler wheel axle, by means of which, while the remaining advantages described are preserved, optimized stability, particularly in the region of the wheel mounting, is achieved at a low outlay in manufacturing terms.

This is achieved, according to the invention, in that the wheel mounting consists of (only) two part bearings, and the first part bearing is arranged within the orifice of the wheel radially between the latter and the axle stub of the carrying leg, while the second part bearing is arranged, offset axially and radially to the first, within the orifice of the carrying leg radially between the latter and the shaft.

This advantageous configuration affords the appreciable advantage that the part bearings, of which only two are provided, can be brought into alignment in a substantially simpler way. This is a “divided” wheel mounting, the first part bearing being arranged, as before, within the wheel, that is to say in that region of the wheel orifice which is defined by the axial width or thickness of said wheel. According to the invention, the second part bearing has been displaced axially into the region in which the third part bearing was provided in the proposed idler wheel axle. There is therefore virtually a “fusion” of two part bearings. As a result, the wheel, together with the shaft, forms virtually a unit which is mounted in its entirety via the two part bearings arranged so as to be offset axially, while a bearing load-bearing capacity and therefore useful bearing life which are optimum in the existing construction space are achieved.

Further advantageous design features of the invention are contained in the subclaims and the following description.

›DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention will be explained in more detail with reference to preferred exemplary embodiments and examples of use illustrated in the drawing in which:

FIG. 1 shows a highly diagrammatic top view of a double-axle chassis with two here, for example, driven idler wheel axles according to the invention,

FIG. 2 shows the area II from FIG. 1 in an enlarged, more detailed sectional view, two different variants of use being illustrated in the upper and the lower half of the figure,

FIG. 3 shows a design variant of the wheel mounting in a half section similar to that of FIG. 2 .

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS · 1 of 2

FIG. 1 first illustrates by way of example a use of two idler wheel axles 1 according to the invention in a driven double-axle chassis. In this case, on each longitudinal side of the chassis, there is a drive unit 2 which consists of an electric motor 4 and of bevel-wheel gears 6 flanged on both sides. Each axle has a U-shaped wheel carrying frame 8 which is also known as a gantry axle. Wheels 10 are mounted individually on the wheel carrying frame 8 , the wheel-carrying frame 8 externally surrounding the wheels with lateral carrying legs 12 , and each wheel being articulated rotatably on the inside of the associated carrying leg 12 . Each drive unit 2 is suspended on a chassis frame, not illustrated, which is supported on the respective wheel carrying frame 8 via a primary suspension. For this purpose, the wheel carrying frame 8 has, in particular in the region of the carrying legs 12 , bearing surfaces 14 for primary spring elements.

As may be gathered from FIG. 2, then, each wheel 10 is torsionally connected on its inside to a shaft 16 which extends outward through orifices 11 and 13 of the wheel 10 and of the carrying leg 12 . This shaft 16 terminates preferably in a connecting plane 18 formed directly on the outside of the carrying leg 12 . Preferably, the shaft 16 is rigidly connected on its inside to the wheel 10 via a connecting element 30 , so that the shaft 16 rotates coaxially with the wheel 10 .

According to the invention, for the rotary mounting of the wheel 10 or of the unit (wheel/shaft unit) formed from the wheel 10 and the shaft 16 as a result of their rigid connection, a wheel mounting 32 is provided, which consists of (only) two part bearings 34 a and 34 b . The first part bearing 34 a is arranged within the wheel 10 , that is to say in that region of its orifice 11 which is defined by its axial width, that is to say radially between the wheel 10 and an axle stub 36 of the carrying leg 12 , said axle stub engaging into the wheel. The second part bearing 34 b is arranged, offset axially and radially to the first part bearing 34 a , within the orifice 13 of the carrying leg 12 radially between the latter and the shaft 16 . This configuration according to the invention shows optimum bearing stress and therefore a high stability of the bearings. Further particulars of the wheel mounting 32 according to the invention will be explained in more detail further below.

In the example of the use of a driven idler wheel axle 1 , as illustrated in the upper half of FIG. 2, the shaft 16 forms an intermediate drive shaft 20 which is connected in the connecting plane 18 , via a coupling 22 , to an actual drive shaft 24 of the drive unit 2 . The drive shaft 24 is connected on its other opposite side, via a further coupling 26 , to the gear 6 of the drive 2 . In the preferred configuration, the drive shaft 24 is designed as a preferably hollow cardan shaft which is essentially coaxial in the prolongation of the intermediate shaft 20 and the two couplings 22 and 26 located on both sides are designed as a cardanic double coupling. In this case, the drive shaft 24 runs through the gear 6 , so that a drive-side coupling plane 28 lies on the outside, pointing away from the carrying frame 8 , of the gear 6 or of the drive 2 , while the driven-side connecting plane 18 and the coupling 22 lie between the gear 6 and the carrying leg 12 of the carrying frame 8 (cf., in this respect, also FIG. 1 ).

Each coupling 22 , 26 consists, in a way known per se, of star-shaped coupling pieces which engage one into the other, with elastic wedge-like compensating elements being interposed. As a result, they allow a cardanic compensation of suspension movements of an order of magnitude of at least approximately ±15 mm.

In contrast to the version according to FIG. 2, the shaft 16 connected to the wheel 10 may also extend continuously, in one piece, as far as the drive 2 or the coupling 26 (coupling plane 28 ) located on the outside there.

The embodiment and form of use of the idler wheel axle 1 according to the invention, as illustrated in the lower half of FIG. 2, is a non-driven version. In this case, the drive units 2 , together with electric motors 4 and the gears 6 , including the drive shafts 24 , are dispensed with. Instead, each shaft 16 may then advantageously be utilized as a braking shaft 37 by being connected to a braking device in the connecting plane 18 . In this alternative, the braking device is designed preferably as a disk brake, the shaft 16 having connected to it a brake disk 38 , so that the latter rotates jointly with the wheel 10 . The brake disk 38 cooperates with a brake caliper, not illustrated, supported on the carrying leg 12 of the wheel carrying frame 8 . The connecting plane 18 of this version which is non-driven, but instead has braking capacity, does not have to coincide exactly with the position of the connecting plane 18 of the driven version according to FIG. 2 .

The wheel mounting 32 according to the invention will be explained in even more detail below. By virtue of the two part bearings 34 a , 34 b being arranged according to the invention, in the first place, the first part bearing 34 a has an outer ring 40 seated in the orifice 11 of the wheel 10 and therefore rotating together with the wheel 10 and an inner ring 42 seated nonrotatably on the axle stub 36 . Furthermore, the second part bearing 34 b has an inner ring 44 rotating with the shaft 16 and an outer ring 46 seated non-rotatably in the orifice 13 of the carrying leg 12 . The two part bearings 34 a , 34 b are in this case designed preferably as tapered roller bearings for the absorption of radial forces F rad and also of axial forces +F a and −F a acting in the two axially opposite directions. Since, according to the invention, the part bearings 34 a , 34 b are arranged, “reversed”, with respect to their rotating or non-rotating outer/inner rings, the result of this, when tapered roller bearings are used, is that, for supporting both axial forces, the conical surfaces of the two part bearings 34 a , 34 b do not, in purely geometric terms, run at an opposite inclination to one another, as is otherwise customary, but, instead, as seen axially, run at an inclination going in the same direction (mirroring of the effective direction of force). In a view from the inside of the wheel in the direction of the outside (from right to left in FIGS. 2 and 3 ), the conical surfaces of the bearing rings may either narrow according to FIG. 2 or widen according to FIG. 3 . The choice between the two alternatives depends on the forces occurring during the respective application. As a rule, the version according to FIG. 2 is to be preferred.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS · 2 of 2

In conclusion, the advantages of the idler wheel axle described will be summarized as follows:

(1) drive components always the same, regardless of the respective gage

(2) a long service life of the wheel mounting due to an optimum arrangement of the two part bearings, regardless of the respective gage

(3) adaption to different gages, with the drive maintained, possible solely by the adaption of the intermediate drive shaft and wheel suspension

(4) high variability of application, thus also for a non-driven axle with wheels braked via the wheel shaft.

The invention is not restricted to the exemplary embodiments illustrated and described, but also embraces all the versions having the same effect within the meaning of the invention. Moreover, the invention has hitherto also not yet been restricted to the feature combination defined in claim 1, but may also be defined by any other combination of specific features of all the individual features disclosed as a whole. This means that, in principle, virtually any individual feature of claim 1 may be omitted or be replaced by at least one individual feature disclosed elsewhere in the application. To that extent, claim 1 is to be understood merely as a first attempt at the formulation of an invention.

Claims as granted

18 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

6 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section B — Performing operations; transporting
  • B61F15/14
  • B61F3/16
  • B61C9/52
USPC · US Patent Classification
295/44295/42.1105/180

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2001Oct 2001Jan 2002Apr 2002Jul 2002Oct 2002Jan 2003Apr 2003Jul 2003Oct 2003USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.3 y
845 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
2
no RCE
Examiner
S. Joseph Morano
art unit 3617 · TC 3600
Citations: 10 back · 1 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20022004200620082010201220142016201820202022Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock