USPatent applicationPatented

Method of removing phosphorus from sludge

Granted 16 Sep 2003 · no office action yet

Assignee: Glenn Springs Holdings, Inc.

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Mohan S. Saran · Examiner: Wayne A. Langel · AU 1754 · TC 1700

Life of the application

6 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20022004200620082010201220142016201820202022ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A method of recovering elementary phosphorus from an aqueous sludge containing about 1 to about 15 wt % dispersed particles of phosphorus is disclosed. To the sludge is added about 1 to about 20 wt %, based on the weight of the phosphorus present in said sludge, of a phosphate salt that has the general formula: where R is an alkali metal or ammonium and n is 0 to 30. The phosphorus in the sludge is melted and the solids in the sludge are separated from liquid phosphorus and water. Liquid phosphorus is then separated from the water.

Description

4 parts
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a method of recovering phosphorus from phosphorus-containing sludge. In particular, it relates to the treatment of this sludge with a phosphate salt which, on further processing, causes the phosphorus particles to coalesce into a separate phosphorus phase.

Sludge from manufacturing phosphorus can contain small amounts of phosphorus and dirt particles dispersed in an aqueous phase. The phosphorus should be removed from the sludge for both economic and environmental reasons. The phosphorus cannot be recovered from the sludge by filtration because most of the filtered phosphorus stays dispersed in water. Phosphorus can be recovered from this sludge by heating the sludge in the absence of air to evaporate the water, but that is uneconomic. Various substances can be added to the sludge to cause the phosphorus particles to coalesce but, until now, this has not been very effective.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

I have discovered that the addition of certain phosphate salts to a heated aqueous phosphorus-containing sludge followed by filtration causes the dispersed phosphorus particles to coalesce and form a continuous phosphorus layer. The phosphorus can then be easily separated and recovered as a valuable product.

This is a very cost-effective process for recovering phosphorus as a valuable product from sludge and for converting the sludge into an inert non-hazardous waste for disposal.

›DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

This invention is applicable to aqueous sludges containing dispersed phosphorus particles as a discontinuous phase. The amount of phosphorus in the sludge should be at least about 1 wt % (based on sludge weight) because it is usually not economical to treat sludges containing less phosphorus by the method of this invention. Sludges that contain more than about 15 wt % phosphorus and have a continuous phosphorus phase can usually be treated more economically by other methods. Preferably, the sludge contains about 5 to about 10 wt % phosphorus. The phosphorus is present as water-dispersed particles of P 4 that are too small to readily settle out. Particles of “dirt” and other charged impurities may keep the phosphorus particles in suspension and prevent them from agglomerating. The “dirt” is a mixture of a variety of substances, such as coke, sand, phosphate rock, etc.

The aqueous sludge is placed in a tank and a phosphate salt that has the general formula

is added to it, where R is an alkali metal or ammonium and n is 0 to 30. Preferably, n is 0 to 12 and R is sodium or potassium as many of those salts are commercially available; sodium salts are most preferred as they are less expensive. Many of the phosphate salts are commercially available and those that aren't can be made using processes similar to the those used to prepare the commercially available phosphate salts. The preferred phosphate salts are sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP), tetrasodium pyrophosphate (TSPP), and sodium hexametaphosphate (SHMP), which have the respective formulas:

where m is 6 to 30. These phosphate salts are preferred as they have been found to work well and are commercially available.

The amount of phosphate salt added to the sludge should be about 1 to about 20 wt %, based on the weight of the phosphorus in the sludge, as less is not very effective and more is usually unnecessary and without additional benefit; preferably, about 2 to about 10 wt % of the phosphate salt is added.

Before or after the addition of the phosphate salt, the sludge is heated above the melting point of phosphorus, 44.1° C.; preferably, it is heated to about 50 to about 70° C. It is preferable to stir for about 5 to about 60 minutes while heating. The sludge is then filtered, preferably under a pressure of about 10 to about 100 psi, or it can be centrifuged. Water and the liquid phosphorus in the aqueous phase pass through as the filtrate and the dirt forms a filter cake. Filtered or centrifuged phosphorus particles agglomerate or coalesce in the aqueous phase and sink to the bottom of the tank, forming a liquid phosphorus phase. This phosphorus phase can be easily separated from the aqueous phase by gravity draining, pumping it out, decantation of the water, or other techniques. The process can be run continuously or in batches.

The following examples further illustrate this invention:

›EXAMPLE 1

In a series of experiments, P 4 sludge (100 g) was charged into a one-liter flask equipped with a stainless steel stirrer having a variable speed motor. The flask was placed in a large Pyrex water bath which was heated with an immersion heater to 65 to 70° C. Once the contents of the flask had reached 60° C., the temperature was maintained, an additive was added, and the mixture was stirred. After stirring, the contents of the flask were centrifuged or filtered while being kept at a temperature above the melting point of phosphorus. Dirt in the sludge formed a filter cake and the filtrate of phosphorus and water separated into an aqueous phase on top and a phosphorus phase on the bottom. Phosphorus was recovered after decanting the aqueous phase. The collected phosphorus and the filter cake were weighed and analyzed for composition. The recovered phosphorus was more than 99% pure. The following table gives the results:

›Tables in the description — 1
These examples show that only about 30 wt % of the phosphorus was recovered when the sludge was filtered without the use of an additive, or when hydrogen peroxide or chromic acid were used as additives. It was possible to recover about 60 wt % phosphorus, however, when the phosphate salts of this invention were used. Greater coalescence of the phosphorus was observed when SHMP was used as the additive.
SludgeAdditiveStirringPhosphorusFilter Cake
%%WeightRateTimeWeight%Weight%%
ExamplePDirtName(g)(rpm)(min)(g)Rec.(g)PDirt
19.726.6None00603.53653.710.346.6
29.625.9None0200602.62751.79.643.8
3 a9.526.1SHMP0.210054.85151.68.750.5
4 b10.630.4SHMP0.556605.65360.87.748.6
5 a9.726.2SHMP0.510055.55751.96.949.9
6 c9.625.8SHMP0.5200604.64852.88.848.6
79.826.8SHMP1.0005.65750.96.452.1
8 d9.929.1SHMP1.056606.56656.54.749.7
910.227.0SHMP1.010055.95851.37.052.1
109.727.1SHMP1.0100155.65853.96.350.0
119.626.7SHMP1.0100305.65852.66.650.6
129.727.0SHMP1.0100606.36549.75.352.2
138.924.8SHMP1.0200605.25848.57.548.5
149.928.9SHMP1.556606.56656.05.751.2
1515.231.1SHMP1.0566011.78456.36.247.8
1615.231.1SHMP1.5566010.87148.86.361.7
17 e10.827.0STPP1.0100305.95550.77.953.1
18 e10.226.7TSPP1.0100306.16053.75.946.1
199.726.4TSPP/0.5/10055.65852.77.854.0
SHMP0.5
2010.426.6STPP/0.5/10055.25053.17.149.9
SHMP0.5
2115.231.1CrO 31.056605.13462.411.248.9
2215.231.1H 2 O 23.456604.12756.515.147.1
30%
a average of 3 runs
b average of 5 runs
c average of 2 runs
d average of 4 runs
e less coalescence; about half of the filtered phosphorus consisted of separate beads

Claims as granted

20 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

10 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section C — Chemistry; metallurgy
  • C02F1/38
  • C02F1/00
  • C02F11/00
  • C01B25/027
  • C02F1/58
  • C02F1/02
  • C01B25/02
USPC · US Patent Classification
423/322210/710210/906

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomApr 2001Jul 2001Oct 2001Jan 2002Apr 2002Jul 2002Oct 2002Jan 2003Apr 2003Jul 2003Oct 2003USPTOApplicantNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.3 y
852 days filing → grant
Office actions
0
none on record
Examiner
Wayne A. Langel
art unit 1754 · TC 1700
Citations: 9 back · 1 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20022004200620082010201220142016201820202022Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock