Note pad
Granted 30 Sep 2003 · 2 office actions
Assignee: TAIWAN HOPAX CHEMS. MFG. CO., LTD.
Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock
Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock
Inventors: Ho-Tsai Lin, Hsieh-Chang Hsieh, Tsung-Tien Kuo, Bin-Tzer Lin +1 · Examiner: Nasser Ahmad · AU 1772 · TC 1700
Life of the application
10 dated eventsAbstract
A note pad includes a plurality of stacked self-stick transparent note sheets. Each of the note sheets includes a transparent plastic film coated with a transparent coating layer and a pressure-sensitive adhesive layer. The coating layer is prepared from a mixture of a binder and at least one pigment. The weight ratio of the binder to the pigment ranges from 1:1 to 1:10. Each of the note sheets has an opacity of less than 45%.
Description
6 parts›CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application is a continuation-in-part (CIP) of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/324,280, filed by the applicant on Jun., 2, 1999, now abandoned, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a note pad, more particularly to a note pad having a plurality of self-stick transparent note sheets.
2. Description of the Related Art
Note pad is a product including a plurality of stacked self-stick note sheets, and has become popular in recent years since the note sheets can be attached on a surface of a table, a wall, a book or a document as desired for informing purpose. Conventionally, the self-stick note sheet is made of paper, and is opaque, thereby limiting its use.
›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to provide a note pad that includes a plurality of self-stick transparent note sheets which can overcome the aforementioned drawback.
According to the present invention, a note pad comprises a plurality of self-stick transparent note sheets stacked one above the other. Each of the note sheets includes a transparent plastic film coated with a transparent coating layer and a pressure-sensitive adhesive layer. The coating layer is prepared from a mixture of a binder and at least one pigment. The weight ratio of the binder to the pigment ranges from 1:1 to 1:10. Each of the note sheets has an opacity of less than 55%.
›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In drawings which illustrate the preferred embodiment of the invention,
FIG. 1 illustrates a side view of a self-stick note sheet of a preferred embodiment of this invention, and
FIG. 2 illustrates a plurality of the self-stick note sheets of FIG. 1 arranged in a stack.
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT · 1 of 2
FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate a side view of a note pad embodying this invention. The note pad includes a plurality of stacked note sheets 1 , each of which includes a plastic film 11 coated with a pressure-sensitive adhesive layer 111 on the bottom side of the note sheet 1 and a transparent coating layer 112 on the top side of the note sheet 1 . The coating layer 112 provides a writing face.
The plastic film 11 is made from a material selected from the group consisting of polypropylene, polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, polyethylene terephthalate, and mylar. The pressure-sensitive adhesive layer 111 can be an acrylate-type adhesive.
The coating layer 112 of the note sheet 1 comprises a mixture of a binder and at least one pigment. The binder of the coating layer 112 is preferably selected from the group consisting of polyvinyl alcohol, polyacrylate, polyvinyl acrylate, and styrene butadiene rubber. The pigment of the coating layer 112 is preferably selected from the group consisting of titanium dioxide, calcium carbonate, clay, and mixtures thereof. The weight ratio of the binder to the pigment preferably ranges from 1:1 to 1:10 so as to render the coating layer 112 of the note sheet 1 to possess a transparent characteristic with excellent writing quality. It is noted that opacity of the note sheet 1 varies with the weight ratio of the binder to the pigment and the thickness of the coating layer 112 on the plastic film 11 .
With the transparent characteristic, the note sheet 1 can be utilized in a document reproduction process that involves reproducing an assembly of a printed paper sheet and the note sheet 1 attached to the printed paper sheet via a copier or a fax machine to produce a copy sheet with images or characters that are reproduced from corresponding images or characters on a region of the printed paper sheet which is covered by the note sheet 1 during the reproduction process. Moreover, the images or characters on the region of the printed paper sheet, which are covered by the note sheet 1 , can be directly viewed without removing or peeling off the note sheet 1 . The note sheet 1 preferably has an opacity of less than 55%, more preferably less than 40%, and most preferably less than 30%, so that the images or characters which were reproduced on the aforesaid copy sheet can be clearly observed.
The coating layer 112 of the note sheet 1 can further include a dye so as to color the note sheet 1 . The dye may be added in an amount of more than 2% by weight based on the total weight of the pigment.
The note sheet 1 of this invention can further include a release paper (not shown) for covering and protecting the coating layer 112 of the plastic film 11 .
The following Examples illustrate variation of writing quality of the note sheet 1 with the weight ratio of the binder to the pigment for different combinations of binders and pigments.
EXAMPLES 1 to 48
The writing quality of the note sheet is classified into three rankings, which are represented as excellent (e), good (g), and fair (f), and is determined based on the writability, anchorage (a binding power of the pigment to the film ), and ink absorbability.
Polypropylene was used as a plastic film in each of these Examples for preparing the note sheet The coating layers on these Examples were prepared from different combinations of binders and pigments with differing weight ratios of binder to pigment. The binders used in these Examples were polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyvinyl acrylate (PA), and styrene butadiene rubber (SBR). The pigments used in these Examples were titanium dioxide(TiO 2 ), calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ), and clay. The weight ratios of the binder to the pigment arranged in these Examples ranged from 1:10 to 1:1, which are expressed in terms of grams of binder per 100 g of pigment in Tables 1-3.
Examples 1-19 are listed in Table 1, Examples 20-34 in Table 2, and Examples 35-48 in Table 3.
The results of these Examples are shown in Table 4. To summarize from the results shown in Table 4, Examples 1-2 which contain TiO 2 , Examples 12-14, 33-34 and 42-43 which contain clay, and Examples 19, and 45-47 which contain CaCO 3 exhibit good and/or excellent writability, anchorage, and as well as ink absorbability.
The following Examples illustrate variation of the opacity of the note sheet 1 with coating weight of the coating layer 112 for different combinations of pigments and binders.
EXAMPLES 49 to 100
Polypropylene was used as a plastic film in each of these Examples for preparing the note sheet. The coating layers on these Examples were prepared from different combinations of binders and pigments with differing weight ratios of binder to pigment and with differing weight of the coating (in terms of gram per square meter). The binders (in these Examples were polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl acrylate, and styrene butadiene rubber. The pigments used in these Examples were titanium dioxide, calcium carbonate, and clay. The opacities of these Examples were listed in Tables 5 to 7.
Tests were conducted to investigate the effect of the opacity of the note sheet on quality of a copy sheet reproduced by subjecting an assembly of a printed paper sheet and a note sheet that is prepared from each of these Examples and that is attached to the printed paper sheet, via a copier machine and followed by observing the quality of images or characters printed on the copy sheet that were reproduced from corresponding images or characters on a region of the printed paper sheet which was covered by the note sheet during the reproduction process.
The quality of the copy sheet is determined based on clearness of the reproduced images or characters on the copy sheet, and is classified into four rankings, which are represented as excellent (e), good (g), fair (f), and poor (p). The results of these tests are shown in Table 8.
To summarize from the results shown in Table 8, the note sheet employed in the note pad of this invention is preferably have an opacity of less than 55%, more preferably less than 40%, and most preferably less than 30%.
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT · 2 of 2
When the note sheet employed in the above tests is replaced with a Post-it™ note sheet (available from 3M corporation, a U.S. based company), which has a yellow color and which has an opacity of about 90%, the quality of the copy sheet based on the aforesaid ranking is very poor.
With the invention thus explained, it is apparent that various modifications and variations can be made without departing from the spirit of the present invention It is therefore intended that the invention be limited only as recited in the appended claims.
›Tables in the description — 8
| Example # | TiO 2 g | Clay g | CaCO 3 g | PVA g |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 | — | — | 100 |
| 2 | 100 | — | — | 75 |
| 3 | 100 | — | — | 50 |
| 4 | 100 | — | — | 25 |
| 5 | 100 | — | — | 20 |
| 6 | 100 | — | — | 15 |
| 7 | — | 100 | — | 100 |
| 8 | — | 100 | — | 75 |
| 9 | — | 100 | — | 50 |
| 10 | — | 100 | — | |
| 11 | — | 100 | — | |
| 12 | — | 100 | — | 20 |
| 13 | — | 100 | — | 15 |
| 14 | — | 100 | — | 10 |
| 15 | — | 100 | — | 5 |
| 16 | — | — | 100 | 75 |
| 17 | — | — | 100 | 50 |
| 18 | — | — | 100 | 30 |
| 19 | — | — | 100 | 20 |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| Example # | TiO 2 g | Clay g | CaCO 3 g | PA g |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | — | — | 100 | 100 |
| 21 | — | — | 100 | 75 |
| 22 | — | — | 100 | 50 |
| 23 | — | — | 100 | 25 |
| 24 | — | — | 100 | 5 |
| 25 | 100 | — | — | 100 |
| 26 | 100 | — | — | 75 |
| 27 | 100 | — | — | 50 |
| 28 | 100 | — | — | 25 |
| 29 | 100 | — | — | 5 |
| 30 | — | 100 | — | 100 |
| 31 | — | 100 | — | 75 |
| 32 | — | 100 | — | 50 |
| 33 | — | 100 | — | 25 |
| 34 | — | 100 | — | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — |
| Example # | TiO 2 g | Clay g | CaCO 3 g | SBR g |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35 | 100 | — | — | 100 |
| 36 | 100 | — | — | 75 |
| 37 | 100 | — | — | 50 |
| 38 | 100 | — | — | 25 |
| 39 | — | 100 | — | 100 |
| 40 | — | 100 | — | 75 |
| 41 | — | 100 | — | 50 |
| 42 | — | 100 | — | 25 |
| 43 | — | 100 | — | 5 |
| 44 | — | — | 100 | 100 |
| 45 | — | — | 100 | 75 |
| 46 | — | — | 100 | 50 |
| 47 | — | — | 100 | 25 |
| 48 | — | — | 100 | 5 |
| Example # | Writability | Anchorage | ability |
| 1 | e | g | e |
| 2 | e | g | e |
| 3 | e | f | g |
| 4 | g | f | g |
| 5 | g | g | g |
| 6 | f | f | e |
| 7 | f | f | e |
| 8 | f | f | e |
| 9 | e | f | f |
| 10 | f | f | e |
| 11 | g | f | e |
| 12 | g | g | g |
| 13 | g | g | g |
| 14 | g | e | g |
| 15 | g | e | f |
| 16 | e | f | g |
| 17 | e | f | f |
| 18 | e | f | F |
| 19 | e | g | g |
| 20 | f | e | f |
| 21 | f | g | f |
| 22 | e | g | f |
| 23 | g | g | f |
| 24 | g | g | f |
| 25 | f | e | f |
| 26 | f | e | f |
| 27 | f | g | e |
| 28 | g | g | g |
| 29 | peeling | — | — |
| 30 | f | g | f |
| 31 | f | e | f |
| 32 | f | e | f |
| 33 | g | e | g |
| 34 | e | e | g |
| 35 | g | e | f |
| 36 | e | e | f |
| 37 | e | e | f |
| 38 | g | f | f |
| 39 | g | e | f |
| 40 | g | e | f |
| 41 | g | e | f |
| 42 | e | e | g |
| 43 | g | g | g |
| 44 | g | e | f |
| 45 | e | e | g |
| 46 | g | e | g |
| 47 | g | g | g |
| 48 | g | f | g |
| Example | TiO 2 | Clay | CaCO 3 | PVA | weight, | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | g | g | g | g | g/m 2 | Opacity |
| 49 | — | 100 | — | 5 | 2.4 | 25.93 |
| 50 | — | 100 | — | 5 | 5.6 | 43.63 |
| 51 | — | 100 | — | 5 | 8.1 | 52.87 |
| 52 | — | 100 | — | 50 | 1.6 | 15.60 |
| 53 | — | 100 | — | 50 | 3.8 | 19.50 |
| 54 | — | 100 | — | 50 | 9.2 | 26.21 |
| 55 | — | 100 | — | 100 | 2.5 | 12.98 |
| 56 | — | 100 | — | 100 | 6.7 | 21.27 |
| 57 | — | 100 | — | 100 | 9.0 | 23.58 |
| 58 | — | — | 100 | 50 | 1.6 | 30.15 |
| 59 | — | — | 100 | 50 | 4.1 | 34.93 |
| 60 | — | — | 100 | 50 | 8.6 | 43.92 |
| 61 | 100 | — | — | 50 | 1.9 | 35.71 |
| 62 | 100 | — | — | 50 | 4.2 | 44.78 |
| 63 | 100 | — | — | 50 | 7.7 | 55.74 |
| Example | TiO 2 | Clay | CaCO 3 | PVA | weight, | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | g | g | g | g | g/m 2 | Opacity |
| 64 | — | 100 | — | 50 | 6.1 | 12.61 |
| 65 | — | 100 | — | 50 | 22.4 | 12.71 |
| 66 | — | 100 | — | 50 | 29.1 | 12.53 |
| 67 | — | — | 100 | 50 | 3.3 | 27.18 |
| 68 | — | — | 100 | 50 | 4.7 | 28.70 |
| 69 | — | — | 100 | 50 | 9.1 | 47.12 |
| 70 | 100 | — | — | 50 | 1.1 | 29.33 |
| 71 | 100 | — | — | 50 | 3.5 | 40.97 |
| 72 | 100 | — | — | 50 | 8.0 | 61.82 |
| Example | TiO 2 | Clay | CaCO 3 | PVA | weight, | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | g | g | g | g | g/m 2 | Opacity |
| 73 | — | 100 | — | 50 | 3.0 | 20.61 |
| 74 | — | 100 | — | 50 | 5.7 | 23.38 |
| 75 | — | 100 | — | 50 | 11.1 | 31.55 |
| 76 | — | — | 100 | 50 | 3.3 | 28.69 |
| 77 | — | — | 100 | 50 | 4.1 | 40.21 |
| 78 | — | — | 100 | 50 | 8.6 | 50.04 |
| 79 | 100 | — | — | 50 | 1.7 | 46.73 |
| 80 | 100 | — | — | 50 | 3.1 | 49.63 |
| 81 | 100 | — | — | 50 | 9.1 | 65.83 |
| 82 | 100 | — | — | 50 | 10.6 | 71.49 |
| Example # | Clearness | Example # | Clearness | Example # | Clearness |
| 49 | g | 61 | g | 73 | g |
| 50 | f | 62 | f | 74 | g |
| 51 | f | 63 | p | 75 | g |
| 52 | e | 64 | e | 76 | g |
| 53 | e | 65 | e | 77 | f |
| 54 | g | 66 | e | 78 | p |
| 55 | e | 67 | g | 79 | f |
| 56 | g | 63 | g | 80 | f |
| 57 | g | 69 | f | 81 | p |
| 58 | g | 70 | g | 82 | p |
| 59 | g | 71 | f | ||
| 60 | f | 72 | p |
Claims as granted
9 claimsLog in to read the claims of this application.
Log in to unlockClassifications
12 codes- B32B7/06
Claim changes
SoonSee which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.
The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.
File wrapper
See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.
Log in to unlockDocuments
Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.
Log in to unlockChain of title
See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.
Log in to unlock