USPatent applicationPatented

Intermetal dielectric layer for integrated circuits

Granted 17 Sep 2002 · 2 office actions

Application· this page
9721898
filed 24 Nov 2000
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,451,687
granted 17 Sep 2002

Life of the application

8 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom2002200420062008201020122014201620182020ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

An intermetal dielectric structure for integrated circuits and a manufacturing method therefore is provided having a premetal dielectric and a metal line thereon, with a SRO liner on the premetal dielectric layer and the metal lines, a FGS dielectric layer over the SRO liner, a SRO film over the FGS dielectric layer, and a TEOS dielectric layer over the SRO film. Vias through the FGS dielectric layer are treated to have fluorine-free regions around the vias. The structure is not subject to fluorine attack on the metal lines or vias while having a stable FGS dielectric layer with less fluorine out-gassing and out-diffusion.

Description

5 parts
›TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to low dielectric constant materials used for the intermetal dielectric layer and more particularly to the use of fluorine containing low dielectric constant materials for intermetal dielectric layers for technologies of 0.18 μm and below.

›BACKGROUND

The speed and reliability of semiconductor integrated circuits are coming to be more and more governed by the on-chip interconnects. Advanced chips employ multilevel on-chip interconnects usually comprising aluminum alloy lines, alluminum alloy or tungsten plugs for interlevel/intermetal contact/via holes, and fluorosilicate glass (fluorinated silicon dioxide, SiO x F y ) as intermetal and interlevel dielectrics.

The speed performance of advanced chips, such as used for microprocessors and digital signal processors using sub-.18 μm complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technologies and beyond is limited by the interconnect signal propagation delays. The signal propagation delay for advanced interconnects is limited by the parasitic resistive, capacitive, and inductive elements. These include the metal interconnect “RC” delays, capacitive noise or cross-talk, and inductive noise and cross-talk.

As chip dimensions are scaled down, the metal interconnect line widths and pitches are also scaled down accordingly. This means that the intermetal/interlevel dielectric layers (IMD and ILD layers) must be thinner. To reduce capacitive effects with the IMD/ILD materials, low dielectric constant (low-k) dielectric materials have been developed which have k values in the range of 3.2 down to 2.0. However, these low-k dielectrics complicate the backend of line (BEOL) process because of their inferior thermal stability as well as their electrical, mechanical, and thermal conductivity properties compared to conventionally used silicon oxide (SiO x ).

High-density plasma (HDP) deposited fluorinated silica glass (FSG) intermetal dielectric (IMD) films have been of high interest for submicron devices due to its low dielectric constant (k) and good gap-filling capability. However HDP FSG has several problems from a process integration aspect, such as fluorine out-gassing, fluorine attack on conductors, etc. Fluorine out-gassing will cause voids in the vias which can lead to open vias. Fluorine attack on conductors during FSG deposition will clip away the comers of metal lines to leave metal lines having “pear” shaped cross-sections. Fluorine attack on conductors after FSG deposition due to the fluorine out-diffusion under thermal stress will lead to conductor fluoride in the metal line which will cause the critical dimension (CD) of the metal line to be lower than specified.

To prevent problems with HDP FSG, one attempt has been to use a very thick FSG film followed by a chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) of the FSG to more than half its thickness and then capping with a silicon rich oxide (SRO) layer. This approach can reduce fluorine out-diffusion, but cannot totally eliminate it, and fluorine out-gassing into the vias and the “pear” shaped metal line problems still occur. At the same time, this method also creates some other problems like lithography CD control variation due to the impact from the SRO unmasking. The use of thick FSG films also leads to low throughput of the FSG process and high cost of ownership (COO). The FSG CMP integration is also a problem.

A solution to the above problems has been long sought, but has long eluded those skilled in the art.

›DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides an intermetal dielectric structure for integrated circuits and a manufacturing method therefore having a premetal dielectric and a metal line thereon with a halogen-barrier liner on the premetal dielectric layer and the metal lines, a halogen-containing dielectric layer over the halogen-barrier liner, a halogen-barrier film over the halogen-containing dielectric layer, and a non-halogen-containing dielectric layer over the halogen-barrier film. The structure is not subject to halogen attack on the metal lines while having a stable halogen containing dielectric layer with less halogen out-gassing and out-diffusion in a simplified integration flow with reduced process cycle time.

The present invention provides an intermetal dielectric structure for integrated circuits and a manufacturing method therefore having a premetal dielectric and a metal line thereon, with a halogen-barrier liner on the premetal dielectric layer and the metal lines, a halogen-containing dielectric layer over the halogen-barrier liner, a halogen-barrier film over the halogen-containing dielectric layer, and a non-halogen-containing dielectric layer over the halogen-barrier film. Vias through the halogen-containing dielectric layer are treated to have non-halogen-containing regions around the vias. The structure is not subject to halogen attack on the metal lines or vias while having a stable halogen containing dielectric layer with less halogen out-gassing and out-diffusion in a simplified integration flow with reduced process cycle time.

The above and additional advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from a reading of the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a view of an intermetal dielectric structure of a premetal dielectric with a metal line thereon;

FIG. 2 is the structure of FIG. 1 having a silicon-rich oxide liner over the premetal dielectric and the metal line;

FIG. 3 is the structure of FIG. 2 having a fluorosilicate glass layer;

FIG. 4 is the structure of FIG. 3 with an in situ silicon-rich oxide film over the fluorosilicate glass layer;

FIG. 5 is the structure of FIG. 4 with a tetraethoxysilane layer;

FIG. 6 is the structure of FIG. 5 after planarization of the tetraethoxysilane layer to form the intermetal dielectric structure in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 7 is the structure of FIG. 6 with a photoresist on the planar surface and a via opening;

FIG. 8 is the structure of FIG. 7 after etching the via opening and stripping the photoresist;

FIG. 9 is the structure of FIG. 8 after post-plasma treatment with an ammonianitrogen gas mixture; and

FIG. 10 is the structure of FIG. 9 after deposition of the via in accordance with the present invention.

›BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION

Referring now to FIG. 1, therein is shown the initial structure of an intermetal dielectric (IMD) structure 10 of a semiconductor substrate or premetal dielectric (PMD) layer 12 having a metal line 14 , generally of aluminum or an aluminum alloy, formed thereon. The IMD 10 is a portion of an integrated circuit interconnect for connecting various components of an integrated circuit. The PMD layer 12 separates the components which are on and in a semiconductor substrate from subsequent layers which contain the metal lines. The components are connected by contacts (not shown) to the bottom of the metal lines at different locations.

Referring now to FIG. 2, therein is shown a silicon-rich oxide (SRO) liner 16 deposited over the PMD 12 and the metal line 14 . The SRO liner 16 is deposited by high-density plasma (HDP) deposition, in situ with zero bias, in a silane (SiH 4 )-oxygen (O 2 ) ambient in which the ratio of silane to oxygen is 0.8 to 1.2:1. The refractive index (RI) is maintained between 1.48 and 1.54 (normal oxide layers have Ris between 1.45 to 1.46). In the best mode, the SRO liner 16 is deposited to a thickness between 200 to 600Å.

It should be noted that the SRO layer 16 prevents fluorine attack on the conductor material during the FSG deposition which previously caused the corners of the metal lines to be clipped away so as to form a pear-shaped cross-section metal lines rather than the rectangular cross-section metal lines in the present invention.

Referring now to FIG. 3, therein is shown the structure of FIG. 2 having a flurosilicate glass (FSG) layer 18 . The FSG layer 18 is deposited by HDP deposition with the temperature controlled in the range from 410° C.-430° C. It has been determined that this temperature range stabalizes the FSG layer 18 and helps to reduce fluorine out-gassing and out-diffusion. In the best mode, the thickness of the FSG layer 18 plus the SRO liner 16 will equal the height of the metal line 14 plus the depth of the oxide over-etch so as to reduce the intra-metal capacitance and control the cost of ownership (COO) of FSG deposition at a low level.

Referring now to FIG. 4, therein is shown the structure of FIG. 3 with an in situ SRO film 20 deposited over the FSG layer 18 . The in situ SRO film 20 is deposited by HDP deposition using the same bias power as for the FSG layer 18 . The HDP deposition is carried out in a silane-oxygen ambient with a silane to oxygen ratio of 0.70 to 1.0:1. The RI is controlled from 1.48-1.54 and the stress is close to that of the FSG layer 18 . In the best mode, the in situ SRO film 20 is deposited to a thickness between 0.5-2 kÅ. The in situ SRO film 20 is deposited immediately after the deposition of the FSG layer 18 so as to eliminate exposure to the ambient to reduce moisture absorption and block fluorine out-diffusion. Using in situ SRO instead of ex-situ plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) SRO also simplifies the integration flow and helps to reduce the process cycle time.

Referring now to FIG. 5, therein is shown the structure of FIG. 4 after deposition of a tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) layer 22 .

Referring now to FIG. 6, therein is shown the structure of FIG. 5 after chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) which forms a planar surface 24 on the TEOS layer 22 . This structure of FIG. 6 manufactured in accordance with the present invention has advantages independent of the structure which includes the via as will hereinafter be described.

Referring now to FIG. 7, therein is shown the structure of FIG. 6 having a photoresist 26 deposited on the planar surface 24 , patterned, developed, and etched to form a via opening 28 in the photoresist 26 .

Referring now to FIG. 8, therein is shown the structure of FIG. 7 after etching of the via opening 30 in the TEOS layer 22 , the SRO film 20 , the FSG layer 18 , and the SRO liner 16 , and after removal of the photoresist 26 .

Referring now to FIG. 9, therein is shown the structure of FIG. 8 after post-plasma treatment with an ammonia (NH 3 )-nitrogen (N 2 ) gas mixture. This post-plasma treatment results in a fluorine-depleted region 32 in the FSG layer 18 around the via opening 30 . The fluorine-depleted region 32 is preferably under 160 A in thickness.

Referring now to FIG. 10, therein is shown the structure of FIG. 9 after deposition of the via 34 . The fluorine-depleted region 32 protects subsequently deposited metal of the via 34 against fluorine attack. The via 34 is of a metal such as aluminum or aluminum alloyed with copper.

While the invention has been described in conjunction with a specific best mode, it is to be understood that many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the aforegoing description. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations which fall within the spirit and scope of the included claims. All matters set forth herein or shown in the accompanying drawings are to be interpreted in an illustrative and non-limiting sense.

Claims as granted

10 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

5 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H10P14/692
USPC · US Patent Classification
438/624438/637438/631438/787

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomOct 2000Jan 2001Apr 2001Jul 2001Oct 2001Jan 2002Apr 2002Jul 2002Oct 2002USPTOApplicantRestriction requirementResponse after non-finalNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
1.8 y
662 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
after a restriction
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
T. N. Quach
art unit 2814 · TC 2800
Citations: 9 back · 10 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2002200420062008201020122014201620182020Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock