USPatent applicationPatented

Phytosanitary treatment by foliar absorption using a modified oil

Granted 20 May 2003 · 3 office actions

Current assignee: SEPPIC · originally Air Liquide

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Thomas Muller, Nathalie Okori, Alain Milius, Christian Gauvrit · Examiner: Alton Pryor · AU 1616 · TC 1600

Application· this page
9720982
filed 5 Apr 2001
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,566,305
granted 20 May 2003

Life of the application

12 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

The subject of the invention is a method of plant-protection treatment by leaf absorption, characterized in that it uses a composition comprising at least one plant-protection active ingredient and at least one modified oil, a composition comprising at least one plant-protection active ingredient, at least one modified vegetable oil and at least one unmodified vegetable oil as well as an alkoxylated vegetable oil containing x% of glycerol.

Description

7 parts
›This Application is a 371 of PCT/FR99/01583 filed…

This Application is a 371 of PCT/FR99/01583 filed Jul. 1, 1999.

The subject of the invention is a method for plant-protection treatment by leaf absorption, using a combination between an active ingredient and a modified oil and a novel combination for using said method.

The use of oils is very widespread in the plant-protection domain; they are used either as formulation adjuvants, to increase the efficacy of the active substances, or as coformulants. Most of the oils used are of petroleum origin and are formulated with surfactants containing aromatic nuclei such as ethoxylated alkylphenols. However, surfactants containing an aromatic nucleus are not rapidly biodegradable and damage the ecosystems. For this reason, the use of rapeseed oil or of methyl esters of rapeseed oil is now growing; however, this oil is difficult to formulate, it is a less satisfactory solvent for the active ingredient than oils of petroleum origin and, since it does not possess intrinsic surfactant properties, it has to be used in combination with surfactants containing an aromatic nucleus. In the international patent application, published under the number WO 96/22109, ethoxylated fatty acid esters are described as self-emulsifiable compounds which can be used in formulations of plant-protection active ingredients such as ethephon or chlorpropham; however, nothing is written or suggested on the activity of the compositions resulting from this combination. However, the penetration of the plant-protection active ingredient into the plant occurs either at the level of the leaves, through leaf absorption, or at the level of the roots, through radicular absorption; it is known furthermore that leaf absorption of an active ingredient is often difficult; it is observed that after seventy-two hours, up to 95% of the active ingredient is still not absorbed by the plant. A period of rain following the treatment of a crop therefore risks inducing pollution of the site, while a period of sunshine can cause the degradation of the active ingredient. The work by C. Gauvrit and F. Cabanne [Pesticide Science, 37, 147-153 (1993)] has recently made it possible to demonstrate that the increase in the efficacy of herbicides in the presence of oils is attributed to a spreading of the droplets deposited at the surface of the leaves, and to a better leaf penetration of the herbicidal active ingredient. However, these effects, for the oils used up until now, only manifest themselves markedly on plants containing crystalline cuticular waxes, such as for example the Gramineae, whereas on the amorphous cuticular waxes of dicotyledons, the effects of these oils are more modest [C. Urvoy, M. Pollacsek and C. Gauvrit, Weed Research, 32, 375-383 (1992); I. Serre, F. Cabanne and C. Gauvrit, Medelingen van de Facultelt Landbouwwentenschappen Rijksuniversiteit Gent 58/3a, 795-802 (1993)]. Starting from the hypothesis that oils can increase the leaf penetration of the products by acting on the availability of the active substances at the surface of the leaf and on the mobility of the substances in the diffusion barrier which the plant cuticle constitutes [I. Serre, University of, Grenoble thesis (1996); I. Serre, F. Cabanne and C. Gauvrit, British Crop Protection Conference 7B-3, 807-812 (1996)], the applicant has thus sought to develop a method of plant-protection treatment by leaf absorption which allows, in a short time, a high level of absorption of the active ingredient by the plant while limiting the nuisances to the ecosystems, by the use of a composition which is sufficiently effective as solvent for the active ingredient and sufficiently stable over time to be marketable.

The subject of the invention is a method of plant-protection treatment by leaf absorption, characterized in that it uses a composition comprising at least one plant-protection active ingredient and at least one modified oil.

The expression modified oil denotes either alkoxylated or else and in particular ethoxylated and/or propoxylated oils, or alkoxylated alkyl esters of the oils and in particular ethoxylated and/or propoxylated methyl, ethyl, linear or branched propyl, or linear or branched butyl esters of said oils. According to a specific aspect of the present invention, the ethoxylated oils or the ethoxylated alkyl esters of vegetable oils each have an ethylene oxide number, called in the text which follows EO value, of between 1 and 50.

The modified oils used in the context of the present invention may be of mineral, plant or animal origin. Among the modified oils of mineral origin which may be used in the method as defined above, there are in particular the modified oils of petroleum origin; among the modified oils of animal origin which may be used in the method as defined above, there is in particular modified tallow oil; among the modified oils of plant origin which may be used in the method as defined above, there are, for example, modified sunflower, linseed, castor, soybean, corn, groundnut, copra, olive, palm, hydrogenated palm or rapeseed oils.

The expression at least one modified oil indicates that the composition used in the method which is the subject of the present invention may comprise either a single modified oil or a mixture of several modified oils; in the latter case, this may include a mixture of modified oils of the same origin or a mixture of modified oils of different origins.

The expression plant-protection treatment is understood to mean in the context of the present invention preferably a fungicidal, insecticidal or herbicidal treatment.

According to a specific variant of the method as defined above, the plant-protection composition used contains at least one modified vegetable oil, alone or in the form of a mixture with one or more modified oils of the same origin or of different origins.

According to another specific variant of the method as defined above, the plant-protection composition used contains, in addition, an unmodified vegetable oil or a mixture of unmodified vegetable oils. The expression unmodified vegetable oil is understood to mean vegetable oils or their alkyl esters, such as for example the methyl, ethyl, linear or branched propyl, or linear or branched butyl esters.

›According to another aspect of the present invention…

According to another aspect of the present invention, its subject is a composition comprising at least one plant-protection active ingredient, at least one modified vegetable oil and at least one unmodified oil.

The unmodified oil contained in the above composition is an oil of plant, animal or mineral origin. The expression unmodified oil is understood to mean oils or their alkyl esters, such as for example the methyl, ethyl, linear or branched propyl, or linear or branched butyl esters.

The subject of the invention is more particularly a composition as defined above in which the oil or the mixture of unmodified oils is of plant origin and is preferably chosen from sunflower, linseed, castor, soybean, corn, groundnut, copra, olive, palm, hydrogenated palm or rapeseed oils.

The expression modified vegetable oil denotes either alkoxylated vegetable oils and in particular ethoxylated and/or propoxylated vegetable oils, or alkoxylated alkyl esters of the oils and in particular ethoxylated and/or propoxylated methyl, ethyl, linear or branched propyl, or linear or branched butyl esters. According to a specific aspect of the present invention, the ethoxylated oils or the ethoxylated alkyl esters of vegetable oils each have an ethylene oxide number, called in the text which follows EO value, of between 1 and 50.

The subject of the invention is more particularly a composition as defined above which comprises at least one ethoxylated methyl ester of a vegetable oil having an EO value of between 1 and 4, more particularly of equal to 1 or 2 and at least one unmodified oil. According to a most specific aspect of the present invention, the composition comprises an ethoxylated methyl ester of a vegetable oil and the same vegetable oil which is unmodified. The ester of ethoxylated vegetable oil/unmodified vegetable oil weight ratio is in general between 1/50 and 50/1 and more particularly between 1/9 and 9/1.

The subject of the invention is also more particularly a composition comprising at least one plant-protection active ingredient, at least one ethoxylated vegetable oil having an EO value of between 10 and 40 and more particularly greater than or equal to 15 and less than or equal to 30, and at least one unmodified oil. According to a most specific aspect of the present invention, the composition as defined above comprises an ethoxylated vegetable oil, and the same vegetable oil which is unmodified. The ethoxylated vegetable oil/unmodified oil weight ratio is generally between 1/50 and 50/1 and more particularly between 1/9 and 9/1.

To improve its stability in the cold, the alkoxylated oil may be prepared by incorporating, before its alkoxylation, from 1 to 10% by weight of glycerol. This problem may also be solved by combining, in the same composition, an alkoxylated vegetable oil as defined above and an alkoxylated alkyl ester of vegetable oil, as defined above, and more particularly an ethoxylated and/or propoxylated methyl, ethyl, linear or branched propyl, or linear or branched butyl ester of a vegetable oil and, more particularly, by combining an ethoxylated vegetable oil having an EO value of between 10 and 40 and preferably greater than or equal to 15 and less than or equal to 30, with an ethoxylated methyl ester of a vegetable oil having an EO value of between 1 and 4, preferably equal to 1 or 2.

According to a final aspect of the present invention, its subject is a modified vegetable oil capable of being obtained by mixing, in the presence of a basic catalyst, from 1 to 10 parts of glycerol per 100 parts of an unmodified vegetable oil chosen from sunflower oil, linseed oil, castor oil, soybean oil, corn oil, groundnut oil, copra oil, olive oil, palm oil or hydrogenated palm oil, and then alkoxylating the resulting mixture; and more particularly a modified vegetable oil as defined above for which the average degree of ethoxylation is approximately greater than or equal to 10, preferably greater than or equal to 15, and less than or equal to 40, and preferably less than or equal to 30. The following examples illustrate the invention without, however, limiting it.

EXAMPLE 1
›PREPARATION OF MODIFIED OILS

A) Preparation of Ethoxylated Methyl Esters of Rapeseed Oil

Starting with the methyl ester of rapeseed oil, by reacting for 45 minutes approximately at 180° C., with the quantity of ethylene oxide necessary for obtaining the desired molar ratio, at a pressure of 4.5 bar, in the presence of a basic catalyst, and then cooling and neutralizing the catalyst, the following ethoxylated methyl esters of rapeseed oils were prepared:

B) Preparation of Ethoxylated Rapeseed Oils Containing 2% Glycerol

Using the ethoxylation method described in the preceding paragraph, in the presence of 2% by weight of glycerol, on rapeseed oil, the following ethoxylated rapeseed oils containing 2% of glycerol are obtained:

C) Preparation of Ethoxylated Rapeseed Oils Containing x% of Glycerol

Using the ethoxylation method described in the preceding paragraph, on rapeseed oil in the presence of variable quantities of glycerol, the following ethoxylated rapeseed oils containing x% of glycerol are obtained:

D) Preparation of Ethoxylated Linseed Oils Containing 2% of Glycerol

Using the ethoxylation method described in paragraph A in the presence of 2% by weight of glycerol, on linseed oil, the following ethoxylated linseed oils containing 2% of glycerol are obtained:

E) Preparation of Ethoxylated Methyl Esters of Sunflower Oil

Using the ethoxylation method described in the preceding paragraph, on the methyl ester of sunflower oil, the following ethoxylated methyl esters of sunflower oil are obtained:

F) Preparation of Ethoxylated Sunflower Oils Containing 4% of Glycerol

Using the ethoxylation method described in paragraph A in the presence of 4% by weight of glycerol, on sunflower oil, the following ethoxylated sunflower oils containing 4% of glycerol are obtained:

G) Preparation of Ethoxylated Corn Oils Containing 2% of Glycerol

Using the ethoxylation method described in paragraph A in the presence of 2% by weight of glycerol, on corn oil, the following ethoxylated corn oils containing 2% of glycerol are obtained:

EXAMPLE 2
›PHYSICOCHEMICAL EVALUATION OF THE MODIFIED OILS

The solubilities in water and in an aqueous solution containing 10% by weight of sodium lauryl ether sulfate, the emulsifying power, the self-emulsifying power and the wetting power were evaluated according to conventional methods, for each of the modified oils prepared. The result is that compounds 2, 3, 8 to 13, 19 to 21, 24 to 27, 33 to 35 and 38 to 40 are more appropriate than the others for carrying out the method which is the subject of the present invention.

›EXAMPLE 3

STUDY OF THE CAPACITY OF THE MODIFIED VEGETABLE OILS TO STIMULATE LEAF PENETRATION OF A PLANT-PROTECTION ACTIVE INGREDIENT

A) Phenmedipham Compositions

The penetration into barley ( Hordeum vulgare ) leaves, of phenmedipham, which [lacuna] a herbicide having a high melting point (greater than 100° C.) called 3-[(methoxycarbonyl)amino]phenyl(3-methylphenyl)-carbamate, alone or in combination with modified oils, was compared according to the following procedure: The carbon-14 labeled phenmedipham is dissolved (42 bq μl −1 ), in the presence or in the absence of modified vegetable oils (about 10 nM), in acetone, a solvent which does not affect the cuticular waxes and which, by evaporating rapidly, does not interfere with the penetration process. Ten drops are applied to the adaxial surface of the first leaf. After 0, 4, 6, 24 or 72 hours, the product which has not penetrated is washed with 0.5 ml of acetone and the radioactivity measured by liquid scintillation. The radioactivity present in the treated leaf in the rest of the plant is determined in the carbon dioxide obtained after burning the tissue. The results, expressed as a percentage of the active ingredient which has penetrated into the leaf, are presented in the following table:

B) 2,4-D Compositions

The penetration into barley ( Hordeum vulgare ) leaves, of 2,4-D or (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid, which is a herbicide with a highly dissociated carboxylic acid function, alone or in combination with modified oils, was compared according to the procedure described in the preceding paragraph.

The following results are obtained:

These results demonstrate the benefit of combining one or more modified oils with an active ingredient which is anionic and/or has a high melting point (>100° C.), for a plant-protection treatment by leaf absorption.

›Tables in the description — 9
COMPOUNDETHOXYLATION VALUE
10
21
32
43
54
66
78
COMPOUNDETHOXYLATION VALUE
815
920
1025
COMPOUNDETHOXYLATION VALUE% GLYCEROL
11201
12202
13205
142010
1502
1632
1762
18102
19202
20302
21402
COMPOUNDETHOXYLATION VALUE% GLYCEROL
2202
23102
24202
25302
26402
COMPOUNDETHOXYLATION VALUE
272
COMPOUNDETHOXYLATION VALUE% GLYCEROL
2804
2914
3034
3164
32104
33204
34304
35404
COMPOUNDETHOXYLATION VALUE% GLYCEROL
3602
37102
38202
39302
40402
LEAF PENETRATION AT:
COMPOSITION06 HOURS24 HOURS72 HOURS
PHENMEDIPHAM ALONE<10%
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜45%˜80%˜80%
COMPOUND 36
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜40%˜60%˜70%
COMPOUND 37
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜25%˜50%˜55%
COMPOUND 38
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜20%˜40%˜55%
COMPOUND 39
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜10%˜30%˜40%
COMPOUND 40
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜75%>80%>80%
COMPOUND 22
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜40%˜70%˜75%
COMPOUND 23
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜20%˜50%˜55%
COMPOUND 24
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜20%˜50%˜50%
COMPOUND 25
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜10%˜40%˜35%
COMPOUND 26
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜65%˜80%>90%
COMPOUND 15
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜60%˜75%˜80%
COMPOUND 16
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜55%˜70%˜80%
COMPOUND 17
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜50%˜70%˜80%
COMPOUND 18
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜25%˜55%˜70%
COMPOUND 19
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜25%˜55%˜75%
COMPOUND 20
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜15%˜45%˜65%
COMPOUND 21
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜80%˜75%˜75%
COMPOUND 28
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜80%˜85%˜90%
COMPOUND 29
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜80%˜85%˜90%
COMPOUND 30
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜60%˜65%˜60%
COMPOUND 31
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜60%˜75%˜90%
COMPOUND 32
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜35%˜55%˜60%
COMPOUND 33
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜35%˜60%˜65%
COMPOUND 34
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜30%˜50%˜60%
COMPOUND 35
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜50%˜75%˜80%
COMPOUND 11
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜50%˜75%˜75%
COMPOUND 12
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜50%˜75%˜70%
COMPOUND 13
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜50%˜75%˜75%
COMPOUND 14
PHENMEDIPHAM +>80%˜85%˜90%
COMPOUND 27
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜95%˜90%˜90%
COMPOUND 1
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜90%˜90%˜90%
COMPOUND 2
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜85%˜90%˜90%
COMPOUND 3
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜80%˜85%˜90%
COMPOUND 4
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜80%˜85%˜90%
COMPOUND 5
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜75%˜75%˜75%
COMPOUND 6
PHENMEDIPHAM +˜65%˜75%˜80%
COMPOUND 7
LEAF PENETRATION AT:
COMPOSITION06 HOURS24 HOURS72 HOURS
2,4-D ALONE—10%15%
2,4-D + COMPOUND 15—>70%>80%
2,4-D + COMPOUND 16—>70%>80%
2,4-D + COMPOUND 17—>70%>80%
2,4-D + COMPOUND 18>70%>80%
2,4-D + COMPOUND 19>70%>80%
2,4-D + COMPOUND 20>70%>80%
2,4-D + COMPOUND 21>70%>80%
2 of 7 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims as granted

6 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

3 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section A — Human necessities
  • A01N37/12
  • A01N25/02
USPC · US Patent Classification
504/116.1

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 1999Jan 2000Jul 2000Jan 2001Jul 2001Jan 2002Jul 2002Jan 2003Jul 2003USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionFinal rejectionNotice of appeal filedNon-final rejection
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.9 y
1,419 days filing → grant
Office actions
3
non-final + final
Responses
2
1 RCE
Interviews
1
examiner interview summaries
Examiner
Alton Pryor
art unit 1616 · TC 1600
Citations: 10 back · 9 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2002200420062008201020122014201620182020Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock