USPatent applicationPatented

Transdermal absorption of active substances from subcooled melts

Granted 5 Feb 2002 · 1 office action

Current assignee: Purdue Pharma · originally LTS Lohmann Therapie-Systeme AG

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Thomas Hille · Examiner: Thurman K. Page · AU 1615 · TC 1600

Application· this page
9716442
filed 21 Nov 2000
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,344,211
granted 5 Feb 2002

Life of the application

7 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom2002200420062008201020122014201620182020ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A pharmaceutical product for the release of medicinal agents to the skin having absorption-increasing auxiliary agents is characterized in that the auxiliary material forms subcooled melts.

Description

2 parts
›This application is a continuation of Ser. No…

This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 09/436,717 filed Nov. 9, 1999, now abandoned, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 08/860,961 filed Nov. 7, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,264,980, which is a 371 of PCT/EP95/05006 filed Dec. 18, 1995.

The present invention relates to the transdermal application of medicinal agents with the aid of inactive ingredients forming sub-cooled melts. Applying pharmaceuticals transdermally undoubtedly is very advantageous, but the limited quantity of medicinal substance that can be absorbed by the skin frequently is a disadvantage. With introducing the therapy by means of transdermal application there have therefore been attempts to increase the pharmaceuticals' capability of penetrating through the skin. The development of penetration enhancers added to drugs for dermal application is regarded as one approach. These substances change subjacent skin structures, at least for a short period; in unfavorable cases they may result in undesired side effects. These side effects are the less marked, the better the penetration enhancers are tolerated physiologically.

A neat approach of increasing the absorption of medicinal agents through the skin is the manufacture of matrix systems. Owing to the concentration gradient the dissolved portion of the active substance diffuses out of the system into the skin first. At the same time, the portion of active substance which is contained in the system in suspended form starts to dissolve. The dissolution rate of the active substance in the system is the factor determining the rate of active substance release. Experiments have shown that dodecanol promotes penetration and is physiologically acceptable. Since its melting point amounts to about 24° C. dodecanol is solid at normal room temperature. The solid state makes it more difficult to deliver dodecanol out of a matrix. This deficiency restricts the use of dodecanol in polymeric matrices because the release rate of a substance from polymer matrices is the higher, easier it can diffuse, in as the matrix. This does not only apply to dodecanol, but also to other penetration enhancers which are solid at room temperature.

Accordingly it is the object of the present invention to improve the release of auxiliary agents which are solid at room temperature from a matrix.

Most surprisingly, this object has been achieved according to the present invention by a pharmaceutical product as defined herein. Compounds forming subcooled melts are understood to mean those whose melting point is above room temperature but which, after a melting process, remain in the liquid state during cooling to room temperature.

The term drug is known to the skilled artisan. Ointments representing gels of plastic deformability as well as pastes which may be characterized as ointments having a high solids content are suitable for the application to the skin or mucous membranes (e.g. nose, eye).

A transdermal therapeutic system (TTS) is to be understood according to Zaffaroni as “a medicinal substance-containing device or administration form continuously releasing one or several medicinal agents at a predetermined rate over a predetermined period of time to a fixed place of application” (quoted according to Heilmann, therapeutische Systeme—Konzept und Realisation programmierter Arzneiverabreichung, 4th edition, Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart 1984, page 26). In the present case the place of application is the skin.

The structure of transdermal systems is known to the skilled artisan. Patents describing the basic design include, for example, DE 3315272, DE 3843239, U.S. Pat. No. 3,598,122.

When a transdermal therapeutic system is applied on the skin of a patient, the medicinal agent is to be released to take a topical or systemic effect in the patient. Administration forms of this kind have already been used in therapy. In most cases they have a layered structure; in the simplest case they consist of a backing layer, a self-adhesive active substance reservoir, and a removable protective layer to be removed prior to application. In the present case, an auxiliary agent must be introduced that increases the absorption of medicinal agents by the skin, is solid at room temperature, and forms subcooled melts, for example, dodecanol or levulic acid.

Substances are used as medicinal agents which—when applied on the skin either without or with an absorption filter—produce a local or systemic effect.

Substances having a local action include, for example, antiperspirants, fungicides, bactericides, and bacteriostatics.

Substances having a systemic action include, for example, antibiotics, hormones, antipyretics, antidiabetic agents, coronary vasodilators, cardio-active glycosides, analgesics, spasmolytics, antihypertensives, psychotropic drugs, migraine analgesics, corticoids, contraceptives, antirheumatics, anticholinergics, sympathicolytics, sympathicomimetics, vasodilators, anticoagulants, and antiarrhythmics. This listing is incomplete.

The delivery of pilocarpine base and ephedrine base from polymer matrices can also be increased, provided that they are present in subcooled melts. Owing to their heat-sensitivity, however, it is impossible to subject these medicinal substances to a melting process.

The present invention will be illustrated by the following Examples:

›EXAMPLE 1

1,139 g of a 47.83%-wt. polyacrylate solution of a self-crosslinked acrylate copolymer of 2-ethylhexyl acrylate, vinyl acetate, acrylic acid, (solvent: ethyl acetate:heptane:isopropanol:toluene:acetylacetonate in the ratio of 37:26:26:4:1), 100 g of levulic acid, 150 g of oleyl oleate, 100 g of polyvinylpyrrolidone, 150 g of ethanol, 200 g of ethyl acetate, and 100 g of buprenorphine base are homogenized. The mixture is stirred for about 2 hours; and dissolution of all solids is controlled visually. The evaporation logs is controlled by reweighing, the possible solvent loss is replenished by ethyl acetate.

Subsequently, the mixture is applied on a transparent polyester film of 420 mm in width in such a manner that the mass per unit area of the dry adhesive layer amounts to about 80 g per m 2 . The polyester film rendered removable by means of siliconization serves as protective layer.

The solvents are removed by drying with heated air which is guided over the moist web. The heat treatment results in evaporation of the solvents, but also in melting of the levulic acid. Afterwards the adhesive film is covered with a polyester film of 15μ. An area of 16 cm 2 is punched by means of suitable cutting tools, and the edges left between the individual systems are removed. Examples 2 to 5 were conducted in accordance with Example 1.

Column 1 indicates the number of the experiment, column 2 the concentration of buprenorphine base, column 3 the quality and quantity of the acid used, column 4 the dissociation constant of the acids used, column 5 the plasticizer, column 6 the polymers used, and column 7 the absorption rate under in-vitro-conditions. The relative amount of buprenorphine base diffusing through mice skin within 24 h, relative to the amount per TTS, is given. The penetration results were obtained using mice skin clamped in a Franz-Cell. The composition of Examples 2-5 are shown in Table 1.

The results of the in-vitro-penetration tests and the qualitative and quantitative compositions of buprenorphine-TTS according to Examples 1-5 are represented in Table 1:

It is seen from column 4 that the dissociation constants of the carboxylic acids used are quite similar. However, if the plasticizer, oleyl oleate, is used in a 10%-concentration each time, it can be seen from Examples 1 and 3 or 2 and 4 that only the carboxylic acids having a tendency to form subcooled melts cause a marked penetration increase under in-vitro conditions. As can be seen from the dissociation constants, undecenoic acid and octanoic acid are weaker acids than glutaric acid monomethyl ester or levulic acid. This was compensated by a higher concentration of the two weaker acids, amounting to 15%, as compared to the concentration of the two stronger acids. However, it can also be seen that the dissociation constants are so similar that the absorption-promoting effect cannot be explained by the dissociation constants. Example 5 demonstrates that it is possible to increase the absorption even with an acid which obviously has an only slight effect on the penetration promotion of buprenorphine base, if a neutral substance, that is dodecanol, is used which forms sub-cooled melts like levulic acid or glutaric acid monomethyl ester do. The physical effect of the specified adjuvants is sufficiently proved by the five Examples.

Recrystallization of levulic acid or dodecanol during storage did not occur in any of the samples, even if the storage temperature amounted to 4° C.

1 of 2 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims as granted

6 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

7 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section A — Human necessities
  • A61K47/10
  • A61K47/12
  • A61K9/70
USPC · US Patent Classification
424/449514/946514/567424/447

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomOct 2000Jan 2001Apr 2001Jul 2001Oct 2001Jan 2002Apr 2002USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
1.2 y
441 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
2
no RCE
Examiner
Thurman K. Page
art unit 1615 · TC 1600
Citations: 9 back · 65 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom201320142015201620172018201920202021Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock