USPatent applicationPatented

Controlled impedance amplifiers

Granted 6 Jan 2004 · 3 office actions

Assignee: Texas Instruments

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Yuji Isobe, Chii-Fa Chiou · Examiner: Regina N. Holder · AU 2651 · TC 2600

Application· this page
9714052
filed 15 Nov 2000
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,674,595
granted 6 Jan 2004

Life of the application

12 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A hard disk drive (HDD) circuit (10) having feedback provided to an input of an differential amplifier setting the amplifier input impedance close to a flexible printed circuit (FPC) characteristic impedance. A matched source and input impedance produces a generally flat gain frequency response. As the result of flat response and wider gain bandwidth, white noise without high frequency peaking can be obtained. Feedback resistors (R5) provide feedback according to the present invention which is superior in terms of the input referred noise since the feedback attenuates both the input signal from the sensor and the noise from the amplifier. Feedback resistors (R5) may be connected through AC coupling capacitors to compensate the voltage differences between amplifier input and output. The circuit of the present invention provides a method to connect the feedback resistors directly from amplifier outputs to inputs which have a different potential. The advantages of the present invention include matched impedance results and a better system level frequency response, the direct feedback connection eliminates costly on-chip capacitors, and the input impedance can be adjusted by the amount of feedback.

Description

7 parts
›FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is generally related to mass storage devices including hard disk drive (HDD) systems, and more particularly to impedance mismatches between sensing heads on a flexible printed circuit (FPC) and a differential amplifier on a separate circuit board.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In a HDD system, sensing heads adapted to read data from a magnetic storage media are typically mounted on a flexible printed circuited (FPC), and are usually electrically connected to a differential amplifier on a fixed printed circuit board as shown in FIG. 1 . The sensor preamp connection is the connection between the MR sensor and the preamp, which has an input impedance of Rin. The FPC usually has a characteristic impedance of 50-150 ohms. Due to the impedance mismatch of the FPC impedance and the input impedance of the differential amplifier, the frequency response is not very flat, and in many cases peaking is present at a high frequency. The peaking in gain response is not favorable since it degrades group delay flatness, and generates high frequency noise. The peaking may also trigger an oscillation and makes the signal read back process unstable.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention achieves technical advantages by adding feedback to the input of the differential amplifier to set the amplifier input impedance close to the FPC characteristic impedance. A matched source and input impedance produces a generally flat gain frequency response. As the result of flat response and wider gain bandwidth, white noise without high frequency peaking is obtained.

Conventionally, the input impedance may be set to a desired value by adding a termination resistor (R T ) in parallel with the input as shown in FIG. 2 . However, the termination resistor attenuates the input signal but not the differential amplifier's noise. Thus, input noise referred to the sensing device increases. Providing feedback according to the present invention is superior in terms of the input referred noise since the feedback attenuates both the input signal from the sensor and the noise from the amplifier. The input referred noise to the sensor does not degrade. In general, the sensing devices are set close to ground potential, while the differential amplifier's outputs are usually close to positive supply voltage due to a nature of a differential amplifier. The feedback resistors may be connected through AC coupling capacitors to compensate the voltage differences between input and output. However, the AC coupling capacitors causes settling issues and increases physical die size. The circuit of the present invention provides a method to connect the feedback resistors directly from outputs to inputs which have different potential.

The advantages of the present invention include matched impedance results in better system level frequency response, the direct feedback connection eliminates costly on-chip capacitors, and the input impedance can be adjusted by the amount of feedback.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a typical HDD read back system;

FIG. 2 is an example of a conventional matched impedance system with a termination resistor;

FIG. 3 shows a schematic diagram of the present invention including feedback to the input of the differential amplifier; and

FIG. 4 is a schematic drawing of the present invention shown in FIG. 3 .

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Referring now to FIG. 4 in view of FIG. 3, the present invention achieves technical advantages by providing feedback from the output to the input through resistors R 5 via a direct connection. The feedback resistors R 5 have two functions, providing both AC signal feedback and preventing DC level shifting. The amount of feedback is set by the combination of the first stage gain and the resistor value of each R 5 . The input voltage, Vin, is set by a bias control circuits VB+ and VB− (comprising Q 13 and R 7 , and Q 14 and R 8 respectively), and the feedback connection of R 5 does not disturb the input voltage. In general, Vin is set to ground level, thus, the voltage drop across each R 5 is set to the lower end of R 5 to be at ground level. This can be embodied by the following method.

The output voltage of the amplifier V OUT :

V OUT =V CC −I 1 *R 1 −2 V BE

By making a replica of the I 1 *R 1 voltage drop into I 3 *R 3 (i.e. I 1 *R 1 =I 3 *R 3 ), obtain a current that conducts through resistor R 4 (I 4 ): I4 = ( V CC - 2 * V BE - I 3 * R 3 ) / R 4 = ( V CC - 2 * V BE - I 1 * R 1 ) / R 4

The voltage at the lower end of the feedback resistor R 5 , V IN , is given by:

V

IN

=V

›OUT

−I

5

*R

5

The voltage drop I 5 *R 5 can be set to equal to the I 4 *R 4 voltage drop with a simple current mirror, seen to include transistors Q 7 , Q 8 , Q 2 , Q 9 , Q 10 , Q 11 , and Q 12 to establish current I 4 , and resistor ratio of R 4 and R 5 , thus:

V

IN

=V

›OUT

−I

4

*R

4

Substituting equation (2) into equation (3):

V IN =V CC −I 1 *R 1 −2 *V BE −( V CC −2 *V BE −I 1 *R 1 )=0

In conclusion, the lower end voltage of the feedback resistor R 5 can be set at a ground potential with a simple resistor ratio and the current mirror circuit. As shown in the equation, the feedback circuit has no voltage supply dependency nor temperature dependency in terms of DC voltage.

Though the invention has been described with respect to a specific preferred embodiment, many variations and modifications will become apparent to those:skilled in the art upon reading the present application. It is therefore the intention that the appended claims be interpreted as broadly as possible in view of the prior art to include all such variations and modifications.

Claims as granted

10 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

5 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G11B5/48
  • G11B5/012
  • G11B5/00
USPC · US Patent Classification
360/67360/46

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2001Jul 2001Jan 2002Jul 2002Jan 2003Jul 2003Jan 2004USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalFinal rejectionNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.1 y
1,147 days filing → grant
Office actions
3
non-final + final
Responses
4
no RCE
Examiner
Regina N. Holder
art unit 2651 · TC 2600
Citations: 5 back · 2 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock