USPatent applicationPatented

Combinations of riluzole and levodopa for the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Granted 14 May 2002 · 1 office action

Application· this page
9694860
filed 24 Oct 2000
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,387,936
granted 14 May 2002

Life of the application

7 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

The invention concerns a combination of levodopa and riluzole or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of said compound and the use of said combination for treating Parkinson Disease.

Description

5 parts
›This application is a continuation of International application…

This application is a continuation of International application number: PCT/FR99/00953, filed Apr. 22, 1999; which claims the benefit of priority to French Patent Application No. 98/05,153, filing date Apr. 24, 1998.

The present invention relates to a combination of L-DOPA and riluzole or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of this compound and the use of this combination for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Parkinson's disease is connected with destruction of the locus niger (substantia nigra) which results in degeneration of the dopaminergic neurons of the nigrostriatial tract and therefore a massive decrease in the levels of dopamine in the striatum. To compensate the depletion of dopamine which is consequent to the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons of the nigrostriatial tract in parkinsonian patients, L-DOPA, (3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-L-alanine) or levodopa, which is converted into dopamine by dopa decarboxylase, is used as a symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease. After oral administration, the L-DOPA is massively decarboxylated at the peripheral level into dopamine, which does not cross the blood-brain barrier; this is why it is generally administered in combination with a decarboxylase inhibitor such as benserazide or carbidopa. These decarboxylase inhibitors actually allow the dose of L-DOPA to be reduced by approximately 5 (Rondot P. et al., Pharmacologie Clinique, bases de la thérapeutique [ Clinical Pharmacology, Therapeutic bases ], published by J.-P. Giroud, G. Mathé and G. Meyniel, 2nd edition, Expansion Scientifique Frangaise, 1988, page 1127).

In patients suffering from Parkinson's disease, L-DOPA reduces the severity of symptoms such as bradykinesia (poverty of movements), muscular rigidity and trembling. However, chronic treatment with L-DOPA leads, in 30% to 80% of parkinsonian patients, to secondary effects and, in particular, to dyskinesias (J. G. Nutt, Neurology, 40, 340-345, 1990).

These dyskinesias are also reproduced by a chronic treatment with L-DOPA in marmosets rendered parkinsonian following an injection of MPTP (1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine), a toxin which destroys the dopaminergic neurons of the nigrostriatial path (R. K. B. Pearce et al., Movement Disorders, vol. 10, No. 6, 731-740, 1995; A. Ekesbo et al., Neuroreport, 8, 2567-2570, 1997).

Riluzole (2-amino-6-trifluoromethoxybenzo-thiazole) is marketed for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. It is also known for its neuroprotective effect in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (WO94/15601).

It has now been found that the combination of riluzole or one of its pharmaceutically acceptable salts and of L-DOPA improves the locomotory activity of parkinsonian marmosets and, in addition, prevents the dyskinesias induced by L-DOPA.

The activity of the riluzole and L-DOPA combination is determined according to the following protocol: 6 adult marmosets ( Callithrix jacchus , Harlan UK) aged 25 months and weighing between 300 and 350 g are accommodated in stainless steel cages (50 cm in width×20 cm in depth×23 cm in height) with wire netting doors, these cages being connected to smaller cages (28×20×23 cm) in which the marmosets can sleep. The animals are accommodated in a controlled environment: temperature of 24±2° C., humidity of 55%, with a day-night cycle of 12 hours. The marmosets have free access to water and have available each day 35 g of food rich in carbohydrates, proteins and vitamins mixed with water, milk and sugar and also fresh fruit.

All the animals receive 3 injections of 2 mg/kg of MPTP by the subcutaneous route, on days 1, 7 and 32. On day 32, the animals are divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (control group) receives 2 oral administrations of 10% sucrose and group 2 (treated group) receives 2 oral administrations of riluzole (10 mg/kg) suspended in 0.5% methylcellulose, each day to day 104. On day 47, the two groups of animals receive an oral administration of L-DOPA (Modopar® 125 dispersible Roche (L-DOPA (25 mg)+benserazide (6.25 mg)). on day 48, they receive 2 oral administrations and from day 49 to day 104 they receive 3 oral administrations of L-DOPA each day.

›LOCOMOTORY ACTIVITY

The locomotory activity is determined by placing the animals in test cages (50 cm×83 cm×77 cm) which are equipped with 3 perches onto which the animals can jump as well as a Plexiglas door in front of which is placed a camera. This camera is connected to an image analyser system (Vigie Primates, View Point R , which is capable of calculating the quantity of movements of 8 marmosets, simultaneously and independently for the duration of the test. The principle of this system is to quantify the movements of the animals in the cage in a determined time window (5s). The image is digitalized with a 800×600 definition with 256 levels of grey and the changes in pixels from one image to another are counted. This allows the locomotory activity to be classified into small, medium or large movements. Each class of movements is analysed every 10 minutes for a period of one hour. The locomotory activity of the animals is measured during the exploration phase, that is to say immediately after they are placed in the test cage.

›DYSKINESIC SCORE

The dyskinesic score is determined according to a number of parameters and each with a different degree of intensity:

This score is measured on days 57, 60, 67 and 104.

The evaluation is made 30 min or 2 h after the first daily injection of L-DOPA (4 h after the riluzole or sucrose solution).

The results are reported in Tables 1 to 5 and FIGS. 1, 2 A, 2 B and 3 :

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS · 1 of 2

Table 1 and FIG. 1 show that the acute administration of L-DOPA at a dose of 25 mg/kg, 15 days after the 3rd injection of MPTP, increases the locomotory activity by decreasing the small movements and increasing the large movements. These results therefore demonstrate that the acute administration of L-DOPA improves the locomotory activity.

Tables 2, 3 and 4 and FIGS. 2A and 2B show that L-DOPA, after a repeated treatment of 10 days and of 20 days, does not have or has little beneficial effect on the locomotory activity of parkinsonian marmosets.

Tables 2, 3 and 4 and FIGS. 2A and 2B also show that riluzole at a dose of 10 mg/kg, by the oral route, twice per day for 72 days is capable of improving the locomotory activity and this is observed equally well after 10 days as after 20 days of treatment with L-DOPA.

Table 5 and FIG. 3 show that the repeated administrations of L-DOPA (25 mg/kg, by the oral route, 3 times per day) produce dyskinesias observed on days 57, 60, 67 and 104, with a maximum effect on day 104.

Table 5 and FIG. 3 also show that riluzole (at a dose of 10 mg/kg, by the oral route, twice per day) reduces the dyskinesias induced by L-DOPA and this is observed from day 57 to day 104.

In conclusion, these results demonstrate that, on the one hand, L-DOPA after an acute administration increased the locomotory activity by decreasing the small displacements, and by increasing the large displacements of the parkinsonian marmosets. On the contrary, L-DOPA, after a repeated treatment, not only produced little or no effect on locomotory activity, but in addition produced secondary effects, dyskinesias in parkinsonian marmosets.

On the other hand, these results show that in parkinsonian marmosets, riluzole improves the locomotory activity and prevents the development of dyskinesias induced by chronic treatment with L-DOPA. The combination riluzole and L-DOPA thus has a double beneficial effects in parkinsonian marmosets, by improving the locomotory activity and by decreasing the secondary effects, the dyskinesias, induced by L-DOPA.

Riluzole or one of its pharmaceutically acceptable salts and L-DOPA can be administered in the form of a combination and optionally combined with any other pharmaceutically compatible product, which can be inert or physiologically active.

Riluzole or one of its pharmaceutically acceptable salts and L-DOPA can likewise be administered separately or in a manner which is spread out in time so as to obtain the maximum efficacy.

Thus in the sense of the present invention, the combinations are not uniquely limited to those which are obtained by physical mixing of the constituents but also to those which allow a separate administration which can be simultaneous or spread out in time.

It is likewise possible to add to this combination a decarboxylase inhibitor such as benserazide or carbidopa.

In the combinations according to the invention, 10 to 400 parts by weight of riluzole are generally used per 100 to 6000 parts by weight of L-DOPA and, preferably, 200 to 4000 parts by weight of L-DOPA or the equivalent of this quantity when the L-DOPA is mixed with a decarboxylase inhibitor. Generally, the quantity of L-DOPA when this is mixed with an L-DOPA inhibitor is 50 to 1500 parts by weight.

When the decarboxylase inhibitor is benserazide, a quantity by weight thereof of 2 to 6 times less than the quantity of L-DOPA and more particularly 4 times less than the quantity of L-DOPA is generally used.

When the decarboxylase inhibitor is carbidopa, a quantity by weight thereof of 2 to 15 times less than the quantity of L-DOPA and more particularly 4 to 10 times less than the quantity of L-DOPA is generally used.

The combination can be employed by the oral, parenteral or rectal route.

Pharmaceutically acceptable salts of riluzole which can be especially mentioned are the addition salts with mineral acids such as the hydrochlorides, sulphates, nitrates, phosphates or organic acids such as the acetates, propionates, succinates, oxalates, benzoates, fumarates, maleates, methanesulphonates, isethionates, theophilline acetates, salicylates, phenolphthaleinates, methylene-bis-β-oxynaphthoates or of substitution derivatives of these derivatives.

Solid compositions for oral administration which can be used are compressed tablets, pills, powders (gelatin capsules, cachets) or granules. In these compositions, the active principles are mixed with one or more inert diluents, such as starch, cellulose, sucrose, lactose or silica, under a current of argon. These compositions can likewise comprise substances other than the diluents, for example one or more lubricants such as magnesium stearate or talc, a colourant, a coating (coated tablets) or a lacquer.

Liquid compositions for oral administration which can be used are solutions, suspensions, emulsions, syrups and pharmaceutically acceptable elixirs containing inert diluents such as water, ethanol, glycerol, vegetable oils or paraffin oil. These compositions can comprise substances other than the diluents, for example wetting, sweetening, thickening, aromatizing or stabilizing products.

The sterile compositions for parenteral administration can preferably be aqueous or non-aqueous solutions, suspensions or emulsions. As a solvent or vehicle, it is possible to employ water, propylene glycol, a polyethylene glycol, vegetable oils, in particular olive oil, injectable organic esters, for example ethyl oleate or other suitable organic solvents. These compositions can likewise contain adjuvants, in particular wetting, isotonicizing, emulsifying, dispersing and stabilizing agents. Sterilization can take place in several ways, for example by sterile filtration, by incorporating sterilizing agents in the composition, by irradiation or by heating. They can likewise be prepared in the form of sterile solid compositions which can be dissolved at the time of use in sterile water or any other sterile injectable medium.

The compositions for rectal administration are suppositories or rectal capsules which contain, apart from the active product, excipients such as cocoa butter, semisynthetic glycerides or polyethylene glycols.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS · 2 of 2

The present invention likewise relates to the method of treatment of parkinsonian patients which consists in administering to the patient a L-DOPA and riluzole combination or one of its pharmaceutically acceptable salts and optionally a decarboxylase inhibitor either simultaneously or separately or in a manner which is spread out in time.

The doses depend on the effect sought, on the duration of treatment and on the route of administration used; they are generally from 10 to 400 mg per day by the oral route for an adult with unit doses ranging from 10 to 200 mg of riluzole and from 100 to 6000 mg and preferably 200 to 4000 mg per day by the oral route for an adult with unit doses of 100 to 250 mg of L-DOPA or the equivalent of this dose when the L-DOPA is administered with a decarboxylase inhibitor. Thus when the L-DOPA is administered with a decarboxylase inhibitor the dose of L-DOPA is generally from 50 to 1500 mg per day by the oral route.

When the decarboxylase inhibitor is benserazide, it is preferable to administer per day, by the oral route, for an adult, 10 to 400 mg of riluzole, 50 to 1500 mg of L-DOPA and a quantity of benserazide by weight which is 2 to 6 times less and particularly 4 times less than the quantity by weight of L-DOPA.

When the decarboxylase inhibitor is carbidopa, it is preferable to administer per day, by the oral route, for an adult, 10 and 400 mg of riluzole, 50 to 1500 mg of L-DOPA and a quantity of carbidopa by weight which is 2 to 15 times less and particularly 4 to 10 times less than the quantity by weight of L-DOPA.

Generally speaking, the physician will determine the appropriate dosage as a function of the age, the weight and all of the other factors peculiar to the subject to be treated.

›Tables in the description — 4
TABLE 1 — Effect of L-DOPA on the locomotory activity of parkinsoian marmosets
MarmosetGroup 1 (sucrose)
No.123123123
ClassTimebeforebefore30 min after
ofintervalMPTPthe 1stthe 1st
move-of mea-administrationadministration
mentssurementsof L-DOPAof L-DOPA
Small1-1029015109017550530520
move-11-202504013535115253510
ments21-3021520585954855200
31-404000450455156055
41-5060350455560451510
51-601205511550545303535
Average ±49 ± 19171 ± 4640 ± 16
S.E.M.±±
Medium1-1014018560255285375235270250
move-11-201657560260270475190290240
ments21-3020024516527517575225205110
31-4027011515310130130355205255
41-502702651252809540260165165
51-6028015015525511055240200215
Average ±163 ± 19214 ± 28226 ± 13
S.E.M.*
Large1-1017540553526014518036530335
move-11-2041052550020529510385275350
ments21-3018533543024033040370375490
31-4029048558524547015230335290
41-502703004752755000295420425
51-602004454402304400330365350
Average ±388 ± 30216 ± 38334 + 23
S.E.M.**
+
Significant difference versus the value before MPTP: P<0.01 **P<0.001 (Student's test);
significant difference versus the value before L-DQPA: + P<0.01 (Student's test)
TABLE 2 — Effect of riluzole on the locomotory activity in dyskinesic marmosets Before MPTP Time interval of
Class ofmeasurementTime passed in moving
move-(min)Group 1Group 2
mentsMarmoset No.123456
Small1-10290151035105
move-11-20250402500
ments21-30215205702540
31-4040004505
41-5060350105010
51-601205525555
Average ±37 ± 10
S.E.M.
Medium1-1014018560506035
move-11-201657560458535
ments21-3020024516510595150
31-4027011515806080
41-5027026512516060145
51-6028015015524521595
Average ±132 ± 13
S.E.M.
Large1-10175405535520535565
move-11-20410525500530515565
ments21-30185335430425480410
31-40290485585475540515
41-50270300475335540445
51-60200445440330330500
Average ±432 ± 19
S.E.M.
TABLE 3 — Effect of riluzole on the locomotory activity in dyskinesic marmosets 10 days after L-DOPA Time passed in moving (evaluated 30 min after the 1st daily
Timeadministration of L-DOPA)
interval ofGroup 2
Class ofmeasurementsGroup 1riluzole
move-(min)(sucrose)(2 × 10 mg/kg)
mentsMarmoset No.123456
Small1-105510375555
move-11-2005002950545
ments21-300560365012550
31-4010485370014525
41-50104652303019540
51-6020522524035210100
Average ±269 ± 47***57 ± 16 +++
S.E.M.
Medium1-10115551904010580
move-11 -20707029535140185
ments21-301004023560120115
31-4015535175140215190
41-50155115370155205175
51-60165305235135125190
Average ±160 ± 23134 ± 13
S.E.M.
Large1-104854040560495520
move-11-205303010565455370
ments21-3050000540355435
31-404358055460240385
41-50435200415200385
51-6023070125430265310
Average ±171 ± 48***410 ± 25 +++
S.E.M.
Significant difference versus value before MPTP: ***P<0.0001 (Student's test)
Significant difference versus control value: +++ P<0.0001 (Student's test)
TABLE 4 — Effect of riluzole on the locomotory acitivty in dyskinesic marmosets 20 days after L-DOPA Time passed in moving (evaluated 30 min after the 1st daily
Timeadministration of L-DOPA)
interval ofGroup 2
Class ofmeasurementsGroup 1riluzole
move-(min)(sucrose)(2 × 10 mg/kg)
mentsMarinoset No.123456
Small1-10105545513035
move-11-204004553955
ments21-3012010105017020
31-40125065527515
41-5013015265013515
51-601850230034515
Average ±83 ± 1967 ± 30
S.E.M.
Medium1-10360047515514080
move-11-2026020475255160105
ments21-3022535400175250100
31-403255530018017580
41-502659528095220125
51-603153031590180105
Average ±235 ± 37**148 ± 13 +
S.E.M.
Large1-1014060085445335490
move-11-203005808034045490
ments21-3025555595425180480
31-40150545235415150505
41-5020549055505245460
51-601005705551075480
Average ±283 ± 50**365 ± 37
S.E.M.
Significant difference versus value before MPTP: **P<0.001 (Student's test)
Significant difference versus control value: +p<0.01 (Student's test)
1 of 5 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims as granted

20 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

7 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section A — Human necessities
  • A61K31/135
  • A61K31/198
  • A61K45/06
  • A61P25/16
  • A61K31/428
  • A61K31/425
USPC · US Patent Classification
514/367

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomOct 2000Jan 2001Apr 2001Jul 2001Oct 2001Jan 2002Apr 2002Jul 2002USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
1.6 y
567 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
2
no RCE
Examiner
James H. Reamer
art unit 1614 · TC 1600
Citations: 8 back · 15 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2002200420062008201020122014201620182020Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock