USPatent applicationPatented

Microelectromechanical system artificial neural network device

Granted 13 Jul 2004 · no office action yet

Current assignee: AIR FORCE, UNITED STATES · originally United States Secretary of the Air Force

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Mark T. Pronobis, David C. Williamson, Daniel J. Burns · Examiner: Wilbert L. Starks, Jr. · AU 2121 · TC 2100

Application· this page
9668225
filed 22 Sep 2000
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,763,340
granted 13 Jul 2004

Life of the application

5 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A novel microelectromechanical system artificial neural network (MEMS ANN) device performs the function of a conventional artificial neural network node element. Micro-machined polysilicon or high aspect ratio composite beam micro-resonators replace as computational elements the silicon transistors and software simulations of prior-art ANNs. The basic MEMSANN device forms a non-linear (e.g., sigmoid) function of a sum of products. Products of the magnitudes of sine waves, applied to the input drive comb and shuttle magnitudes, are formed in the frequency domain and summed by coupling a plurality of resonators with a mechanical coupling frame, or by integrating them into one resonator. A sigmoid function is applied to the sum of products by shaping the overlap capacitance of the output comb fingers of the resonator. Methods of building and using various single MEMS ANN devices and multi-layered arrays of MEMS ANN circuits are also described. These novel MEMS ANNs exhibit an attractive combination of performance characteristics, compared to conventional hardware ANNs that use silicon transistors or simulations of ANNs running in software on digital computers, including lower cost, simpler design, wider temperature range, greater radiation tolerance, and lower operating and standby power. These advantages favorably impact system weight and size because of reduced shielding, cooling, and power requirements.

Description

8 parts
›STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT INTEREST

The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or for the Government for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalty thereon.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to an artificial neural network device (ANN) and, in particular, to an ANN embodied in a microelectromechanical system (MEMS). In general, ANNs may be thought of as data processing devices that extract advanced knowledge from complex data. In particular, ANNs can be designed with training methods that use a number of known test cases to effectively teach the ANN to perform a task, for example, to extract features from images, recognize printed text (optical character recognition or OCR) and phonemes/morphemes (speech recognition). They are also used to solve optimization problems and to perform complex, non-linear control functions.

The prior-art ANNs, whether hardware or software, have limitations. Hardware ANNs can be either digital or analog circuits. The basic ANN ‘node’ element or device produces a non-linear function of a sum of weighted inputs, for example, a sigmoid function of the sum of several products, where each product is an ‘input’ multiplied by a ‘weight’. ANN node elements that perform the base function are often used in configurations consisting of highly interconnected layers of elements.

In a digital hardware ANN network, the inputs and weights are binary numbers stored in registers. Ways of using the network can be micro-coded as operations, such as transfer, multiplication, summing, and other computations, on the binary numbers that represent the inputs and weights. Their output is a binary number stored in a register.

In an analog hardware ANN, the inputs and weights take the form of voltages, currents, or charge packets that vary in magnitude. Special-purpose analog or digital circuits that produce an output voltage perform the multiplications and other computations. The prior art also includes software ANNs implemented as a simulation on a general-purpose digital computer.

One disadvantage of all the prior-art ANNs described above is that they require silicon transistors, either in the digital or analog circuits of hardware ANNs or in the general-purpose digital computer of software ANNs. Embodiments using transistors have restricted operating temperature, typically within a range of 0-70 or −55-+125 degrees Celsius. As the power dissipation of silicon circuitry increases with complexity, supplying power to and removing the heat from very large chips containing millions of transistors is troublesome. Thus routing power supply conductors to such a system and packaging and cooling it are difficult and costly, thereby limiting the system's complexity.

Another disadvantage of prior-art ANNs is that their silicon transistors incorporate insulating dielectric layers, such as silicon dioxide, that are subject to degradation. For example, bulk- and surface-charge generation and trapping may occur in the dielectric layers, especially in devices placed in outer space, where they are subject to continuous ionizing radiation. This degradation can lead to shifts in transistor threshold voltages, and in turn to problems in timing. Eventually, the circuits fail. Likewise, charges generated in these layers can become trapped, causing surface inversion and stray leakage that in turn increase power dissipation and cause catastrophic latch-up, particularly in analog circuits.

Still another limitation has been reported for analog hardware ANNs that represent weights with charge packets of variable size stored internally on a small oxide capacitor. At high temperature the amount of charge may decay slightly with dwell time, necessitating a complex “chip in the loop, bake re-training” procedure that may have to be repeated several times to ensure the ANN's stability. Such a device would be difficult to use in a system that requires built-in training modes to enable it to learn from experience.

›OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An object of the present invention is to provide ANNs at lower cost with simpler design and fabrication, greater temperature range and radiation tolerance, and lower operating and standby power requirements.

A further object of the present invention is to provide ANNs based on MEMS.

Still a further object of the present invention is to provide MEMS ANNs made from micro-machined polysilicon as the operative computational element in the MEMS.

Yet a further object of the present invention is to provide MEMS ANNs whose micro-machined polysilicon or composite beam structure is the operative computational element.

Briefly stated, a novel microelectromechanical system artificial neural network (MEMS ANN) device performs the function of a conventional artificial neural network node element. Micro-machined polysilicon or high aspect ratio composite beam micro-resonators replace as computational elements the silicon transistors and software simulations of prior-art ANNs. The basic MEMSANN device forms a non-linear (e.g., sigmoid) function of a sum of products. Products of the magnitudes of sine waves, applied to the input drive comb and shuttle magnitudes, are formed in the frequency domain and summed by coupling a plurality of resonators with a mechanical coupling frame, or by integrating them into one resonator. A sigmoid function is applied to the sum of products by shaping the overlap capacitance of the output comb fingers of the resonator. Methods of building and using various single MEMS ANN devices and multi-layered arrays of MEMS ANN circuits are also described. These novel MEMS ANNs exhibit an attractive combination of performance characteristics, compared to conventional hardware ANNs that use silicon transistors or simulations of ANNs running in software on digital computers, including lower cost, simpler design, wider temperature range, greater radiation tolerance, and lower operating and standby power. These advantages favorably impact system weight and size because of reduced shielding, cooling, and power requirements.

According to an embodiment of the invention, [1 ST INDEPENDENT CLAIM]

According to a feature of the invention, [2 ND INDEPENDENT CLAIM]

The above, and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals designate the same elements.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a single node element of an ANN.

FIG. 2 shows an array of interconnected ANN node elements.

FIG. 3 is a diagram of a MEMS resonator and test circuit.

FIG. 4 shows a Fourier spectrum of I s for a resonator with an input comb driven at frequency w d and a shuttle driven at frequency w c .

FIG. 5A shows a schematic block diagram of a MEMS ANN node element.

FIGS. 5B, 5 C, and 5 D show Fourier spectra of signals produced at different stages of a MEMS ANN node element.

FIG. 6 shows an array of MEMS ANN node elements whose weights are coded as v d and v c voltages, with weight generation/control scheme.

FIG. 7 shows an array of MEMS ANN node elements whose weights are coded as w d and w c frequencies, with weight generation/control scheme.

FIG. 8 shows a three-input MEMS ANN with shaped output combs for applying a sigmoid transformation to the output, implemented in a composite-beam, complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT · 1 of 4

Referring to FIG. 1, a classical ANN node element 100 produces an output signal 103 that is a sigmoid function of a thresholded sum of a multiplicity of weighted input signals 101 , as shown in Eq. 1, with the threshold term provided by a threshold signal 102 .

OUT=Sigmoid (IN 1 * w 1 +IN 2 * w 2 +IN 3 * w 3 −Threshold)  (Eq. 1)

Referring to FIG. 2, a plurality of such classical ANN node elements 100 can be interconnected in an ANN array 110 . A plurality of array input signals 111 are sent to ANN array 110 , processed, and output as array output signals 113 . Array interconnect signals 112 allow the processing in ANN array 110 to occur.

MEMS are micro-machined electromechanical devices that operate in multiple energy domains (e.g., both electrical and mechanical). MEMS devices made from polysilicon or silicon can implement resonators, filters, switches, and variable capacitors. The present invention uses MEMS micro-resonators to implement a computation very similar to that of the prior-art node element of an ANN. MEMS have been used for Signal Processing (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,537,083 and 5,589,082) and Frequency Signature Sensors (U.S. Pat. No. 5,856,722) but not for ANNs.

Referring to FIG. 3, a basic MEMS resonator and an electrical test circuit commonly used to operate it, from the prior art, apply an input drive comb voltage 122 from an input drive comb voltage source 121 to an input drive comb 120 . Both a shuttle dc voltage 125 , from a shuttle dc voltage source 124 , and a shuttle ac voltage 127 , from a shuttle ac voltage source 126 are applied to a plate terminal 133 . Setting or sweeping frequencies and voltages in the test circuit permits tests that measure parameters that characterize the resonator's performance, such as center frequency and quality factor (C. Nguyen, “Micromechanical Signal Processors”, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Cal. Berkeley, 1991, p. 218).

In its basic mode of operation, a fixed input drive comb 120 is biased with input drive comb voltage source 121 , V dac =|v d |cos(wt), and a movable shuttle 123 is driven with shuttle dc voltage source 124 , V pdc =30v (typical) in series with shuttle ac voltage source 126 , V pac =0. If the drive frequency (w d ) of input drive comb voltage source 121 , V dac , is set to be near the resonant frequency (w r ) of the resonator, the central, suspended part of movable shuttle 123 vibrates left and right. This vibrating motion causes a time-varying overlap of the fingers on movable shuttle 123 with respect to the fixed position of the fingers on an output sense comb 128 , and thus a varying capacitance between movable shuttle 123 and fixed output sense comb 128 . As a result, a current I s 129 flows from output sense comb 128 into a pre-amplifier 130 . Current I s 129 is transduced to an output voltage V S 132 by pre-amplifier 130 and a resistor R 1 131 . The power spectrum of this waveform is analyzed with methods and equipment described in the prior art, e.g., a hardware or software spectrum analyzer. The prior art of MEMS resonator testing teaches that the power spectrum near W d may have noise components, arising from parasitic capacitances associated with the drive comb node and test setup, that feed unwanted current to the output node through paths external to the resonator. Such parasitic feed-through confounds attempts to characterize the resonator through electrical measurements. However, a particular test method that solves this problem is also described in the prior art by C. Nguyen, supra, called Electromechanical Amplitude Modulation (EAM). This method adds shuttle ac voltage source 126 (V pac ) in series with shuttle dc voltage source 124 (V pdc ) to obtain noise-free measurements of current I S 129 by shifting, away from W d , the frequency of a component of current I s 129 that is measured. The fact that the magnitude of this frequency-shifted component that appears at w d +w c is proportional to the product of V dac and V pac is central to mapping the function of an ANN to a MEMS. It allows the resonator to form products of ac signals that represent inputs and weights.

To understand how resonators can implement the basic ANN node function, consider the following example. V dac and V pac are cosine waves, i.e., V dac =|v d |cos(w d t) and V pac =|v c |cos(w c t), and w d is near the resonance frequency w r . The Fourier spectrum of current I S 129 will look like FIG. 4 . In phasor form, the magnitude of the rightmost component appearing at frequency w d +w c , i.e., a right-hand-side current component I RHS 140 , is: I RHS  ( j     w ) = 1 2  j  ( w d + w c )   v d   v c   V pdc  C 1  C 2    k  [ 1 - ( w d / w r ) 2 + j     w d / ( Qw r ) ] . Eq .    2

where C 1 , C 2 , K, and Q are constants that depend on design features (C. Nguyen, supra). The magnitude of I RHS depends on the product of V d . v c and V pdc . Also, W c and w d appear as components of a multiplier in the numerator. Thus, if the inputs and weights of the ANN node element are mapped onto two of these five factors, the magnitude of I RHS is analogous to one of the product terms in the sum in Eq. 1, e.g., the term IN 1 *w 1 .

Referring to FIG. 5A, a plurality of MEMS ANN resonators 152 can produce product terms, as well as the threshold term in Eq. 1, from MEMS ANN input signals 150 and MEMS ANN weight signals 151 . Further, a current I OUTn 153 from each MEMS ANN resonator 152 can be summed in a number of ways taught in the prior art. To use, or read out, the output of the MEMS ANN, the I RHS component must be extracted from the overall Fourier spectrum of I S , and an output voltage signal must be produced for driving other devices, e.g., other MEMS ANN inputs in a layered circuit. This is accomplished by transforming a summed current I SUM 154 to a voltage V 1 156 with a current-to-voltage converter 155 and isolating the frequency component of interest with a MEMS notch filter 158 , also described by Nguyen, supra. The result is a voltage V 2 159 . FIG. 5B is a graph of the Fourier spectrum of voltage V 1 156 , and FIG. 5C is a graph of the Fourier spectrum of voltage V 2 159 . A rectifier/low pass filter 160 changes voltage V 2 159 into a dc analog output voltage V dcOUT 164 , similar to the output of a conventional ANN, on nodes that go off-chip to be interpreted by the system. Finally, a mixer 161 uses a mixer frequency 162 to shift the frequency of voltage V 2 159 to whatever frequency drives subsequent stages of devices, e.g., a frequency w d . The result is an ac analog output voltage V acOUT 163 ; FIG. 5D shows a graph of its Fourier spectrum. Mixer 161 can also be implemented as a MEMS resonator.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT · 2 of 4

To complete the analogy with the ANN node element, the summed output must be transformed by a sigmoid function, as in Eq. 1. A special-purpose analog circuit can carry out this transformation, as described in the prior art. However, a better result comes from a design feature of the resonators. Shaping the input drive comb of a resonator tailors the force-against-voltage profile to extend the range of shuttle motion (see W. Yo, S. Mukheijee, and N. McDonald, “Optimal Shape Design of an Electrostatic Comb Drive in Microeletromechanical Systems”, 7 JMEMS (1), 16-26 (March 1998)). The output sense comb can likewise be shaped to produce a sigmoid output current-against-motion function. Shaping input or output combs can also produce other functions.

One application of the embodiment described above is in an array of MEMS ANN devices as illustrated in FIG. 6 . The values of array input signals 111 to MEMS ANN array 110 node elements correspond to the peak-to-peak amplitudes of V dac that are sine waves at frequency w d . Array input signals 111 can come from sensors that modulate a sine wave in amplitude. Weight signals 175 correspond to the peak-to-peak amplitudes of V pac of frequency w c , supplied from a sine wave generator 170 that produces a sine wave signal 171 , a stepped attenuator 172 that taps off various magnitudes, and a latching cross-point switch 174 , all of which reside either on- or off-chip. Voltage signals 173 , for example, called v c1 , v c2 , and v c3 , can be sine waves of 10.0v, 9.9v, and 9.8v respectively. The column outputs of latching cross-point switch 174 are routed to the resonator shuttle terminals in ANN array 110 . A control 176 provides whatever control signals are need for sine wave generator 170 and latching cross-point switch 174 , e.g. a sine wave generator control signal 178 and cross-point switch control signals 177 .

MEMS micro-switches are currently under development. Until they are available, the signals representing weights can be generated and switched off-chip by prior-art methods. Or the cross-point switches can be implemented with conventional transistor circuitry, such as transmission gates controlled by flip-flops. The cross-point switch, rather than simply providing a separate resonator of fixed (weight) value to each MEMS ANN, enables a trainable mode of operation. The output of each of the MEMS ANNs on the first layer would then be a sine wave at frequency (w d +w c ). To maximize the magnitude of the motion response, and hence the output comb current of the product-forming resonators, w d and w c should be chosen so that (w d +w c )=w r , where w r is the resonant frequency of the product-forming resonators on the first layer. For example, if w d =w c =w r /2, then (w d +w c )=w r . The mixer in the first-layer MEMS ANNs could shift its input signal from frequency (w d +w c )=w r down to frequency w d =w r /2, thereby providing an output to drive other MEMS ANNs on the next layer with the same w r as those on the first layer. Other embodiments that employ different w d , w c , and w r frequencies and phases on different layers are within the scope of the present invention.

Another embodiment of the MEMS ANN device of the present invention is illustrated in FIG. 7 . Here the ANN input values 111 correspond to the values of the input drive signal frequencies w d n, and the values of the weights 175 correspond to the values of the shuttle ac signal frequencies, w c n. Here again, the weight generation and storage can be implemented as an array of self-oscillating resonators, or frequency generators 180 , each with a different w r , that send frequency signals 181 through latching cross-point switch 174 to the MEMS ANNs in a layered ANN array 110 , enabling a trainable mode of operation. Control 176 provides frequency generators 180 and latching cross-point switch 174 with control signals 182 . In this embodiment, the output again corresponds to the magnitude of the component of current I S that appears at the sum frequency w d +w c . But here both frequencies depend on the values of the inputs and weights. The desired effect is the multiplication of factors in the numerator of Eq. 2 to form the products. But the denominator of Eq. 2 also changes according to the ratio of w d to w r , thereby changing the magnitude of the output. However, the change is similar to that of a sigmoid, i.e., the I RHS magnitude increases non-linearly as w d approaches w r . This effectively combines the multiplication with a non-linear transformation, potentially simplifying the MEMS ANN design by taking the place of the sigmoid transformation. Although the predicted form of the dependence is not exactly a sigmoid transformation, it may be close enough for proper training and operation. In this case, the frequencies w d and w c are chosen such that the sum (w d +w c ) spans the rising part of the resonator's resonance curve from just below w r to w r .

Other mappings of inputs and weights to resonator drive parameters are possible within the scope of the present invention, thereby allowing the combination of different types of sensors that modulate ac voltage, dc voltage, phase, or frequency.

Another embodiment within the scope of the present invention is to produce an output by optical means. For example, an LED, laser diode, or other light source can illuminate a portion of the shuttle along an edge. Different magnitudes of the shuttle's motion reflect different amounts of light. Measuring the intensity of the reflected light reads out the magnitude of the shuttle's motion.

Referring again to Eq. 1 and the discussion relating to FIG. 5A about how to sum a multiplicity of products, one can sum current I OUTn 's 153 from MEMS ANN resonators 152 that form the different products with one or more operational amplifiers. One can also connect together electrically to the same node all sense-comb outputs from MEMS ANN resonators 152 . Another embodiment within the scope of the present invention is to sum by mechanical coupling the motions of the output of multiple product-forming resonators in a MEMS ANN and to transmit the motions directly to the shuttles of other MEMS ANN devices. In such an embodiment, current-to-voltage converter 155 that contains silicon transistor circuitry, MEMS notch filter 158 , and mixer 161 would be unnecessary. However, the second-stage MEMS ANN devices would have to exhibit maximum motion at frequency (w r +w c ). This embodiment is especially useful in a surface micro-machined polysilicon process, where different product terms must be produced with different resonators.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT · 3 of 4

Still another embodiment connects the multiple shuttles together mechanically by a coupling frame of beams, and senses the summed motions with an output sense comb connected to one of the shuttles or to the coupling frame. In another embodiment the moving shuttle output comb fingers of a set of multiple resonators share a single fixed-output sense comb. These embodiments, and others for summing multiple output currents or motions, are especially useful in surface micro-machined processes, where all fingers on the moving shuttle are shorted together because they are all formed in the same continuous polysilicon layer.

Still another embodiment is to fabricate a resonator by the Carnegie-Mellon University (C-MU) High Aspect Ratio MEMS (HARM) process. In this process one connects subsets of the fingers on the fixed-input drive comb to different input signals; and subsets of the fingers on the movable shuttle input comb, to different weight signals. These connections are possible in the HARM process because the electrical connections to individual fingers or sets of fingers on the moving shuttle can be wired with patterned polysilicon, metal 1 , and metal 2 interconnections. This HARM process is preferred to the surface micro-machined polysilicon process, where all fingers on the moving shuttle are shorted together, because they are all formed in the same continuous polysilicon layer.

We have fabricated MEMS resonators and verified that the effects predicted by Eq. 2 do occur, thus showing that physical MEMS ANNs function. We have also simulated MEMS ANNs to verify that they work as described. For example, we constructed a software simulator in which we apply inputs and weights to a traditional ANN and a MEMS ANN side-by-side to compare their outputs. The simulator allows us to map inputs and weights onto various combinations of values of v d , v c , w d , and w c for the case of a simplified, single-input ANN, with no threshold, summing, or sigmoid transformation. With this simulator we have established the ranges of values of the MEMS ANN parameters that correspond to the range 0 to 1 often used for traditional ANN inputs and weights.

The feasibility of a stepped attenuator that supplies weights mapped to voltages is obvious. The design of an array of resonators, each with a slightly different frequency, to map inputs and weights to frequencies is more difficult. Our simulations have taught us that, besides having different resonant frequencies (F 0 ), all resonators must have similarly shaped resonance curves to avoid output current scaling. This requirement imposes constraints on quality factor (Q) and the maximum motion magnitude (x max ) and makes design an optimization problem that requires adjustment of multiple resonator physical dimensions. Such a problem can be solved by methods from the prior art. T. Mukheijee at C-MU has worked on a similar problem: the optimal design of accelerometers. After studying the sensitivity of resonant frequency, Q, and motion magnitude to physical design dimensions for a typical resonator we constructed a simple design algorithm that optimizes these outputs by adjusting three physical design dimensions. Using this approach, we have designed arrays of resonators that span a 20% range in resonant frequency while substantially preserving Q and x max .

We have also submitted for fabrication a preliminary design for a three-input MEMS ANN that will be available for testing. FIG. 8 shows the layout of this device, which incorporates shaped output combs 191 to evaluate the method of the present invention for applying a sigmoid transformation of inputs 190 to the output.

In summary, ANN devices implemented in MEMS technologies, and circuits comprising a multiplicity of MEMS ANN devices, are feasible. They exhibit an attractive combination of characteristics compared to conventional ANNs. The advantages include lower cost, simpler design, smaller area, greater temperature range and radiation tolerance, and, very importantly, lower operating and standby power. These significant advantages in performance arise from micro-mechanical resonators made from micro-machined polysilicon as the operative computational element in the MEMS ANN, as opposed to active devices such as the silicon transistors found in conventional digital or analog ANN circuitry.

In general, the ability to implement ANNs in MEMS technology represents a novel computing paradigm not previously available to MEMS system designers. This paradigm is especially valuable for higher-order signal and data processing on very small sensor platforms, with very little-power, and perhaps at high temperatures with little cooling. Power dissipation in MEMS ANN structures is very small. Nguyen, supra, has shown that the equivalent impedances of practical MEMS resonators can be very high, e.g., series resistance of megohms (10{circumflex over ( )}6), capacitances of only femtoFarads (10{circumflex over ( )}−15), and inductances on the order of tens of kiloHenries (10{circumflex over ( )}5). Such impedances imply operating currents on the order of nanoamperes and power dissipation on the order of a few nanowatts per resonator. With such low-power dissipation, many MEMS ANNs can be placed on a single chip.

A whole MEMS ANN chip can be constructed without any silicon transistors; a very few self-oscillating resonators could be off-chip. Operating temperatures can be very high, as polysilicon resonators operate at many hundreds of degrees C. For example, in addition to standard polysilicon and CMOS aluminum resonators, others have built MEMS resonators with very high temperature materials, e.g., silicon carbide (Case Western Reserve University, 400C+), and nickel (University of Michigan). As noted above, alternatives for mapping ANN inputs and weights onto various combinations of v d , v c , V pdc , w c , and w d accommodate input signals from a variety of sensors that modulate ac and dc voltage and sine wave frequency.

Also, MEMS ANN circuits that are not trainable, but rather have fixed weights, can be constructed within the scope of the present invention. In this embodiment, depending on its form, the stepped attenuator, or array of different frequency resonators, and the cross-point switch and associated wiring that supply weights to the MEMS ANNs in an array can be replaced with a free-running resonator oscillator that supplies a weight value locally at each MEMS ANN. This replacement adds silicon transistors at each node to support self-oscillation. The weights cannot be changed unless the oscillators are tunable. (Thermal and electrical methods for tuning MEMS resonators have been discussed in the prior art.) Even without tuning, ANNs with fixed weights are useful where training can be done off-line and continued learning during system operation is not important. For example, a circuit for calculating fixed mathematical functions of a set of inputs can be built with weights that do not change.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT · 4 of 4

U.S. Pat. No. 5,537,083, “Microelectromechanical Signal Processors”, teaches how to construct ‘signal processors’. These devices couple, with a beam or beams, two or more MEMS resonators at one point on each resonator, and they take advantage of the dynamics of certain box-shaped coupling spring structures to make higher-order filters. In the present invention, the preferred embodiment uses a symmetrically shaped coupling frame that connects to two points on the source resonators to produce a purely additive summation of motion.

Another feature suggested in the preferred embodiment of the present invention is to shape the output comb to apply a non-linear transform to the sum-of-products output. While this shaping resembles the method suggested in the prior art to shape the input drive comb to tailor its force-against-displacement relation, the intent is quite different, i.e., to apply a nonlinear transform to the output current-against-displacement relation of the output comb.

Having described preferred embodiments of the invention with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to those precise embodiments, and that various changes and modifications may be effected therein by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims as granted

26 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

4 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G06N3/063
USPC · US Patent Classification
706/26706/40706/33

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2000Jan 2001Jul 2001Jan 2002Jul 2002Jan 2003Jul 2003Jan 2004Jul 2004USPTOApplicantNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.8 y
1,390 days filing → grant
Office actions
0
none on record
Examiner
Wilbert L. Starks, Jr.
art unit 2121 · TC 2100
Citations: 8 back · 29 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom200420062008201020122014201620182020Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock