USPatent applicationPatented

Non-carcinogenic corrosion inhibiting additive

Granted 25 Mar 2003 · 1 office action

Assignee: RTX Corporation

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: John William Putnam, Mark Jaworowski · Examiner: Deborah Jones · AU 1775 · TC 1700

Application· this page
9666402
filed 20 Sep 2000
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,537,678
granted 25 Mar 2003

Life of the application

9 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom200020022004200620082010201220142016201820202022ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A non-carcinogenic corrosion inhibiting additive includes an anodic corrosion inhibitor and a cathodic corrosion inhibitor.

Description

5 parts
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a corrosion inhibiting additive and, more particularly, a corrosion inhibiting additive which is as effective as hexavalent chromium compounds but which do not have the health hazards associated with hexavalent chromium compounds.

Corrosion inhibitive compounds have long been used on, for example, metallic surfaces to inhibit corrosion thereof. U.S. Pat. No. 2,387,528 describes alkaline earth metal chromates containing trivalent as well as hexavalent chromium as additives for metal protective pigments. U.S. Pat. No. 2,430,589 describes protective pigments comprising calcium chromate associated with minor additions of ferric, manganic or chromic oxides. U.S. Pat. No. 2,902,394 describes the use of soluble chromium containing compounds used in aqueous metal treating or rinsing solutions applied to metal surfaces or to the conversion coating onto metal surfaces to improve corrosion resistance. U.S. Pat. No. 3,063,877 describes aqueous solutions for treating metal surfaces to in part improve corrosion resistance which are prepared by partially reducing a dissolved hexavalent chromium compound with formaldehyde. U.S. Pat. No. 3,279,958 describes rinsing of phosphate, chromate and other chemical conversion coatings on metal surfaces with a dilute aqueous acid solution of a chromium-chromate complex followed by a water rinse. The complex is prepared by treating aqueous chromic acid solution with an organic reducing agent to reduce a portion of the hexavalent chromium to the trivalent state.

In the aerospace industry, aluminum alloys achieve their high strength to weight ratio by inclusion of such additional elements as copper, silicon, chromium, manganese, zinc and magnesium. The presence of these elements in high strength aluminum alloys make them more susceptible to corrosion attack than pure aluminum. These high strength aluminum alloys are, therefore, generally protected in service by use of corrosion inhibitive compounds based on hexavalent chromium. These compounds includes barium or strontium chromate particles used as inhibitive pigments and adhesives, paints and primers, chromic acid, which is used to produce a chromium-rich conversion coating, and sodium and potassium dichromate, which are used as sealing compounds for anodized films.

All forms of hexavalent chromium are recognized by the United States National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences as a Group 1 known human carcinogen. Accordingly, the use of corrosion inhibiting compounds which contain forms of hexavalent chromium are subject to stringent regulation and control. It would be very beneficial to eliminate hexavalent chromium as a corrosion inhibiting additive to corrosion inhibitive compounds as described above.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,030,285 describes a substitute corrosion inhibiting pigment for hexavalent chromium compounds. The corrosion inhibiting additive includes a combination ferric phosphate and ferrous phosphate. While the proposed corrosive inhibiting additive does not suffer from the possible health problems associated hexavalent chromium compounds, it has not proved to be particularly effective in inhibiting corrosion, particularly of metals, when used as an additive in inhibitive pigments in adhesives, paints and primers, as a conversion coating.

Naturally, it would be highly desirable to provide corrosion inhibitors which can be used and substituted for hexavalent chromium inhibitors so as to avoid potential health hazards while at the same time provide effective corrosion protection on metal surfaces, particularly, high strength aluminum alloys used in aerospace applications.

Accordingly, it is the principle object of the present invention to provide a corrosion inhibiting additive which is non-carcinogenic.

It is a particular object of the present invention to provide a corrosion inhibiting additive as set forth above which is effective in preventing corrosion attack on metals.

It is a further object of the present invention to provide a corrosion inhibiting additive as set forth above which is particularly effective when applied to high strength aluminum alloys.

It is a still further object of the present invention to provide a corrosion inhibiting additive as set forth above which is effective against both general corrosion and pitting corrosion.

Further objects and advantages of the present invention will appear hereinbelow.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the present invention, the foregoing objections and advantages are readily obtained.

The present invention is drawn to a non-carcinogenic corrosion inhibiting additive comprising an anodic corrosion inhibitor and cathodic corrosion inhibitor. The inhibiting additive comprises a combination of an anodic corrosion inhibitor and a cathodic corrosion inhibitor. The inhibiting additive of the present invention provides protection against both localized pitting corrosion and general corrosion. Suitable additives which are non-carcinogenic and comprise both anodic corrosion inhibitors and cathodic corrosion inhibitors. Particularly suitable additives include cerous molybdate with bismuth vanadate, cerous molybdate with strontium tungstate, cerous phosphate with strontium tungstate, bismuth vanadate with bismuth molybdate and strontium tungstate, and mixtures thereof. Preferred inhibiting additives are compounds of tungsten and cerium. Particularly preferred inhibiting additives are those additives which comprise cerous and tungstate compounds.

The corrosion inhibiting additive of the present invention may be used as an inhibitive additive in adhesives, paints and primers, sealants, epoxies and the like which are thereafter applied to a substrate by mechanical methods known in the art or dissolved in solution and applied to a substrate as a conversion coating.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 1 of 2

The present invention is drawn to a non-carcinogenic corrosion inhibiting additive and, more particularly, a non-carcinogenic corrosion inhibiting additive which is effective against general corrosion and pitting corrosion.

In accordance with the present invention, the non-carcinogenic corrosion inhibiting additive comprises, in combination, an anodic corrosion inhibitor and a cathodic corrosion inhibitor. By anodic corrosion inhibitor is meant suppression of metal oxidation reactions. By cathodic corrosion inhibitor is meant suppression of reduction reactions. In order to be effective, both the anodic and cathodic corrosion inhibitors should be “strong” corrosion inhibitors. By strong anodic corrosion inhibitor is meant a compound that is soluble in alkaline media, while precipitating as a reduced, insoluble oxide under neutral and acidic reducing conditions, that is, existing as an insoluble oxide below −600 mv vs Ag/AgCl at pH 7, and below −300 mv vs Ag/AgCl at pH 2. By a strong cathodic corrosion inhibitor is meant a compound that is soluble in acidic media, while undergoing a valance change to precipite as an insoluble oxide under neutral and alkaline and moderately oxidizing conditions, that is, existing as an insoluble oxide above −300 mv vs Ag/AgCl at pH 7, and above −900 mv vs Ag/AgCl at pH 12. The corrosion inhibiting additive requires both an anodic corrosion inhibitor and a cathodic corrosion inhibitor in order to be effective against general corrosion and pitting corrosion. General corrosion means uniform dissolution of base metal. By pitting corrosion is meant localized corrosion of base metal resulting in the formation of corrosion pits. The anodic corrosion inhibitor is effective against general corrosion while the cathodic corrosion inhibitor is particularly effective against pitting corrosion.

Suitable cathodic corrosion inhibitors for use in the inhibiting additive of the present invention are the elements of Group IIIB of the Periodic Table (the CAS version). All of the foregoing elements have cathodic corrosion inhibiting characteristics; however, it has been found that cerium, neodymium and praseodymium are “strong” cathodic corrosion inhibitors as defined above and are therefore preferred Group IIIB elements. Particularly preferred cathodic corrosion inhibitors are compounds of cerium and, most preferred are cerous compounds. Suitable anodic corrosion inhibitors for use in the inhibiting additive of the present invention include elements from Groups VB and VIB of the Periodic Table, with the exception of hexavalent chromium, and more particularly include compounds of vanadium, molybdenum and tungsten and more particularly tungstate compounds. Suitable additives which are non-carcinogenic include, for example, cerous molybdate with bismuth vanadate, cerous molybdate with strontium tungstate, cerous phosphate with strontium tungstate, bismuth vanadate with bismuth molybdate and strontium tungstate, and mixtures thereof.

The corrosion inhibiting additive of the present invention may be added as an inhibitive pigment in adhesives, paints and primers, sealants, epoxies and the like (hereafter referred to as an organic carrier). These products may be applied to the substrate which is being protected by any suitable manner known in the art such as spraying, brushing, or the like. In addition, the corrosion inhibiting additive, which must be at least partially soluble in water, may be dissolved in a carrier such as alcohol, water or the like and formed on the surface of a substrate as a conversion coating. In either case, that is, as an additive to adhesive, paints and primers, epoxies and the like, or as an additive to a solution for conversion coating, the corrosion inhibiting additive is provided in a solution comprising a carrier and the corrosion inhibiting additive. In the first case described above with regard to paints and primers, etc., the carrier may be at least an organic binder. When the corrosion inhibiting additive is to be applied by conversion coating, the carrier may simply be, for example, water or alcohol. Solutions for conversion coatings and compounds used as adhesives, paints and primers, and epoxies and their preparation are well-known in the art as evidenced by the above-referenced patents referred to in the background of the invention.

When the corrosion inhibiting additive is used as an additive to solutions such as adhesives, paints and primers, sealants, epoxies and the like (herein referred to as organic carriers), it is preferred that the additive be present in an amount of between about 1 to 50 wt. % and the minimum amount of anodic corrosion inhibitor and cathodic corrosion inhibitor is at least 0.25 wt. % and 0.25 wt. %, respectively. It is preferred that molar solubility in water of the anodic corrosion inhibitor and the cathodic corrosion inhibitor lie between 10 −6 and 10 −2 mol/liter.

When the corrosion inhibiting additive is dissolved in solution with a carrier, such as alcohol or water, and applied to a substrate as a conversion coating, it is preferred that the additive be present in an amount of between about 50 to 1000 mg/ft 2 and wherein the minimum amount of anodic corrosion inhibitor and cathodic corrosion inhibitor is at least 25 mg/ft 2 and 25 mg/ft 2 , respectively. The concentration of the anodic corrosion inhibitor and cathodic corrosion inhibitor in the carrier should be between 1 and 100 grams/liter, preferably between 10 and 50 grams/liter. With the corrosion inhibiting additive is dissolved with the carrier for use in water circulation systems such as boiler feed systems, radiator fluid systems, and the like, the concentration of the anodic corrosion inhibitor and the cathodic corrosion inhibitor in the carrier should be between 1 ppm and 1000 ppm, preferably between 10 ppm and 500 ppm.

The corrosion inhibiting additive is particularly useful in preventing general corrosion and pitting corrosion on metal substrates, particularly, high strength aluminum alloys for use in the aerospace industry. The additive may be applied in any manner known in the art including as a conversion coating, or applied as a primer, paint, organic sealant, sealer for anodized aluminum, additive for recirculating water system or the like. Obviously the use of the corrosion inhibiting additive of the present invention extends to other fields outside of aerospace and includes automotive, architectural, packaging, electronics, HVAC and marine.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 2 of 2

The final product is an article comprising a metal substrate having a corrosion inhibiting coating having a corrosion inhibiting additive which comprises an anodic corrosion inhibitor and a cathodic corrosion inhibitor on the final product wherein the anodic corrosion inhibitor is present between 0.25 wt. % to 50 wt. % and the cathodic corrosion inhibitor is present between 0.25 wt. % to 50 wt. %. When the corrosion inhibiting additive is applied as a conversion coating on the metal substrate, it is preferred that the coating have a coating weight of at least 50 mg/ft 2 , preferably between 100 and 500 mg/ft 2 , and the anodic corrosion inhibitor and cathodic corrosion inhibitor be present in an amount of between 25 to 250 mg/ft 2 and 25 to 250 mg/ft 2 , respectively. When the corrosion inhibitive additive is incorporated into an organic carrier (as described above) and applied to the metal substrate by mechanical methods known in the art, the coating should have a thickness of at least 2.5 microns, preferably between 2.5 and 250 microns, and the anodic corrosion inhibitor and cathodic corrosion inhibitor be present in an amount of between 0.25 wt. % to 25 wt. % and 0.25 wt. % to 25 wt. %, respectively.

The corrosion inhibiting properties of the additive of the present invention will now be made clear from the following example.

›EXAMPLE

In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the corrosion inhibiting additives of the present invention, an electrochemical cell was employed and twenty-four potential corrosion inhibiting additives were tested. The testing was carried out as follows. Slurries of candidate corrosion inhibitive pigments were prepared by magnetically stirring the pigments in 5 weight % sodium chloride solution for 24 hours and adjusting to pH 7.0 with sodium hydroxide or hydrochloric acid as required. Samples of alumina grit blasted 6061 T6 aluminum alloy were fixtured in a paint cell, obtained from Gamry Instruments, that exposed 18 cm 2 of surface. The paint cell was equipped with a silver / silver chloride reference electrode and a graphite rod counter electrode. The supernatant 5% sodium chloride solutions in contact with the candidate inhibitive pigments were added to the paint cell. The specimens were stabilized at E corr for 30 minutes. An impedance scan of 10 mV amplitude was run from 10KhZ to 0.01 Hz . A linear polarization scan was be run from −200 mV to +600 mV of the corrosion potential.

The measured values of the output of this testing were:

E pit -E corr , mV

I corr , μA/cm 2

Z, Kohm

Where E pit -E corr is indicative of pitting corrosion wherein the higher the value the greater the additive effect on pitting corrosion, I corr is indicative of general corrosion wherein the lower the value the greater the additive effect, and Z indicates the barrier surface film quality wherein the higher the value the greater the additive effect. The results are set forth below in Tables I and II.

As can be seen from the Tables above, samples 16, 18, (both anodic corrosion inhibitors) and samples 19, 20, 22 and 24 (all combinations of anodic and cathodic inhibitors) showed potential as corrosion inhibiting additives which exhibit effectiveness against both general corrosion and pitting corrosion.

In order to demonstrate the effectiveness over time of inhibiting additives having both an anodic corrosion inhibitor and a cathodic corrosion inhibitor in accordance with the invention as compared to additives which contain only anodic corrosion inhibitors, acidified salt spray tests were conducted under the following conditions. Panels of Aluminum Alloy 6061 were processed by phosphoric acid anodizing, air sprayed with epoxy primers of the corrosion inhibiting additive set forth in Table III and oven cured at 350° F. for 90 minutes. The panels were subjected to acidified salt spray tests conducted for 1000 hours in 5% NaCl solution acidified to pH 3.4 with acetic acid. Visual inspections of the panels were then conducted and the results are shown below in Table III and compared with the prior art, namely, SrCrO 4 .

As can be seen, those additives which contain both anodic and cathodic inhibitors were far more effective against pitting than additives which contain only anodic inhibitors. Also, the additives of the present invention are comparable to the prior art additive of strontium chromate. These tests show that while anodic inhibitors may form a barrier film which produces short term effect (see for example Table I, samples 18 and 16), no long term effect is obtained.

It is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the illustrations described and shown herein, which are deemed to be merely illustrative of the best modes of carrying out the invention, and which are susceptible of modification of form, size, arrangement of parts and details of operation. The invention rather is intended to encompass all such modifications which are within its spirit and scope as defined by the claims.

›Tables in the description — 3
TABLE 1 — Electrochemical Measurements of Individual Inhibitors
TestI corr ,E pit -E corr ,Max. Z,
CodeCompoundConcentration of elements in supernatant, μmol/LuA/cm 2mVKohm
1STCHStrontium ChromatePRIORART
(SEE TABLE III)
2CEPHCerous PhosphateCe1925001
3CEMOCerous MolybdateCe162Mo200.3010
4LAPHLanthanum PhosphateLa<94P405580.702
5CEVOCerium Vanadium OxideV1657Ce<5.180.209
6BATGBarium TungstateW<2.6414403
7CAVACalcium VanadateV1207050.08030
8BIVABismuth VanadateV100.12706
(with Molybdate)
9PHGJPhosguard J0806Mo<50.80.2012
(Zinc Phosphate/
1% Molybdenum)
10HZMPHeucophos ZMPMo<50.80.18020
(Zinc Molybdenum
Phospho-Oxide)
11DCCCDCC 1773Mo<54.70.19014
(Calcium Zinc Molybdate)
12MWZMMoly-white 101Mo16211.601.8
(Zinc Molybdate)
1MWEDMoly-white 101 ED+Mo15052.101.5
(Zinc Molybdate)
14MWZPMoly-white ZNPMo14341.202.5
(Zinc Phospho-Molybdate)
15ZPEDMoly-white ZNP ED+Mo3764P105Zn13560.603
(Zinc Phospho-Molybdate)
16STTUStrontium TungstateW<680.54101.5
17CATUCalcium TungstateW<680.1604
18BVwMBismuth Vanadate0.75505
(without Molybdate)
TABLE II — Electrochemical Measurements of Combinations of Inhibitor Concentration of
Testelements in supernatant, μmol/LI corr ,E pit -E corr ,Max. Z,
CodeCompoundsWMoCeVSrBiPuA/cm 2mVKohm
19WCCerous Phosphate +8<7811160.32906
Strontium Tungstate
20WMCCerous Molybdate +<51291896330.93901
Strontium Tungstate
21WVBismuth Vanadate6589078260.4012
(No Molybdate) +
Strontium Tungstate
22MVCCerous Molybdate +19751<209.62.04805
Bismuth Vanadate w/Molybdate
23MVCpCerous Phosphate +26<7255.5900.507
Bismuth Vanadate w/Molybdate
24WMVBismuth Vanadate w/93144754417.41.64101
Molybdate + Strontium
Tungstate
TABLE III
Inhibiting AdditivePit Clusters
SrCrO 41
CeVO 41-5
CePO 4 and SrWO 41-5
CeMoO 4 and SrWO 41-5
BiVO 4 w/ MoO 416-20
BiVO 416-20
BiVO 4 and SrWO 420+

Claims as granted

21 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

11 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section C — Chemistry; metallurgy
  • C09D5/08
  • C23F11/18
  • C23F11/00
USPC · US Patent Classification
428/469106/14.11106/14.44106/14.21106/14.12428/472428/704106/14.5

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomOct 2000Jan 2001Apr 2001Jul 2001Oct 2001Jan 2002Apr 2002Jul 2002Oct 2002Jan 2003Apr 2003USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.5 y
916 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Interviews
1
examiner interview summaries
Examiner
Deborah Jones
art unit 1775 · TC 1700
Citations: 41 back · 24 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020Owner 1liens, releases & corrections
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock