USPatent applicationPatented

Pigment for warpage-free polyolefins coloration

Granted 28 Oct 2003 · 2 office actions

Assignee: CLARIANT FINANCE (BVI) LIMITED

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Till Borchert, Bansi Lal Kaul, Bruno Piastra · Examiner: Kriellion A. Sanders · AU 1714 · TC 1700

Application· this page
9637541
filed 11 Aug 2000
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,638,996
granted 28 Oct 2003

Life of the application

9 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

Use of the pigment of formula (I) in which X stands for Cl or CH3,and of formula (II) wherein R is phenyl or C12H25,for the coloration of polyolefins which do not warp.

Description

3 parts
›This invention relates to the use of a…

This invention relates to the use of a pigment for the warpage-free coloration of polyolefins.

Unexpected shrinkage and warpage problems can occur when organic pigments are used for the coloration of polyolefins, especially high density polyethylene. This may be due to changes in crystallization behaviour due to the presence of pigments. A number of studies have shown that pigments can affect both the size of the crystallites and the rate of crystallization by acting as nucleating agents, inducing crystallization at higher temperatures a than expected.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

All these aspects have an important commercial issue. For example the coloration of bottle crates is a very important market for a pigment producer. A pigment has to fulfill an important condition when used in high density polyethylene application: it must not influence the crystallization process of the polymer. Such an influence can cause shrinkage or warpage, showing deformations of the injected article and deterioration of the mechanical properties.

In order to avoid this problem, when using organic pigment for the coloration of polyolefins, surface treatments have been developed in order to modify the surface of the pigment precipitation on the surface of the organic particules of a thin layer of a metal oxide (e.g. zirconium, silicium or aluminium) or adsorption or precipitation of some polar polymers (polyacrylates or cellulose derivatives) on the pigment surface. However these treatments are not always efficient.

It has now been found that thiazine-indigo pigments of formula (I) and of formula (II) do not provoke warpage when used in high density polyethylene.

in which X stands for Cl or CH 3

wherein R is phenyl or C 12 H 25 .

Other derivatives of this family have also been tested, for example the two pigments of formula (Ill) and (IV) and the pigment of formula (II) with R=p-C 6 H 4 CF 3 , but they show warpage when used in high density polyethylene.

The invention, therefore, resides in the use of a pigment of formula (I) or (II) for the coloration of polyolefins which do not warp and provides warpage-free polyolefins, more preferably high density polyethylene (HDPE), which have been colored with a pigment of formula (I) or (II).

When coloring polyolefins with the pigment of formula (I) the usual amounts can be used, i.e. from 0.01 to 30% by weight, preferably from 0.1 to 10% by weight based on the material to be colored.

›EXPERIMENTAL PART

The testing method is the following:

injection mould 10 test plates 60×60 mm in HDPE with and without 0.1% pigment

processing temperature 220° C. and 280° C.

result: difference of the length and width measurement between test plates in natural HDPE and in HDPE colored with 0.1% pigment.

% FV=(% vertical shrinkage−% horizontal shrinkage)/(% horizontal shrinkage)×100%

% FV=0-10%: good

% FV=10-20%: suitable

% FV>20%: unsuitable

With the pigments of formula (I) and (II) an excellent result is obtained regarding warpage of the test plates.

›Tables in the description — 1
% FV at% FV at
220° C.280° C.
Pigment of formula (I) with X = CH 38%0.25%
Pigment of formula (I) with X = Cl1.78%6.36%
Pigment of formula (II) with R = Ph10.47%7.61%
Pigment of formula (II) with R = C 12 H 256.88%4.53%
Pigment of formula (II) with R = p-C 6 H 4 CF 332.10%25.64%
Pigment of formula (III)43.85%55.92%
Pigment of formula (IV)47.75%34.6%
1 of 3 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims as granted

3 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

7 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section C — Chemistry; metallurgy
  • C09B7/00
  • C08L23/00
  • C08L23/04
  • C08K5/46
  • C09B57/00
USPC · US Patent Classification
524/878/575

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2000Jan 2001Jul 2001Jan 2002Jul 2002Jan 2003Jul 2003Jan 2004USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalRequest for continued examinationNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.2 y
1,173 days filing → grant
Office actions
2
non-final + final
Responses
2
1 RCE
Examiner
Kriellion A. Sanders
art unit 1714 · TC 1700
Citations: 9 back · 2 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom200420062008201020122014201620182020Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock