USPatent applicationPatented

Folding scooter

Granted 3 Sep 2002 · 1 office action

Application· this page
9634085
filed 8 Aug 2000
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,443,470
granted 3 Sep 2002

Life of the application

11 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A scooter has a plurality of wheels, a steerer, a platform, and a steerer support. The steerer support connects the steerer to the platform. The steerer support can rotate with respect to the platform, allowing the scooter to be folded when not in use. The steerer support can nest within the platform, further allowing the scooter to collapse into a compact position. The steering axis, front wheel diameter, and fork geometry are arranged to provide stable steering. Specifically, the steering axis and the front wheel axis of rotation are both located aft of the centerline of the steerer. Further, the contact point between the front wheel and the ground and the axis about which the front wheel rotates are located aft of the steering axis about which the steerer rotates. The trail, measured between the steering axis and the front wheel contact point, is kept relatively small, between 0 and 75 mm. Also disclosed is a collapsing steerer, a parallel-rail support structure, and a compact braking element.

Description

5 parts
›This application claims benefit of provisional No. 60/148,792…

This application claims benefit of provisional No. 60/148,792 filed Aug. 13, 1999.

›BACKGROUND

This invention relates to personal transportation devices and more specifically to scooters.

Most people walk at speeds of 3-6 kilometers per hour, so that walking a distance of 1 kilometer requires 10-20 minutes. For centuries, people have sought to increase the speed and/or the ease with which they travel.

Early transportation schemes employed watercraft (e.g., canoes, rafts) or large animals (e.g., camels, elephants, horses). Wheeled devices provided improved performance because of the ability of wheels to reduce the friction and associated energy dissipation in moving across the ground. In the early 1800s, two-wheeled human-powered devices called Draisines were invented and produced. A person using one of these devices straddled a frame and employed running for propulsion. In the mid-1800s, pedals were attached to Draisines creating the Velocipede, the precursor to the modern bicycle. Subsequent inventions include scooters, roller skates, and skateboards. Today, the dominant human-powered personal transportation devices include bicycles, roller skates, and skateboards. Scooters are also widely available.

Despite advances over the past several centuries, these existing devices fail to provide humans with efficient, highly convenient, small, lightweight, and easily deployed means of traveling distances of 10 km or less. Bicycles require substantial storage area, can not be easily carried in automobiles or on public transportation, and can be stolen when parked outdoors. Roller skates require substantial time to put on and take off, and when not in use are awkward to carry. Skateboards are small and light, but require substantial athletic ability to ride and can be frightening and dangerous when cornering or descending hills. Scooters, whether human-powered or motor-powered, have historically not been light enough or small enough to conveniently carry.

It is an object of this invention to provide a means of efficient personal transportation that can be easily carried and stored when not in use, and that is easily used by people with a wide range of athletic abilities.

›SUMMARY

A preferred embodiment of the invention is a scooter having a plurality of wheels, a steerer, a platform, and a steerer support. The steerer support connects the steerer to the platform. The steerer support can rotate with respect to the platform, allowing the scooter to be folded when not in use. The invention allows the steerer support to nest within the platform, further allowing the scooter to collapse into a compact position.

An aspect of the invention is also a configuration of the steering axis, front wheel diameter, and fork geometry that provides stable steering. Specifically, the contact point between the front wheel and the ground is located aft of the steering axis about which the steerer rotates. Furthermore, the trail, which is the distance along the ground, between the front wheel contact point and the steering axis is small, between approximately 0 and 75 mm. The front wheel axis and the steering axis are also aft of the centerline of the steerer.

Additional aspects of the invention include a collapsing steerer, a parallel-rail support structure, and a compact braking element.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims and accompanying drawings, where:

FIG. 1 is an overall perspective view of an embodiment of the invention shown in the deployed position;

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of an embodiment of the invention shown in the folded position;

FIG. 3 is a perspective view of an embodiment of the invention shown without a deck, and in a deployed position;

FIG. 4 is a perspective view of an embodiment of the invention shown without a deck, and in a folded position;

FIG. 5 is a side view of an embodiment of the invention in a deployed position;

FIG. 6 is a side view of an embodiment of the invention in a folded position;

FIG. 7 is a side view of the front portion of an embodiment of the invention showing the steering geometry; and

FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view of a portion of an embodiment of the invention showing the braking element.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A preferred embodiment of the invention is shown in the deployed position in FIG. 1 . This embodiment has a front wheel 10 , rear wheel 11 , deck 12 , steerer support 13 , pivot 14 , locking pin 15 , steerer 16 and fork 19 . FIG. 2 shows this embodiment in the collapsed position. A platform has a deck 12 and two rails. These rails, left rail 30 and right rail 31 are shown in FIG. 3 .

In a preferred embodiment of the invention, deck 12 is fastened to rails 30 and 31 with fasteners 17 and cleats 32 . Fasteners 17 pull deck 12 against rails 30 and 31 via cleats 32 .

The embodiment shown in FIGS. 1-8 is a push scooter in which power is supplied by the human user. However, in other embodiments of the invention, not shown, power can be applied to the rear wheel by an electric motor or internal combustion engine.

To collapse the scooter, the user loosens clamp 33 in FIG. 3 and telescopes handlebar 34 into lower steerer 35 . Next, the user removes locking pin 15 from holes 36 , 37 , and 38 in FIG. 3 . The user then folds steerer 16 towards the platform comprised of deck 12 and rails 30 and 31 . Steerer support 13 rotates about pivot 14 and nests within the platform. Locking pin 15 is finally inserted back through hole 37 and steerer support 13 is prevented from rotating by the interference of locking pin 15 with rail notch 40 (FIG. 4) and another similar notch (not shown) on the other side of the scooter in the rail 31 .

The location of pivot 14 and the geometry of the steerer support and platform contribute to determining how compactly the scooter can be collapsed. The present invention allows the steerer support and the platform to nest together, further allowing the angle between the steerer and platform to be minimized when the scooter is collapsed. Locating pivot 14 as close as possible relative to the ground, when the scooter's wheels are resting on the ground, in combination with the nesting of the steerer and the platform, allows the scooter to collapse within a small dimension perpendicular to the plane of the platform. However, the pivot 14 must be located at a sufficient height above the plane in which the wheels contact the ground to allow clearance for bumps and other obstacles. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the pivot is located approximately 60 mm above the plane in which the wheels contact the ground.

FIGS. 5 and 6 illustrate the deployed and collapsed positions of an embodiment of the invention shown from a side.

FIG. 7 illustrates the steering geometry of a preferred embodiment of the invention. Stable steering requires that the contact point 70 between front wheel 10 and the ground be located aft of the steering axis A about which the steerer rotates. Aft and fore are defined by a motion axis M along which the scooter moves in a straight ahead direction. The distance along a planar surface, such as the ground, between the contact point 70 of the front wheel upon the planar surface, and the intersection with the plane, of the steering axis A, is defined as the trail T. The size of the trail T is determined according to the basic rules of plane geometry by the steering angle S, the wheel diameter D, and the fork offset F. The steering angle S is measured between the steering axis A and the motion axis M. The fork offset F is the distance along the direction of motion between the steering axis A and the wheel axis W. As S increases, T decreases. As D increases, T increases. As F increases, T increases. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, D is approximately 180 mm, S is approximately 81 degrees, F is approximately 0 mm and the resulting T is approximately 13 mm. The desirable range for T is between 0 and 75 mm, with smaller values providing less stable, but more responsive steering. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the wheel axis W and the steering axis A are both located aft of the centerline 71 of the steerer. The centerline 71 is substantially parallel to the major axis of the elongated steerer, and intersects a point in the cross section of the steerer that is located at the midpoints of the major and minor axes of the cross section. This arrangement allows for a desirable value of T, while allowing the front wheel to be located close to the platform and steerer support, providing a compact configuration.

FIG. 8 illustrates the braking element of a preferred embodiment of the invention. A brake shoe 80 pivots about brake pivot 81 . Translation of cable 82 causes the rotation of brake shoe 80 such that it contacts and applies force to rear wheel 11 . Return spring 83 restores the brake shoe to its neutral position when tension in cable 82 is released. Rails 30 and 31 comprise parallel surfaces that sandwich brake shoe 80 and locate brake pivot 81 .

The foregoing discussion should be understood as illustrative and should not be considered to be limiting in any sense. While this invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims.

The corresponding structures, materials, acts and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or acts for performing the functions in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed.

1 of 5 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims as granted

8 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

4 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section B — Performing operations; transporting
  • B62K3/00
  • B62K15/00
USPC · US Patent Classification
280/87.41280/87.5

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2000Oct 2000Jan 2001Apr 2001Jul 2001Oct 2001Jan 2002Apr 2002Jul 2002Oct 2002USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.1 y
756 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
1
no RCE
Examiner
Brian L. Johnson
art unit 3611 · TC 3600
Citations: 14 back · 53 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2002200420062008201020122014201620182020Owner 3liens, releases & corrections
TitleLienhover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock