USPatent applicationPatented

Air damper with graphite coated lip seal

Granted 4 Feb 2003 · 5 office actions

Assignee: Illinois Tool Works Inc.

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Steven L. Bivens · Examiner: Anthony Knight · AU 3626 · TC 3600

Application· this page
9626270
filed 25 Jul 2000
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,513,811
granted 4 Feb 2003

Life of the application

17 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

The air damper includes a piston reciprocating within a cylindrical housing. The piston includes a lip seal which is made of rubber or thermoplastic elastomer impregnated with a minimum of 3% molybdenum/seal part weight, or a minimum of 2% polytetrafluoroethylene or silicone/seal part weight or a minimum of 1% wax/seal part weight. The lip seal is coated with a minimum of 0.5%/seal part weight graphite powder/molybdenum disulfide. The housing is made with a minimum of 2% silicone impregnated thermoplastic or a minimum of 2% moly sulfide impregnated thermoplastic. This provides for increased smoothness of operation of the air damper, particularly at low speeds.

Description

5 parts
›This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent…

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/388,971 filed on Sep. 2, 1999 entitled “Air Damper with Graphite Coated Lip Seal”.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention pertains to the use of powdered graphite on the lip seal of an air damper to cause the air damper to operate more smoothly.

2. Description of the Prior Art

In the prior art, an air damper of the type with a piston shaft and a lip seal reciprocating within a body or cylinder is well-known. However, a typical rubber seal may slide roughly, particularly at low speeds, resulting in a rough operation of the air damper. Many coatings may attract dust or plug the air orifice thereby impairing the function of the air damper. Moreover, the use of grease or silicone may cause the seal to stick in place and not open. Moreover, the viscosity of grease increases under cold conditions which slows down the damping rate.

An elastomeric coating for a lip seal is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,818,620 entitled “Elastomer Coated Lip Seal”, issued on Apr. 4, 1989 to Pilkington, but does not adequately address the above deficiency.

Graphite powder for lubrication purposes is likewise old in the prior art, such as is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,702,769 entitled “Method for Coating a Substrate with a Sliding Abrasion-Resistant Layer Utilizing Graphite Lubricant Particles”, issued on Dec. 30, 1997 to Peters but does not address the above deficiency with regard to smoothness of operation.

›OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is therefore an object of this invention to provide for increased smoothness of operation of an air damper, particularly at low speeds.

It is therefore a further object of this invention to achieve the above object without any impairment of the function of the air damper, such as attracting dust or plugging the air orifice.

It is therefore a further object of this invention to achieve the above objects without unduly increased manufacturing expenses or other deficiencies.

These and other objects are achieved by providing a rubber or thermoplastic elastomer lip seal coated with a minimum of 0.5%/seal part weight graphite powder/molybdenum disulfide. Typically, the lip seal is made of rubber or thermoplastic elastomer impregnated with a minimum of 3% molybdenum/seal part weight, or a minimum of 2% TEFLON® (polytetrafluoroethylene) or silicone/seal part weight or a minimum of 1% wax/seal part weight. The housing is typically made with a minimum of 2% silicone impregnated thermoplastic or a minimum of 2% moly sulfide impregnated thermoplastic.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Further objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following description and claims, and from the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a plan view of an air damper which is adaptable to the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the housing of the air damper which is adaptable to the present invention, illustrating the film of graphite powder spread within the interior of the housing by the movement of the piston.

FIG. 3 is a plan view of the piston and shaft of an air damper which is adaptable to the present invention.

FIG. 4 is a plan view of the piston of an air damper which is adaptable to the present invention, with the two positions of the lip seal shown in phantom.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Referring to the drawings in detail wherein like numerals refer to like elements throughout the several views, one sees that FIG. 1 is a plan view of an air damper 10 which is adaptable to the present invention. This air damper 10 is disclosed in more detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/177,029, entitled “Silent Damper with Anti-Rattle Shaft”, filed on Oct. 22, 1998, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.

Air damper 10 typically comprises a cylindrical housing 12 with a closed end 14 and an open end 16 (see FIG. 2 ), along with a piston 18 attached to a shaft 20 with an attachment head 22 (see FIG. 3 ). Selective air communication groove 24 is formed between disks 26 , 28 of piston 18 (see FIG. 4 ). The vertical portion (in the orientation shown in FIG. 4) of selective air communication groove 24 formed on disk 28 has substantially greater area than the vertical portion of selective air communication groove 24 formed on disk 26 . Lip seal 30 urges radially outward against the interior of cylindrical housing 12 to form a relatively airtight seal. As piston 18 is extended or withdrawn from cylindrical housing 12 , lip seal 30 urges against disk 26 thereby restricting the passage of air through selective air communication groove 24 thereby effecting damping. However, as piston 18 is retracted into housing 12 , lip seal 30 urges against disk 28 thereby allowing increased passage of air through selective air communication groove 24 thereby diminishing damping. It is important to the operation of air damper 10 that selective air communication groove 24 not become plugged or blocked.

As evidenced by film 32 shown on the interior of housing 12 on FIG. 2, lip seal 30 is coated with a minimum of 0.5%/seal part weight graphite powder/molybdenum disulfide or equivalent. Moreover, typically, lip seal 30 is made of rubber or thermoplastic elastomer impregnated with a minimum of 3% molybdenum/seal part weight, or a minimum of 2% TEFLON® (polytetrafluoroethylene) or silicone/seal part weight or a minimum of 1% wax/seal part weight. Cylindrical housing 12 is typically made with a minimum of 2% silicone impregnated thermoplastic or a minimum of 2% moly sulfide impregnated thermoplastic.

This graphite powder as evidenced by film 32 allows for smoother operation of piston 18 within housing 12 without the risk of attracting dust or plugging selective air communication groove 24 .

Thus the several aforementioned objects and advantages are most effectively attained. Although a single preferred embodiment of the invention has been disclosed and described in detail herein, it should be understood that this invention is in no sense limited thereby and its scope is to be determined by that of the appended claims.

1 of 5 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims as granted

4 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

12 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section F — Mechanical engineering; lighting; heating; weapons
  • F16J15/32
  • F16J15/16
  • F16F9/32
  • F16F9/02
  • F16F9/36
USPC · US Patent Classification
277/549277/556277/569277/650277/935188/322.18277/944

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2000Oct 2000Jan 2001Apr 2001Jul 2001Oct 2001Jan 2002Apr 2002Jul 2002Oct 2002Jan 2003Apr 2003USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalResponse after finalResponse after non-finalResponse after non-finalResponse after final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.5 y
924 days filing → grant
Office actions
5
non-final + final
Responses
5
1 RCE
Examiner
Anthony Knight
art unit 3626 · TC 3600
Citations: 21 back · 5 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock