USPatent applicationPatented

Meltblown die tip with capillaries for each counterbore

Granted 17 Jun 2003 · 3 office actions

Assignee: Kimberly Clark Worldwide

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Michael C. Cook · Examiner: Robert Davis · AU 1722 · TC 1700

Application· this page
9625465
filed 25 Jul 2000
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,579,084
granted 17 Jun 2003

Life of the application

12 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A extruded filament die tip, such as meltblown filaments, has a plurality of bores communicating with the main polymer distribution channel. The bores have a plurality of capillary openings, or spinnerettes, drilled into the bore to act as extrusion orifices for the die tip. The present die tip differs from conventional die tips in which capillaries are drilled into a deep slot formed in the die tip for polymer distribution. The invention allows more material to remain in the body of the die tip while facilitating more spinnerette openings per linear inch in the die tip and permitting higher operating pressures and smaller diameter fibers such as between 1 and 4 microns. A resultant nonwoven fabric made with the die tip will have a higher hydrohead resistance due to the increased number of fine filaments per inch for the same osy of fabric.

Description

4 parts
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to die heads for extruded filaments and particularly die heads for extruding meltblown fabrics.

2. Discussion of the Related Art

A general overview of meltblown polymer filament technology may be had by referring to U.S. Pat. No. 3,825,380 (Harding et al.).

Generally a single deep polymer-distribution channel is formed in the die head and multiple capillaries are drilled in the so-called “knife edge”, or extrusion edge of the die tip to contact the distribution channel and provide the extrusion channels and orifices for the fine, or small, diameter, meltblown fibers. The reader is also referred to U.S. Pat. No. 4,486,161 (Middleton) and U.S. Pat. No. 4,013,816 (Sabee et al.).

The words “fibers” and “filaments” will be used interchangeably in this specification.

However, owning to physical constraints of the die head, such as the requirement for a fine edge at the point of extrusion, there have always been tradeoffs between extrusion pressure and meltblown die capillary density in the meltblown die head. Ideally the maker of meltblown fabrics would prefer to have options for utilizing both higher pressures and greater capillary density than were previously available from prior art designs.

›SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION

In order to accomplish the object of higher die head pressures and greater capillary, or extrusion orifice, density in a meltblown fiber die head, the present invention provides a die head with bores communicating with a central polymer distribution channel and running in the extrusion direction to communicate with multiple capillaries. At least some, or all, of the bores will have multiple capillary extrusion outlets. By distributing multiple capillaries to a bore, more metal may be retained in the die head thereby allowing higher pressures in the extrusion process while permitting higher capillary density.

It is anticipated that the die tip of the present invention will withstand extrusion pressures that would cause other seals in the die head assembly to fail, resulting in no practical pressure limit on the die tip of the present invention.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other objects and features of this invention will be better understood from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the drawings wherein:

FIG. 1 is a front elevation of a meltblown fiber die head according to the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a bottom view, along line II—II of FIG. 1, of a section of the knife edge of the die showing the in-line capillaries with regular spacing and counterbores in phantom.

FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 show cross-sectional views of a front elevation to illustrate various densities of the multiple capillaries.

It will be appreciated that the drawings may be highly schematic and not to scale for purposes of clear explanation of the principles of the present invention.

›DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring to FIG. 1, the die tip 11 is shown with a polymer distribution channel 13 connected to multiple counterbores, collectively 15 , whose longitudinal axes are parallel to the extrusion direction 16 , and which in turn communicate with the capillaries, collectively 17 . The capillaries pass through the die head body 20 and serve as the extrusion orifices of the die head 11 at its knife edge 19 . While these counterbores 15 are shown as continuing across the width of the die head, as indicated by the three dots 21 , it will be appreciated by the person having ordinary skill in the art that various suitable arrangements of counterbores and capillaries may be arranged according to the dictates of the particular manufacturing situation within the teachings of the present invention.

While designated as being a straight-sided counterbore, the bore need not have parallel sides if machining techniques or design dictates otherwise. Neither must the longitudinal axis of a bore necessarily run parallel to the extrusion direction 18 , i.e. perpendicular to the knife edge 19 . The ordinary skilled artisan will further appreciate that various common arrangements and components of a working die head have been left unshown or unstated as they are unnecessary to an exposition of the present invention.

Referencing FIG. 2, a partial bottom view of the knife edge 19 , the outlets of the capillaries 17 can be seen with the counterbores 15 shown in phantom. While shown as being regular in spacing, alignment, and distribution, the capillaries of the present invention, and their counterbores, need not be so limited to regular forms.

Referencing FIG. 3, a partial cross-section at a front elevational view, there is shown a detailed view of these capillaries 17 a , 17 b , and 17 c communicating between a first counterbore 15 a and the knife edge 19 of the die. It will be noted that the capillaries which are off-center of the counterbore, 17 a , 17 c , will be drilled at slight angles to the longitudinal axis of the counterbore 15 a . The counterbore may include a conical countersink portion 23 at its juncture with the capillaries 17 .

FIG. 4 illustrates that even higher concentrations of capillaries may be achieved. In this case, five capillaries 17 are shown connecting to each counterbore 15 . Present conventional drilling can easily achieve one hundred holes per inch in an exemplary die tip by utilizing the present invention.

While in the foregoing specification this invention has been described in relation to certain preferred embodiments thereof, and many details have been set forth for purpose of illustration, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the invention is susceptible to additional embodiments and that certain of the details described herein can be varied considerably without departing from the basic principles of the invention.

Claims as granted

24 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

5 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section B — Performing operations; transporting
  • B29C48/05
  • B29C48/305
  • B29C48/345
USPC · US Patent Classification
425/463425/382.R

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2000Jan 2001Jul 2001Jan 2002Jul 2002Jan 2003Jul 2003USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalFinal rejectionResponse after finalResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.9 y
1,057 days filing → grant
Office actions
3
non-final + final
Responses
3
no RCE
Interviews
1
examiner interview summaries
Examiner
Robert Davis
art unit 1722 · TC 1700
Citations: 8 back · 5 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020Owner 1Owner 2
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock