USPatent applicationPatented

Fungicides

Granted 15 Jan 2002 · 1 office action

Application· this page
9622096
filed 12 Dec 2000
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,339,103
granted 15 Jan 2002

Life of the application

7 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

The new compound, dimethy3-(propoxycarbonylamino)propylammonium O-ethylphosphonate, having fungicidal activity, its preparation, compositions comprising it and methods for its use in agriculture.

Description

3 parts
›This invention relates to a new compound having…

This invention relates to a new compound having fungicidal activity.

In one aspect, the invention provides the compound, dimethyl-[3-(propoxycarbonylamino)propyl]ammonium O-ethylphosphonate, having the structure

The compound of the invention has activity as a fungicide, especially against Phycomycete diseases of plants, e.g. vine downy mildew ( Plasmopara viticola ), various Phytophthora blights e.g. late tomato or potato blight ( Phytophthora infestans ), Pythium spp., Aphanomyces spp., Bremia spp., Perenospora spp. and Pseudoperenospora spp.

The invention thus also provides a method of combating fungi at a locus infested or liable to be infested therewith, which comprises applying to the locus the compound of formula I.

The invention also provides an agricultural composition comprising the compound of formula I in admixture with an agriculturally acceptable diluent or carrier.

The composition can comprise one or more additional active ingredients, for example compounds known to possess plant-growth regulant, herbicidal, fungicidal, insecticidal or acaricidal properties. Alternatively the compound of the invention can be used in sequence with the other active ingredient.

Fungicides with which the compound can be mixed include acylanilines, such as metalaxyl, oxadixyl, ofurace, benalaxyl and furalaxyl; cymoxanil; mancozeb; chlorothalonil; folpet; captan; famoxadone; fenamidone; spiroxamine; fluazinam; dimethomorph; strobilurins, such as kresoxim-methyl, azoxystrobin and trifloxystrobin, pyrimethanil, cyprodinil; mepanipyrim; and iprodione.

The names quoted for these compounds are the non-proprietary common names and the chemical structure can be found for example by reference to the “Pesticide Manual”, eleventh edition, 1997, published by the British Crop Protection Council. Of the compounds whose common names are not mentioned in the Pesticide Manual the full chemical names are as follows:

trifloxystrobin—methyl (E,E)-methoxyimino-{2-[1-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)-ethylideneaminooxymethyl]phenyl}acetate

spiroxamine—8-tert-butyl-1,4-dioxaspiro[4.5]decan-2-ylmethyl(ethyl)-(propyl)amine

fenamidone—(S)-1-anilino-4-methyl-2-methylthio-4-phenylimidazolin-5-one

The composition of the invention may include for example a dispersing agent, emulsifying agent or wetting agent. Usually they are in the form of an aqueous concentrate.

The concentration of the active ingredient in the composition of the present invention, as applied to plants is preferably within the range of 0.0001 to 1.0 percent by weight, especially 0.0001 to 0.01 percent by weight. In a primary composition, the amount of active ingredient can vary widely and can be, for example, from 5 to 95 percent by weight of the composition.

In the method of the invention the compound is generally applied to seeds, plants or their habitat. Thus, the compound can be applied directly to the soil before, at or after drilling so that the presence of active compound in the soil can control the growth of fungi which may attack seeds. When the soil is treated directly the active compound can be applied in any manner which allows it to be intimately mixed with the soil such as by spraying, by broadcasting a solid form of granules, or by applying the active ingredient at the same time as drilling by inserting it in the same drill as the seeds. A suitable application rate is within the range of from 5 to 1000 g per hectare, more preferably from 10 to 500 g per hectare.

Alternatively the active compound can be applied directly to the plant by, for example, spraying or dusting either at the time when the fungus has begun to appear on the plant or before the appearance of fungus as a protective measure. In both such cases the preferred mode of application is by foliar spraying. It is generally important to obtain good control of fungi in the early stages of plant growth as this is the time when the plant can be most severely damaged. The spray or dust can conveniently contain a pre- or post-emergence herbicide if this is thought necessary. Sometimes, it is practicable to treat the roots of a plant before or during planting, for example, by dipping the roots in a suitable liquid or solid composition. When the active compound is applied directly to the plant a suitable rate of application is from 0.025 to 5 kg per hectare, preferably from 0.05 to 1 kg per hectare.

The compounds of formula I may be obtained by reacting an amine of formula II

with ethyl hydrogen phosphonate.

This reaction can be carried out in aqueous solution

The invention is illustrated in the following Example.

›EXAMPLE 1

A solution of the sodium salt of ethyl hydrogen phosphonate (13.2 g in water (25 ml)) was added to a an aqueous solution of propyl 3-(dimethylamino)propylcarbamate hydrochloride (31.0 ml of concentration 722 g/l 0.1 moles). The solution was evaporated to dryness to leave an oil containing sodium chloride as a white solid. The crude product was triturated with dichloromethane (ca. 100 ml) and the insoluble white solid (sodium chloride) filtered off and washed with several portions of dichloromethane. The filtrates were combined and evaporated to leave the dimethyl-[3-(propoxycarbonylamino)propyl]ammonium O-ethylphosphonate, as a viscous colourless oil.

Nmr spectroscopy confirmed that the product was a salt by observation of the chemical shifts relative to propyl 3-(dimethylamino)propylcarbamate.

The starting material was prepared by alkaline hydrolysis of diethyl phosphite by a known procedure. See for example Synthesis 134, 1978.

›EXAMPLE 2

Aqueous solutions of the compound of Example 1 were sprayed at various concentrations onto vines to run off using a hand-sprayer. Plants were then inoculated by hand spraying with a spore suspension of 100,000 spores per ml of Plasmopara viticola. For the purposes of comparison the vines were sprayed also with the commercially available propamocarb hydrochloride.

Plants were assessed for degree of disease control compared with untreated plants.

The results are as follows:

›Tables in the description — 1
TreatmentRate (ppm)% Control
Compound of invention80081.5
Compound of invention40027.6
propamocarb hydrochloride80014.6
propamocarb hydrochloride4004.2
1 of 3 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims as granted

23 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

13 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section A — Human necessities
  • A01N57/12
  • A01P3/00
  • A01N47/12
  • A01N/
Section C — Chemistry; metallurgy
  • C07C/
  • C07F/
  • C07C271/20
  • C07F9/142
USPC · US Patent Classification
514/478568/13560/159568/11514/479

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 1999Jul 1999Jan 2000Jul 2000Jan 2001Jul 2001Jan 2002USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.9 y
1,062 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
2
no RCE
Examiner
Sreeni Padmanabhan
art unit 1621 · TC 1600
Citations: 7 back · 4 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom200220042006200820102012201420162018Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock