Amplifier with folded super-followers
Granted 12 Mar 2002 · 1 office action
Assignee: Texas Instruments
Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock
Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock
Inventors: John L. Wallberg, Bryan E. Bloodworth, Andrija Jezdic · Examiner: Robert Pascal · AU 2817 · TC 2800
Life of the application
8 dated eventsAbstract
Fixed gain amplifiers have particular use in the read channel of hard disk drives. A CMOS fixed gain amplifier 18c having a constant gain over the large dynamic range of hard disk drive applications is provided by incorporating super follower transistors M3 and M4 into the input stage of the fixed gain amplifier. The super follower transistors are folded into the output stage of the amplifier. The differential current through the degeneration resistor RE1 travels through the super follower transistors M3 and M4 and into the current mirrors I5 and I6. Thus the ac differential current goes directly to the cascoded stage, into the load resistors RL1 and RL2, and to the output load.
Description
8 parts›This application claims priority under 35 USC §119(e)(1)…
This application claims priority under 35 USC §119(e)(1) of provisional application number 60/143,798 filed Jul. 14, 1999.
›FIELD OF INVENTION
This invention relates generally to electronic amplifiers and more particularly to CMOS fixed gain amplifiers.
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 2
Amplifiers are commonly used in electronic applications. One example of the use of an amplifier is in a disk storage system commonly used in personal computers known as hard disk drives, HDD. U.S. Pat. No. 5,831,888 entitled “Automatic Gain Control Circuit” and assigned to Texas Instruments Incorporated, the assignee of the present invention, sets forth generally the description of disk storage. The HDD device generally includes a magnetic storage media, such as rotating disks or platters, a spindle motor, read/write heads, an actuator, a preamplifier, a read channel, a write channel, a servocontroller, a memory and control circuitry to control the operation of the HDD and to properly interface the HDD to a host or system bus. The following U.S. Patents describe various aspects of HDD devices:
Prior art FIG. 1 illustrates a partial HDD system. A disk/head assembly 12 stores data. A magnetoresistive, MR, head 14 works through magnetic media to read data from disk 12 or to write data to disk 12 . A write occurs through an inductive element in the MR head to the magnetic media disk assembly 12 and a read occurs by sensing the magnetic shifts in the disk assembly 12 by using the resistive read element of the MR head 14 . A preamplifier 16 , typically of the single ended variety, connects to MR head 14 to provide an initial amplification stage. The output of the preamplifier 16 is an analog signal which flows to a read channel 18 for further processing.
The read channel 18 in prior art FIG. 1 takes the analog signal from preamplifier 16 and conditions it to provide a digital output signal that will be sent by an appropriate bus structure to other components of a computer system, such as, for example, the digital signal processor in either the modem or the graphics card. An automatic gain control circuit 18 a is the first part of the read channel 18 . It provides an output signal having a larger amplitude than the input from preamplifier 16 . A low pass filter 18 b receives the amplified read signal and removes undesirable noise, such as high frequency noise, and generates a filtered read signal that is input to a fixed gain amplifier 18 c. The output signal of the low pass filter 18 b is typically a fairly large voltage input of around a 0.4 volt peak to peak differential. From there, the signal flows into a fixed gain amplifier, FGA, 18 c. The fixed gain amplifier 18 c provides sufficient amplification to the output of the low pass filter 18 b to allow sample space processor 18 d and digital processor 18 e to perform the analog to digital conversion of the read signal.
There are several requirements that govern the design of fixed gain amplifier 18 c. Power supply voltages are continually decreasing and are typically below 2.9 volts, at present, in CMOS applications. Given the low power supply, a CMOS amplifier still needs to have a really wide linear range and be fast enough to support the data rate at which the channel operates. The frequency range of the HDD is up to around 300 megahertz, at present. The output signal of low pass filter 18 b, being about 0.4 volt peak to peak differential, is a very high input to the FGA 18 c. If FGA 18 c were just a regular differential pair, it would have a linear range of only about 26 millivolts which is very tiny. Additionally, one thing the FGA 18 c should not do is to ruin what was done in the AGC 18 a and the LPF 18 b. So the total harmonic distortion, THD, should be very low, yet both the gain and a high bandwidth must be preserved. Additionally, the FGA 18 c should provide a reasonable amount of amplification (typically around 4 V/V) and be manufacturable. That is, when built on silicon, it must be easy to match and be flexible.
Prior art FIG. 2 illustrates a fixed gain amplifier typical of the type used for FGA 18 c. FGA 18 c has two main parts: an amplifier core 20 ; and a common mode feedback circuit 22 . In the amplifier core 20 , the resistor RE 1 is typically referred to as emitter degeneration resistor. Input transistors M 1 and M 2 are CMOS source followers. They follow the input voltage appearing at inputs Vin and VinB. Resistors RL 1 and RL 2 are the load resistors. Transistors M 5 and M 6 are cascoded devices. Transistor M 5 and current source I 5 form a cascoded mirror that is a high swing cascoded mirror. [In integrated circuit structures, when one device is connected on top of another device, (current source I 5 is actually a MOS transistor in a silicon implementation) the structure is referred to as a cascoded stage.] Output transistors M 5 and M 6 are cascoded transistors that actually shield the mirroring transistors I 5 and I 6 (shown as ideal sources) so that the voltages on node 5 and node 6 don't vary too much.
The common mode feedback circuit 22 of prior art FIG. 2, as the name implies, provides a mechanism to control the common mode voltage. It helps keep the dc values of the output nodes Vout and VoutB at a desired value independent of the variations in the manufacturing process and the fluctuations in the operating conditions. The common mode needs to be controllable because the next stage, the sample space processor 18 d, can operate correctly only for a very narrow range of input common mode voltages. A very simple amplifier compares the reference common mode to the actual extracted common mode at the output. The circuit thus compares the common mode voltage to the average voltage at Vout and VoutB to see what the dc value of the output is. If the value is larger than the common mode, it needs to be brought down. If the value is smaller than the common mode, it needs to be brought up. The circuit folds transistors M 9 and M 10 into amplifier 20 and injects current on nodes N 5 and N 6 in order to affect the total DC current going through the load resistors RL 1 and RL 2 and consequently set the correct output common mode.
In prior art FIG. 2, the degeneration resistor RE 1 on the input stage of the amplifier allows for a larger input voltage with a larger input voltage swing. By adding the degeneration resistor, the linear range of the amplifier is improved. The differential current that goes through the input source followers M 1 and M 2 is defined by the size of the resistor RE 1 and the swing of the differential input voltage. With appropriate sizing of resistor RE 1 the differential current going through M 1 and M 2 can be made reasonably smaller than the DC current going through M 1 and M 2 , hence improving the linear range and reducing the overall distortion of the output signal. However, what brings in the majority of distortion to the amplifier is that the total currents through M 1 and M 2 are not independent of the input signal. In other words, the voltage gain across M 1 and M 2 instead of being constant is directly modulated by the variation in the input signal causing distortions in the output signal. The prior art circuit thus has gain dependant on the amplitude of the differential input signal making it unsuitable for very low distortion applications.
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 2
U.S. Pat. No. 5,142,242 to Schaffer, issued Aug. 25, 1992, provides a method of making the gain of the input transistors less dependant on the variation in the input signal. In the CMOS embodiment disclosed in FIG. 9, it provides a way to reduce the variation in the gain of the input transistors by mirroring the current at transistors Q 8 to transistors Q 10 and Q 11 . A problem with this approach, however is the mirror in the amplifier's signal path creates a low frequency pole making the amplifier too slow for HDD applications where the usable frequencies extend into the 300 megahertz range. Another problem with this approach is that it is based on an inaccurate approximation that NMOS and PMOS transistors (Q 6 and Q 7 consequently) have identical behavior, needed for a complete cancellation of the distortion inherent to the recommended circuit topology. U.S. Pat. No. 5,451,901 to Welland, issued Sep. 19, 1995 uses a similar concept as the above '242 patent to reduce the gain dependency on the variation in the input signal. MOS transistors M 9 and M 11 form a mirror that is similar to '242 patent. It is a different way of forming a mirror, but it is still a current mirror. While this circuit is faster than the '242 circuit, it is too slow for typical HDD applications. Node 78 and node 80 charge faster because of transistors M 11 and M 12 respectively, but they still form mirrors that are too slow. Moreover, the gain of input transistors M 7 and M 8 is not independent from the variation in the input signal, making the distortion level too high for common HDD applications.
What is needed, therefore, is a CMOS amplifier whose gain is very constant over a large dynamic range and is fast enough for HDD applications. It is accordingly an object of the invention herein to provide such an amplifier.
Other objects and advantages of the invention herein will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein.
›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A CMOS fixed gain amplifier incorporates super follower transistors into its input stage and folds the super follower transistors into its output stage to provide a constant gain over a large dynamic range for particular usefulness in hard disk drive applications.
›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a prior art drawing illustrating a partial read channel used in a hard disk drive storage application.
FIG. 2 is a prior art drawing illustrating the fixed gain amplifier 18 c of prior art FIG. 1 .
FIG. 3 is a drawing illustrating a fixed gain amplifier according to the preferred embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 4 is a drawing illustrating an alternative embodiment of a fixed gain amplifier.
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT · 1 of 2
The invention herein provides a fixed gain amplifier suitable for HDD read channel applications. It handles the large voltage input and still maintains a gain that is very constant and independent of the amplified input signal. It has very small THD of about 0.35 percent and high bandwidth of around 300 megahertz. The application is very predictable, is very easy to design and is very flexible. It offers a solution to the problem of building highly linear wide bandwidth CMOS amplifiers operating at power supplies below 2.9 volts while maintaining a large dynamic range. Because of its folded architecture, described below, power supply rejection (PSR) and the amplifier's bandwidth are enhanced, while providing a flexible platform to optimize both noise and total harmonic distortion without sacrificing device matching.
FIG. 3 depicts an electrical schematic of the preferred embodiment of the inventive fixed gain amplifier. By comparing FIG. 3 to prior art FIG. 2, aspects of the inventive fixed gain amplifier having folded super-follower transistors M 3 and M 4 can be readily seen as common reference numerals are used in the figures.
In FIG. 3, transistors M 3 and M 4 are added to amplifier core 20 as well as ideal current sources I 3 and I 4 . MOS transistor M 3 has its source and drain connections connected across degeneration resistor RE 1 and node N 6 (between transistor M 6 and current source I 6 ) and its gate connected to node N 3 (between transistor M 1 and current source I 3 ). MOS transistor M 4 has its source drain connections connected across degeneration resistor RE 1 and node N 5 (between transistor M 5 and current source I 5 ) and has its gate connected to node N 4 (between transistor M 2 and current source I 4 ). Transistors M 3 and M 4 are referred to as super-follower transistors because they are conducting (i.e. following) the entire differential current passing through resistor RE 1 . The prefix “super” is added to differentiate this configuration from a common-drain configuration typically called a “source-follower.” They are additionally folded into the next stage current mirror of I 5 and I 6 .
The circuit of FIG. 3 operates generally as the amplifier of prior art FIG. 2 but with advantages of bandwidth, linearity, large dynamic range, power supply rejection and noise rejection. The input to the circuit is a differential voltage applied at pins Vin and VinB, while the output of the circuit is a differential voltage at pins Vout and VoutB. A single-ended voltage applied to pin Vcm defines the output common mode voltage. Pin VB 1 should be set to an appropriate constant bias voltage to keep the cascoded transistors M 5 and M 6 saturated over all operating conditions. When the input differential signal across Vin and VinB is zero, the voltage across resistor RE 1 is zero and therefore there is no current flowing through it. For the same condition, currents through M 1 and M 2 are identical, as well as currents through M 3 and M 4 . As the magnitude of the input signal Vin and VinB becomes larger than zero the voltage across resistor RE 1 is also larger than zero generating a differential current through resistor RE 1 . Since currents through transistors M 1 and M 2 are set by current sources I 3 and I 4 respectively, the differential current formed through resistor RE 1 must go through the super-followers M 3 and M 4 without affecting the currents through M 1 and M 2 . Since the currents through transistors M 1 and M 2 are constant and independent from the input signal Vin, VinB there will be no distortion contribution from these two transistors to the output signal Vout, VoutB making a significant contribution to the linearity of the entire amplifier.
When all the transistors are biased up, the current I 1 is larger than I 3 in order to provide some quiescent current for super-follower M 3 . In the same fashion, the current I 2 is larger than current I 4 to provide some quiescent current for super-follower M 4 . So, there is always some quiescent current going through transistors M 3 and M 4 that comes from I 1 and I 2 . When the magnitude of the input signal Vin, VinB is larger than zero the differential current formed through resistor RE 1 will flow through super-followers M 3 and M 4 but in opposite directions. Therefore, to minimize the distortion in the output signal due to the variable current going through the super-followers M 3 and M 4 the differential current through these two transistors must be much smaller than the quiescent current through the same transistors. In mathematical terms this condition can be expressed by the following formula: I1 - I3 max Vin - VinB RE1 and I2 - I4 max Vin - VinB RE1
Note that the distortion contribution of the super-followers was further reduced by connecting their gates to nodes N 3 and N 4 respectively. A small voltage variation on nodes N 3 and N 4 will have negligible effects on the currents going through the input transistors M 1 and M 2 making them the perfect spots to connect the gates of M 3 and M 4 . Therefore, by proper biasing of the super-followers M 3 and M 4 they will have a negligible contribution to the overall distortion of the amplified output signal.
In FIG. 3, the ac current from transistors M 3 and M 4 is folded into the next stage mirror of I 5 and I 6 . This significantly speeds up the amplifier as opposed to the prior art mirroring approaches described in the Background of The Invention. The differential current through the transconductor is very fast. The differential current searches for the low impedance node to flow through, node N 5 for example. The circuit's bandwidth is improved because the signal path consists of low impedance nodes only (N 1 , N 2 and N 5 and N 6 ). The current in current sources I 5 and I 6 is constant. On top of this, the ac current from super-followers M 3 and M 4 is added, or folded. Thus, the ac current goes directly to the cascoded stage and into load resistors RL 1 and RL 2 , and, goes to the output load.
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT · 2 of 2
In the preferred embodiment of FIG. 3, the cascoded stage resistors RL 1 and RL 2 form the amplifiers gain. A constant gain is achieved because the ratio of load resistor RL 1 and degeneration resistors RE 1 forms the gain, and, the gain is constant because the resistors can be matched. In the prior art U.S. Pat. No. 5,451,901 to Welland, MOS device M 13 , M 20 and M 21 are used as resistors. A problem with using MOS devices as resistors is that MOS devices are smaller than resistors and it is difficult to match their conductances and linear regions. Resistors can be well controlled and are more accurate. Thus, distortion from a nonlinear MOS device is avoided. By varying the ratio of the current sources I 5 vs I 1 (or I 3 in a sense) or by varying how much differential current goes to folded super follower transistors M 3 and M 4 versus their dc current, the THD can be directly affected. The smaller the ac differential current is to the dc current, the less variation (percentage wise) exist, the Gm varies less and therefore better performance is achieved. The current through input transistors M 1 and M 2 in the ideal case is constant and nonvarying. The only loss (from THD) could be from folded super-follower transistors M 3 and M 4 . However, they don't really affect it that much because their only task is to get the differential current to the next stage. So, the Gm of folded super-followers M 3 and M 4 is not really that important in actually setting the gain for amplifier 18 as the signal goes through the low impedance nodes.
In the preferred embodiment of FIG. 3, the linearity of the transfer characteristic is very high as a consequence of the folded architecture and the constant current running through the input transistors M 1 and M 2 . By folding transistors M 3 and M 4 into current mirrors I 5 and I 6 , the linearity can be easily controlled by the amount of current set by current sources I 1 -I 6 and by controlling the differential current going through transistors M 3 and M 4 set by the input voltage swing and the size of degeneration resistor RE 1 .
FIG. 4 presents an alternative embodiment for the output load resistors RL 1 and RL 2 . The super follower transistors M 3 and M 4 are folded into the output stage as in FIG. 3. A set of cascoded PMOS transistors M 15 and M 16 connected to M 9 and M 1 O from the common mode feedback circuit are inserted with load resistors RL 1 and RL 2 connected across them. This allows resistors RL 1 and RL 2 to have a lower absolute value (note the same applies for RE 1 in order to maintain a constant voltage gain) since it has no role in determining the output common mode level and therefore provides even more bandwidth and better linearity than FIG. 3 . This way, the common mode may be chosen closer to the mid-supply, which better suits typical applications. Pin VB 2 should be set to an appropriate constant bias voltage to keep the cascoded transistors M 15 and M 16 saturated over all operating conditions. The output load resistors RL 1 and RL 2 are between Vout and VoutB. This allows the common mode to be lowered over FIG. 3 as FIG. 3 sets the common mode closer to the power supply through load resistors RL 1 and RL 2 . So, automatically, the common mode in FIG. 3 is quite high and close to the supply for the same choice of currents I 1 -I 6 and resistor values RE 1 , RL 1 , and RL 2 . FIG. 4 allows the load resistors RL 1 and RL 2 to be smaller than RL 1 or RL 2 of FIG. 3 and therefore, provides more bandwidth and better linearity.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described by the foregoing detailed description, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various other changes in form and detail may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
›Tables in the description — 1
| 5,535,067 | Frequency Controlled Reference Generator Issued | 07/09/96 |
| 5,570,241 | Single Channel, Multiple Head Servo . . . | 10/29/96 |
| 5,862,005 | Synchronous Detection Of Wide BI-Phase . . . | 01/19/99 |
| 5,793,559 | In Drive Correction Of Servo Pattern . . . | 08/11/98 |
| 5,719,719 | Magnetic Disk Drive With Sensing . . . | 02/17/98 |
| 5,444,583 | Disk Drive Having On-Board Triggered . . . | 08/22/95 |
| 5,448,433 | Disk Drive Information Storage Device . . . | 09/05/95 |
| 5,208,556 | Phase Lock Loop For Sector Servo System | 05/04/93 |
| 5,642,244 | Method and Apparatus For Switching . . . | 06/24/97 |
Claims as granted
6 claimsLog in to read the claims of this application.
Log in to unlockClassifications
3 codes- H03F3/45
Claim changes
SoonSee which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.
The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.
File wrapper
See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.
Log in to unlockDocuments
Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.
Log in to unlockChain of title
See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.
Log in to unlock