USPatent applicationPatented

Weldable anti-corrosive aluminium-magnesium alloy containing a high amount of magnesium, especially for use in aviation

Granted 11 Mar 2003 · 3 office actions

Application· this page
9530007
filed 18 Oct 2000
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,531,004
granted 11 Mar 2003

Life of the application

16 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom19982000200220042006200820102012201420162018ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

Weldable, high-magnesium-content aluminum-magnesium alloy consisting of at least 5-6% w/w magnesium (Mg), 0.05-0.15% w/w zirconium (Zr), 0.05-0.12% w/w manganese (Mn), 0.01-0.2% w/w titanium (Ti), 0.05-0.5% w/w of one or more elements from the scandium group and/or terbium (Tb), wherein at least scandium (Sc) is included, 0.1-0.2% w/w copper (Cu) and/or 0.1-0.4% w/w zinc (Zn), along with aluminum (Al), and unavoidable contamination does not exceed 0.1% w/w silicon (Si).

Description

1 parts
›The invention relates to a weldable, corrosion-resistant, high-magnesium-content…

The invention relates to a weldable, corrosion-resistant, high-magnesium-content aluminum-magnesium alloy, which contains a ternary aluminum-scandium-zirconium phase as the essential component. Such an alloy is known from U.S. Pat. No. 5,624,632, for example, and is of interest above all for applications in aeronautics due to its low density, high strength and corrosion resistance. Adding rare earth or rare earth-like elements generates dispersoids in the aluminum-magnesium alloy, which produce a higher strength and corrosion resistance according to the above US patent. The above US patent makes no statement as to the weldability of such an alloy.

The object of this invention is to provide a weldable, corrosion-resistant, high-magnesium-content aluminum-magnesium alloy, which is at least as good as the known alloy in terms of strength and corrosion behavior, and exhibits a high recrystalization threshold to go along with a good weldability. This object is achieved by an aluminum-magnesium alloy according to claim 1 .

In comparison to the known alloy, this new alloy exhibits above all a distinctly lower manganese content, wherein an improved corrosion resistance was surprisingly found, primarily in the sensitized state of the parts made out of this alloy, e.g., when cold-formed parts are subjected to an elevated temperature over a prolonged period. It is assumed that these positive properties are determined primarily by the ratio of manganese to scandium. An improved corrosion resistance is observed at a ratio of Mn to Sc<2. Along with acting as a grain growth inhibitor, the titanium content not present in the known alloy helps to increase strength, since titanium can replace the zirconium in the ternary Al—Sc—Zr phase, wherein the solubility of titanium is lower than that of zirconium however.

The addition of Cu and/or Zn increases the strength, which can be traced back to the known high strength of the Al—Cu or Al—Zn phase. The respective upper concentration limits are selected to prevent the Cu from diminishing the weldability, and the Zn from diminishing the corrosion resistance.

A particularly strong and corrosion-resistant alloy contains at least 0.15% w/w scandium. A component from the lanthanide series is preferably added in amounts ranging from 0.05 and 0.35% w/w, wherein this range relates to the total mixture when using a lanthanide mixture. The alloy tolerates silicon contamination of up to 0.1% w/w; primarily the dynamic properties deteriorate above this level.

A particularly strong and corrosion-resistant alloy contains at least 0.15% w/w scandium. Lanthanidene is preferably added in amounts ranging from 0.05 and 0.35% w/w, wherein this range relates to the total mixture when using a lanthanidene mixture. The alloy tolerates silicon contamination of up to 0.1% w/w; primarily the dynamic properties deteriorate at above this level.

the grant prints no section headings; every part label below is ours, taken from that part's own first words

Claims as granted

6 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

10 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section B — Performing operations; transporting
  • B23K35/28
Section C — Chemistry; metallurgy
  • C22C21/06
  • C22C21/08
USPC · US Patent Classification
148/439420/543420/541148/440420/542420/533420/532

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 1998Jan 1999Jul 1999Jan 2000Jul 2000Jan 2001Jul 2001Jan 2002Jul 2002Jan 2003USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionFinal rejectionResponse after finalResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
4.6 y
1,663 days filing → grant
Office actions
3
non-final + final
Responses
3
1 RCE
Examiner
George Wyszomierski
art unit 1742 · TC 1700
Citations: 12 back · 23 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom200220042006200820102012201420162018Owner 2Owner 3Owner 4
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock