USPatent applicationPatented

Process for separating molten metals

Granted 14 May 2002 · 2 office actions

Current assignee: Goldschmidt GmbH · originally Th. Goldschmidt AG

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Wilfried Knott, Andreas Weier, Georg Frommeyer · Examiner: Roy King · AU 1742 · TC 1700

Application· this page
9510860
filed 23 Feb 2000
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,387,154
granted 14 May 2002

Life of the application

10 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A process for separating molten metals, the molten metals being treated with metal hydrides is provided. The molten metals employed are from Groups II-IV of the Periodic Table of Elements and the subgroups, including their alloys, and are distinguished by the fact that the metals or alloys are reacted with a metal hydride in a molten bath.

Description

6 parts
›DESCRIPTION

1. Field of Invention

The present invention relates to a process for separating molten metals, and more particularly to a process for separating molten metals that are treated with metal hydrides.

2. Background of the Invention

As is well known in the art, magnesium, aluminum and zinc, as well as their alloys, and numerous other nonprecious metals become covered with a more or less protective oxide skin (passivation) even under environmental influences. This skin formation may cause undesirable gray discoloration of the metals. This is seen in the case of aluminum, wherein it is known that impurities such as iron, silicon and other foreign metals, as well as reaction products thereof, reduce the transparency of the oxide film which is formed and impart a matt gray color to the surface (Kirk-Othmer, Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 4th Ed., Vol. 2, p. 247).

On the other hand, the passivity of nonprecious metal oxide layers opens up numerous applications to such metals. Treating the metals with reducing agents, e.g., with nascent hydrogen and hydrogen gas at elevated temperatures, leads to a loss of passivity (Römpps Chemie Lexikon, 9th Edition (1991), p. 3230).

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to a process for separating molten metals selected from Groups II-IV of the Periodic Table of Elements or their alloys by treating the molten metal or alloy thereof with a metal hydride. The process of the present invention produces metals which have a highly reflective surface, yet are highly resistant to tarnishing. That is, the metals produced in the present invention are passivated and are not adversely affected by customary environmental influences.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

A first embodiment of the present invention comprises a process for separating molten metals of principal groups II-IV of the Periodic Table of Elements as well as their subgroups and alloys, wherein the metals or alloys are reacted with a metal hydride in a molten bath.

When metals or alloys are melted in the presence of metal hydride, a separation of metal or alloy constituents is observed. This is revealed, for example, by the formation of a grainy layer covering the molten material or the solidified regulus. Following this treatment, the metals or metal alloys exhibit a changed chemical composition compared to the untreated starting material.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the metals are selected from those which, under standard environmental conditions, are subject to external passivation. In particular, the metals employed in the present invention are metals which form an oxide skin under standard environmental conditions. Therefore, it is preferable in the context of the present invention for these metals to be selected from nonferrous metals and nonprecious metals, and more preferably selected from magnesium, calcium, aluminum, silicon, titanium or zinc, and their alloys. The term “alloy” is used in the context of the present invention to denote a composition that contains at least 30% by weight of said metal.

Another embodiment of the present invention comprises reacting metals or metal alloys with metal hydrides of one of the metals which are to be separated. For example, to separate magnesium, it is particularly advantageous to use magnesium hydride. Similarly, of course, it is also possible to use mixed metal hydrides in the case of alloys. In the same way, however, it is also possible to deliberately introduce new material components into the metal alloy by specifically selecting the metal hydride or hydrides.

A still further embodiment of the present invention consists of setting a molar ratio of metal, including alloys, to metal hydride in the range from 1:0.0001 to 1:100, preferably in the range from 1:0.001 to 1:0.01, and even more preferably in the range from 1:0.005 to 1:0.03. By carrying out the reaction of the present invention in the ranges mentioned above, repeated treatment is typically unnecessary. Thus, the present invention significantly reduces the cost of separating molten metals. This provides an economic advantage over prior art processes.

Using the present invention it is therefore possible to remove impurities, in particular, volatile impurities which form metal hydride, from a metal.

The metals or alloys are treated with the metal hydrides in the molten state. It is advantageous to use the hydrides whose metals also act as alloying components in the metal matrix.

The present invention unexpectedly provides a metal which has a reflective surface, yet is passivated such that unwanted reactions caused by customary environments, i.e., tarnishing, does not occur.

For example, for lamp reflectors and shiny decorative effects in the automotive and mechanical engineering sectors, it is desired to use high-purity alloys which guarantee maximum reflection and shine (Kirk-Othmer, Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 4th Ed., Vol. 2, p. 247). The purity of the metal, and its surfaces, is therefore directly linked to the observed shine and reflectivity, so that it is possible to deduce directly from this relationship that the metals obtained using the process according to the present invention are of very high purity. In view of the fact that commercially available metals are often used with a purity of almost 100%, and these metals are passivated in relation to environmental atmospheres such as air using separate processes, the process according to the present invention is an efficient refining process, for example, for the removal of impurities, and especially, volatile impurities which form metal hydrides.

For example, if a small amount of autocatalytically produced magnesium hydride (TEGO-Magnan®) is applied to a pulverulent Al—Mg alloy, and this mixture is heated in a muffle to approx. 1000° C., the solidified metal, which is obtained after the reaction mixture has cooled, has shiny, bright silver-colored external and internal surfaces which do not become tarnished even after they have been stored for months in ordinary air. It was also possible to make a similar observation when zinc (electrolytic zinc) was reacted with magnesium hydride. In addition to a shiny silver-colored surface which was stable under environmental atmospheres, the impurity levels of lead, tin, iron and copper had fallen considerably.

The following examples are given to illustrate the present invention and to demonstrate some advantages that can arise therefrom.

EXAMPLES
›Example 1

A steel capsule was charged with a mixture comprising 500 g of a 99.5% by weight magnesium powder and 10 g of a 95% by weight autocatalytically produced magnesium hydride (Tego Magnan®), and was heated to 750° C. in an induction furnace which had been washed with an inert gas. The temperature was held for about 3 minutes, and then the reaction mixture was cooled. The result was a regulus which was studded with shiny, bright silver-colored cavities and which did not exhibit any tendency to tarnish either at these cavity surfaces generated by the process or at bright silver-colored sawn surface, even after it had been stored for 3 months in a standard atmosphere.

The ultimate chemical analysis shown in Table 1 clarifies the separation process which is achieved by the hydride treatment:

›Example 2

In the same way as in Example 1, a steel capsule was charged with a mixture comprising 700 g of a 99.99% by weight lumpy electrolytic zinc and 14 g of a 95% by weight autocatalytically produced magnesium hydride (Tego Magnan®) and was heated to 550° C. in an induction furnace which had been rendered inert. After approx. 10 minutes, the reaction mixture was cooled. The result was a Zn regulus, the sawn surface of which did not exhibit any tarnishing even after it had been stored for months in the atmosphere.

The ultimate chemical analysis shown in Table 2 proves the separation effect achieved by the hydride treatment:

While this invention has been particularly shown and described with respect to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing and other changes in forms and details may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. It is therefore intended that the present invention not be limited to the exact forms and details described and illustrated, but fall within the scope of the appended claims.

›Tables in the description — 2
TABLE 1
SpecimenDescription% Al% Cu% Fe% Si% Zn
Mg(starting0.22<0.0010.0730.00540.0017
condition)
Mg(after0.0093<0.0010.00720.00320.0018
treatment
with
magnesium
hybride)
TABLE 2
Spec-Descrip-
imention% Bi% Cu% Fe% Pb% Sn
Zn(starting<0.0010.00180.00250.00230.0015
condition)
Zn(after<0.001<0.0010.00110.0012<0.001
treatment
with
magne-
sium
hydride)

Claims as granted

15 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

7 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section B — Performing operations; transporting
  • B22F3/11
Section C — Chemistry; metallurgy
  • C22B21/06
  • C22B19/32
  • C22C1/08
  • C22B9/05
USPC · US Patent Classification
75/585420/590

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2000Apr 2000Jul 2000Oct 2000Jan 2001Apr 2001Jul 2001Oct 2001Jan 2002Apr 2002Jul 2002USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalResponse after final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
2.2 y
811 days filing → grant
Office actions
2
non-final + final
Responses
2
no RCE
Examiner
Roy King
art unit 1742 · TC 1700
Citations: 4 back · 11 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020Owner 1Owner 2
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock