USPatent applicationPatented

Frequency sensitive inductance device in POTS splitter design

Granted 28 Mar 2006 · 3 office actions

Current assignee: Corning Optical Communications · originally Corning Incorporated

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Wei Tian, Harley J. Staber · Examiner: Duc Nguyen · AU 2643 · TC 2600

Application· this page
9483756
filed 14 Jan 2000
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 7,020,276
granted 28 Mar 2006

Life of the application

15 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

POTS splitter design which incorporates a low-pass filter which improves the voice-band return loss characteristics without sacrificing performance with regard to the voice-band insertion loss or the ADSL-band attenuation distortion. This is accomplished by replacing the inductor of the conventional POTS splitter low-pass circuit with a parallel-connected inductor and resistor.

Description

4 parts
›BACKGROUND

The present invention generally relates to improved telecommunications systems and in particular to an improved digital/POTS telecommunications system. Still more particularly, the present invention relates to an improved digital/POTS splitter design.

The basic functions and requirements for POTS Splitter are well defined in TIE1.4/98-007R5, Annex E, which is hereby incorporated by reference. The POTS splitter is used to split “Plain Old Telephone System” (POTS) voiceband signals from Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) signals traveling over the same telephone line.

In conventional systems, the POTS splitter is designed as a LC low-pass filter. With regard to ADSL signals, a low-pass filter provides protection from the high-frequency transients and impedance effects that occur during POTS operation, e.g., ringing transients, ring trip transients, and off-hook transients and impedance changes. With regard to POTS voice band service, the low-pass filter provides protection from ADSL signals which may impact through non-linear or other effects remote devices, e.g., handset, fax, voice band modem, etc., and central office operation.

TIE1.4/98-007R5, Annex E specifies acceptable ranges for insertion loss in the voice band, return loss in the voice band, and attenuation distortion in the ADSL band, among other requirements. These requirements make the common POTS splitter design, which incorporates a differential pair of conventional LC low-pass filter circuits, less than ideal for this purpose. Because the inductor used in a conventional LC low-pass filter circuit is frequency independent in the voice range, it is very hard to meet each of the requirements above at same time. It would therefore be desirable to provide an improved low-pass filter circuit for a POTS splitter which optimizes the TIE1.4 requirements.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The POTS splitter design of the preferred embodiment incorporates a low-pass filter which improves the voice-band loss characteristics without sacrificing performance with regard to the voice-band insertion loss or the ADSL-band attenuation distortion. This is accomplished by replacing the inductor of the conventional POTS splitter low-pass circuit with a parallel-connected inductor and resistor.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 depicts a basic RL inductor circuit in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2 depicts a differential-mode RL inductor pair in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3 depicts a central-office POTS splitter employing a low-pass filter circuit in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention; and

FIG. 4 is depicts a remote-end POTS splitter employing a low-pass filter circuit in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

With reference now to the figures, and in particular with reference to FIG. 1 , there is provided an improved low-pass filter circuit for a POTS splitter, which uses a parallel-connected resistor R and inductor L.

This invention is used to get lower inductive impedance at high frequency (3 KHz–4 KHz), so a better return loss is obtained without interfering with other performance characteristics.

FIG. 1 shows the basic structure of this invention. The total impedance of this device is (Equation 1):

z ( w ) = jwRL R + jwL = jwR 2 ⁢ L + w 2 ⁢ L 2 ⁢ R R 2 + ( wl 2 ) = R ⁢ ⁢ 1 1 + ( wl ) 2 + jwL ⁢ ⁢ 1 1 + ( wL R ) 2

The imaginary part if the impedance is (Equation 2):

Im ⁡ ( z ( m ) ) = wl ⁢ 1 1 + ( wL R ) 2

As the frequency goes high,

( wL R ) 2

goes high, and the inductance of this device,

L ⁢ 1 1 + ( wl R ) 2 ,

goes low due to the addition of the resistor.

FIG. 2 shows a POTS splitter device, in accordance with the preferred embodiment, which incorporates a low-pass filter with the improved inductor circuit described above. In the POTS splitter, transformers are used as differential mode inductors. In FIG. 2 , the transformer TX 1 is shown with each inductive coil connected in parallel with a respective resistor R 1 and R 2 . The impedance of each side of transformer TX 1 is described by Equations 1 and 2, above; the transformation from FIG. 1 to FIG. 2 is:

R 1= R 2= R/ 2 L 1= L 2= L/ 4

where L 1 and L 2 are the inductance of each transformer winding. Of course, this is merely exemplary; according to different requirements for the central office and remote end POTS splitters, the value of R and L may change in different designs.

FIGS. 3 and 4 , respectively, show POTS splitter designs, using frequency-sensitive inductance devices in accordance with the preferred embodiment, of a central office POTS splitter and a remote end POTS splitter. In these figures, the frequency sensitive device consists of L 3 , R 2 , and R 3 . The low-pass filter is therefore comprised of L 3 , R 2 , R 3 , and C 4 in FIG. 3 , and L 3 , R 2 , R 3 , and C 3 in FIG. 4 . Other parts of the circuit will be understood by those of skill in the art as a conventional POTS splitter circuit.

For purposes of this discussion, the conventional circuit comprised by L 1 and C 2 in FIG. 3 , and by L 1 and C 1 in FIG. 4 , will be refereed to as “stage 1” of each of these figures. Similarly, the conventional circuit comprised by L 2 , C 5 , C 6 , and C 3 in FIG. 3 , and by L 2 , C 5 , C 6 , and C 2 in FIG. 4 , will be referred to as “stage 2” of each of these figures. Finally, “stage 3” will reference the frequency-sensitive circuit of the preferred embodiment, which comprises L 3 , R 2 , R 3 , and C 4 in FIG. 3 , and by L 3 , R 2 , R 3 , and C 3 in FIG. 4 .

It will then be clear that, in FIGS. 3 and 4 , nodes A and B form the inputs to stage 1 , and nodes C and D are both the outputs of stage 1 and the inputs of stage 2 . Nodes E and F are both the outputs of stage 2 and the inputs of stage 3 , and nodes G and H are the outputs of stage 3 .

In normal operation, a combined voice-band and ADSL signal is received by the splitter circuits at inputs L 1 T and L 1 R of FIG. 3 , and inputs LT and LR of FIG. 4 . The ADSL signal is output at outputs D 1 T and D 1 R of FIG. 3 , and outputs DT and DR of FIG. 4 . The ADSL signal is filtered from the voiceband signal, and the voiceband signal is output at outputs V 1 T and V 1 R of FIG. 3 , and outputs VT and VR of FIG. 4 .

According to the preferred embodiment, the values of the components of FIG. 3 are as follows:

Also according to the preferred embodiment, the values of the components of FIG. 4 are as follows:

Of course, while the component values of the preferred embodiment are shown above, those of skill in the art will recognize that these values can be varied according to specific system requirements. In particular, in FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 , the preferred frequency sensitive device that consists of L 3 , R 2 , and R 3 , from stage 3 , can be used to replace other conventional transformer/filter circuits, e.g., the C 5 , C 6 , L 2 circuit of stage 2 . This means that a frequency-sensitive circuit as in stage 3 may also appear as the first or second stage.

Further, the position of the frequency-sensitive inductive device within the POTS splitter will vary the overall performance characteristics of the splitter. For example, in FIG. 4 above, the stage 3 circuit can be switched with the stage 2 circuit, so that their order is reversed, according to the requirements of the system in which the system is to be installed.

The preferred embodiment, by incorporating this frequency-sensitive inductive device, will simultaneously minimize the magnitude of ripple in the high frequency band (3 K–4 KHz) and maximize the return loss at high frequency band (3 K–4 KHz), without negatively affecting, to any substantial degree, the attenuation distortion of the ADSL band.

While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

›Tables in the description — 2
L120 mH (±8%)
L2, L312 mH (±8%)
C11, C12120 nF 400 V (±10%)
C210 nF 400 V (±5%)
C310 nF 400 V (±5%)
C447 nF 400 V (±5%)
C5, C64.7 nF 400 V (±5%)
R2, R3200
L120 mH (±8%)
L2, L312 mH (±8%)
C133 nF 400 V (±5%)
C222 nF 400 V (±5%)
C347 nF 400 V (±5%)
C40.47 nF 400 V (±5%)
C5, C64.7 nF 400 V (±5%)
R133.1K 1% .25 W
R2, R3100 10% .25 W

Claims as granted

12 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

11 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H03H7/09
  • H04M9/08
  • H04M1/00
  • H04L27/00
  • H04Q11/04
  • H03H7/06
  • H04M9/00
USPC · US Patent Classification
379/402379/93.6379/399.1379/93.1

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoom2000200120022003200420052006USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionFinal rejectionResponse after non-finalNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
6.2 y
2,265 days filing → grant
Office actions
3
non-final + final
Responses
3
no RCE
Examiner
Duc Nguyen
art unit 2643 · TC 2600
Citations: 3 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020Owner 1Owner 3Owner 4liens, releases & corrections
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock