Requalification controller for durables
Granted 30 Jul 2002 · 1 office action
Current assignee: GlobalFoundries · originally International Business Machines
Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock
Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock
Inventors: Perry G. Hartswick, Alan C. Thomas, Anne Marie Pelella, John T. Federico · Examiner: Leo Picard
Life of the application
9 dated eventsAbstract
A system is provided for controlling the time at which a durable item, such as a reticle used in a lithography process in semiconductor manufacturing, is requalified for use. A counting device counts occurrences of predefined events, such as the number of jobs in which the reticle is used or the number of times it is placed in a lithography tool. The reticle is not removed from use until a limiting number of jobs or tool placements is reached, or the reticle is needed for processing the requalification job. The system also includes a requalification device for the durable item.
Description
5 parts›FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a system for controlling the time at which a durable item used in a manufacturing process is requalified for use and particularly to such a system in which the time at which such durable item is requalified is determined by the occurrence of one or more of a predetermined number of definable events.
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Within manufacturing environments today, durable items (that is, resources that are reused during the manufacturing process) are key elements in the production process. These durable items are subject to damage during use and, therefore, it has become the practice to requalify such durable items at specific time intervals.
A specific example of such a durable item would be a photomask (called a reticle) which is used in a lithography tool of a semi-conductor manufacturing facility. For the case of reticles, a requalification is typically initiated at a pre-determined time interval after its introduction into the manufacturing process to ensure that the reticle is viable for use in the process. This requalification process typically has overhead associated with it, which means that the lithography tool is used for requalification rather than making product during requalification. This conventional method of requalification results in the reticle being removed from the production process after its expiration time, and is thus unavailable for use in manufacturing for the entire lifetime of the requalification job.
›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, requalification of a durable item used in a manufacturing process is initiated prior to the durable item's expiration. The system of this invention includes a first counter for counting the occurrences of first events to provide a first counter count, a device for determining if the first counter count exceeds a warning level, a device for determining if said first counter count is less than a limit level and a requalification device for initiating requalification of said durable item when the warning level is reached, but before the limit level is reached.
In a preferred embodiment of this invention the system also includes an apparatus for using the durable item in the manufacturing process and apparatus for determining if the durable item is fit for further use. In a further embodiment, the system also includes an apparatus, responsive to a determination that the durable item is fit for use, for resetting the first counter.
The system can also be used if the durable item also expires after a second predetermined number of second events. In such circumstances the system also includes a second counter for counting the occurrences of the second events to provide a second counter count; a device for determining if the second counter count exceeds a second warning level; a device for determining if the second counter count is less than a second limit level; and the requalification device also initiates requalification of the durable item when the warning level is reached, but before the limit level is reached.
›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a general purpose computer and an automated manufacturing machine in accordance with the invention; and
FIG. 2 is a logic flow diagram showing the logic used in the apparatus of FIG. 1 .
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION
Referring now to FIG. 1, a block diagram is shown of a system in accordance with this invention. The system includes an automated manufacturing machine 2 , such as a semiconductor manufacturing photolithography tool, controlled by a general purpose computer 4 . The general purpose computer 4 includes a processor 5 , a keyboard 6 and a monitor 7 . The computer also includes a hard drive and various other drives 8 for receiving such items as CD ROMs and magnetic disc.
Referring now to FIG. 2, a logical flow diagram is shown for a system which operates in accordance with this invention. The system of the logical flow diagram of FIG. 2 is implemented on the general purpose computer 4 and the automated manufacturing machine 2 of FIG. 1 . In accordance with this invention, the general purpose computer 4 automatically activates the start of requalification of a durable manufacturing resource, such as a reticle, used in the semiconductor manufacturing photolithography tools. Such a reticle may need to be requalified after it is used in a first predetermined number of jobs or after it is used a second predetermined number of times.
The system of this invention employs two counters. The first counter is a job counter to keep track of how many jobs the reticle was used for, and the second counter is a tool counter which determines how many times the reticle was actually used, (i.e. taken from a storage location and placed in the tool). It should be noted that if a reticle is used for two successive jobs, it is only placed in the tool once. Each time a manufacturing job is completed at the litho tool (see Box 10 ), the job counter is incremented for the reticle that was used for that job (see Box 11 ). It is then determined whether the prior reticle was used again (see Box 12 ). If it was not, the tool counter is incremented for the reticle that was used at Box 13 . This is so because, if the prior reticle was not used again, that means that a new reticle was used and, therefore, the tool counter for that new reticle needs to be incremented. If the prior reticle was used again, the tool counter is not incremented since there was no new use of any recticle in the tool.
In either event, it is next determined in Box 14 if the tool count is less than a pre-determined warning level. The pre-determined warning level is set at the level at which requalification of the reticle is to begin. If the tool count is not less than the warning level (meaning it is at or above the warning level), it is next determined in Box 16 if the tool count is less than a predetermined tool limit. If the tool count is not less than the tool limit, the recticle is rendered expired in Box 17 , and is thus made unavailable for future manufacturing.
The reticle is likewise expired if the job limit has been reached for that reticle (Box 18 ). If neither the tool limit nor the job limit have been reached, but either the tool warning or job warning levels have been reached, it is then determined in Box 19 if requalification has already started. If not, requalification will begin in Box 21 . This will trigger Box 22 to release a lot of wafers for use with the reticle during requalification. In most instances, this lot will be one wafer. However, any number of wafers can be used.
Next, in Box 23 , pre-reticle overhead processing will be implemented.
It should be noted that the reticle needing requalification may continue in regular use during the pre-reticle overhead processing. Accordingly, after the requalification job is started, the tool counter and job counter may still be incremented. The reticle will not be actually removed from use until (1) the job or tool limits are reached or (2) the reticle is needed for processing the requalification job. Ideally, the reticle will be removed from regular use for requalification purposes just before the tool limit or job limit is reached.
In Box 24 , the reticle status will be made unavailable to manufacturing and then process qualification with the lot will begin using the reticle in Box 26 . It will be determined in Box 27 if the reticle passes inspection. If not, Box 28 will make the status of the reticle that it failed inspection and, thus, will be unavailable for manufacturing. If Box 27 indicates that the reticle passes inspection, both the tool count and the job count will be reset to zero in Box 29 . In Box 31 , the reticle will be made available again for manufacturing, and the system will wait for the next job to be processed.
Looking again at Box 14 , it may be seen that if the tool count is less than the warning level, it is next determined if the job count is less than the job warning level, as shown in Box 33 . If it is, the system rests and waits for the next job at Box 34 . If the job count is not less than the job warning level, Box 18 is activated; and if the job count is less than the job limit (as it should be), requalification is started in Box 19 and the process as set forth above from Box 19 through Boxes 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 and 31 is followed as described above.
In this embodiment of the invention, a system is provided which initiates the start of reticle requalification prior to the reticle expiring due to one or more event occurrences. In this way, the requalification occurs when it is needed, not at a predetermined time and, therefore, minimizes the number of requalifications and yet ensures that the durable resource, in this instance a reticle, is requalified as necessary.
While the invention has been described in terms of a specific embodiment, it is evident in view of the foregoing description that numerous alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the invention is intended to encompass all such alternatives, modifications and variations which fall within the scope and spirit of the invention and the following claims.
Claims as granted
18 claimsLog in to read the claims of this application.
Log in to unlockClassifications
4 codes- G06Q10/06
- G05B19/418
Claim changes
SoonSee which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.
The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.
File wrapper
See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.
Log in to unlockDocuments
Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.
Log in to unlockChain of title
See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.
Log in to unlock