USPatent applicationPatented

Radially expandable stent IV

Granted 26 Aug 2003 · 5 office actions

Application· this page
9340939
filed 28 Jun 1999
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,610,086
granted 26 Aug 2003

Life of the application

19 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

A radially expandable support structure is presented, for keeping open lumina within a body, in particular a blood vessel, having a tube-shaped structure that has at least two partial structures, with a wall surface that extends between a first and a second end, which has several cut out areas, in particular, slits, which are essentially oriented parallel to the longitudinal axis of the tube-shaped structure. At least one of the partial structures (11) extend without interruption in the axial direction generally from the first end to the second end of the tube-shaped structure. A first partial structure (1, 2) can be expanded at least in the radial direction and has at least one radial-expansion component. The individual radial expansion components (12, 13) are arranged as a helix or in a helix shape. A second partial structure (11) is generally almost rigid in the axial direction. The two partial structures (1, 2; 11) are arranged in such a way that during the radial expansion of the tube-shaped structure, the second partial structure (11) receives the longitudinal axial forces that arise.

Description

4 parts
›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The invention involves a radially expandable support structure for keeping open lumina within a body, in particular a blood vessel.

EP 0 335 341 B1 discloses, among other things, an expandable intraluminar vascular structure or prosthesis having at least one thin walled tube-shaped part with first and second ends and a wall surface arranged between the first and second ends, which has essentially the same thickness and several slits, which are directed essentially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the tube-shaped part. The tube-shaped part can have a first diameter, which makes the intraluminary transport of the tube-shaped part into a body passage that has a lumen possible, and the tube-shaped part can have a second, expanded and deformed diameter; such that a force directed radially outwardly can be applied from inside of the tube-shaped part and the second diameter is variable and depends on the amount of the force acting on the tube-shaped part, whereby the tube-shaped part is expanded and deformed in order to expand the lumen of the bodily passage. The vascular structure or the vascular prosthesis has several tube-shaped parts and at least one connection piece, which is arranged between tube-shaped parts that border each other, in order to connect tube-shaped parts, which are bordering each other, together with each other in a flexible manner.

A disadvantage in this intraluminary vascular structure is the relatively high radial rigidity of the individual parts, which noticeably impairs the flexibility necessary in a lumen for the prevention of internal injuries.

In U.S. Pat. No. 4,969,458, an intraluminary support structure is disclosed, which is made up of a spiral-shaped spring. Disadvantageous in this is the relatively high radial instability, which can lead to positions of undesired buckling.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

From the aforementioned stems the problem of at least partially eliminating the disadvantages mentioned above using a new type of support structure. The resulting problem lies in particular in ensuring a high stability in the longitudinal direction with not too small of a radial rigidity, while avoiding a shortening of the support structure during radial expansion and while avoiding uncontrolled radial buckling movements.

This problem is solved according to the invention by a support structure according to the present invention.

The support structure according to the invention has a tube-shaped body that has at least two partial structures, with a wall surface that extends between a first and a second end, which has several cut out areas, in particular, slits, which are essentially oriented parallel to the longitudinal axis of the tube-shaped body. At least one partial structure runs without interruption in the axial direction almost, at least, from a first end to a second end of the tube-shaped structure. The first partial structure can be expanded at least in the radial direction and has at least one radial-expansion component, where the individual radial expansion components are arranged as a helix or in a helix shape. The second partial structure is almost rigid in the axial direction. The radial expansion component can be constructed to be closed, for example, oval, rectangular, rhomboidal, or elliptical in shape, or open, for example, in a meandering shape.

Through in particular this arrangement of the partial structures, it is achieved that during the radial expansion of the tube-shaped body, the second partial structure receives the thereby arising longitudinal forces. This has the result that the radial deformation is independent of the axial deformation and accordingly no shortening in the longitudinal direction occurs during the radial expansion. This is especially important during the invasive surgery, in order to create a desired supporting effect over a certain length.

In an advantageous manner, at least one partial structure has at least one meandering pattern, in order to increase the flexibility. This applies for the at least two partial structures.

It is advantageous that the loops of the meandering pattern are of varying sizes. This involves the elongation (amplitude) and/or wavelength, both in the radial as well as in the longitudinal direction of the support structure. Thus, on the whole a highly homogenous expandability relative to the first partial structure arises.

Furthermore, it is advantageous that the meandering pattern is a double meandering pattern, in order to increase the radial expandability.

The double meandering pattern is made advantageously of a first meandering pattern having loops and a second meandering pattern having larger or smaller loops than that of the first meandering pattern, in order, in this manner, to achieve at least an approximately uniform expansion during loading to cause radial expansion.

Furthermore, in an advantageous manner, a connection element that connects to the respective longitudinal end of the first radial expansion component is constructed as a loop-shaped stay. The stay prevents or lessens the possibility of the loops becoming spaced apart or rising out of the surface of the support structure when bending is required. Furthermore, when expanded, they improve the support action of the stent via a uniform surface.

In addition, it is advantageous when the wall surface has an essentially uniform thickness, in order to improve the homogeneous radial expansion.

The support structure can, for example, be made of a stainless steel that is suitable for medical purposes and/or have a biocompatible coating. Furthermore, any biocompatible material can be used as a material for manufacturing the stent, for example, tantalum, platinum, niobium, alloys and synthetic materials. The structures can be manufactured by laser cutting, electro-erosion, etching or even metal cutting.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment of the invention, will be better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. For the purpose of illustrating the invention, there is shown in the drawing an embodiment which is presently preferred. It should be understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown. In the drawings:

FIG. 1 is an unrolled support structure.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

FIG. 1 shows the unrolled, wall surface of a support structure. This has a first partial structure 1 , 2 that includes double meandering structures made up of meandering structures 12 and 13 and a second partial structure 11 . The meandering structures form several slits 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , which are directed essentially parallel to the longitudinal axis of the tube-shaped body 3 . The second partial structure 11 runs without interruption in the axial direction almost from the first end 4 to the second end 5 . The first partial structure can be expanded in the radial direction and has a radial expansion design element, which is made up of the radial expansion components 12 , 13 . These are arranged as helixes. The second partial structure 11 is relatively rigid in the axial direction in spite of the loop-shaped progression.

Furthermore, the connection element 10 that connects to the longitudinal ends of the radial expansion component 12 , i.e. in this case on the loop ends of the first meandering pattern 12 , is constructed as a loop-shaped stay.

The stent depicted as an example has a length of approx. 15 mm and a radial circumference of approx. 4 mm. The helix angle α of the helix amounts to approximately 50° relative to the longitudinal direction of the support structure.

With this exemplary embodiment of the support structure according to the invention, excellent results are achieved.

Claims as granted

7 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

4 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section A — Human necessities
  • A61F2/915
  • A61F2/91
USPC · US Patent Classification
623/1.22623/1.15

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 1999Jan 2000Jul 2000Jan 2001Jul 2001Jan 2002Jul 2002Jan 2003Jul 2003USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionFinal rejectionResponse after finalNon-final rejectionResponse after non-finalResponse after finalNon-final rejectionResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
4.2 y
1,520 days filing → grant
Office actions
5
non-final + final
Responses
5
2 RCE
Examiner
Paul B. Prebilic
art unit 3738 · TC 3700
Citations: 15 back · 72 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock