USPatent applicationPatented

Optical diffuser plates

Granted 23 Jul 2002 · 3 office actions

Application· this page
9284470
filed 7 Jul 1999
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,424,406
granted 23 Jul 2002

Life of the application

11 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom19982000200220042006200820102012201420162018ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

The invention relates to optical diffuser plates (1) made of transparent plastics such as polycarbonate or polymethacrylate. Several thin strips (2) made of plastic B inserted into plates made of transparent plastic A with the proviso that A and B are incompatible and the strips (2) made of plastic B are subsequently withdrawn. The hollows that are formed in the plate (1) made of plastic A are used to deflect light.

Description

5 parts
›BACKGROUND OF THE PRESENT INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The invention relates to optical diffuser plates of transparent plastic designed for improved illumination of rooms by means of daylight.

2. Description of the Related Art

One of the most important objects of the art is to save energy or to preserve existing resources. The studies in this regard have been directed not only at economizing on fossil energy sources but also on reducing the consumption of electrical power.

One problem in illumination of relatively deep rooms with daylight is that the rear zone of the rooms remote from the window is not adequately illuminated (see FIG. 1 ), especially when the sun is high. Consequently, parts of the room must be artificially illuminated even during the daytime, which is a disadvantage from the viewpoint of both energy and ergonomics. FIG. 1 represents a typical inside room. The reference symbols used therein have the following meanings:

›SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION

The object of the present invention is now to remedy this situation. So-called optical diffuser plates are used to solve the problem. These optical diffuser elements—via part of the window area—collect the daylight and deflect it into the depth of the room or toward the ceiling (FIG. 2 ). The optical diffuser elements thus redirect daylight streaming in from outside at a steep angle into the inside of the room.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 represents a typical inside room with daylight;

FIG. 2 represents the room depicted in FIG. 1, now equipped with the optical diffuser element according to the invention in part of the window area. The reference letters LLP denote the optical diffuser plate. The other reference letters correspond to those in FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 represents an optical diffuser plate; and

FIG. 4 represents different orientations of the steps.

To achieve the desired deflection effect, there is proposed an optical diffuser plate LLP with the following structure (FIG. 3 ):

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS · 1 of 2

In a plate—usually plane—of transparent plastic A with refractive index n A there are embedded thin strips of a plastic B with refractive index n B , preferably by coextrusion, with the proviso that plastic A is not compatible with plastic B and that plastic A separates from plastic B. This separation is favored by the existence of a yield point in plastic B.

The following plastics are examples of plastic B:

fluoropolymers such as thermoplastic fluoropolymers, an example being THV 500 G of the 3M Company,

polypropylene types such as the Lupolen types of BASF AG,

polyethylene types, such as

the polyamide types, examples being the Vestamid types of Hüls AG.

The optical diffusion effect can be achieved by two inherently different features. Accordingly, the surface of separation of the materials or the material transition either is noticeable only by virtue of the difference in refractive indices or—if a separating gap is present—is very clearly evident as a reflecting surface.

The coextruded strips of plastic B become detached from plastic A during or after cooling of the plate and can be easily pulled out of this plate. This can be done manually or by a winding mechanism.

The strips of plastic B can be disposed both perpendicular to the plate surface and at an angle of y<90° to the plate surface.

When a light beam is incident on an optical diffuser plate LLP of the described type, the laws of total internal reflection apply at the interface between plastic A and the air gap. The critical angle a G of total internal reflection depends only on the refractive indices of the two plastics.

a G =arc sin n A /n B

For the case that plastic B has detached from plastic A and thus that a gap is present between the strips and the matrix surrounding them, the said angle is given by:

a G =arc sin n A /1

If the angle of incidence a E of the light beam on the interface is smaller than the critical angle a G I , total internal reflection takes place (Case I in FIG. 4 ). The steeply incident light beam is deflected to a shallower trajectory or upward. The maximum possible difference in refractive index is achieved by replacing, by air, the plastic strips of plastic B described in German Patent Application DE 195 43 687.3 having a refractive index different from that of plastic A.

If the angle a E is larger than a G II (Case II in FIG. 4 ), the incident light beam passes through the interface. Since the preferred method of manufacture of the optical diffuser plates LLP is coextrusion of the plate together with embedded thin strips, the most desirable starting materials are coextrudable, transparent thermoplastics which are incompatible with the plastic A of the plate. The critical angle a G and thus the effectiveness of the system increase as the difference in refractive index becomes larger. Adequate effectiveness of the system even at small critical angles a G can be achieved by orienting the strips of plastic obliquely (V<90°). The angle of incidence a E on the interface is reduced by the oblique orientation of the strips (Case II in FIG. 4 ).

Examples of suitable plastics A are polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA and copolymers) or polycarbonate (PC) and of plastic B are the polymers mentioned hereinabove. In experiments on the manufacture of optical diffuser plates as described hereinabove, it 0 has been shown that yet another feature leads to unexpected optical diffusion effects. It has been found that, if plastic B is incompatible with plastic A, in which case the thin strip of plastic B does not adhere at all to the matrix, or in other words to plastic A, and is separated therefrom by a thin gap, the optical diffusion effect is increased. The detachment of the plastic strip of plastic B from matrix polymer A can be easily recognized optically. The plastic strip appears to have a reflecting surface. This is a sign that the thin gap along the surface of the strip has caused pronounced total internal reflection. The refractive indices of air and the matrix plastic differ to an even greater extent that those of plastic B and matrix plastic A, in conformity with the formula presented hereinabove, thus explaining the total internal reflection.

Heretofore it has not yet been possible to establish whether the gap is initially filled with air or is more or less free of air. It can be assumed that the gap will eventually become filled with air by subsequent diffusion of air through plastic A, once plastic B has detached from plastic A.

Detachment of the two plastics A and B from each other is favored by different coefficients of thermal expansion. It is achieved by cooling the extrusion compound. Under these conditions the strip should preferably shrink to a greater extent than the matrix, or in other words plastic B should have a higher coefficient of thermal expansion than plastic A. Even small differences of≧0.001% in the coefficients of thermal expansion lead to the effect according to the invention.

If a separating gap is formed between plastics A and B, it is immaterial whether the two plastics still have different refractive indices within the meaning described initially. The refractive index of plastic A can preferably be higher than that of plastic B, but may also be the same or lower. The total internal reflection resulting from formation of the separation point is always sufficient to produce an impressive optical diffusion effect. The width of the separating gap must be larger than 1 μm. The thickness of the optical diffuser plates LLP is generally in the range of 2 to 20 mm. The embedded, preferably coextruded strips of plastic B usually have a thickness of 0.05 to 0.5 mm and a width of 50 to 95% relative to the thickness of the plate comprising A. In general, the strips of plastic B are disposed regularly at mutual spacings of 2 to 40 mm in plastic plates A. The other dimensions of optical diffuser plates LLP are expediently adapted to glazing units, especially to window or door sizes. Restriction of the dimensions due to the extrusion technology employed is not expected as a rule.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS · 2 of 2

The manufacturing technology involving extrusion in an extrusion machine through multi-component nozzles corresponds to the prior art (West German Application A 4326232).

The optical diffuser plates LLP according to the invention will be explained with reference to FIG. 3, wherein the reference symbols have the following meanings:

The optical diffuser plates according to the invention can be mounted in known mounting frames for plates of organic glasses.

Advantageous Effects

The optical diffuser plates according to the invention can be used successfully for improved illumination of rooms, including workshops, parlors, basements, vaults, shafts, and possibly even vehicles such as ships, etc. The use thereof can contribute not only to energy savings but also to improved ergonometric layout of work rooms.

›Tables in the description — 2
S=Incident sunlightH=Relatively bright zone
F=WindowD=Relatively dark zone
T=Door
(1)=optical diffuser plate LLP of plastic A
(2)=embedded thin strips of plastic B
(3)=distance between the hollows formed by extraction of the
plastics
(4)=hollows

Claims as granted

16 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

6 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section E — Fixed constructions
  • E06B9/24
Section F — Mechanical engineering; lighting; heating; weapons
  • F21S11/00
Section G — Physics
  • G02B5/00
USPC · US Patent Classification
355/613359/599359/614

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 1997Jan 1998Jul 1998Jan 1999Jul 1999Jan 2000Jul 2000Jan 2001Jul 2001Jan 2002Jul 2002USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionRestriction requirementResponse after finalNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
4.8 y
1,762 days filing → grant
Office actions
2
after a restriction
Responses
3
no RCE
Examiner
Thong Nguyen
art unit 2872 · TC 2800
Citations: 8 back · 26 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom200220042006200820102012201420162018Owner 2
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock