USPatent applicationPatented

Anti-two block device using non-contract measuring and detecting devices

Granted 5 Feb 2002 · 3 office actions

Assignee: Grove U.S. L.L.C.

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Jon E. Fleagle, Francis R. Eyler, Dennis W. Eckstine, William W. Banks · Examiner: Eileen D. Lillis · AU 3652 · TC 3600

Application· this page
9205298
filed 4 Dec 1998
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 6,343,703
granted 5 Feb 2002

Life of the application

24 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom199820002002200420062008201020122014201620182020ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

In the anti-two block device, a non-contact measuring device detects in one form or another the distance between a boom nose and a load-bearing member supported thereby. If the distance detected is less than a predetermined threshold value, the device triggers a warning or other operation to assist an operator in preventing anti-two blocking.

Description

5 parts
›This application claims benefit of provisional Nos. 60/067,815…

This application claims benefit of provisional Nos. 60/067,815 filed Dec. 5, 1997 and provisional No. 60/069,055 filed Dec. 10, 1997.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to devices for cranes and aerial work platforms; and more particularly, to an anti-two block device for cranes and aerial work platforms using non-contact measuring and detecting devices.

2. Description of Related Art

Conventional anti-two block devices rely on physical contact between elements of the device to detect when anti-two block is imminent. Devices which rely on contact, however, have a limited life span because each physical contact serves to wear and degrade the device. Contact devices also fail because of external factors which prohibit the detection of contact. For instance, most contact devices use electrical switches, and freezing rain can prevent such switches from functioning. Furthermore, most contact devices only provide a discreet measurement. When contact occurs, this contact indicates that, for example, anti-two blocking is imminent. Such contact devices cannot supply a continuously varying real-time measurement. Contact devices also have slow response times. Accordingly, contact devices include a certain amount of error.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The anti-two block device according to the present invention includes a non-contact measuring device which detects in one form or another the distance of a load-bearing member from the nose of a boom. By comparing the detection results to one or more predetermined threshold values, the anti-two block device according to the present invention can assist an operator in preventing anti-two blocking in various ways.

For instance, when the distance measured by the non-contact measuring device indicates a distance between the boom nose and the load-bearing members is less than a first predetermined threshold, a warning light is driven and/or the movement of the load-bearing member is slowed. If the measured distance falls below a second predetermined threshold, then movement of the load-bearing member is stopped completely.

The present invention contemplates the use of numerous different non-contact measuring devices such as micro-impulse radar, a sonic measuring device, an ultrasonic measuring, an infra-red measuring device, and a laser measuring device.

Other objects, features, and characteristics of the present invention; methods, operation, and functions of the related elements of the structure; combination of parts; and economies of manufacture will become apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments and accompanying drawings, all of which form a part of this specification, wherein like reference numerals designate corresponding parts in the various figures.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given hereinbelow and the accompanying drawings which are given by way of illustration only, and thus are not limitative of the present invention, and wherein:

FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of an anti-two block device according to the present invention;

FIG. 2 illustrates another embodiment of a anti-two block device according to the present invention;

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of an anti-two block device according to the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1, a crane boom 50 includes a boom nose 60 , and the boom nose 60 includes upper boom nose sheaves 70 and lower boom nose sheaves 30 . A cable 80 extends from the boom nose 60 , and is connected to a load bearing hookblock 40 . A hoist (not shown) controls movement of the cable 80 ; and thus, the hookblock 40 . A micro-impulse radar (MIR) system 10 , according to the present invention is mounted on a pivot plate 20 , which is attached to the shaft of the lower boom nose sheaves 30 . Because the MIR system 10 is mounted on the pivot plate 20 , the transmit and receive antennas (not shown) of the MIR system 10 always point in the direction of the hookblock 40 regardless of the elevation angle of the boom 50 .

As is well-known, MIR systems emit short-range ultra-wideband pulses, and detect the reflection of these pulses off of a body. Based on the reflected pulses, namely, the time delay between transmission and reception of the pulses, the MIR systems determine, among other things, the distance to the body. Besides an MIR system, the anti-two block device 10 can be any device which measures the distance to a body without relying on contact such as sonic, ultra-sonic, infra-red and laser distance measuring devices.

The MIR system 10 is calibrated to transmit a warning signal to the crane operator via an electric cable 90 when the hookblock 40 is within a predetermined distance of the boom nose 60 . For instance, in the embodiment of FIG. 1, the warning signal drives an indicator light 95 , and, in another embodiment, drives an indicator light and a control system (not shown) which prevents further movement of the hookblock 40 towards the boom nose 60 .

In an alternate embodiment, the MIR system 10 is calibrated to transmit first and second warning signals to the crane operator via the electric cable 90 when the hookblock 40 is at first and second predetermined distances, respectively, from the boom nose 60 ; the second predetermined distance being less than the first predetermined distance. The first warning signal drives a hydraulic valve (not shown) causing the line speed of the cable 80 to decrease, and the second warning signal drives the control system which prevents further movement of the hookblock 40 towards the boom nose 60 . This technique allows cable 80 to travel at the maximum line speed until the hookblock 40 reaches the first predetermined distance from the boom nose 60 .

A further embodiment of the anti-two block device according to the present invention is shown in FIG. 2 . In this embodiment, the MIR system 10 supplies the distance measurement, as opposed to warning signals, to a control system 15 , which includes a processor 25 connected to a ROM 26 and a RAM 27 . The control system 15 compares the distance measurement to the first and second predetermined distances. When the distance measurement from the MIR system 10 exceeds the first predetermined distance, the control system 15 output controls signals to a cable control system 35 to reduce the line speed of the cable 80 and to an indicator light 45 to warn the operator. When the distance measurement from the MIR system 10 exceeds the second predetermined distance, the control system 15 output controls signals to the cable control system 35 to stop movement of the cable 80 .

Instead of supplying the distance measurement to the control system 15 , the MIR system 10 can be configured to output the time delay between transmission and reception of the pulses. The control system 15 then compares the time delay to first and second predetermined time delays which correspond to the first and second predetermined distances discussed above. The control system 15 then operates in the same manner as discussed above with respect to exceeding the first and second predetermined distances depending on whether the time delay exceeds the first and/or second predetermined time delays.

The anti-two block device eliminates the use of physical contact to prevent anti-two blocking. Also, the anti-two block device does not include any moving parts, and is not exposed to the environment. The response time, compared to anti-two block devices based on contact, is greatly increased as well. Accordingly, the anti-two block device according to the present invention does not suffer from the problems and disadvantage of contact based anti-two block devices.

While the embodiments of the present invention discussed above activate indicator lights, in addition or instead of the indicator lights, warning sounds may be issued.

The invention being thus described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of the invention.

1 of 5 part labels are ours — the grant heads the rest

Claims as granted

4 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

31 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section B — Performing operations; transporting
  • B66F9/24
  • B60T7/12
  • B66C23/90
  • B60R21/00
  • B66C15/04
  • B66C23/78
  • B66F11/04
  • B66F17/00
  • B66C13/50
  • B66C13/46
Section E — Fixed constructions
  • E04G1/24
Section F — Mechanical engineering; lighting; heating; weapons
  • F16J10/00
  • F16J1/02
  • F15B15/28
Section G — Physics
  • G01S15/93
  • G01S13/931
  • G01S15/931
  • G01S13/93
  • G01S17/93
  • G01B21/02
  • G01C15/00
  • G01S13/87
  • G01B21/00
  • G01S15/88
  • G01S13/02
  • G01S17/88
  • G01S13/88
  • G01B11/02
USPC · US Patent Classification
212/281212/276212/284

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 1999Jul 1999Jan 2000Jul 2000Jan 2001Jul 2001Jan 2002USPTOApplicantRestriction requirementResponse after non-finalResponse after final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.2 y
1,159 days filing → grant
Office actions
2
after a restriction
Responses
2
no RCE
Examiner
Eileen D. Lillis
art unit 3652 · TC 3600
Citations: 24 back · 18 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2000200220042006200820102012201420162018Owner 1liens, releases & corrections
TitleLienReleasehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock