USPatent applicationPatented

Emergency control method and system based on source-load-storage regulation and cutback

Granted 30 Jul 2024 · 1 office action

Life of the application

8 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20222024202620282030203220342036203820402042ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

Disclosed are an emergency control method and system based on source-load-storage regulation and cutback. According to the method, output power of power generating sources is regulated according to a power regulating quantity and a frequency regulation requirement, an output power compensation and output frequency of each power generating source are maintained within permissible ranges, so that a balance between power supply and demand of a power distribution network is maintained; and standby energy-storage power stations are used to make up a power gap, and an external power supply system is used to assist in making up a power deficiency, so that large load disturbance can be handled make up the power gap.

Description

15 parts
›FIELD

The invention relates to an emergency control method and system based on source-load-storage regulation and cutback, and belongs to the technical field of emergency frequency regulation of power distribution networks.

›BACKGROUND

The frequency characteristics of the power system play an important role in safe and steady operation of the power distribution network. Power generation devices and electrical devices in the power system are designed and manufactured according to rated frequency, and will exhibit their best performance only when operating in the vicinity of the rated frequency. Large fluctuations of the system frequency will compromise the power quality, thus affecting the production process of different departments. When the output of power generators declines due to a drastic decrease of the system frequency, a frequency collapse will be caused. For a long time, generator tripping or load cutback is used to maintain the frequency of the power distribution network within a rated range during actual operation of the power grid. However, pure generator tripping or load cutback is effective in case of small disturbance and will not work anymore in case of long-term load disturbance. So, a novel emergency frequency regulation method is urgently needed.

›SUMMARY · 1 of 3

The objective of the invention is to overcome the defects of the prior art by providing an emergency control method based on source-load-storage regulation and cutback, which can reasonably regulate the output power compensation of a source-load-storage power distribution network, maintain a balance between power supply and demand in cooperation with generator tripping and load cutback, and keep the output power compensation and output frequency of each power generating source within a permissible range. To fulfill the above objective, the invention is implemented through the following technical solution.

In a first aspect, the invention provides an emergency control method based on source-load-storage regulation and cutback, comprising:

Step 1, obtaining a power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity ; Step 2, determining a frequency regulation demand: if a system load rises suddenly and grid frequency falls, increasing active power to maintain a balance of supply and demand, and increasing the frequency, an output power compensation and variation being both greater than zero at this moment, and performing Step 3; or, if the system load falls suddenly and the grid frequency rises, decreasing the active power to maintain the balance between supply and demand, and decreasing the frequency, the output power compensation and variation being both less than zero at this moment, and performing Step 9; Step 3, if a total output power compensation of power generating sources in a power distribution network is greater than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and output power and output frequency of each power generating source are less than rated values of a power source, performing Step 4; if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is greater than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and the output Power of part of the power generating sources is greater than the rated value of the power source, performing Step 5; if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is less than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity , using standby energy-storage power stations to compensate a power deficiency of the power distribution network, and performing Step 6; if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network, is less than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and the balance between power supply and demand of the power distribution network is still not maintained after the standby energy-storage power stations are used to compensate the power deficiency, performing Step 7; or, if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is less than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and the power deficiency of the power distribution network is still not made up by using the standby energy-storage power stations and cutting back removable loads, performing Step 8; Step 4, if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is greater than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and the output power and output frequency of the power generating sources are less than the rated values of the power source, making a total output power compensation of the power generating sources participating in output power compensation meet ΔP=ΔP regulating quantity according to the balance between supply and demand, calculating an output power compensation of each power generating source, and ending the process; Step 5, if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is greater than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and the output power of part of the power generating sources is greater than the rated value of the power source, limiting the output power of the power generating sources with the output power being greater than the rated value of the power source, and compensating a remaining power deficiency with the standby energy-storage power stations, making a total output power compensation of the power generating sources participating in power output, excluding the power generating sources with output power being greater than the rated value of the power source, meet ΔP=ΔP regulating quantity −ΔP out-of-limit power station according to the balance between supply and demand, calculating an output power compensation of each power generating source, and ending the process; Step 6, if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is less than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity , using the standby energy-storage power stations to compensate a power deficiency of the power distribution network, making a total output power compensation of the power generating sources participating in power output and the standby energy-storage power stations meet ΔP=ΔP regulating quantity according to the balance between supply and demand, calculating an output power compensation of each power generating source, and ending the process; Step 7, if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is less than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and the balance between power supply and demand of the power distribution network is still not maintained after the standby energy-storage power stations are used to compensate the power deficiency, cutting back removable loads, based on a preset cutback principle, making a total output power compensation of the power generating sources and the standby energy-storage power stations after load cutback meet ΔP=ΔP regulating quantity −ΔP removable load f according to the balance between supply and demand, returning to Step 3, repeating this cycle h times, then calculating a total output power compensation ΔP=ΔP regulating quantity −Σ f=1 h ΔP removable load f of the power generating sources participating in power output and the standby energy-storage power stations after load cutback according to the balance between supply and demand, and ending the process; Step 8, if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is less than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and the power deficiency of the power distribution network is still not made up by using the standby energy-storage power stations and cutting back removable loads, using an external power supply system to assist in making up the deficiency, making a total output power compensation of the power generating sources participating in power output, the standby energy-storage power stations and the external power supply system after load cutback meet ΔP=ΔP regulating quantity −Σ d=1 l ΔP removable load d according to the balance between supply and demand, calculating an output power compensation of each power generating source, and ending the process; Step 9, if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is greater than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and the output power and output frequency of each power generating source are less than the rated values of the power source, performing Step 10; or, if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is greater than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and the output power of part of the power generating sources is greater than the rated value of the power source, performing Step 11; Step 10, if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is greater than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and the output power and output frequency of each power generating source are less than the rated values of the power source, making a total output power compensation of the power generating sources meet ΔP=ΔP regulating quantity according to the balance between supply and demand, calculating an output power compensation of each power generating source, and ending the process; and Step 11, if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is greater than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and the output power of part of the power generating sources is greater than the rated value of the power source, cutting back the power generating sources with the output power being greater than the rated value of the power source, making a total output power compensation of the power generating sources participating in power output meet ΔP=ΔP regulating quantity −ΔP out-of-limit according to the balance between supply and demand, calculating an output power compensation of each power generating source, and ending the process.

›SUMMARY · 2 of 3

In conjunction with the first aspect, further, the power generating sources in the power distribution network comprise micro-grids, photovoltaic power stations and wind power stations, and the power distribution network further comprises energy-storage power stations.

In conjunction with the first aspect, further, response modes of the method comprise active response and passive response, the active response means that the power distribution network actively responds to a frequency fall under large disturbance in an island mode or a weakly-connected mode, and the passive response means that the power distribution network passively responds to an emergency control instruction issued by a major network in a grid-connected mode.

In conjunction with the first aspect, further, in the active response mode of a source-grid-load-storage networked cloud decision control system, an actively calculated power gap required for stable operation of the system under an island condition is used as the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity ; and in the passive response mode of the source-grid-load-storage networked cloud decision control system, a power gap required for stable operation of the major network and issued by the major network is used as the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity .

In conjunction with the first aspect, further, the power gap required for stable operation of the system under the island condition is actively calculated according to the following formula:

Δ P actively calculated power difference =Σ a=1 x ΔP micro-grid a +Σ j=1 y ΔP photovoltaic power station j +Σ j=1 z ΔP wind power station i +Σ b=1 m ΔP energy-storage power station b   (1).

In formula (1), Σ a=1 x ΔP micro-grid a is an output power compensation of the micro-grids, and is expressed by the following formula:

In formula (2), Σ a=1 x Δf is a difference between output frequency of the micro-grids and rated grid frequency, and k micro-grid a is a frequency regulation coefficient of the micro grids.

In formula (1), Σ j=1 y ΔP photovoltaic power station j is an output power compensation of the photovoltaic power stations, and is expressed by the following formula.

In formula (3), Σ a=1 x Δf is the difference between the output frequency of the micro-grids and the rated grid frequency, and k photovoltaic power station j is a frequency regulation coefficient of the photovoltaic power stations.

In formula (1), Σ j=1 z P wind power station i is an output power compensation of the wind power stations, and is expressed by the following formula.

In formula (4), Σ a=1 x Δf is the difference between the output frequency of the micro grids and the rated grid frequency, and k wind power station i is a frequency regulation coefficient of the wind power stations.

In formula (1), Σ b=1 m ΔP energy-storage power station b an output power compensation of the energy-storage power stations, and is expressed by the following formula:

In formula (5), Σ a=1 x Δf the difference between the output frequency of the micro-grids and the rated grid frequency, and k energy-storage power station b is a frequency regulation coefficient of the energy-storage power stations.

In a second aspect, the invention provides a source-grid-load-storage networked cloud decision control system, comprising a cloud intelligent analysis and decision platform, a source-grid-load-storage networked cooperative control system, and a source-grid-load-storage cooperative control intelligent terminal.

The cloud intelligent analysis and decision platform has a terminal connected to a power grid dispatching system and a terminal connected to the source-grid-load-storage networked cooperative control system, and the source-grid-load-storage networked cooperative control system is connected to the source-grid-load-storage cooperative control intelligent terminal.

The cloud intelligent analysis and decision platform is able to directly respond to grid frequency/voltage disturbance and fault information to make an analysis and decision, the source-grid-load-storage networked cooperative control system sends the decision to the source-grid-load-storage cooperative control intelligent terminal; the cloud intelligent analysis and decision platform is also able to respond to a management and regulation instruction issued by the power grid dispatching system to make an analysis and decision, and the source-grid-load-storage networked cooperative control system sends the decision to the source-grid-load-storage cooperative control intelligent terminal.

The source-grid-load-storage cooperative control intelligent terminal is connected to a distributed power unit, a distributed micro-grid unit, a distributed energy-storage device unit and a distributed load aggregation unit for executing a decision issued by the source-grid-load-storage cooperative control intelligent terminal.

In conjunction with the second aspect, in an active response mode, the system actively responds to the grid frequency/voltage disturbance and fault information to provide analysis and decision support by means of the cloud intelligent analysis and decision platform, and the source-grid-load-storage networked cooperative control system sends a decision command to the distributed units to be executed.

In conjunction with the second aspect, further, in a passive response mode, the system provide analysis and decision support by means of the cloud intelligent analysis and decision platform according to a management and regulation strategy issued by the power grid dispatching system, and the source-grid-load-storage networked cooperative control system sends a decision command to the distributed units to be executed.

In conjunction with the second aspect, further, the source-grid-load-storage networked cooperative control system comprises an emergency regulation and cutback module, and the emergency regulation and cutback module is used to perform the steps of the method in the first aspect.

Compared with the prior art, the emergency control method based on source-load-storage regulation and cutback has the following beneficial effects:

›SUMMARY · 3 of 3

According to the invention, the output power of the power generating sources is regulated according to the power regulating quantity and the frequency regulation requirement, and the output power compensation and output frequency of each power generating source are maintained within permissible ranges, so that a balance between power supply and demand of the power distribution network is maintained.

According to the invention, standby energy-storage power stations can be used to make up a power gap, and an external power supply system can be used to assist in making up a power deficiency, so that the method can adapt to large load disturbance to make up the power gap.

According to the invention, by using standby energy-storage power stations, cutting back power generating sources with power being greater than the rated value of a power source, cutting back removable loads, and using an external power supply system to assist in making up a power deficiency, a power gap caused by long-term load disturbance can be made up, long-term load disturbance can be handled, and the output power compensation and output frequency of each power generating source can be maintained within permissible ranges.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a flow diagram of an emergency control method based on, source-load-storage regulation and cutback in Embodiment 1 of the invention.

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a source-grid-load-storage networked cloud decision control system in Embodiment 2 of the invention.

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a power system in an active response mode of the source-grid-load-storage networked cloud decision control system in Embodiment 2 of the invention.

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of the power system in a passive response mode of the source-grid-load-storage networked cloud decision control system in Embodiment 2 of the invention.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The invention will be further described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. The following embodiments are merely used to explain the technical solutions of the invention more clearly, and should not be construed as limiting the protection scope of the invention.

›Embodiment 1

As shown in FIG. 1 , this embodiment provides an emergency control method based on source-load-storage regulation and cutback. Power generating sources in a power distribution network comprise micro-grids, photovoltaic power stations, wind power stations, and the power distribution network further comprises energy-storage power stations. Response modes of the method comprise active response and passive response, the active response means that the power distribution network actively responds to a frequency fall under large disturbance in an island mode or a weakly-connected mode, and the passive response means that the power distribution network passively responds to an emergency control instruction issued by a major network in a grid-connected mode.

›Step 1: a power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity is obtained · 1 of 6

Power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity : in an active response mode of a source-grid-load-storage networked cloud decision control system, an actively calculated power gap required for stable operation of the system under an island condition is used as the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity ; and in the passive response mode of the source-grid-load-storage networked cloud decision control system, a power gap required for stable operation of the major network and issued by the major network is used as the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity .

Specifically, in the active response mode of the source-grid-load-storage networked cloud decision control system, the power gap required for stable operation of the system under the island condition and used as the Power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity is actively calculated according to the following formula:

Δ P actively calculated power gap =Σ a=1 x ΔP micro-grid a +Σ j=1 y ΔP photovoltaic power station j +E j=1 z ΔP wind power station i +Σ b=1 m ΔP energy-storage power station b   (1).

In formula (1), Σ a=1 x ΔP micro-grid a is an output power compensation of the micro-grids, x is the number of the micro grids, and Σ a=1 x ΔP micro-grid a is expressed by the following formula:

In formula (2), Σ a=1 x Δf is a difference between output frequency of the micro-grids and rated grid frequency, and k micro-grid a is a frequency regulation coefficient of the micro-grids.

In formula (1), Σ j=1 y ΔP photovoltaic power station j is an output power compensation of the photovoltaic power stations, y is the number of the photovoltaic power stations, and Σ j=1 y ΔP photovoltaic power station j is expressed by the following formula:

In formula (3), Σ a=1 x Δf is the difference between the output frequency of the micro grids and the rated grid frequency, and k photovoltaic power station j is a frequency regulation coefficient of the photovoltaic power stations.

In formula (1), Σ j=1 z ΔP wind power station i is an output power compensation of the wind power stations, z is the number of the wind power stations, and Σ j=1 z ΔP wind power station i is expressed by the following formula:

In formula (4), Σ a=1 x Δf is the difference between the output frequency of the micro-grids and the rated grid frequency, and k wind power station i is a frequency regulation coefficient of the wind power stations.

In formula (1), Σ b=1 m ΔP energy-storage power station b is an output power compensation of the energy-storage power stations, m is the number of the energy-storage power stations, and Σ b=1 m ΔP energy-storage power station b is expressed by the following formula:

In formula (5), Σ a=1 x Δf is the difference between the output frequency of the micro-grids and the rated grid frequency, and k energy-storage power station b is a frequency regulation coefficient of the energy-storage power stations.

Step 2: a frequency regulation demand is determined: if a system load rises suddenly and grid frequency falls, active power is increased to maintain a balance between supply and demand, and the frequency is increased, an output power compensation and variation are both greater than zero at this moment, and Step 3 is, performed; or, if the system load falls suddenly and the grid frequency rises, the active power is decreased to maintain the balance between supply and demand, and the frequency is decreased, the output power compensation and variation are both less than zero at this moment, and Step 9 is performed. Step 3: if a total output power compensation of the power generating sources in a power distribution network is greater than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and output power and output frequency of each power generating source are less than rated values of a power source, Step 4 is performed; if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is greater than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and the output power of part of the power generating sources is greater than the rated value of the power source, Step 5 is performed-, if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is less than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity , standby energy-storage power stations are used to compensate a power deficiency of the power distribution network, and Step 6 is performed; if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is less than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and the balance between power supply and demand of the power distribution network is still not maintained after the standby energy-storage power stations are used to compensate the power deficiency, Step 7 is performed; or, if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is less than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and the power deficiency of the power distribution network is still not made up by using the standby energy-storage power stations and cutting back removable loads, Step 8 is performed. Step 4: if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is greater than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and the output power and output frequency of each power generating source are less than the rated values of the power source, that is:

Σ i=1 x ΔP wind i.max +Σ j=1 y ΔP photovoltaic j.max +Σ a=1 z ΔP micro-grid a.max +Σ b=1 m ΔP energy-storage b.max >ΔP regulating quantity   (6).

In formula (6), ΔP wind i.max is a maximum value of the output power compensation of an i th wind power station under the constraint of a rated power value, ΔP photovolatic j.max is a maximum value of the output power compensation of a j th photovoltaic power station under the constraint of the rated power value, P micro-grid a.max is a maximum value of the output power compensation of an a th micro-grid under the constraint of the rated power value, and ΔP energy-storage b.max is a maximum value of the output power compensation of a b th energy-storage power station under the constraint of the rated power value.

›Step 1: a power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity is obtained · 2 of 6

Interfaces of the power stations meet Δf=kΔP, in which Δf is a difference between the grid frequency and, rated frequency, so

K wind power station 1 ΔP wind power station 1 = . . . =K wind power station z ΔP wind power station z =K photovoltaic power station 1 ΔP photovoltaic station 1 = . . . =K photovoltaic power station y ΔP photovoltaic power station y =K micro-grid 1 ΔP micro-grid 1 = . . . =K micro-grid x ΔP micro-grid x =K energy-storage power station 1 ΔP energy-storage power station 1 = . . . =K energy-storage power station m ΔP energy-storage power station m   (7).

In formula (7), K wind power station i and ΔP wind power station i are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the i th wind power station respectively, K photovoltaic power station j and ΔP photovoltaic power station j are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the j th photovoltaic power station respectively, K micro-grid a and ΔP micro-grid a are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the a th micro-grid respectively, and K energy-storage power station b and ΔP energy-storage power station b are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the b th energy-storage power station respectively.

Wherein, the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity is expressed by the following formula:

Σ i=1 x ΔP wind i +Σ j=1 y ΔP photovoltaic j +Σ a=1 z ΔP micro-grid a +Σ b=1 m ΔP energy-storage b =ΔP regulating quantity   (8)

In formula (8), ΔP wind i is the output power compensation of the i th wind power station, ΔP photovoltaic j is the output power compensation of the j th photovoltaic power station, ΔP micro-grid a is the output power compensation of the a th micro-grid, and ΔP energy-storage b is the output power compensation of the b th energy-storage power station.

A total output power compensation of the power generating sources participating in output power compensation is made to meet ΔP=ΔP regulating quantity according to the balance between supply and demand, and the output power compensation of each power generating source is calculated according to the following formula:

In formula (9), ΔP r is the output power compensation of an r th power generating source, K s is the frequency regulation coefficient of an s th power generating source, and u is the total number of the power generating sources participating in power generation.

In formula (6) and formula (8), x is the number of the micro-grids, y is the number of the photovoltaic power stations, z is the number of wind power stations, and m is the number of the energy-storage power stations, and x, y, z and m meet:

u=x+y+z+m   (10)

In formula (10), u is the total number of the power generating sources participating in output power compensation.

Step 5: if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is greater than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and the output power of part of the power generating sources is greater than the rated value of the power source, the output power of the power generating sources with the output power being greater than the rated value of the power source is limited, and a remaining power deficiency is made up by the standby energy-storage power stations.

For example, if the first wind power station is out of limit, that is, the output power of the first wind power station is greater than the rated value of the power source, the interfaces of the power stations meet Δf=kΔP, in which Δf is the difference between the grid frequency and the rated frequency, so:

K wind power station 1 ΔP wind power station 1-out-of-limit = . . . =K wind power station z ΔP wind power station z =K photovoltaic power station 1 ΔP photovoltaic power station 1 = . . . =K photovoltaic power station y ΔP photovoltaic power station y =K micro-grid 1 ΔP micro-grid 1 = . . . =K micro-grid x ΔP micro-grid x =K energy-storage power station 1 ΔP energy-storage power station 1 = . . . =K energy-storage power station m ΔP energy-storage power station m =K standby energy-storage power station 1 ΔP standby energy-storage power station 1 = . . . =K standby energy-storage power station n ΔP standby energy-storage power station n   (11).

In formula (11), K wind power station i and ΔP wind power station i are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the i th wind power station respectively, ΔP wind power station 1-out-of-limit is a maximum value of the output power compensation of the out-of-limit wind power station under the constraint of the rated power value, K photovoltaic power station j and ΔP photovoltaic power station j are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the j th photovoltaic power station respectively, K micro-grid a and ΔP micro-grid a are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the a th micro-grid respectively, and K energy-storage power station b and ΔP energy-storage power station b are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the b th energy-storage power station respectively.

Wherein, the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity is expressed by the following formula:

Σ i=1 x ΔP wind i +Σ j=1 y ΔP photovoltaic j +Σ a=1 z ΔP micro-grid a +Σ b=1 m ΔP energy-storage b +Σ c=1 n ΔP standby energy-storage c =ΔP regulating quantity   (12).

In formula (12), ΔP wind i is the output power compensation of the i th wind power station, ΔP photovoltaic j is the output power compensation of the j th photovoltaic power station, ΔP micro-grid a is the output power compensation of the a th micro-grid, ΔP energy-storage b is the output power compensation of the b th energy-storage power station, and ΔP standby energy-storage c is the output power compensation of the c th standby energy-storage power station.

A total output power compensation of the power generating sources participating in power output, excluding the power generating sources with output power being greater than the rated value of the power source, is made to meet ΔP=ΔP regulating quantity −ΔP wind power station 1 out-of-limit according to the balance between supply and demand, and the output power compensation of each power generating source is calculated according to the following formula:

›Step 1: a power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity is obtained · 3 of 6

In formula (13), ΔP r is the output power compensation of the r th power generating source, K s is the frequency regulation coefficient of the s th power generating source, and u is the total number of the power generating sources participating in power generation.

In formula (12), x is the number of the micro-grids, y is the number of the photovoltaic power stations, z is the number of wind power stations, and m is the number of the energy-storage power stations, and x, y, z and m meet:

u=x+y+z+m+n− 1  (14).

In formula (14), u is the total number of the power generating sources participating in output power compensation.

Step 6: when the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is less than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity , the standby energy-storage power stations are used to compensate a power deficiency of the power distribution network, so

K wind power station 1 ΔP wind power station 1 = . . . =K wind power station z ΔP wind power station z =K photovoltaic power station 1 ΔP photovoltaic power station 1 = . . . =K photovoltaic power station y ΔP photovoltaic power station y =K micro-grid 1 ΔP micro-grid 1= . . . = K micro-grid x ΔP micro-grid x =K energy-storage power station 1 ΔP energy-storage power station 1 = . . . =K energy-storage power station m ΔP energy-storage power station m =K standby energy-storage power station 1 ΔP standby energy-storage power station 1 = . . . =K standby energy-storage power station n ΔP standby energy-storage power station n   (15).

In formula (15), K wind power station i and ΔP wind power station i are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the i th wind power station respectively,

K photovoltaic power station j an ΔP photovoltaic power station j are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the j th photovoltaic power station respectively, K micro-grid a and ΔP micro-grid a are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the a th micro-grid respectively, K energy-storage power station b and ΔP energy-storage power station b are frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of a b th standby energy-storage power station respectively, and K standby energy-storage power station c and ΔP standby energy-storage power station c are a frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the c th standby energy-storage power station respectively.

Wherein, the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity is expressed by the following formula:

Σ i=1 x ΔP wind i +Σ j=1 y ΔP photovoltaic j +Σ a=1 z ΔP micro-grid a +Σ b=1 m ΔP energy-storage b +Σ c=1 n ΔP standby energy-storage c =ΔP regulating quantity   (16).

In formula (16), P wind i is the output power compensation of the i th wind power station, ΔP photovoltaic j is the output power compensation of the j th photovoltaic power station, ΔP micro-grid a is the output power compensation of the a th micro-grid. ΔP energy-storage b is the output power compensation of the b th energy-storage power station, and ΔP standby energy-storage c is the output power compensation of the c th standby energy-storage power station.

A total output power compensation of the power generating sources participating, in power output and the standby energy-storage power stations is made to meet ΔP=ΔP regulating quantity according to the balance between supply and demand, and the output power compensation of each power generating source is calculated according to the following formula:

In formula (17), ΔP r is the output power compensation of the r th power generating source, K s is the frequency regulation coefficient of the s th power generating source, and u is the total number of the power generating sources participating in power generation.

In formula (16), x is the number of the micro-grids, y is the number of the photovoltaic power stations, z is the number of wind power stations, m is the number of the energy-storage power stations, n is the number of the energy-storage power stations, and x, y, z, m and n meet:

u=x+y+z+m+n   (18).

In formula (18), u is the total number of the power generating sources participating in power output.

Step 7: if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is less than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and the balance between power supply and demand of the power distribution network is still not maintained after the standby energy-storage power stations are used to compensate the power deficiency, removable loads are cut back based on a preset cutback principle, wherein the preset cutback principle is expressed as:

In formula (19), aload f is a load to be cut back, and P loudd is power distributed to a d th load by the power distribution network.

A total output power compensation of the power generating sources and the standby energy-storage power stations after load cutback is made to meet ΔP=ΔP regulating quantity −ΔP removable load f according to the balance between supply and demand, and Step 3 is performed.

This cycle is repeated h times, and the interfaces of the power stations meet Δf=kΔP, in which Δf is a difference between the grid frequency and the rated frequency, so:

K wind power station 1 ΔP wind power station 1 = . . . =K wind power station z ΔP wind power station z =K photovoltaic power station 1 ΔP photovoltaic power station 1 = . . . =K photovoltaic power station y ΔP photovoltaic power station y =K micro-grid 1 ΔP micro-grid 1 = . . . =K micro-grid x ΔP micro-grid x =K energy-storage power station 1 ΔP energy-storage power station 1 = . . . =K energy-storage power station m ΔP energy-storage power station m =K standby energy-storage power station 1 ΔP standby energy-storage power station 1 = . . . =K standby energy-storage power station n ΔP standby energy-storage power station n   (20).

In formula (20), K wind power station i and ΔP wind power station i are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the i th wind power station respectively, K photovoltaic power station j and ΔP photovoltaic power station j are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the j th photovoltaic power station respectively, K micro-grid a and ΔP micro-grid a are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the a th micro-grid respectively,

›Step 1: a power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity is obtained · 4 of 6

K energy-storage power station b and ΔP energy-storage power station b are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the b th standby energy-storage power station respectively, and K standby energy-storage power station c and ΔP standby energy-storage power station c are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the c th standby energy-storage power station respectively.

Wherein, the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity is expressed by the following formula:

In formula (21), P wind i is the output power compensation of the i th wind power station, ΔP photovoltaic j is the output power compensation of the j th photovoltaic power station, ΔP micro-grid a is the output power compensation of the a th micro-grid, ΔP energy-storage b is the output power compensation of the b th energy-storage power station, ΔP standby energy-storage c is the output power compensation of the c th standby energy-storage power station, and ΔP removable load f is the output power compensation of the j th removable load.

A total output power compensation of the power generating sources participating in power output and the standby energy-storage power stations is made to meet ΔP=ΔP regulating quantity −Σ f=1 h ΔP removable load f according to the balance between supply and demand, and the output power of each power generating source is calculated according to the following formula:

In formula (22), ΔP r is the output power compensation of the r th power generating, source, K s is the frequency regulation coefficient of the s th power generating source, and u is the total number of the power generating sources participating in power generation.

In formula (21), x is the number of the micro-grids, y is the number of the photovoltaic power stations, z is the number of wind power stations, m is the number of the energy-storage power stations, n is the number of the energy-storage power stations, and x, y, z, m and n meet:

u=x+y+z+m+n   (23)

In formula (23), u is the total number of the power generating sources participating in power output.

Step 8: if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is less than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and the power deficiency of the power distribution network is still not made up by using the standby energy-storage power stations and cutting, back removable loads, an external power supply system is used to make up the deficiency, so:

K wind power station 1 ΔP wind power station 1 = . . . =K wind power station z ΔP wind power station z =K photovoltaic power station 1 ΔP photovoltaic power station 1 = . . . =K photovoltaic power station y ΔP photovoltaic power station y =K micro-grid 1 ΔP micro-grid 1 = . . . =K micro-grid x ΔP micro-grid x =K energy-storage power station 1 ΔP energy-storage power station 1 =. . . =K energy-storage power station m ΔP energy-storage power station m =K standby energy-storage power station 1 ΔP standby energy-storage power station 1 = . . . =K standby energy-storage power station n ΔP standby energy-storage power station n =K external power supply ΔP external power supply   (24).

In formula (24), K wind power station i and ΔP wind power station i are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the i th wind power station respectively, K photovoltaic power station j and ΔP photovoltaic power station j are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the j th photovoltaic power station respectively, K micro-grid a and ΔP micro-grid a are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the a th micro-grid respectively,

K energy-storage power station b and ΔP energy-storage power station b are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the b th standby energy-storage power station respectively, K standby energy-storage power station c and ΔP standby energy-storage power station c are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the c th standby energy-storage power station respectively, and K external power supply and ΔP external power supply are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the external power supply system respectively.

Wherein, the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity is expressed by the following formula:

Δ P wind +ΔP photovoltaic +P controllable source Σ i=1 x ΔP wind i +Σ j=1 y ΔP photovoltaic j +Σ a=1 z ΔP micro-grid a +Σ b=1 m ΔP energy-storage b +Σ c=1 n ΔP standby energy-storage c +ΔP external power supply =ΔP regulating quantity −Σ d=1 l ΔP removable load d   (25)

In formula (25), P wind i is the output power compensation of the i th wind power station, ΔP photovoltaic j is the output power compensation of the j th photovoltaic power station, ΔP micro-grid a is the output power compensation of the a th micro-grid, ΔP energy-storage b is the output power compensation of the b th energy-storage power station, ΔP standby energy-storage c is the output power compensation of the c th standby energy-storage power station, ΔP external power supply is the output power compensation of the external power supply system, and ΔP removable load f is the output power compensation of the f th removable load.

A total output power compensation of the power generating sources participating, in power output, the standby energy-storage power stations and the external power supply system after load cutback is made to meet ΔP=ΔP regulating quantity −Σ d=1 l ΔP removable load d according to the balance between supply and demand, and the output power compensation of each power generating source is calculated according to the following formula:

In formula (26), ΔP r is the output power compensation of the r th power generating source, K s is the frequency regulation coefficient of the s th power generating source, and u is the total number of the power generating sources participating in power generation.

›Step 1: a power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity is obtained · 5 of 6

In formula (25), x is the number of the micro-grids, y is the number of the photovoltaic power stations, z is the number of wind power stations, m is the number of the energy-storage power stations, n is the number of the energy-storage power stations, and x, y z, m and n meet:

u=x+y+z+m+n+ 1  (27)

In formula (27), u is the total number of the power generating sources participating in power output.

Step 9: if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is greater than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and the output power and output frequency of each power generating source are less than the rated values of the power source, Step 10 is performed; or, if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is greater than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulation quantity and the output power of part of the power generating sources is greater than the rated value of the power source, Step 11 is performed. Step 10: if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is greater than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and the output power and output frequency of each power generating source are less than the rated values of the power source, that is:

|Σ i=1 x ΔP wind i.max +Σ j=1 y ΔP photovoltaic j.max +Σ a=1 z ΔP micro-grid a.max +Σ b=1 m ΔP energy-storage b.max |≥|ΔP regulating quantity |  (28).

In formula (28), ΔP wind i.max is a maximum value of the output power compensation of the i th wind power station under the constraint of a rated power value, ΔP photovoltaic j.max is a maximum value of the output power compensation of the j th photovoltaic power station under the constraint of the rated power value, P micro-grid a.max is a maximum value of the output power compensation of the a th micro-grid under the constraint of the rated power value, and ΔP energy-storage b.max is a maximum value of the output power compensation of the b th energy-storage power station under the constraint of the rated power value.

Interfaces of the power stations meet Δf=kΔP, in which Δf is a difference between the grid frequency and rated frequency, so:

K wind power station 1 ΔP wind power station 1 = . . . =K wind power station z ΔP wind power station z =K photovoltaic power station 1 ΔP photovoltaic power station 1 = . . . =K photovoltaic power station y ΔP photovoltaic power station y =K micro-grid 1 ΔP micro-grid 1 = . . . =K micro-grid x ΔP micro-grid x =K energy-storage power station 1 ΔP energy-storage power station 1 = . . . =K energy-storage power station m ΔP energy-storage power station m   (29).

In formula (29), K wind power station i and ΔP wind power station i are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the i th wind power station respectively, K photovoltaic power station j and ΔP photovoltaic power station j are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the j th photovoltaic power station respectively, K micro-grid a and ΔP micro-grid a are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the a th micro-grid respectively, and K energy-storage power station b and ΔP energy-storage power station b are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the b th energy-storage power station respectively.

Wherein, the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity is expressed by the following formula:

Σ i=1 x ΔP wind i +Σ j=1 y ΔP photovoltaic j +Σ a=1 z ΔP micro-grid a +Σ b=1 m Δ energy-storage b =ΔP regulating quantity   (30)

In formula (30), ΔP wind i is the output power compensation of the i th wind power station, ΔP photovoltaic j is the output power compensation of the j th photovoltaic power station, ΔP micro-grid a is the output power compensation of the a a th micro-grid, and ΔP energy-storage b is the output power compensation of the b th energy-storage power station.

A total output power compensation of the power generating sources is made to meet ΔP=ΔP regulating quantity according to the balance between supply and demand, and the output power compensation of each power generating source is calculated according to the following formula:

In formula (31), ΔP r is the output power compensation of the r th power generating source, K s is the frequency regulation coefficient of the s th power generating source, and u is the total number of the power generating sources participating in power generation.

In formula (28) and formula (30), x is the number of the micro-grids, y is the number of the photovoltaic power stations, z is the number of wind power stations, and m is the number of the energy-storage power stations, and x, y, z and m meet:

u=x+y+z+m   (32)

In formula (32), u is the total number of the power generating sources participating in output power compensation.

Step 11: if the total output power compensation of the power generating sources in the power distribution network is greater than the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity and the output power of part of the power generating sources is greater than the rated value of the power source, Step 10 is performed; for example, if the first wind power station is removed, the interfaces of the power stations meet Δf=kΔP, in which Δf is the difference between the grid frequency and the rated frequency, so:

K wind power station 2 ΔP wind power station 2 = . . . =K wind power station z ΔP wind power station z =K photovoltaic power station 1 ΔP photovoltaic power station 1 = . . . =K photovoltaic power station y ΔP photovoltaic power station y =K micro-grid 1 ΔP micro-grid 1 = . . . =K micro-grid x ΔP micro-grid x =K energy-storage power station 1 ΔP energy-storage power station 1 = . . . =K energy-storage power station m ΔP energy-storage power station m   (33)

In formula (33), K wind power station i and ΔP wind power station i are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the i th wind power station respectively, K photovoltaic power station j and ΔP photovoltaic power station j are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the j th photovoltaic power station respectively. K micro-grid a and ΔP micro-grid a are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the a th micro-grid respectively, and K energy-storage power station b and ΔP energy-storage power station b are the frequency regulation coefficient and output power compensation of the b th energy-storage power station respectively.

›Step 1: a power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity is obtained · 6 of 6

Wherein, the power regulating quantity ΔP regulating quantity is expressed by the following formula:

Σ i=2 x ΔP wind i +Σ j=1 y ΔP photovoltaic j Σ a=1 z ΔP micro-grid a +Σ b=1 m ΔP energy-storage b =ΔP regulating quantity −ΔP wind 1-out-of-limit   (34)

In formula (34), ΔP wind i is the output power compensation of the i th wind power station, ΔP photovoltaic j is the output power compensation of the j th photovoltaic power station, ΔP micro-grid a is the output power compensation of the a th micro-grid, and ΔP energy-storage b is the output power compensation of the b th energy-storage power station.

A total output power compensation of the power generating sources participating in power output is made to meet ΔP=ΔP regulating quantity −ΔP out-of-limit according to the balance between supply and demand, and the output power compensation of each power generating source is calculated according to the following formula:

In formula (35), ΔP r is the output power compensation of the r th power generating source, K s is the frequency regulation coefficient of the s th power generating source, and u is, the total number of the power generating sources participating in power generation.

In formula (34), x is the number of the micro-grids, y is the number of the photovoltaic power stations, z is the number of wind power stations, m is the number of the energy-storage power stations, n is the number of the energy-storage power stations, and x, y, z, m and n meet:

u=x+y+z+m+n− 1  (36).

In formula (36), u is the total number of the power generating sources participating in power output.

›Embodiment 2

As shown in FIG. 2 , this embodiment discloses a source-Did-load-storage networked cloud decision control system, comprising a cloud intelligent analysis and decision platform, a source-grid-load-storage networked cooperative control system, and a source-grid-load-storage cooperative control intelligent terminal.

The cloud intelligent analysis and decision platform has a terminal connected to a power grid dispatching system and a terminal connected to the source-grid-load-storage networked cooperative control system, and the source-grid-load-storage networked cooperative control system is connected to the source-grid-load-storage cooperative control intelligent terminal.

The cloud intelligent analysis and decision platform is able to directly respond to grid frequency/voltage disturbance and fault information to make an analysis and decision, the source-grid-load-storage networked cooperative control system sends the decision to the source-grid-load-storage cooperative control intelligent terminal; the cloud intelligent analysis and decision platform is also able to respond to a management and regulation instruction issued by the power grid dispatching system to make an analysis and decision, and the source-grid-load-storage networked cooperative control system sends the decision to the source-grid-load-storage cooperative control intelligent terminal.

The source-grid-load-storage cooperative control intelligent terminal is connected to a distributed power unit, a distributed micro-grid unit a distributed energy-storage device unit and a distributed load aggregation unit for executing a decision issued by the source-grid-load-storage cooperative control intelligent terminal.

In the active response mode, the source-grid-load-storage networked cloud decision control system actively responds to the grid frequency/voltage disturbance and fault information to provide analysis and decision support by means of the cloud intelligent analysis and decision platform, and the source-grid-load-storage networked cooperative control system sends a decision command to the distributed units to be executed. As shown in FIG. 3 which is a schematic diagram of a power system in the active response mode, the power system comprises a major network, loads, an adjacent power supply system, micro-grids, photovoltaic power stations, wind power stations, energy-storage power stations, standby energy-storage power stations, and removable loads, and the all units, except the major network, are connected.

In a passive response mode, the source-grid-load-storage networked cloud decision control system provide analysis and decision support by means of the cloud intelligent analysis and decision platform according to a management and regulation strategy issued by the power grid dispatching system, and the source-grid-load-storage networked cooperative control system sends a decision command to the distributed units to be executed. As shown in FIG. 4 which is a schematic diagram of a power system in the passive response mode the power system comprises a major network, loads, an adjacent power supply system, micro-grids, photovoltaic power stations, wind power stations, energy-storage power stations, standby energy-storage power stations, and removable loads, and the all units, except the major network, are connected.

The source-grid-load-storage, networked cooperative control system comprises an emergency regulation and cutback module, and the emergency regulation and cutback module is used to perform the steps of the method in Embodiment 1.

The above embodiments are merely preferred ones of the invention. It should be noted that various improvements and transformations may be made by those ordinarily skilled in the art without departing from the technical principle of the invention, and all these improvements and transformations should fall within the protection scope of the invention.

Claims as granted

8 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

3 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H02J3/28
  • H02J3/48
  • H02J3/0014

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJul 2021Jan 2022Jul 2022Jan 2023Jul 2023Jan 2024Jul 2024USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
3.0 y
1,096 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
3
no RCE
Examiner
Ziaul Karim
art unit 2119 · TC 2100
Citations: 10 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2024202620282030203220342036203820402042Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock