USPatent applicationPatented

Isolation estimation system, isolation estimation method, and processor circuit

Granted 7 Dec 2021 · no office action yet

Application· this page
17/130,231
filed 22 Dec 2020
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 11,196,455
granted 7 Dec 2021

Life of the application

6 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom2022202420262028203020322034203620382040ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

An isolation estimation system includes a transmitter device, a first receiver device, a second receiver device, and a processor circuit. The transmitter device adopts a first communication technology. The transmitter device is configured to transmit a transmitting signal to the first receiving device. The second receiver device is configured to acquire a leakage signal power spectral density of a leakage signal corresponding to the transmitting signal. The second receiver device adopts a second communication technology. A bandwidth of the second communication technology is narrower than a bandwidth of the first communication technology, and the second communication technology supports a frequency hopping process. The processor circuit is configured to calculate isolation according to a signal-in-air power spectral density of the transmitting signal and the leakage signal power spectral density. The isolation is for determining whether to adjust the transmitter device.

Description

9 parts
›RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to Taiwanese Application Serial Number 109124639, filed Jul. 21, 2020, which is herein incorporated by reference.

BACKGROUND
›Technical Field

The present disclosure relates to an isolation estimation technology. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to an isolation estimation system, an isolation estimation method, and a processor circuit for estimating the isolation.

›Description of Related Art

With developments of technology (for example but not limited to, IoT technology), more and more electrical devices support different wireless communication technologies to transmit or receive signals, to achieve their functions.

However, when the different wireless communication technologies are used to transmit signals or receive signals at the same time, interference occurs among the signals of the different wireless communication technology. The interference causes that the error rate of receiving the signals increases, such that user experience is affected and other negative effects are generated.

›SUMMARY

Some aspects of the present disclosure are to provide an isolation estimation system. The isolation estimation system includes a transmitter device, a first receiver device, a second receiver device, and a processor circuit. The transmitter device adopts a first communication technology. The transmitter device is configured to transmit a transmitting signal to the first receiving device. The second receiver device is configured to acquire a leakage signal power spectral density of a leakage signal corresponding to the transmitting signal. The second receiver device adopts a second communication technology. A bandwidth of the second communication technology is narrower than a bandwidth of the first communication technology, and the second communication technology supports a frequency hopping process. The processor circuit is configured to calculate isolation according to a signal-in-air power spectral density of the transmitting signal and the leakage signal power spectral density. The isolation is for determining whether to adjust the transmitter device.

Some aspects of the present disclosure are to provide an isolation estimation method. The isolation estimation method includes the following operations: transmitting a transmitting signal to a first receiving device by a transmitter device, in which the transmitter device adopts a first communication technology, acquiring a leakage signal power spectral density of a leakage signal corresponding to the transmitting signal by a second receiver device, in which the second receiver device adopts a second communication technology, in which a bandwidth of the second communication technology is narrower than a bandwidth of the first communication technology, and the second communication technology supports a frequency hopping process; and calculating isolation according to a signal-in-air power spectral density of the transmitting signal and the leakage signal power spectral density by a processor circuit, in which the isolation is for determining whether to adjust the transmitter device.

Some aspects of the present disclosure are to provide a processor circuit. The processor circuit is configured to calculate isolation according to a signal-in-air power spectral density of a transmitting signal and a leakage signal power spectral density, to determine whether to adjust a transmitter device. The transmitter device is configured to transmit the transmitting signal to a first receiving device. The leakage signal power spectral density corresponds to a leakage signal received by a second receiver device, and the leakage signal corresponds to the transmitting signal. The transmitter device adopts a first communication technology. The second receiver device adopts a second communication technology. A bandwidth of the second communication technology is narrower than a bandwidth of the first communication technology, and the second communication technology supports a frequency hopping process.

As described above, the isolation estimation system, the isolation estimation method, and the processor circuit of the present disclosure can estimate isolation between apparatuses with different communication technologies so as to adjust related devices or related parameters.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The disclosure can be more fully understood by reading the following detailed description of the embodiment, with reference made to the accompanying drawings as follows:

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an isolation estimation system according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2 is a time sequence diagram of operations of the isolation estimation system in FIG. 1 according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of estimating isolation according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating an isolation estimation method according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 1 of 3

The embodiments in the following descriptions are described in detail with the accompanying drawings, but the examples provided are not intended to limit the scope of the disclosure covered by the present disclosure. The structure and operation are not intended to limit the execution order. Any structure regrouped by elements, which has an equal effect, is covered by the scope of the present disclosure. In addition, the drawings are merely for illustration and are not illustrated according original sizes. For ease of understanding, the same or similar components in the following descriptions will be described with the same symbols.

In the present disclosure, “connected” or “coupled” may refer to “electrically connected” or “electrically coupled.” “Connected” or “coupled” may also refer to operations or actions between two or more elements.

Reference is made to FIG. 1 . FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an isolation estimation system 100 according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. The isolation estimation system 100 includes a communication device D 1 , and a communication device D 2 . The communication device D 1 and the communication device D 2 can transmit data or signals to each other. As illustrated in FIG. 1 , the communication device D 1 includes a transmitter device TX 1 , a transmitter device TX 2 , a receiver device RX 1 , a receiver device RX 2 , a processor circuit 120 , an antenna A 1 , and an antenna A 2 . The communication device D 2 includes a transmitter device TX 3 , a receiver device RX 3 , and an antenna A 3 .

The transmitter device TX 1 , the receiver device RX 1 , the transmitter device TX 3 , and the receiver device RX 3 adopt a first communication technology. The transmitter device TX 2 and the receiver device RX 2 adopt a second communication technology. In some embodiments, the first communication technology is Wi-Fi technology, and the second communication technology is Bluetooth technology. For example, the transmitter device TX 1 can transmit packets with Wi-Fi technology through the antenna A 1 , such that the receiver device RX 3 receives the packets through the antenna A 3 . The transmitter device TX 3 can transmit packets with Wi-Fi technology through the antenna A 3 , such that the receiver device RX 1 receives the packets through the antenna A 1 . In addition, the transmitter device TX 2 can transmit packets with Bluetooth technology through the antenna A 2 . The receiver device RX 2 can receive packets with Bluetooth technology through the antenna A 2 .

In implementation, Wi-Fi technology and Bluetooth technology operate at the same frequency band, for example, Industrial Scientific Medical (ISM) 2.4G. A bandwidth of Bluetooth technology is less than a bandwidth of Wi-Fi technology. Bluetooth technology supports a frequency hopping process. The frequency hopping process is, for example, an Adaptive Frequency Hopping (AFH) process.

In some embodiments, the transmitter device TX 1 transmits a transmitting signal S 1 with Wi-Fi technology through the antenna A 1 to the receiver device RX 3 . If the isolation between the antenna A 1 and the antenna A 2 is worse, more signal components of the transmitting signal S 1 is leaked to the receiver device RX 2 .

When the receiver device RX 2 receives a leakage signal S 1 ′ through the antenna A 2 , the receiver device RX 2 measures a power spectral density (PSD) of the leakage signal S 1 ′ (it is called “a leakage signal power spectral density” hereafter). Then, the processor circuit 120 calculates the isolation between the antenna A 1 and the antenna A 2 according to a signal-in-air power spectral density of the transmitting signal S 1 and the leakage signal power spectral density of the leakage signal S 1 ′. The isolation indicates interference level between apparatuses operating at the same frequency band. The isolation can be used to determine whether to adjust the transmitter device TX 1 .

In some embodiments, the processor circuit 120 is implemented by a Wi-Fi driver and configured to control the transmitter device TX 1 , the receiver device RX 1 , and the receiver device RX 2 at least, but the present disclosure is not limited thereto.

In some related approaches, network analyzers and a distance estimation method for estimating a distance between antennas are used to determine the isolation between the antenna A 1 and the antenna A 2 . However, in these related approaches, a platform with external points is needed for the network analyzers, and the arrangements of the antennas during the measurement may be different from the arrangements of the antennas in practical applications. Thus, the measurement result may by wrong.

In some other related approaches, a leakage signal leaked from the transmitter device TX 2 to the receiver device RX 1 is used for estimating the isolation. However, in these related approaches, since the receiver device RX 1 does not support a frequency hopping process, it cannot sample correct signals during the measurement and it causes errors. For solving the aforementioned problems, additional circuit needs to be disposed in the receiver device RX 1 which does not support the frequency hopping process. However, this method leads to higher circuit complexity and higher cost.

Compared to the related approaches above, in the present disclosure, a leakage signal (the leakage signal S 1 ′) leaked from the transmitter device TX 1 to the receiver device RX 2 is used for estimating the isolation. Since a bandwidth of the receiver device RX 2 is narrower and the receiver device RX 2 supports the frequency hopping process, the present disclosure can receive correct signals to avoid errors. In addition, the present disclosure only adds two bits in the circuit to acquire the operation states of related apparatuses and complete subsequent isolation estimation and does not need to dispose additional circuits.

Reference is made to FIG. 2 . FIG. 2 is a time sequence diagram of operations of the isolation estimation system 100 in FIG. 1 according to some embodiments of the present disclosure.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 2 of 3

As described above, two additional bits are added in the circuit of the present disclosure to acquire the operation states of the transmitter device TX 1 and the receiver device RX 1 . In detail, two bits WL_TX_ON and WL_RX_ON are added in the circuit. The bits constitute a return style, and the return style indicates the operation states of the transmitter device TX 1 and the receiver device RX 1 . For example, when the bit WL_TX_ON is 1 and the bit WL_RX_ON is 0, the return style is 10. This indicates that the transmitter device TX 1 is in a transmitting state. When the bit WL_TX_ON is 0 and the bit WL_RX_ON is 1, the return style is 01. This indicates that the receiver device RX 1 is in a receiving state. When the bit WL_TX_ON is 0 and the bit WL_RX_ON is 0, the return style is 00. This indicates that the transmitter device TX 1 and the receiver device RX 1 are not in the transmitting state and not in the receiving state. In this situation, a background noise can be measured. In addition, the receiver device RX 2 may be controlled to measure power spectral density periodically between a driving power spectral density command and a stopping power spectral density command.

How the processor circuit 120 calculates the isolation between the antenna A 1 and the antenna A 2 are described in following paragraphs.

It is assumed that the signal-in-air power spectral density of the transmitting signal S 1 is X (dBm/MHz), the leakage signal power spectral density of the leakage signal S 1 ′ leaked to the receiver device RX 2 is Z (dBm/MHz), and a background noise power spectral density is Y (dBm/MHz). The processor circuit 120 calculates the isolation according to the signal-in-air power spectral density X, the leakage signal power spectral density Z, and the background noise power spectral density Y.

First, for considering the effects caused by the background noise power spectral density Y, a parameter W (dBm/MHz) is defined as formula (1) below:

W= 10×log 10(10 Z/10 −10 Y/10 )  (1)

After the parameter W is calculated, the processor circuit 120 calculates an average value of the signal-in-air power spectral density X and an average value of the parameter W. Then, the processor circuit 120 utilizes formula (2) below to calculate the isolation:

IV=X AVG −W AVG   (2)

IV (dB) is isolation, X AVG is a Wi-Fi in-band average value of the signal-in-air power spectral density X, W AVG is a Wi-Fi in-band average value of the parameter W.

The isolation estimation ways in different conditions are described in following paragraphs.

If the leakage signal power spectral density Z is greater than the background noise power spectral density Y and a different between the leakage signal power spectral density Z and the background noise power spectral density Y is greater than a first value (for example, Z>Y+10), it indicates that the leakage signal power spectral density Z is much greater than the background noise power spectral density Y. In this situation, the background noise power spectral density Y can be omitted and the parameter W in formula (1) is simplified to be equal to the leakage signal power spectral density Z. Accordingly, the isolation IV in formula (2) is equal to a Wi-Fi in-band average value of the signal-in-air power spectral density X minus a Wi-Fi in-band average value of the leakage signal power spectral density Z.

If the leakage signal power spectral density Z is greater than the background noise power spectral density Y and the difference between the leakage signal power spectral density Z and the background noise power spectral density Y is less than or equal to the first value and greater than or equal to a second value (for example, Y+10≥Z≥Y+1), it indicates that the leakage signal power spectral density Z is not much greater than the background noise power spectral density Y but the leakage signal power spectral density Z is greater than the background noise power spectral density Y. In this situation, the background noise power spectral density Y cannot be omitted, and the parameter W still satisfies the formula (1) above. Accordingly, the isolation IV in formula (2) is equal to the Wi-Fi in-band average value of the signal-in-air power spectral density X minus an average value in Wi-Fi of the parameter W.

If the leakage signal power spectral density Z is equal to or less than the background noise power spectral density Y (for example, Z≅Y or Z<Y), or the difference between the leakage signal power spectral density Z and the background noise power spectral density Y is less than the second value (for example, Z<Y+1), it indicates that the leakage signal S 1 ′ leaked to the receiver device RX 2 is subdued by the background noise (the background noise is louder). In this situation, the parameter W does not satisfy the aforementioned formula (1) and needs to be modified as a parameter W′. The parameter W′ is equal to the background noise power spectral density Y minus an estimation value, as formula (3) below:

W′=Y−A   (3)

In some embodiments, the estimation value A is equal to 6. If the estimation value A is equal to 6, the parameter W′ is equal to Y−6. The isolation IV in formula (2) is equal to the Wi-Fi in-band average value of the signal-in-air power spectral density X minus a Wi-Fi in-band average value of the parameter W′.

In some embodiments, if the calculated isolation is less than a threshold value, it indicates that overmuch signal components of the transmitting signal S 1 is leaked to the receiver device RX 2 . Accordingly, the processor circuit 120 reduces transmitting power of the transmitter device TX 1 , to transmit the transmitting signal S 1 with lower power.

Reference is made to FIG. 3 . FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of estimating isolation according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. FIG. 3 illustrates the parameters used in the aforementioned calculation process, FIG. 3 is an example, and the present disclosure is not limited thereto. As illustrated in FIG. 3 , the actual isolation is 15 decibel, but the estimated isolation is 13.5 decibel.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 3 of 3

Reference is made to FIG. 4 . FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating an isolation estimation method 400 according to some embodiments of the present disclosure. The isolation estimation method 400 includes operations S 410 , S 420 , and S 430 . In some embodiments, the isolation estimation method 400 in FIG. 4 may be implemented to the isolation estimation system 100 in FIG. 1 .

In operation S 410 , the transmitter device TX 1 transmits the transmitting signal S 1 to the receiver device RX 3 . In some embodiments, the transmitter device TX 1 adopts Wi-Fi technology and transmits the transmitting signal S 1 with Wi-Fi technology.

In operation S 420 , the receiver device RX 2 acquires the leakage signal power spectral density of the leakage signal St corresponding to the transmitting signal S 1 . In some embodiments, the receiver device RX 2 adopts Bluetooth technology. The bandwidth of Bluetooth technology is less than the bandwidth of Wi-Fi technology, and Bluetooth technology supports the frequency hopping process.

In operation S 430 , the processor circuit 120 estimates the isolation between the antenna A 1 and the antenna A 2 according to the signal-in-air power spectral density of the transmitting signal S 1 and the power spectral density of the leakage signal S 1 ′. The estimated isolation may be used to determine whether to adjust the transmitter device TX 1 . In some embodiments, the estimated isolation may be used for adjusting the transmitting power of the transmitter device TX 1 .

The above description of the isolation estimation method 400 includes exemplary operations, but the operations of the isolation estimation method 400 are not necessarily performed in the order described. The order of the operations of the isolation estimation method 400 disclosed in the present disclosure are able to be changed, to be added, to be replaced, to be omitted, or the operations are able to be executed simultaneously or partially simultaneously as appropriate, in accordance with the spirit and scope of various embodiments of the present disclosure.

As described above, the isolation estimation system, the isolation estimation method, and the processor circuit of the present disclosure can estimate isolation between apparatuses with different communication technologies so as to adjust related devices or related parameters.

Various functional components or blocks have been described herein. As will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art, in some embodiments, the functional blocks will preferably be implemented through circuits (either dedicated circuits, or general purpose circuits, which operate under the control of one or more processors and coded instructions), which will typically comprise transistors or other circuit elements that are configured in such a way as to control the operation of the circuitry in accordance with the functions and operations described herein. As will be further appreciated, the specific structure or interconnections of the circuit elements will typically be determined by a compiler, such as a register transfer language (RTL) compiler. RTL compilers operate upon scripts that closely resemble assembly language code, to compile the script into a form that is used for the layout or fabrication of the ultimate circuitry. Indeed, RTL is well known for its role and use in the facilitation of the design process of electronic and digital systems.

Although the present disclosure has been described in considerable detail with reference to certain embodiments thereof, other embodiments are possible. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the embodiments contained herein.

It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the structure of the present disclosure without departing from the scope or spirit of the disclosure. In view of the foregoing, it is intended that the present disclosure cover modifications and variations of this disclosure provided they fall within the scope of the following claims.

Claims as granted

18 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

4 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section H — Electricity
  • H04B1/44
  • H04B1/715
  • H04W84/12
  • H04W4/80

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomJan 2021Apr 2021Jul 2021Oct 2021Jan 2022USPTOApplicantNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
1.0 y
350 days filing → grant
Office actions
0
none on record
Examiner
Fitwi Y Hailegiorgis
art unit 2632 · TC 2600
Citations: 3 back · 1 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom2022202420262028203020322034203620382040Owner 1
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock