USPatent applicationPatented

Magnetic field sensor with fault reporting

Granted 11 Jan 2022 · no office action yet

Application· this page
17/009,072
filed 1 Sep 2020
Publication
Not published
not published
Patent
US 11,221,203
granted 11 Jan 2022

Life of the application

11 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20202022202420262028203020322034203620382040ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

In one aspect, a magnetic field sensor includes a magnetic field sensing element configured to detect changes in a magnetic field caused by a target and an encoder configured to process signals originating from the magnetic field element. The encoder is configured to generate a first output signal and a second output signal. In a non-fault state, the first and second output signals are 90 electrical degrees out of phase from one another, and in a fault state, the first and second output signals are in phase with each other.

Description

5 parts
›BACKGROUND

Magnetic field sensors are used in a variety of applications, including, but not limited to, an angle sensor that senses an angle of a direction of a magnetic field, a current sensor that senses a magnetic field generated by a current carried by a current-carrying conductor, a magnetic switch that senses the proximity of a ferromagnetic object, a rotation detector that senses passing ferromagnetic articles, for example, magnetic domains of a ring magnet or a ferromagnetic target (e.g., gear teeth) where the magnetic field sensor is used in combination with a back-biased or other magnet, and a magnetic field sensor that senses a magnetic field density of a magnetic field.

›SUMMARY

In one aspect, a magnetic field sensor includes a magnetic field sensing element configured to detect changes in a magnetic field caused by a target and an encoder configured to process signals originating from the magnetic field element. The encoder is configured to generate a first output signal and a second output signal. In a non-fault state, the first and second output signals are 90 electrical degrees out of phase from one another, and in a fault state, the first and second output signals are in phase with each other.

In another aspect, an angle sensor includes a magnetic field sensing element configured to detect changes in a magnetic field caused by a target; an incremental encoder configured to process signals originating from the magnetic field element; and a pulse width modulation (PWM) processor producing a PWM output. The incremental encoder is configured to generate a first output signal, a second output signal and a third output signal. The PWM output indicates a fault when a frequency of the PWM output is reduced. In a non-fault state, the first and second output signals are 90 electrical degrees out of phase from one another; and, in a fault state, the first and second output signals are in phase with each other and the third output has a high impedance, or the first, second and third outputs have a high impedance.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing features may be more fully understood from the following description of the drawings. The drawings aid in explaining and understanding the disclosed technology. Since it is often impractical or impossible to illustrate and describe every possible embodiment, the provided figures depict one or more illustrative embodiments. Accordingly, the figures are not intended to limit the scope of the broad concepts, systems and techniques described herein. Like numbers in the figures denote like elements.

FIG. 1A is a block diagram of an example of a magnetic field sensor;

FIG. 1B is an example of output signals from the magnetic field sensor of FIG. 1A ;

FIG. 1C is an example of quadrature states for the magnetic field sensor of FIG. 1A ;

FIG. 2 is a table with examples of duty cycle values that may be used to indicate different types of faults; and

FIG. 3 is a diagram of an example of a system that the magnetic field sensor of FIG. 1A may be used.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 1 of 2

The effects of data corruption in transmission lines may have fatal consequences for critical applications. In some critical systems, it is mandatory that there is the capability of exchanging reliable data and signaling failures. For example, in the automotive industry, functional safety using electric or electronic equipment is stated in industry standards (e.g., ISO 26262 Road vehicles—Functional safety). Described herein are techniques to report data and faults from a magnetic field sensor.

As used herein, the term “magnetic field sensing element” is used to describe a variety of electronic elements that can sense a magnetic field. The magnetic field sensing element can be, but is not limited to, a Hall Effect element, a magnetoresistance element, or a magnetotransistor. As is known, there are different types of Hall Effect elements, for example, a planar Hall element, and a vertical Hall element. As is also known, there are different types of magnetoresistance elements, for example, a semiconductor magnetoresistance element such as Indium Antimonide (InSb), a giant magnetoresistance (GMR) element, an anisotropic magnetoresistance element (AMR), a tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) element, and a magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ). The magnetic field sensing element may be a single element or, alternatively, may include two or more magnetic field sensing elements arranged in various configurations, e.g., a half bridge or full (Wheatstone) bridge. Depending on the device type and other application requirements, the magnetic field sensing element may be a device made of a type IV semiconductor material such as Silicon (Si) or Germanium (Ge), or a type III-V semiconductor material like Gallium-Arsenide (GaAs) or an Indium compound, e.g., Indium-Antimonide (InSb).

As is known, some of the above-described magnetic field sensing elements tend to have an axis of maximum sensitivity parallel to a substrate that supports the magnetic field sensing element, and others of the above-described magnetic field sensing elements tend to have an axis of maximum sensitivity perpendicular to a substrate that supports the magnetic field sensing element. In particular, planar Hall elements tend to have axes of sensitivity perpendicular to a substrate, while metal based or metallic magnetoresistance elements (e.g., GMR, TMR, AMR) and vertical Hall elements tend to have axes of sensitivity parallel to a substrate.

As used herein, the term “magnetic field sensor” is used to describe a circuit that uses a magnetic field sensing element, generally in combination with other circuits. Magnetic field sensors are used in a variety of applications, including, but not limited to, an angle sensor that senses an angle of a direction of a magnetic field, a current sensor that senses a magnetic field generated by a current carried by a current-carrying conductor, a magnetic switch that senses the proximity of a ferromagnetic object, a rotation detector that senses passing ferromagnetic articles, for example, magnetic domains of a ring magnet or a ferromagnetic target (e.g., gear teeth) where the magnetic field sensor is used in combination with a back-biased or other magnet, and a magnetic field sensor that senses a magnetic field density of a magnetic field.

As used herein, the terms “target” and “magnetic target” are used to describe an object to be sensed or detected by a magnetic field sensor or magnetic field sensing element.

Referring to FIG. 1A , a magnetic field sensor includes a magnetic field sensing element 102 a , a signal processor 104 a and an encoder 106 . In one example, the encoder 106 is an incremental encoder.

The magnetic field sensor 100 also includes a magnetic field sensing element 102 b , a signal processor 104 b and a pulse width modulation (PWM) processor 108 . In one example, the magnetic field sensor 100 is an angle sensor.

The encoder 106 may provide at least three output signals (e.g., a signal A, a signal B, and a signal I). The PWM processor 108 may provide at least one output signal (e.g., a PWM signal).

In one example, the signals A and B are 50% duty cycle pulses (relative to angular distance) with a defined phase relationship. For example, the signal B is offset from the signal A by one quarter of the cycle period. At a frequency of 2 N cycles per magnetic revolution, a cycle resolution is 360/2 N degrees per cycle, where N is the cycle resolution in bits. The duration of one cycle is referred to as 360 electrical degrees (or 360e). One half of a cycle is 180e and a quarter of a cycle (one quadrature state, or R degrees) is 90e.

Signals A and B may be used to indicate a rotational direction of a magnetic field. In one example, if the signal A leads the signal by 90 electrical degrees, then the magnetic field is rotating clockwise (CW); and if the signal B leads the signal A by 90 electrical degrees as shown in FIG. 1B , then the magnetic field is rotating counterclockwise (CCW). In another example, the opposite may be true. That is, if the signal A leads the signal by 90 electrical degrees, then the magnetic field is rotating CCW; and if the signal B leads the signal A by 90 electrical degrees, then the magnetic field is rotating CW.

Since signals A and B are offset by ¼ of a cycle, they are in quadrature and together have 4 unique states per cycle (or counts). Each state represents R degrees of the full revolution:

R = 360 ⁢ ° 4 * 2 N

where N is the cycle resolution in bits.

This angular distance is the quadrature resolution (R) of the encoder 106 . The direction of rotation is determined by the order in which the states change (the order of the edge transitions from signal A to signal B). If a given signal B edge (rising/falling) precedes the following signal A edge, the angle is increasing from the perspective of the electrical angle and the angle position is incremented by the quadrature resolution R at each state transition. Conversely, if a given signal A edge precedes the following signal B edge, the angle is decreasing from the perspective of the electrical angle and the angle position is decremented by the quadrature resolution R at each state transition.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION · 2 of 2

As shown in FIG. 1C , quadrature states are designated as Q 1 , Q 2 , Q 3 and Q 4 . In the Q 1 state, signals A and B are “0” or low. In the Q 2 state, signal A is “0” or low and signal B is “1” or high. In the Q 3 state, signals A and B are “1” or high. In the Q 4 state, signal B is “0” or low and signal A is “1” or high.

For an increasing angle, the state progression is Q 1 to Q 2 to Q 3 to Q 4 to Q 1 and so forth. For a decreasing angle, the state progression is Q 4 to Q 3 to Q 2 to Q 1 to Q 4 and so forth.

In one example, in a fault state, the signals A and B are in phase with each other. In one example, in a fault state, the signals A and B are in phase with each other at a fixed frequency. In another example, the signals A and B are in phase with each other at a fixed frequency with a fixed duty cycle. In another particular example, in the fault state, the signals A and B are in phase with each other at a fixed frequency for a fixed period (e.g., 2 PWM frames). In a further example, in a fault state, the signal I is set to a high impedance. In other examples, any combination thereof may be used to indicate a fault.

The PWM processor 108 has several mechanisms to indicate a fault. In one example, the PWM processor 108 may change the PWM signal to output a high impedance signal to indicate a fault.

In another example, the frequency of the PWM signal may be reduced by the PWM processor 108 to a predetermined value to indicate a fault. In one particular example, the frequency of the PWM signal may be reduced by 50% to indicate a fault.

In other examples, the duty cycle of the PWM signal may be set to a predetermined value to indicate a fault. In other examples, the PWM processor 108 may indicate a fault by changing the PWM signal to output a high impedance signal, or reducing the frequency of the PWM signal and changing the duty cycle of the PWM signal to a predetermined value or any combination thereof.

A fault may include one or more of: a supply voltage under voltage condition, a voltage check failure, a supply voltage over voltage condition, a temperature sensor error, a magnet sense high, a saturation current, a magnet sense low, a signal path mismatch condition, a memory (e.g., EEPROM) single bit error condition, an error of the encoder 106 output signal (signal A, signal B and/or signal I), a slew rate warning, an count up by encoder 106 completed, oscillator frequency error, memory (e.g., EEPROM) double bit error condition and/or shadow memory error.

Referring to FIG. 2 , a table 200 is an example of duty cycle values 202 b of the PWM signal and their corresponding faults 202 a . A duty cycle of 38.75 may indicate a supply voltage under voltage condition (UVCC). A duty cycle of 33.13 may indicate a voltage check failure (VCF). A duty cycle of 72.50 may indicate a supply voltage over voltage condition (OVCC). A duty cycle of 66.88 may indicate a temperature sensor error (TSE). A duty cycle of 61.25 may indicate a magnet sense high (MSH). A duty cycle of 56.63 may indicate a saturation condition (SAT). A duty cycle of 44.38 may indicate a magnet sense low (MSL). A duty cycle of 21.88 may indicate a signal path mismatch condition (SMM). A duty cycle of 27.5 may indicate an error of the encoder 106 output signal (ABI) or a slew rate warning (SLR). A duty cycle of 78.05 may indicate that a memory (e.g., EEPROM) has a single bit error condition (ESE+POR). A duty cycle of 84 indicates that a count-up of the encoder 106 is complete (ACD).

In other examples, the oscillator frequency error, the memory double bit error condition and the shadow memory error may be indicated by forcing the PWM signal to a high impedance state that may only be cleared by a reset.

In one example, any fault state is reported for at least two PWM frames. In one example, if the fault is cleared after two frames the magnetic field sensor 100 generates outputs as it would in a normal state (e.g., providing angle data).

Referring back to FIG. 1 , after a fault has been cleared the encoder 106 may begin increasing from 0°. In some examples, to reduce the amount of time in the counting up process, the encoder 106 may increment in a clockwise direction or a counterclockwise direction, whichever may be the shortest time to achieve the current angle position before the fault. For example, if the current angle position is 270°, the encoder 106 may increment in the counterclockwise direction counting down from 360° toward 270°.

Referring to FIG. 3 , a system 300 includes a magnetic field sensor 100 ′ and a target 302 . In one example, the magnetic field sensor 100 ′ is substantially the same as the magnetic field sensor 100 . In some examples, the target 302 may include magnetic domains of a ring magnet or the target 302 may be a ferromagnetic target (e.g., with gear teeth). In some examples, in a normal state, the magnetic field sensor 100 ′ may be used to detect the angular position of the target 302 . In other examples, in a fault state, the magnetic field sensor 100 ′ reports faults as described herein with respect to the magnetic field sensor 100 .

Elements of different embodiments described herein may be combined to form other embodiments not specifically set forth above. Various elements, which are described in the context of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or in any suitable subcombination. Other embodiments not specifically described herein are also within the scope of the following claims.

Claims as granted

20 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

2 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section G — Physics
  • G01B7/30
  • G01D5/14

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomOct 2020Jan 2021Apr 2021Jul 2021Oct 2021Jan 2022USPTOApplicantNotice of allowance
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
1.4 y
497 days filing → grant
Office actions
0
none on record
Examiner
Reena Aurora
art unit 2858 · TC 2800
Citations: 15 back · 3 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20202022202420262028203020322034203620382040Owner 1liens, releases & corrections
TitleLienReleasehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock