Antisense molecules and methods for treating pathologies

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/357,918, filed on Mar. 19, 2019, which is a division of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/661,750, filed on Jul. 27, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/944,886, filed on Nov. 18, 2015, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,758,783, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/108,137, filed on Dec. 16, 2013, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,228,187, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/509,331, filed on Jul. 9, 2012, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,637,483, which is a 35 U.S.C. § 371 U.S. National Phase application of International Patent Application No. PCT/AU2010/001520, filed on Nov. 12, 2010, claiming the benefit of priority to Australian Patent Application No. 2009905549, filed on Nov. 12, 2009. The contents of the aforementional applications are hereby incorporated by reference.

The present invention relates to novel antisense compounds and compositions suitable for facilitating exon skipping. It also provides methods for inducing exon skipping using the novel antisense compounds as well as therapeutic compositions adapted for use in the methods of the invention.

The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted in ASCII format via EFS-Web and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Aug. 13, 2020, is named 4140_0160006_Seqlisting_ST25.txt and is 105,894 bytes in size. The Sequence Listing is being submitted by EFS Web and is hereby incorporated by reference into the specification.

The following discussion of the background art is intended to facilitate an understanding of the present invention only. The discussion is not an acknowledgement or admission that any of the material referred to is or was part of the common general knowledge as at the priority date of the application.

Significant effort is currently being expended into researching methods for suppressing or compensating for disease-causing mutations in genes. Antisense technologies are being developed using a range of chemistries to affect gene expression at a variety of different levels (transcription, splicing, stability, translation). Much of that research has focused on the use of antisense compounds to correct or compensate for abnormal or disease-associated genes in a myriad of different conditions.

Antisense molecules are able to inhibit gene expression with exquisite specificity and because of this many research efforts concerning oligonucleotides as modulators of gene expression have focused on inhibiting the expression of targeted genes such as oncogenes or viral genes. The antisense oligonucleotides are directed either against RNA (sense strand) or against DNA where they form triplex structures inhibiting transcription by RNA polymerase II.

To achieve a desired effect in specific gene down-regulation, the oligonucleotides must either promote the decay of the targeted mRNA or block translation of that mRNA, thereby effectively preventing de novo synthesis of the undesirable target protein.

Such techniques are not useful where the object is to up-regulate production of the native protein or compensate for mutations which induce premature termination of translation such as nonsense or frame-shifting mutations.

Furthermore, in cases where a normally functional protein is prematurely terminated because of mutations therein, a means for restoring some functional protein production through antisense technology has been shown to be possible through intervention during the splicing processes (Sierakowska H, et al., (1996) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 12840-12844; Wilton S D, et al., (1999) Neuromusc Disorders 9, 330-338; van Deutekom J C et al., (2001) Human Mol Genet 10, 1547-1554). In these cases, the defective gene transcript should not be subjected to targeted degradation so the antisense oligonucleotide chemistry should not promote target mRNA decay.

In a variety of genetic diseases, the effects of mutations on the eventual expression of a gene can be modulated through a process of targeted exon skipping during the splicing process. The splicing process is directed by complex multi-particle machinery that brings adjacent exon-intron junctions in pre-mRNA into close proximity and performs cleavage of phosphodiester bonds at the ends of the introns with their subsequent reformation between exons that are to be spliced together. This complex and highly precise process is mediated by sequence motifs in the pre-mRNA that are relatively short semi-conserved RNA segments to which bind the various nuclear splicing factors that are then involved in the splicing reactions. By changing the way the splicing machinery reads or recognises the motifs involved in pre-mRNA processing, it is possible to create differentially spliced mRNA molecules. It has now been recognised that the majority of human genes are alternatively spliced during normal gene expression, although the mechanisms invoked have not been identified. Using antisense oligonucleotides, it has been shown that errors and deficiencies in a coded mRNA could be bypassed or removed from the mature gene transcripts.

In nature, the extent of genetic deletion or exon skipping in the splicing process is not fully understood, although many instances have been documented to occur, generally at very low levels (Sherrat T G, et al., (1993) Am J Hum Genet 53, 1007-1015). However, it is recognised that if exons associated with disease-causing mutations can be specifically deleted from some genes, a shortened protein product can sometimes be produced that has similar biological properties of the native protein or has sufficient biological activity to ameliorate the disease caused by mutations associated with the target exon (Lu Q L, et al., (2003) Nature Medicine 9, 1009-1014; Aartsma-Rus A et al., (2004) Am J Hum Genet 74: 83-92).

This process of targeted exon skipping is likely to be particularly useful in long genes where there are many exons and introns, where there is redundancy in the genetic constitution of the exons or where a protein is able to function without one or more particular exons (e.g. with the dystrophin gene, which consists of 79 exons; or possibly some collagen genes which encode for repeated blocks of sequence or the huge nebulin or titin genes which are comprised of −80 and over 370 exons, respectively).

Efforts to redirect gene processing for the treatment of genetic diseases associated with truncations caused by mutations in various genes have focused on the use of antisense oligonucleotides that either: (1) fully or partially overlap with the elements involved in the splicing process; or (2) bind to the pre-mRNA at a position sufficiently close to the element to disrupt the binding and function of the splicing factors that would normally mediate a particular splicing reaction which occurs at that element (e.g., binds to the pre-mRNA at a position within 3, 6, or 9 nucleotides of the element to be blocked).

For example, modulation of mutant dystrophin pre-mRNA splicing with antisense oligoribonucleotides has been reported both in vitro and in vivo. In one type of dystrophin mutation reported in Japan, a 52-base pair deletion mutation causes exon 19 to be removed with the flanking introns during the splicing process (Matsuo et al., (1991) J Clin Invest. 87:2127-2131). An in vitro minigene splicing system has been used to show that a 31-mer 2′-O-methyl oligoribonucleotide complementary to the 5′ half of the deleted sequence in dystrophin Kobe exon 19 inhibited splicing of wild-type pre-mRNA (Takeshima et al. (1995), J. Clin. Invest. 95:515-520). The same oligonucleotide was used to induce exon skipping from the native dystrophin gene transcript in human cultured lymphoblastoid cells.

Dunckley et al. (1997) Nucleosides & Nucleotides, 16, 1665-1668 described in vitro constructs for analysis of splicing around exon 23 of mutated dystrophin in the mdx mouse mutant, a model for muscular dystrophy. Plans to analyse these constructs in vitro using 2′ modified oligonucleotides targeted to splice sites within and adjacent to mouse dystrophin exon 23 were discussed, though no target sites or sequences were given.

2′-O-methyl oligoribonucleotides were subsequently reported to correct dystrophin deficiency in myoblasts from the mdx mouse from this group. An antisense oligonucleotide targeted to the 3′ splice site of murine dystrophin intron 22 was reported to cause skipping of the mutant exon as well as several flanking exons and created a novel in-frame dystrophin transcript with a novel internal deletion. This mutated dystrophin was expressed in 1-2% of antisense treated mdx myotubes. Use of other oligonucleotide modifications such as 2′-O-methoxyethyl phosphodiesters are described (Dunckley et al. (1998) Human Mol. Genetics, 5:1083-90).

Thus, antisense molecules may provide a tool in the treatment of genetic disorders such as Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). However, attempts to induce exon skipping using antisense molecules have had mixed success.

Studies on dystrophin exon 19, where successful skipping of that exon from the dystrophin pre-mRNA was achieved using a variety of antisense molecules directed at the flanking splice sites or motifs within the exon involved in exon definition as described by Errington et al. (2003) J Gen Med 5: 518-527).

In contrast to the apparent ease of exon 19 skipping, the first report of exon 23 skipping in the mdx mouse by Dunckley et al., (1998) is now considered to be reporting only a naturally occurring revertant transcript or artefact rather than any true antisense activity. In addition to not consistently generating transcripts missing exon 23, Dunckley et al, (1998) did not show any time course of induced exon skipping, or even titration of antisense oligonucleotides, to demonstrate dose dependent effects where the levels of exon skipping corresponded with increasing or decreasing amounts of antisense oligonucleotide. Furthermore, this work could not be replicated by other researchers.

The first example of specific and reproducible exon skipping in the mdx mouse model was reported by Wilton et al., (1999) Neuromuscular Disorders 9, 330-338. By directing an antisense molecule to the donor splice site, consistent and efficient exon 23 skipping was induced in the dystrophin mRNA within 6 hours of treatment of the cultured cells. Wilton et al., (1999), also describe targeting the acceptor region of the mouse dystrophin pre-mRNA with longer antisense oligonucleotides and being unable to repeat the published results of Dunckley et al. (1998). No exon skipping, either 23 alone or multiple removal of several flanking exons, could be reproducibly detected using a selection of antisense oligonucleotides directed at the acceptor splice site of intron 22.

While the first antisense oligonucleotide directed at the intron 23 donor splice site induced consistent exon skipping in primary cultured myoblasts, this compound was found to be much less efficient in immortalized cell cultures expressing higher levels of dystrophin. However, with refined targeting and antisense oligonucleotide design, the efficiency of specific exon removal was increased by almost an order of magnitude (see Mann C J et al., (2002) J Gen Med 4, 644-654).

Thus, there remains a need to provide antisense oligonucleotides capable of binding to and modifying the splicing of a target nucleotide sequence. Simply directing the antisense oligonucleotides to motifs presumed to be crucial for splicing is no guarantee of the efficacy of that compound in a therapeutic setting.

The preceding discussion of the background to the invention is intended only to facilitate an understanding of the present invention. It should be appreciated that the discussion is not an acknowledgment or admission that any of the material referred to was part of the common general knowledge as at the priority date of the application.

The present invention provides antisense molecule compounds and compositions suitable for binding to RNA motifs involved in the splicing of pre-mRNA that are able to induce specific and efficient exon skipping and a method for their use thereof.

The choice of target selection plays a crucial role in the efficiency of exon skipping and hence its subsequent application of a potential therapy. Simply designing antisense molecules to target regions of pre-mRNA presumed to be involved in splicing is no guarantee of inducing efficient and specific exon skipping. The most obvious or readily defined targets for splicing intervention are the donor and acceptor splice sites although there are less defined or conserved motifs including exonic splicing enhancers, silencing elements and branch points. The acceptor and donor splice sites have consensus sequences of about 16 and 8 bases respectively (see FIG. 1 for schematic representation of motifs and domains involved in exon recognition, intron removal and the splicing process).

According to a first aspect, the invention provides antisense molecules capable of binding to a selected target to induce exon skipping.

For example, to induce exon skipping in exons 5, 12, 17, 21, 22, 24, 43-47, 49, 50, 54-64, 66, 67, 70 and 72 in the Dystrophin gene transcript the antisense molecules are preferably selected from the group listed in Table 1A.

In a further example, it is possible to combine two or more antisense oligonucleotides of the present invention together to induce more efficient exon skipping in exons 3, 4, 8, 10, 26, 36, 48, 60, 66 and 68. A combination or “cocktail” of antisense oligonucleotides are directed at exons to induce efficient exon skipping.

According to a second aspect, the present invention provides antisense molecules selected and or adapted to aid in the prophylactic or therapeutic treatment of a genetic disorder comprising at least an antisense molecule in a form suitable for delivery to a patient.

According to a third aspect, the invention provides a method for treating a patient suffering from a genetic disease wherein there is a mutation in a gene encoding a particular protein and the affect of the mutation can be abrogated by exon skipping, comprising the steps of: (a) selecting an antisense molecule in accordance with the methods described herein; and (b) administering the molecule to a patient in need of such treatment.

The invention also addresses the use of purified and isolated antisense oligonucleotides of the invention, for the manufacture of a medicament for treatment of a genetic disease.

The invention further provides a method of treating a condition characterised by Duchenne muscular dystrophy, which method comprises administering to a patient in need of treatment an effective amount of an appropriately designed antisense oligonucleotide of the invention, relevant to the particular genetic lesion in that patient. Further, the invention provides a method for prophylactically treating a patient to prevent or at least minimise Duchene muscular dystrophy, comprising the step of: administering to the patient an effective amount of an antisense oligonucleotide or a pharmaceutical composition comprising one or more of these biological molecules.

The invention also provides kits for treating a genetic disease, which kits comprise at least a antisense oligonucleotide of the present invention, packaged in a suitable container and instructions for its use.

Other aspects and advantages of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from a review of the ensuing description, which proceeds with reference to the following figures.

FIG. 1 . Schematic representation of motifs and domains involved in exon recognition, intron removal and the splicing process.

FIG. 2 . Diagrammatic representation of the concept of antisense oligonucleotide induced exon skipping to by-pass disease-causing mutations (not drawn to scale). The hatched box represents an exon carrying a mutation that prevents the translation of the rest of the mRNA into a protein. The solid black bar represents an antisense oligonucleotide that prevents inclusion of that exon in the mature mRNA.

FIG. 3 . Gel electrophoresis showing a “cocktail” of antisense molecules directed at exon 3 which induce strong and consistent exon skipping at a transfection concentration of 10 nanomolar in cultured normal human muscle cells.

FIG. 4 . Gel electrophoresis showing a “cocktail” of antisense molecules directed at exon 4 which induce strong and consistent exon skipping at a transfection concentration of 25 nanomolar in cultured normal human muscle cells.

FIG. 5 Gel electrophoresis showing strong and efficient human exon 5 skipping using an antisense molecules [H5A(+35+65)] directed at an exon 5 internal domain, presumably an exon splicing enhancer. This preferred compound induces consistent exon skipping at a transfection concentration of 25 nanomolar in cultured human muscle cells.

FIG. 6 . Gel electrophoresis showing a “cocktail” of antisense molecules directed at exon 8 which induce strong and consistent exon skipping of both exon 8 and exon 8/9 at a transfection concentration of 10 nanomolar in cultured normal human muscle cells.

FIG. 7 . Gel electrophoresis showing various cocktails and single antisense molecules which induce skipping of exon 10 and surrounding exons. A combination of [H10A(−05+16)] and [H10A(+98+119)] or [H10A(−05+16)] and [H10A(+130+149)] induces skipping of exon 10 and exons 9-12, whilst [H10A(−05+16)] alone induces skipping of exons 9-14.

FIG. 8 . Gel electrophoresis showing exon 14 skipping using antisense molecule H14A(+31+61) directed at exon 14.

FIG. 9 . Gel electrophoresis showing exon 17 skipping using antisense molecule H17A(+10+35) directed at exon 17.

FIG. 10 . Gel electrophoresis showing two cocktails of antisense molecules directed at exon 26. The double cocktail of [H26A(−07+19)] and [H26A(+24+50)] induces good skipping of exon 26, and the addition of a further antisense molecule to the cocktail does not affect the efficiency of skipping.

FIG. 11 . Gel electrophoresis showing a “cocktail” of antisense molecules directed at exon 36 which induce strong and consistent exon skipping at a transfection concentration of 25 nanomolar in cultured normal human muscle cells.

FIG. 12 . Gel electrophoresis showing strong and consistent exon 43 skipping to 25 nanomolar in cultured normal human muscle cells using antisense molecule H43A(+92+117).

FIG. 13 . Gel electrophoresis showing dose dependent exon 55 skipping using antisense molecule H44A(+65+90).

FIG. 14 . Gel electrophoresis showing strong and consistent exon 45 skipping using antisense molecule H45A(−09+25).

FIG. 15 . Gel electrophoresis showing strong and consistent exon 46 skipping using antisense molecule H46A(+81+109).

FIG. 16 . Gel electrophoresis showing strong and consistent exon 47 skipping using antisense molecule H47A(+01+29).

FIG. 17 . Gel electrophoresis showing a “cocktail” of antisense molecules directed at exon 48 which induce strong and consistent exon skipping.

FIG. 18 . Gel electrophoresis showing strong and consistent exon 49 skipping using antisense molecule H49A(+45+70).

FIG. 19 . Gel electrophoresis showing strong and consistent exon 50 skipping using antisense molecule H50A(+48+74).

FIG. 20 . Gel electrophoresis showing strong and consistent exon 51 skipping using antisense molecule H51A(+66+95).

FIG. 21 . Gel electrophoresis showing strong and consistent exon 54 skipping using antisense molecule H54A(+67+97).

FIG. 22 . Gel electrophoresis showing antisense molecule H55A(−10+20) induced dose dependent exon 55 skipping.

FIG. 23 . Gel electrophoresis showing strong and consistent exon 56 skipping using antisense molecule H56A(+92+121).

FIG. 24 . Gel electrophoresis showing antisense molecule H57A(−10+20) induced dose dependent exon 57 skipping.

FIG. 25 . Gel electrophoresis showing exon 59 and exon 58/59 skipping using antisense molecule H59A(+96+120) directed at exon 59.

FIG. 26 . Gel electrophoresis showing two different cocktails which induce exon skipping of exon 60.

FIG. 27 . Gel electrophoresis showing exon 63 skipping using antisense molecule H63A(+20+49).

FIG. 28 . Gel electrophoresis showing exon 64 skipping using antisense molecule H64A(+34+62).

FIG. 29 . Gel electrophoresis showing a “cocktail” of antisense molecules directed at exon 66 which induce dose dependent exon skipping.

FIG. 30 . Gel electrophoresis showing exon 67 skipping using antisense molecule H67A(+17+47).

FIG. 31 . Gel electrophoresis showing a “cocktail” of antisense molecules directed at exon 68 which induce dose dependent exon skipping.

FIG. 32 . Gel electrophoresis showing a “cocktail” of antisense molecules which induce strong and consistent exon skipping of exons 69/70 at a transfection concentration of 25 nanomolar.

FIG. 33 . Gel electrophoresis showing various “cocktails” of antisense molecules which induce various levels of skipping in exon 50.

FIG. 34 . Gel electrophoresis showing a cocktail of three antisense molecules which induce efficient skipping of exons 50/51.

FIG. 35 . Graph of densitometry results showing various efficiencies of exon skipping. The antisense molecules tested were Exon 3 [H3A(+30+60) & H3A(+61+85)]; Exon 4 [H4D(+14-11) & H4A(+11+40)]; Exon 14 [H14A(+32+61)]; Exon 17 [H17A(+10+35)]; Exon 26 [H26A(−07+19), H26A(+24+50) & H26A(+68+92)]; Exon 36 [H36A(−16+09) & H36A(+22+51)].

FIG. 36 . Graph of densitometry results showing various efficiencies of exon skipping. The antisense molecules tested were Exon 46 [H46A(+81+109)]; Exon 47 [H47A(+01+29)]; Exon 48 [H48A(+01+28) & H48A(+40+67)]; Exon 49 [H49A(+45+70)].

FIG. 37 . Gel electrophoresis showing exon 11 skipping using antisense molecule H11A(+50+79).

FIG. 38 . Gel electrophoresis showing exon 12 skipping using antisense molecule H12A(+30+57).

FIG. 39 . Gel electrophoresis showing exon 44 skipping using antisense molecule H44A(+59+85).

FIG. 40 . Gel electrophoresis showing exon 45 skipping using antisense molecule H45A(−03+25).

FIG. 41 . Gel electrophoresis showing exon 51 skipping using antisense molecule H51A(+71+100).

FIG. 42 . Gel electrophoresis showing exon 52 skipping using antisense molecule H52A(+09+38).

FIG. 43 . Gel electrophoresis showing exon 53 skipping using antisense molecule H53A(+33+65).

FIG. 44 . Gel electrophoresis showing exon 46 skipping using antisense molecule H46A(+93+122).

FIG. 45 . Gel electrophoresis showing exon 46 skipping using antisense molecule (H46A(+93+2).

FIG. 46A . Sequences of antisense molecules.

FIG. 46B . Sequences of antisense molecules.

Brief Description of the Sequence Listings

General

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention described herein is susceptible to variations and modifications other than those specifically described. It is to be understood that the invention includes all such variations and modifications. The invention also includes all of the steps, features, compositions and compounds referred to or indicated in the specification, individually or collectively and any and all combinations or any two or more of the steps or features.

The present invention is not to be limited in scope by the specific embodiments described herein, which are intended for the purpose of exemplification only. Functionally equivalent products, compositions and methods are clearly within the scope of the invention as described herein.

Sequence identity numbers (SEQ ID NO:) containing nucleotide and amino acid sequence information included in this specification are collected at the end of the description and have been prepared using the programme PatentIn Version 3.0. Each nucleotide or amino acid sequence is identified in the sequence listing by the numeric indicator <210> followed by the sequence identifier (e.g. <210>1, <210>2, etc.). The length, type of sequence and source organism for each nucleotide or amino acid sequence are indicated by information provided in the numeric indicator fields <211>, <212> and <213>, respectively. Nucleotide and amino acid sequences referred to in the specification are defined by the information provided in numeric indicator field <400> followed by the sequence identifier (e.g. <400>1, <400>2, etc.).

An antisense molecule nomenclature system was proposed and published to distinguish between the different antisense molecules (see Mann et al., (2002) J Gen Med 4, 644-654). This nomenclature became especially relevant when testing several slightly different antisense molecules, all directed at the same target region, as shown below:

H #A/D ( x:y ).

The first letter designates the species (e.g. H: human, M: murine, C: canine)

“#” designates target dystrophin exon number.

“A/D” indicates acceptor or donor splice site at the beginning and end of the exon, respectively.

(x y) represents the annealing coordinates where “−” or “+” indicate intronic or exonic sequences respectively. As an example, A(−6+18) would indicate the last 6 bases of the intron preceding the target exon and the first 18 bases of the target exon. The closest splice site would be the acceptor so these coordinates would be preceded with an “A”. Describing annealing coordinates at the donor splice site could be D(+2−18) where the last 2 exonic bases and the first 18 intronic bases correspond to the annealing site of the antisense molecule. Entirely exonic annealing coordinates that would be represented by A(+65+85), that is the site between the 65th and 85th nucleotide from the start of that exon.

The entire disclosures of all publications (including patents, patent applications, journal articles, laboratory manuals, books, or other documents) cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference. No admission is made that any of the references constitute prior art or are part of the common general knowledge of those working in the field to which this invention relates.

As used herein the term “derived” and “derived from” shall be taken to indicate that a specific integer may be obtained from a particular source albeit not necessarily directly from that source.

Throughout this specification, unless the context requires otherwise, the word “comprise”, or variations such as “comprises” or “comprising”, will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or group of integers but not the exclusion of any other integer or group of integers.

Other definitions for selected terms used herein may be found within the detailed description of the invention and apply throughout. Unless otherwise defined, all other scientific and technical terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood to one of ordinary skill in the art to which the invention belongs.

When antisense molecule(s) are targeted to nucleotide sequences involved in splicing in exons within pre-mRNA sequences, normal splicing of the exon may be inhibited, causing the splicing machinery to by-pass the entire mutated exon from the mature mRNA. The concept of antisense oligonucleotide induced exon skipping is shown in FIG. 2 .

In many genes, deletion of an entire exon would lead to the production of a non-functional protein through the loss of important functional domains or the disruption of the reading frame. However, in some proteins it is possible to shorten the protein by deleting one or more exons from within the protein, without disrupting the reading frame and without seriously altering the biological activity of the protein. Typically, such proteins have a structural role and or possess functional domains at their ends. The present invention describes antisense molecules capable of binding to specified dystrophin pre-mRNA targets and re-directing processing of that gene.

A preferred aim of a therapy based on antisense molecules is to get maximum exon skipping by providing the lowest possible concentration of the antisense molecule. Generally, an antisense molecule may cause strong, robust exon skipping; weak, sporadic exon skipping or no exon skipping at all. It is preferable to develop antisense molecules (alone or in combination) which can deliver strong, robust consistent exon skipping at a low therapeutic dose.

Antisense Molecules

According to a first aspect of the invention, there is provided antisense molecules capable of binding to a selected target to induce exon skipping. To induce exon skipping in exons of the Dystrophin gene transcript, the antisense molecules are preferably selected from the group of compounds shown in Table 1A.

There is also provided a combination or “cocktail” of two or more antisense oligonucleotides capable of binding to a selected target to induce exon skipping. To induce exon skipping in exons of the Dystrophin gene transcript, the antisense molecules in a “cocktail” are preferably selected from the group of compounds shown in Table 1B.

Designing antisense molecules to completely mask consensus splice sites may not necessarily generate any skipping of the targeted exon. Furthermore, the inventors have discovered that size or length of the antisense oligonucleotide itself is not always a primary factor when designing antisense molecules. With some targets such as exon 19, antisense oligonucleotides as short as 12 bases were able to induce exon skipping, albeit not as efficiently as longer (20-31 bases) oligonucleotides. In some other targets, such as murine dystrophin exon 23, antisense oligonucleotides only 17 residues long were able to induce more efficient skipping than another overlapping compound of 25 nucleotides. However, in the present invention it has been generally found that longer antisense molecules are often more effective at inducing exon skipping than shorter molecules. Thus preferably, the antisense molecules of the present invention are between 24 and 30 nucleic acids in length, preferably about 28 nucleotides in length. For example, it has previously been found that an antisense oligonucleotide of 20 bases (H16A(−07+13)) was ineffective at inducing exon skipping of exon 16, but an oligonucleotide of 31 bases (H16A(−06+25)), which completely encompassed the shorter oligonucleotide, was effective at inducing skipping (Harding et al (2007) Mol Ther 15:157-166).

The inventors have also discovered that there does not appear to be any standard motif that can be blocked or masked by antisense molecules to redirect splicing. In some exons, such as mouse dystrophin exon 23, the donor splice site was the most amenable to target to re-direct skipping of that exon. It should be noted that designing and testing a series of exon 23 specific antisense molecules to anneal to overlapping regions of the donor splice site showed considerable variation in the efficacy of induced exon skipping. As reported in Mann et al., (2002) there was a significant variation in the efficiency of bypassing the nonsense mutation depending upon antisense oligonucleotide annealing (“Improved antisense oligonucleotide induced exon skipping in the mdx mouse model of muscular dystrophy”. J Gen Med 4: 644-654). Targeting the acceptor site of exon 23 or several internal domains was not found to induce any consistent exon 23 skipping.

In other exons targeted for removal, masking the donor splice site did not induce any exon skipping. However, by directing antisense molecules to the acceptor splice site (human exon 8 as discussed below), strong and sustained exon skipping was induced. It should be noted that removal of human exon 8 was tightly linked with the co-removal of exon 9. There is no strong sequence homology between the exon 8 antisense oligonucleotides and corresponding regions of exon 9 so it does not appear to be a matter of cross reaction. Rather, the splicing of these two exons is generally linked. This is not an isolated instance, as the same effect is observed in canine cells where targeting exon 8 for removal also resulted in the skipping of exon 9. Targeting exon 23 for removal in the mouse dystrophin pre-mRNA also results in the frequent removal of exon 22 as well. This effect occurs in a dose dependent manner and also indicates close coordinated processing of 2 adjacent exons.

In other targeted exons, antisense molecules directed at the donor or acceptor splice sites did not induce exon skipping or induce poor skipping, while annealing antisense molecules to intra-exonic regions (i.e. exon splicing enhancers within human dystrophin exon 4) was most efficient at inducing exon skipping. Some exons, both mouse and human exon 19 for example, are readily skipped by targeting antisense molecules to a variety of motifs. That is, targeted exon skipping is induced after using antisense oligonucleotides to mask donor and acceptor splice sites or exon splicing enhancers.

It is also not possible to predict which cocktails of antisense molecules will induce exon skipping. For example, the combination of two antisense molecules which, on their own, are very good at inducing skipping of a given exon may not cause skipping of an exon when combined in a cocktail. For example, each of H50A(+02+30) and H50A(+66+95) on their own induce good skipping of exon 50 and 51. However, in combination as a cocktail, they only induced poor skipping of the two exons. Likewise, the combination of H50A(+02+30) and H51A(+66+90) or H50A(+02+30) and H51A(+61+90) did not cause efficient skipping of exons 50 and 51, even though the individual antisense molecules were effective. Yet the introduction of a third antisense molecule ([H51D(+16−07)] which by itself did not cause skipping), created a three element cocktail ([H50A(+02+30)], H51A(+66+90) and [H51D(+16−07)]) that was able to cause skipping of exons 50 and 51 down to 1 nM.

Alternatively, the combination of two or three antisense molecules which are ineffective or only moderately effective on their own may cause excellent skipping when combined. For example, individually H26A(−07+19) [SEQ ID NO: 39], H26A(+24+50) [SEQ ID NO: 40] and H26A(+68+92) [SEQ ID NO: 41] cause inefficient skipping of exon 26, and also induce multiple exon skipping (26-29 or 27-30). However, when the three exons are combined as a cocktail, highly efficient skipping of exon 26 occurs.

From the above examples and discussion, it is clear that there is no way to accurately predict whether a combination will work or not.

Antisense molecules may cause skipping of exons in a ‘dose dependent’ or ‘non-dose dependent’ manner. By dose dependent, it is meant that a larger amount of the antisense molecule induces better skipping of the exon, whereas non-dose dependent antisense molecules are able to induce skipping even at very low doses. For example, from FIG. 15 it can be seen that H46A(+81+109) [SEQ ID NO: 12] gives equally good skipping of exon 46 regardless of the amount of antisense molecule present (from 600 nM to 25 nM). In contrast, H57A(−10+20) [SEQ ID NO: 20] ( FIG. 24 ) induces strong skipping of exon 57 at 100 nM, but reduced skipping at 50 nM and an even greater reduction in skipping at 25 nM.

It is preferable to select antisense molecules that induce skipping in a dose independent manner, as these molecules may be administered at very low concentrations and still give a therapeutic effect. However, it is also acceptable to select as preferred molecules those antisense molecules that induce skipping in a dose dependent manner, particularly if those molecules induce good or excellent skipping at low concentrations. Preferably, the antisense molecules of the present invention are able to induce good or excellent exon skipping at concentrations of less than 500 nM, preferably less than 200 nM and more preferably as low as 100 nM, 50 nM or even 25 nM. Most preferably, the oligonucleotide molecules of the present invention are able to induce skipping at levels of greater that 30% at a concentration of 100 nM.

To identify and select antisense oligonucleotides suitable for use in the modulation of exon skipping, a nucleic acid sequence whose function is to be modulated must first be identified. This may be, for example, a gene (or mRNA transcribed form the gene) whose expression is associated with a particular disorder or disease state, or a nucleic acid molecule from an infectious agent. Within the context of the present invention, preferred target site(s) are those involved in mRNA splicing (i.e. splice donor sites, splice acceptor sites, or exonic splicing enhancer elements). Splicing branch points and exon recognition sequences or splice enhancers are also potential target sites for modulation of mRNA splicing.

Preferably, the present invention aims to provide antisense molecules capable of binding to a selected target in the dystrophin pre-mRNA to induce efficient and consistent exon skipping. Duchenne muscular dystrophy arises from mutations that preclude the synthesis of a functional dystrophin gene product. These Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene defects are typically nonsense mutations or genomic rearrangements such as deletions, duplications or micro-deletions or insertions that disrupt the reading frame. As the human dystrophin gene is a large and complex gene (with 79 exons being spliced together to generate a mature mRNA with an open reading frame of approximately 11,000 bases), there are many positions where these mutations can occur. Consequently, a comprehensive antisense oligonucleotide based therapy to address many of the different disease-causing mutations in the dystrophin gene will require that many exons can be targeted for removal during the splicing process.

Within the context of the present invention, preferred target site(s) are those involved in mRNA splicing (i.e. splice donor sites, splice acceptor sites or exonic splicing enhancer elements). Splicing branch points and exon recognition sequences or splice enhancers are also potential target sites for modulation of mRNA splicing.

The oligonucleotide and the DNA or RNA are complementary to each other when a sufficient number of corresponding positions in each molecule are occupied by nucleotides which can hydrogen bond with each other. Thus, “specifically hybridisable” and “complementary” are terms which are used to indicate a sufficient degree of complementarity or precise pairing such that stable and specific binding occurs between the oligonucleotide and the DNA or RNA target. It is understood in the art that the sequence of an antisense molecule need not be 100% complementary to that of its target sequence to be specifically hybridisable. An antisense molecule is specifically hybridisable when binding of the compound to the target DNA or RNA molecule interferes with the normal function of the target DNA or RNA to cause a loss of utility, and there is a sufficient degree of complementarity to avoid non-specific binding of the antisense compound to non-target sequences under conditions in which specific binding is desired, i.e., under physiological conditions in the case of in vivo assays or therapeutic treatment, and in the case of in vitro assays, under conditions in which the assays are performed.

While the above method may be used to select antisense molecules capable of deleting any exon from within a protein that is capable of being shortened without affecting its biological function, the exon deletion should not lead to a reading frame shift in the shortened transcribed mRNA. Thus, if in a linear sequence of three exons the end of the first exon encodes two of three nucleotides in a codon and the next exon is deleted then the third exon in the linear sequence must start with a single nucleotide that is capable of completing the nucleotide triplet for a codon. If the third exon does not commence with a single nucleotide there will be a reading frame shift that would lead to the generation of a truncated or a non-functional protein.

It will be appreciated that the codon arrangements at the end of exons in structural proteins may not always break at the end of a codon. Consequently, there may be a need to delete more than one exon from the pre-mRNA to ensure in-frame reading of the mRNA. In such circumstances, a plurality of antisense oligonucleotides may need to be selected by the method of the invention, wherein each is directed to a different region responsible for inducing splicing in the exons that are to be deleted.

The length of an antisense molecule may vary so long as it is capable of binding selectively to the intended location within the pre-mRNA molecule. The length of such sequences can be determined in accordance with selection procedures described herein. Generally, the antisense molecule will be from about 10 nucleotides in length up to about 50 nucleotides in length. However, it will be appreciated that any length of nucleotides within this range may be used in the method. Preferably, the length of the antisense molecule is between 17 to 30 nucleotides in length. Surprisingly, it has been found that longer antisense molecules are often more effective at inducing exon skipping. Thus, most preferably the antisense molecule is between 24 and 30 nucleotides in length.

In order to determine which exons can be connected in a dystrophin gene, reference should be made to an exon boundary map. Connection of one exon with another is based on the exons possessing the same number at the 3′ border as is present at the 5′ border of the exon to which it is being connected. Therefore, if exon 7 were deleted, exon 6 must connect to either exons 12 or 18 to maintain the reading frame. Thus, antisense oligonucleotides would need to be selected which redirected splicing for exons 7 to 11 in the first instance or exons 7 to 17 in the second instance. Another and somewhat simpler approach to restore the reading frame around an exon 7 deletion would be to remove the two flanking exons. Induction of exons 6 and 8 skipping should result in an in-frame transcript with the splicing of exons 5 to 9. In practise however, targeting exon 8 for removal from the pre-mRNA results in the co-removal of exon 9 so the resultant transcript would have exon 5 joined to exon 10. The inclusion or exclusion of exon 9 does not alter the reading frame.

Once the antisense molecules to be tested have been identified, they are prepared according to standard techniques known in the art. The most common method for producing antisense molecules is the methylation of the 2′ hydroxyribose position and the incorporation of a phosphorothioate backbone.

This produces molecules that superficially resemble RNA but that are much more resistant to nuclease degradation.

To avoid degradation of pre-mRNA during duplex formation with the antisense molecules, the antisense molecules used in the method may be adapted to minimise or prevent cleavage by endogenous RNase H. This property is highly preferred, as the presence of unmethylated RNA oligonucleotides in an intracellularly environment or in contact with crude extracts that contain RNase H will lead to degradation of the pre-mRNA: antisense oligonucleotide duplexes. Any form of modified antisense molecules that are capable of by-passing or not inducing such degradation may be used in the present method. The nuclease resistance may be achieved by modifying the antisense molecules of the invention so that it comprises partially unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbon chain and one or more polar or charged groups including carboxylic acid groups, ester groups, and alcohol groups.

An example of antisense molecules which, when duplexed with RNA, are not cleaved by cellular RNase H are 2′-O-methyl derivatives. 2′-O-methyl-oligoribonucleotides are very stable in a cellular environment and in animal tissues, and their duplexes with RNA have higher Tm values than their ribo- or deoxyribo-counterparts. Alternatively, the nuclease resistant antisense molecules of the invention may have at least one of the last 3′-terminus nucleotides fluoridated. Still alternatively, the nuclease resistant antisense molecules of the invention have phosphorothioate bonds linking between at least two of the last 3-terminus nucleotide bases, preferably having phosphorothioate bonds linking between the last four 3′-terminal nucleotide bases.

Antisense molecules that do not activate RNase H can be made in accordance with known techniques (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,149,797). Such antisense molecules, which may be deoxyribonucleotide or ribonucleotide sequences, simply contain any structural modification which sterically hinders or prevents binding of RNase H to a duplex molecule containing the oligonucleotide as one member thereof, which structural modification does not substantially hinder or disrupt duplex formation. Because the portions of the oligonucleotide involved in duplex formation are substantially different from those portions involved in RNase H binding thereto, numerous antisense molecules that do not activate RNase H are available. For example, such antisense molecules may be oligonucleotides wherein at least one, or all, of the inter-nucleotide bridging phosphate residues are modified phosphates, such as methyl phosphonates, methyl phosphorothioates, phosphoromorpholidates, phosphoropiperazidates and phosphoramidates. For example, every other one of the internucleotide bridging phosphate residues may be modified as described. In another non-limiting example, such antisense molecules are molecules wherein at least one, or all, of the nucleotides contain a 2′ lower alkyl moiety (e.g., C 1 -C 4 , linear or branched, saturated or unsaturated alkyl, such as methyl, ethyl, ethenyl, propyl, 1-propenyl, 2-propenyl, and isopropyl). For example, every other one of the nucleotides may be modified as described.

While antisense oligonucleotides are a preferred form of the antisense molecules, the present invention comprehends other oligomeric antisense molecules, including but not limited to oligonucleotide mimetics such as are described below.

Specific examples of preferred antisense compounds useful in this invention include oligonucleotides containing modified backbones or non-natural inter-nucleoside linkages. As defined in this specification, oligonucleotides having modified backbones include those that retain a phosphorus atom in the backbone and those that do not have a phosphorus atom in the backbone. For the purposes of this specification, and as sometimes referenced in the art, modified oligonucleotides that do not have a phosphorus atom in their inter-nucleoside backbone can also be considered to be oligonucleosides.

In other preferred oligonucleotide mimetics, both the sugar and the inter-nucleoside linkage, i.e., the backbone, of the nucleotide units are replaced with novel groups. The base units are maintained for hybridization with an appropriate nucleic acid target compound. One such oligomeric compound, an oligonucleotide mimetic that has been shown to have excellent hybridization properties, is referred to as a peptide nucleic acid (PNA). In PNA compounds, the sugar-backbone of an oligonucleotide is replaced with an amide containing backbone, in particular an aminoethylglycine backbone. The nucleo-bases are retained and are bound directly or indirectly to aza nitrogen atoms of the amide portion of the backbone.

Modified oligonucleotides may also contain one or more substituted sugar moieties. Oligonucleotides may also include nucleobase (often referred to in the art simply as “base”) modifications or substitutions. Certain nucleobases are particularly useful for increasing the binding affinity of the oligomeric compounds of the invention. These include 5-substituted pyrimidines, 6-azapyrimidines and N-2, N-6 and O-6 substituted purines, including 2-aminopropyladenine, 5-propynyluracil and 5-propynylcytosine. 5-methylcytosine substitutions have been shown to increase nucleic acid duplex stability by 0.6-1.2° C. and are presently preferred base substitutions, even more particularly when combined with 2′-O-methoxyethyl sugar modifications.

Another modification of the oligonucleotides of the invention involves chemically linking to the oligonucleotide one or more moieties or conjugates that enhance the activity, cellular distribution or cellular uptake of the oligonucleotide. Such moieties include but are not limited to lipid moieties such as a cholesterol moiety, cholic acid, a thioether, e.g., hexyl-S-tritylthiol, a thiocholesterol, an aliphatic chain, e.g., dodecandiol or undecyl residues, a phospholipid, e.g., di-hexadecyl-rac-glycerol or triethylammonium 1,2-di-O-hexadecyl-rac-glycero-3-H-phosphonate, a polyamine or a polyethylene glycol chain, or adamantane acetic acid, a palmityl moiety, or an octadecylamine or hexylamino-carbonyl-oxycholesterol moiety.

It is not necessary for all positions in a given compound to be uniformly modified, and in fact more than one of the aforementioned modifications may be incorporated in a single compound or even at a single nucleoside within an oligonucleotide. The present invention also includes antisense compounds that are chimeric compounds. “Chimeric” antisense compounds or “chimeras,” in the context of this invention, are antisense molecules, particularly oligonucleotides, which contain two or more chemically distinct regions, each made up of at least one monomer unit, i.e., a nucleotide in the case of an oligonucleotide compound. These oligonucleotides typically contain at least one region wherein the oligonucleotide is modified so as to confer upon the increased resistance to nuclease degradation, increased cellular uptake, and an additional region for increased binding affinity for the target nucleic acid.

Methods of Manufacturing Antisense Molecules

The antisense molecules used in accordance with this invention may be conveniently and routinely made through the well-known technique of solid phase synthesis. Equipment for such synthesis is sold by several vendors including, for example, Applied Biosystems (Foster City, Calif.). One method for synthesising oligonucleotides on a modified solid support is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,458,066.

Any other means for such synthesis known in the art may additionally or alternatively be employed. It is well known to use similar techniques to prepare oligonucleotides such as the phosphorothioates and alkylated derivatives. In one such automated embodiment, diethyl-phosphoramidites are used as starting materials and may be synthesized as described by Beaucage, et al., (1981) Tetrahedron Letters, 22:1859-1862.

The antisense molecules of the invention are synthesised in vitro and do not include antisense compositions of biological origin, or genetic vector constructs designed to direct the in vivo synthesis of antisense molecules. The molecules of the invention may also be mixed, encapsulated, conjugated or otherwise associated with other molecules, molecule structures or mixtures of compounds, as for example, liposomes, receptor targeted molecules, oral, rectal, topical or other formulations, for assisting in uptake, distribution and/or absorption.

Therapeutic Agents

The present invention also can be used as a prophylactic or therapeutic, which may be utilised for the purpose of treatment of a genetic disease.

Accordingly, in one embodiment the present invention provides antisense molecules that bind to a selected target in the dystrophin pre-mRNA to induce efficient and consistent exon skipping described herein in a therapeutically effective amount admixed with a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, diluent, or excipient.

The phrase “pharmaceutically acceptable” refers to molecular entities and compositions that are physiologically tolerable and do not typically produce an allergic or similarly untoward reaction, such as gastric upset and the like, when administered to a patient. The term “carrier” refers to a diluent, adjuvant, excipient, or vehicle with which the compound is administered. Such pharmaceutical carriers can be sterile liquids, such as water and oils, including those of petroleum, animal, vegetable or synthetic origin, such as peanut oil, soybean oil, mineral oil, sesame oil and the like. Water or saline solutions and aqueous dextrose and glycerol solutions are preferably employed as carriers, particularly for injectable solutions. Suitable pharmaceutical carriers are described in Martin, Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 18th Ed., Mack Publishing Co., Easton, Pa., (1990).

In a more specific form of the invention there are provided pharmaceutical compositions comprising therapeutically effective amounts of an antisense molecule together with pharmaceutically acceptable diluents, preservatives, solubilizers, emulsifiers, adjuvants and/or carriers. Such compositions include diluents of various buffer content (e.g., Tris-HCl, acetate, phosphate), pH and ionic strength and additives such as detergents and solubilizing agents (e.g., Tween 80, Polysorbate 80), anti-oxidants (e.g., ascorbic acid, sodium metabisulfite), preservatives (e.g., Thimersol, benzyl alcohol) and bulking substances (e.g., lactose, mannitol). The material may be incorporated into particulate preparations of polymeric compounds such as polylactic acid, polyglycolic acid, etc. or into liposomes. Hyaluronic acid may also be used. Such compositions may influence the physical state, stability, rate of in vivo release, and rate of in vivo clearance of the present proteins and derivatives. See, e.g., Martin, Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 18th Ed. (1990, Mack Publishing Co., Easton, Pa. 18042) pages 1435-1712 that are herein incorporated by reference. The compositions may be prepared in liquid form, or may be in dried powder, such as lyophilised form.

It will be appreciated that pharmaceutical compositions provided according to the present invention may be administered by any means known in the art. Preferably, the pharmaceutical compositions for administration are administered by injection, orally, or by the pulmonary, or nasal route. The antisense molecules are more preferably delivered by intravenous, intra-arterial, intraperitoneal, intramuscular, or subcutaneous routes of administration.

Antisense Molecule Based Therapy

Also addressed by the present invention is the use of antisense molecules of the present invention, for manufacture of a medicament for modulation of a genetic disease.

The delivery of a therapeutically useful amount of antisense molecules may be achieved by methods previously published. For example, intracellular delivery of the antisense molecule may be via a composition comprising an admixture of the antisense molecule and an effective amount of a block copolymer. An example of this method is described in US patent application US 20040248833.

Other methods of delivery of antisense molecules to the nucleus are described in Mann C J et al., (2001) [“ Antisense - induced exon skipping and the synthesis of dystrophin in the mdx mouse ”. Proc., Natl. Acad. Science, 98(1) 42-47] and in Gebski et al., (2003). Human Molecular Genetics, 12(15): 1801-1811.

A method for introducing a nucleic acid molecule into a cell by way of an expression vector either as naked DNA or complexed to lipid carriers, is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,806,084.

It may be desirable to deliver the antisense molecule in a colloidal dispersion system. Colloidal dispersion systems include macromolecule complexes, nanocapsules, microspheres, beads, and lipid-based systems including oil-in-water emulsions, micelles, mixed micelles, and liposomes or liposome formulations.

Liposomes are artificial membrane vesicles which are useful as delivery vehicles in vitro and in vivo. These formulations may have net cationic, anionic or neutral charge characteristics and are useful characteristics with in vitro, in vivo and ex vivo delivery methods. It has been shown that large unilamellar vesicles (LUV), which range in size from 0.2-4.0.PHI.m can encapsulate a substantial percentage of an aqueous buffer containing large macromolecules. RNA and DNA can be encapsulated within the aqueous interior and be delivered to cells in a biologically active form (Fraley, et al., Trends Biochem. Sci., 6:77, 1981).

In order for a liposome to be an efficient gene transfer vehicle, the following characteristics should be present: (1) encapsulation of the antisense molecule of interest at high efficiency while not compromising their biological activity; (2) preferential and substantial binding to a target cell in comparison to non-target cells; (3) delivery of the aqueous contents of the vesicle to the target cell cytoplasm at high efficiency; and (4) accurate and effective expression of genetic information (Mannino, et al., Biotechniques, 6:682, 1988).

The composition of the liposome is usually a combination of phospholipids, particularly high-phase-transition-temperature phospholipids, usually in combination with steroids, especially cholesterol. Other phospholipids or other lipids may also be used. The physical characteristics of liposomes depend on pH, ionic strength, and the presence of divalent cations.

Alternatively, the antisense construct may be combined with other pharmaceutically acceptable carriers or diluents to produce a pharmaceutical composition. Suitable carriers and diluents include isotonic saline solutions, for example phosphate-buffered saline. The composition may be formulated for parenteral, intramuscular, intravenous, subcutaneous, intraocular, oral or transdermal administration.

The routes of administration described are intended only as a guide since a skilled practitioner will be able to determine readily the optimum route of administration and any dosage for any particular animal and condition.

The antisense molecules of the invention encompass any pharmaceutically acceptable salts, esters, or salts of such esters, or any other compound which, upon administration to an animal including a human, is capable of providing (directly or indirectly) the biologically active metabolite or residue thereof. Accordingly, for example, the disclosure is also drawn to prodrugs and pharmaceutically acceptable salts of the compounds of the invention, pharmaceutically acceptable salts of such pro-drugs, and other bioequivalents.

The term “pharmaceutically acceptable salts” refers to physiologically and pharmaceutically acceptable salts of the compounds of the invention: i.e., salts that retain the desired biological activity of the parent compound and do not impart undesired toxicological effects thereto.

For oligonucleotides, preferred examples of pharmaceutically acceptable salts include but are not limited to (a) salts formed with cations such as sodium, potassium, ammonium, magnesium, calcium, polyamines such as spermine and spermidine, etc.; (b) acid addition salts formed with inorganic acids, for example hydrochloric acid, hydrobromic acid, sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, nitric acid and the like; (c) salts formed with organic acids such as, for example, acetic acid, oxalic acid, tartaric acid, succinic acid, maleic acid, fumaric acid, gluconic acid, citric acid, malic acid, ascorbic acid, benzoic acid, tannic acid, palmitic acid, alginic acid, polyglutamic acid, naphthalenesulfonic acid, methanesulfonic acid, p-toluenesulfonic acid, naphthalenedisulfonic acid, polygalacturonic acid, and the like; and (d) salts formed from elemental anions such as chlorine, bromine, and iodine. The pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention may be administered in a number of ways depending upon whether local or systemic treatment is desired and upon the area to be treated. Administration may be topical (including ophthalmic and to mucous membranes including rectal delivery), pulmonary, e.g., by inhalation or insufflation of powders or aerosols, (including by nebulizer, intratracheal, intranasal, epidermal and transdermal), oral or parenteral. Parenteral administration includes intravenous, intra-arterial, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal or intramuscular injection or infusion; or intracranial, e.g., intrathecal or intraventricular, administration. Oligonucleotides with at least one 2′-O-methoxyethyl modification are believed to be particularly useful for oral administration.

The pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention, which may conveniently be presented in unit dosage form, may be prepared according to conventional techniques well known in the pharmaceutical industry. Such techniques include the step of bringing into association the active ingredients with the pharmaceutical carrier(s) or excipient(s). In general the formulations are prepared by uniformly and intimately bringing into association the active ingredients with liquid carriers or finely divided solid carriers or both, and then, if necessary, shaping the product.

Kits of the Invention

The invention also provides kits for treatment of a patient with a genetic disease which kit comprises at least an antisense molecule, packaged in a suitable container, together with instructions for its use.

In a preferred embodiment, the kits will contain at least one antisense molecule as shown in Table 1A, or a cocktail of antisense molecules as shown in Table 1B. The kits may also contain peripheral reagents such as buffers, stabilizers, etc.

The contents of the kit can be lyophilized and the kit can additionally contain a suitable solvent for reconstitution of the lyophilized components. Individual components of the kit would be packaged in separate containers and, associated with such containers, can be a notice in the form prescribed by a governmental agency regulating the manufacture, use or sale of pharmaceuticals or biological products, which notice reflects approval by the agency of manufacture, use or sale for human administration.

When the components of the kit are provided in one or more liquid solutions, the liquid solution can be an aqueous solution, for example a sterile aqueous solution. For in vivo use, the expression construct may be formulated into a pharmaceutically acceptable syringeable composition. In this case the container means may itself be an inhalant, syringe, pipette, eye dropper, or other such like apparatus, from which the formulation may be applied to an affected area of the animal, such as the lungs, injected into an animal, or even applied to and mixed with the other components of the kit.

The components of the kit may also be provided in dried or lyophilized forms. When reagents or components are provided as a dried form, reconstitution generally is by the addition of a suitable solvent. It is envisioned that the solvent also may be provided in another container means. Irrespective of the number or type of containers, the kits of the invention also may comprise, or be packaged with, an instrument for assisting with the injection/administration or placement of the ultimate complex composition within the body of an animal. Such an instrument may be an inhalant, syringe, pipette, forceps, measured spoon, eye dropper or any such medically approved delivery vehicle.

Those of ordinary skill in the field should appreciate that applications of the above method has wide application for identifying antisense molecules suitable for use in the treatment of many other diseases.

The following Examples serve to more fully describe the manner of using the above-described invention, as well as to set forth the best modes contemplated for carrying out various aspects of the invention. It is understood that these Examples in no way serve to limit the true scope of this invention, but rather are presented for illustrative purposes. The references cited herein are expressly incorporated by reference.

Methods of molecular cloning, immunology and protein chemistry, which are not explicitly described in the following examples, are reported in the literature and are known by those skilled in the art. General texts that described conventional molecular biology, microbiology, and recombinant DNA techniques within the skill of the art, included, for example: Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , Second Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. (1989); Glover ed., DNA Cloning: A Practical Approach , Volumes I and II, MRL Press, Ltd., Oxford, U. K. (1985); and Ausubel, F., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., Struhl, K. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology . Greene Publishing Associates/Wiley Intersciences, New York (2002).

Determining Induced Exon Skipping in Human Muscle Cells

Attempts by the inventors to develop a rational approach in antisense molecules design were not completely successful as there did not appear to be a consistent trend that could be applied to all exons. As such, the identification of the most effective and therefore most therapeutic antisense molecules compounds has been the result of empirical studies.

These empirical studies involved the use of computer programs to identify motifs potentially involved in the splicing process. Other computer programs were also used to identify regions of the pre-mRNA which may not have had extensive secondary structure and therefore potential sites for annealing of antisense molecules. Neither of these approaches proved completely reliable in designing antisense oligonucleotides for reliable and efficient induction of exon skipping.

Annealing sites on the human dystrophin pre-mRNA were selected for examination, initially based upon known or predicted motifs or regions involved in splicing. 2OMe antisense oligonucleotides were designed to be complementary to the target sequences under investigation and were synthesised on an Expedite 8909 Nucleic Acid Synthesiser. Upon completion of synthesis, the oligonucleotides were cleaved from the support column and de-protected in ammonium hydroxide before being desalted. The quality of the oligonucleotide synthesis was monitored by the intensity of the trityl signals upon each deprotection step during the synthesis as detected in the synthesis log. The concentration of the antisense oligonucleotide was estimated by measuring the absorbance of a diluted aliquot at 260 nm.

Specified amounts of the antisense molecules were then tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in an in vitro assay, as described below.

Briefly, normal primary myoblast cultures were prepared from human muscle biopsies obtained after informed consent. The cells were propagated and allowed to differentiate into myotubes using standard culturing techniques. The cells were then transfected with the antisense oligonucleotides by delivery of the oligonucleotides to the cells as cationic lipoplexes, mixtures of antisense molecules or cationic liposome preparations.

The cells were then allowed to grow for another 24 hours, after which total RNA was extracted and molecular analysis commenced. Reverse transcriptase amplification (RT-PCR) was undertaken to study the targeted regions of the dystrophin pre-mRNA or induced exonic re-arrangements.

For example, in the testing of an antisense molecule for inducing exon 19 skipping the RT-PCR test scanned several exons to detect involvement of any adjacent exons. For example, when inducing skipping of exon 19, RT-PCR was carried out with primers that amplified across exons 17 and 21. Amplifications of even larger products in this area (i.e. exons 13-26) were also carried out to ensure that there was minimal amplification bias for the shorter induced skipped transcript. Shorter or exon skipped products tend to be amplified more efficiently and may bias the estimated of the normal and induced transcript.

The sizes of the amplification reaction products were estimated on an agarose gel and compared against appropriate size standards. The final confirmation of identity of these products was carried out by direct DNA sequencing to establish that the correct or expected exon junctions have been maintained.

Once efficient exon skipping had been induced with one antisense molecule, subsequent overlapping antisense molecules may be synthesized and then evaluated in the assay as described above. Our definition of an efficient antisense molecule is one that induces strong and sustained exon skipping at transfection concentrations in the order of 300 nM or less. Most preferably, the oligonucleotide molecules of the present invention are able to induce skipping at levels of greater that 30% at a concentration of 100 nM.

Densitometry Methods

Densitometry analysis of the results of the exon skipping procedures was carried out, in order to determine which antisense molecules achieved the desired efficiency. Amplification products were fractionated on 2% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide and the images captured by a Chemi-Smart 3000 gel documentation system (Vilber Lourmat, Marne La Vallee). The bands were then analyzed using gel documentation system (Bio-Profil, Bio-1D version 11.9, Vilber Lourmat, Marne La Vallee), according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Densitometry was carried out on the following antisense molecules:

FIG. 35

Exon 3 H3A(+30+60) & H3A(+61+85)

Exon 4 H4D(+14−11) & H4A(+11+40)

Exon 14 H14A(+32+61)

Exon 17 H17A(+10+35)

Exon 26 H26A(−07+19), H26A(+24+50) & H26A(+68+92)

Exon 36 H36A(−16+09) & H36A(+22+51)

FIG. 36

Exon 46 H46A(+81+109)

Exon 47 H47A(+01+29)

Exon 48 H48A(+01+28) & H48A(+40+67)

Exon 49 H49A(+45+70)

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 17

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 17 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

From Table 2 below, it can be seen that the effect of antisense molecules directed at the same site (the exon 17 acceptor splice site) can be very different, even though the binding location of the two antisense molecules are overlapping. H17A(−07+23) [SEQ ID NO:3], which anneals to the last 7 bases of intron 16 and the first 23 bases of exon 17, induces exon 17 skipping when delivered into the cell at a concentration of 25 nM. In contrast, the antisense molecule H17A(−12+18), which anneals to the last 12 bases of intron 16 and the first 18 bases of exon 17, and thus overlaps the location of binding of H17A(−07+23), was not able to induce exon skipping at all. Furthermore, H17A(−07+16), which anneals to the last 7 bases of intron 16 and the first 16 bases of exon 17 caused skipping of both exon 17 and 18 at 200 nM. Antisense molecule H17A(+61+86) [SEQ ID NO:4], which binds in an intra-exonic splicing enhancer motif of exon 17, is also able to induce good skipping. It can be seen that the ability of antisense molecules to induce exon skipping cannot be predicted simply from their binding location and must be determined through rigorous testing.

This data shows that some particular antisense molecules induce efficient exon skipping while another antisense molecule, which targets a near-by or overlapping region, can be much less efficient. Titration studies show one molecule is able to induce targeted exon skipping at 20-25 nM while a less efficient antisense molecule might only induced exon skipping at concentrations of 300 nM and above. Therefore, we have shown that targeting of the antisense molecules to motifs involved in the splicing process plays a crucial role in the overall efficacy of that compound.

Efficacy refers to the ability to induce consistent skipping of a target exon. However, sometimes skipping of the target exons is consistently associated with a flanking exon. That is, we have found that the splicing of some exons is tightly linked. For example, in targeting exon 23 in the mouse model of muscular dystrophy with antisense molecules directed at the donor site of that exon, dystrophin transcripts missing exons 22 and 23 are frequently detected. As another example, when using an antisense molecule directed to exon 8 of the human dystrophin gene, many induced transcripts are missing both exons 8 and 9.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 2

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 2 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 3

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 3 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Each used alone, antisense molecules H3A(+30+60) [SEQ ID NO: 31] and H3A(+61+85) [SEQ ID NO: 32] induce exon 3 skipping. However, in combination, the two molecules are even more effective at inducing skipping ( FIG. 3 ), and are also able to induce skipping of exons 4 and 5 at 300 nM and 600 nM, a result not seen or predicted by the results of the use of each antisense molecule alone. Additional products above the induced transcript missing exon 3 arise from amplification from carry-over outer primers from the RT-PCR as well as heteroduplex formation.

Antisense Oligionucleotides Directed at Exon 4

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 4 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. FIG. 4 shows skipping of exon 4 using a cocktail of H4A(+11+40) [SEQ ID NO: 33] and H4D(+14−11) [SEQ ID NO: 34].

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 5

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 5 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. H5D(+26−05) would be regarded as a non-preferred antisense molecule as it failed to induce even low level skipping of exon 5. However, H5A(+35+65) [SEQ ID NO: 1], which presumably targets an exonic splicing enhancer was evaluated, found to be highly efficient at inducing skipping of that target exon, as shown in FIG. 5 and is regarded as the preferred compound for induced exon 5 skipping.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 6

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 6 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 7

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 7 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 8

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 8 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 6 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 9

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 9 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 10

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 10 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 7 for examples of a single antisense oligonucleotide molecule and cocktails which induce skipping of exon 10 and surrounding exons. Single antisense oligonucleotide molecule H10A(−05+16) [SEQ ID NO: 37] was able to induce skipping of exons 9-14, whilst the combination with H10A(+98+119) [SEQ ID NO: 38] was able to induce skipping of exon 10 alone and exons 9-12 (and some skipping of exons 10-12). The combination of H10A(−05+16) and H10A(+130+149) was able to induce skipping of exon 10 and exons 9-12.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 11

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 11 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 37 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Direct at Exon 12

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 12 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 38 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 13

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 13 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 14

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 14 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 8 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 16

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 16 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 17

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 17 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 18

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 18 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 9 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 19

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 19 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Direct at Exon 20

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 20 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 23

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 23 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 23 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. H23(+69+98)-SNP contains a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) that has been previously documented.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 24

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 24 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 25

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 25 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. Oligonucleotide H25A(+95+119)-DupA is a patient specific antisense molecule.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 26

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 26 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 10 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Direct at Exon 31

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 31 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 32

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 32 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 34

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 34 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 35

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 35 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Direct at Exon 36

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 36 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 11 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 38

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 38 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 39

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 39 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 41

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 41 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 42

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 42 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 43

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 43 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 12 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 44

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 44 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 13 and FIG. 39 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 45

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 45 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 14 and FIG. 40 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Direct at Exon 46

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 46 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 15 and FIG. 44 .

Antisense Oligonucleotide Cocktails Directed at Exons 44 to 46

Antisense oligonucleotide cocktails directed at exons 44 to 46 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 47

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 47 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 16 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 48

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 48 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 17 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Direct at Exon 49

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 49 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 18 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 50

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 50 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIGS. 19 and 33 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Direct at Exon 51

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 51 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 20 and FIG. 41 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 52

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 52 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 42 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 53

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 53 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 43 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Direct at Exon 54

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 54 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 21 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 55

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 55 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 22 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 56

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 56 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 23 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 57

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 57 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 24 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 59

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 59 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 25 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Direct at Exon 60

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 60 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 26 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 61

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 61 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 62

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 62 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 63

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 63 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 27 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 64

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 64 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 28 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 65

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 65 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 66

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 66 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 29 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 67

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 67 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 30 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Direct at Exon 68

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 68 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 31 .

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 69

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 69 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above. See FIG. 32 which shows a cocktail of H69A(+32+60) and H70A(−06+18) to remove both exons 69 and 70.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Direct at Exon 70

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 70 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 71

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 71 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Direct at Exon 72

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 72 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 73

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 73 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 74

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 74 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Antisense Oligonucleotides Directed at Exon 76

Antisense oligonucleotides directed at exon 76 were prepared and tested for their ability to induce exon skipping in human muscle cells using similar methods as described above.

Modifications of the above-described modes of carrying out the various embodiments of this invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art based on the above teachings related to the disclosed invention. The above embodiments of the invention are merely exemplary and should not be construed to be in any way limiting.