High-linearity flash analog to digital converter
Granted 7 Apr 2020 · no office action yet
Current assignee: Wells Fargo · originally Maxlinear
Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock
Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock
Inventors: Rishi Mathur, Chandrajit Debnath, Abhishek Ghosh, Anand Mohan Pappu · Examiner: Howard Williams · AU 2845 · TC 2800
Life of the application
12 dated eventsAbstract
An analog-to-digital converter circuit comprises code-shuffling circuitry, a plurality of digital-to-analog converter circuits, a plurality of difference circuits, and a plurality of latch circuits. The code-shuffling circuitry is operable to shuffle a plurality of digital codes among a plurality of its outputs. The plurality of digital-to-analog converter circuits are operable to convert a digital code on the respective one of the outputs to a corresponding one of a plurality of analog reference voltages. The plurality of difference circuits is operable to generate a respective one of a plurality of difference signals corresponding to a difference between an input voltage and a respective one of the plurality of reference voltages. The plurality of latch circuits is operable to latch a respective one of the plurality of difference signals to a corresponding one of a plurality of digital values.
Description
7 parts›PRIORITY CLAIM
This application claims priority to Indian provisional patent application 201811016618 filed May 2, 2018. This application also claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application 62/686,699 filed Jun. 19, 2018. Each of the above-referenced documents is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
›BACKGROUND
Limitations and disadvantages of conventional and traditional approaches to analog-to-digital conversion will become apparent to one of skill in the art, through comparison of such systems with some aspects of the present invention as set forth in the remainder of the present application with reference to the drawings.
›BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A system and/or method is provided for a high-linearity flash analog to digital converter, substantially as shown in and/or described in connection with at least one of the figures, as set forth more completely in the claims.
These and other advantages, aspects and novel features of the present invention, as well as details of an illustrated embodiment thereof, will be more fully understood from the following description and drawings.
›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
FIGS. 1A-1C show example implementations of a flash analog-to-digital converter (ADC) with resistive digital-to-analog converter (RDAC) generated references.
FIG. 2 shows an example flash ADC with RDAC-generated references and passive reference subtraction.
FIG. 3 shows an example receiver comprising a flash ADC.
FIG. 4 shows an example DSM modulator comprising a flash ADC.
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 1 of 3
FIG. 1A shows an example flash analog-to-digital converter (ADC) with resistive digital-to-analog converter (RDAC) generated references. The example flash ADC with RDAC-generated references 100 comprises code-shuffling circuitry 102 , RDACs 104 _ 1 to 104 _N, active subtractor circuits 106 _ 1 to 106 _N, and latch circuits 108 _ 1 to 108 _N (where N is an integer).
The code-shuffling circuitry 102 is operable to receive N digital codes 101 _ 1 to 101 _N, each of which may be a unique log 2 (N)-bit value. The code-shuffling circuitry 102 is operable to couple each digital code 101 _ n to a RDAC input 103 _ m (where n and m are integers; 1≤n≤N; 1≤m≤N, and n may be equal to or different than m). Which digital code 101 _ n is connected to which RDAC input 103 _ m may, for example, be changed occasionally or periodically such that any one or more of the digital codes 101 _ n is shuffled among multiple of the RDAC inputs 103 _ 1 to 103 _N over time. This shuffling of the digital codes, thus shuffles the reference voltages 105 _ 1 to 105 _N generated by the RDACs 104 _ 1 to 104 _N. Shuffling the reference voltages 105 _ 1 to 105 _N helps to mitigate the effects of variations (e.g., mismatch of circuit elements) in the ADC 100 . Such variations may include variations among the subtractors 106 _ 1 to 106 _N, variations among the RDACS 104 _ 1 to 104 _N, and/or variations among the latches 108 _ 1 to 108 _N. For example, the shuffling may reduce spurs or tones (which were not part of a sinusoidal input signal) occurring in the output signal 109 due to device mismatches, random offsets, etc. that are inevitable in any non-ideal system.
Each RDAC 104 _ n is operable to generate an analog voltage 105 _ n corresponding to the digital code applied to its input 103 _ n . Each RDAC 104 _ n may be, for example, a thermometric resistive DAC or a binary resistive DAC or an R2R DAC.
Each active subtractor circuit 106 _ n is operable to generate, as signal 107 _ n , a voltage corresponding to the difference between Vin, which is the voltage to be converted to digital by the ADC 100 , and the reference voltage 105 _ n generated by RDAC 104 _ n.
Each latch circuit 108 _ n is operable to latch the value of signal 107 _ n as signal 109 _ n . In an example implementation, the outputs of the ADC 100 is a thermometric representation of the digital output and 109 _N- 109 _ 1 are the N thermometric bits whose sum represents the value of digital output, which can vary from 0 to N. In an example implementation in which the output of the ADC 100 is desired to be in binary format, a thermometric-to-binary encoder may be added at the output. The thermometric-to-binary encoder can be a simple summing circuit which adds the values of the N binary signals 109 _ 1 to 109 _N.
One advantage of the architecture of ADC 100 is that it there is no analog reference voltage to be physically multiplexed. Instead, the digital codes 101 _ 1 to 101 _N are shuffled. The digital codes have shorter settling times than analog reference voltages and thus this shuffling can be done much faster than multiplexing of analog reference voltages. This is aided by the fact that settling of each RDAC 104 _ n requires charging just the local gate capacitance of 106 _ n . The shuffling logic may be heavily optimized to achieve minimal code-shuffling delay.
In an example implementation shown in FIG. 1B , the code-shuffling 102 may be controlled to implement data-dependent dynamic element matching (DEM) techniques and incorporate mismatch shaping. The digital output signal 109 (comprising bits 109 _ 1 - 109 _N) may be fed back to realize DEM logic 111 and control the code-shuffling 102 . In such an implementation, code-shuffling 102 settling and RDAC settling will be a part of the DEM timing loop only.
In an example implementation shown in FIG. 1C , delay of the code-shuffling 102 is totally de-coupled from settling delay of the RDACS 104 _ 1 to 104 _N by sample and hold circuits 113 _ 1 to 113 _N
FIG. 2 shows an example flash ADC with RDAC-generated references and passive reference subtraction. The ADC 200 is similar to the ADC 100 of FIG. 1 except the active subtractor circuits 106 _ 1 to 106 _N have been replaced by passive subtractor circuits 202 _ 1 to 202 _N, which can offer substantial power savings and reduce the overall latency of the ADC 200 relative to ADC 100 .
In an example implementation, by configuring the RDAC 104 _ n to have output impedance that is independent of the code 103 _ n , the subtraction is achieved by shorting 112 to 107 _ n through an appropriate impedance 202 _ n.
In an example implementation, the RDACS 104 _ 1 to 104 _N are capacitive DACs and their inputs are sampled and held and impedances 202 _ 1 to 202 _N are capacitors.
FIG. 3 shows an example receiver 300 comprising a flash ADC. The receiver comprises a radio frequency (RF) front end circuit 304 , an instance of analog-to-digital converter 310 , and demodulator circuit 308 .
FIG. 4 . Shows an example Delta-Sigma Modulator comprising a flash ADC. The Delta-Sigma modulator comprises an error amplifier 410 , a loop filter 420 , an instance of analog-to-digital converter 430 and a feedback digital-to-analog converter 440 .
The error amplifier 410 comprises circuitry operable to generate error signal 402 which is equal to the input signal 401 minus the signal 441 output by feedback DAC 440 .
The loop filter 420 comprises circuitry operable to filter the signal 402 to generate the signal 403 . The loop filter 420 may be implemented as a continuous-time loop filter or a discrete-time loop filter.
The feedback digital-to-analog converter 440 comprises circuitry operable to convert the digital code 404 to analog voltage or current 441 . In an example implementation, the DAC 440 comprises N thermometric units and is configured to receive the input 404 in thermometric format.
In the modulator 400 , the shuffled outputs of flash ADC 430 also shuffle the feedback digital-to-analog converter's thermometric units. This technique helps to mitigate the effect of undesired spurious tones produced due to mismatches in feedback digital-to-analog converter units, without adding any extra delay in the voltage-to-code and code-to-voltage loop while implementing dynamic element matching for the feedback digital-to-analog converter.
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 2 of 3
The analog-to-digital converter 310 may be any of the analog-to-digital converters 100 or 200 of FIG. 1A to FIG. 2 .
The RF front end circuit 304 is operable to receive a signal 301 via a communication channel (e.g., wired or wireless) and convert the received signal 301 to analog signal 112 .
The analog-to-digital converter 100 converts the analog signal 112 to digital signal 109 as described above.
The demodulator circuit 308 then processes the digital signal 109 to recover information carried in the signal.
In an example implementation of this disclosure, an analog-to-digital converter circuit (e.g., 100 ) comprises code-shuffling circuitry (e.g., 102 ), a plurality of digital-to-analog converter circuits (e.g., 104 _ 1 to 104 _N), a plurality of difference circuits (e.g., 106 _ 1 to 106 _N or 202 _ 1 to 202 _N), and a plurality of latch circuits (e.g., 108 _ 1 to 108 _N). The code-shuffling circuitry is operable to shuffle, over time, a plurality of digital codes (e.g., 101 _ 1 to 101 _N) among a plurality of outputs of the code-shuffling circuitry (e.g., 103 _ 1 to 103 N). The plurality of digital-to-analog converter circuits are coupled, respectively, to the plurality of outputs of the code-shuffling circuitry; and operable to convert a digital code on the respective one of the outputs to a corresponding one of a plurality of analog reference voltages (e.g., 105 _ 1 to 105 _N in FIGS. 1A to 1C or 107 _ 1 to 107 _N in FIG. 2 ). The plurality of difference circuits is operable to generate a respective one of a plurality of difference signals (e.g., 107 _ 1 to 107 _N in FIGS. 1A to 1C ) corresponding to a difference between an input voltage (e.g., 110 ) and a respective one of the plurality of reference voltages. The plurality of latch circuits is operable to latch a respective one of the plurality of difference signals (e.g., 107 _ 1 to 107 _N) to a corresponding one of a plurality of digital values (e.g., 109 _ 1 to 109 _N). Each of the plurality of digital-to-analog converter circuits may be coupled to the respective one of the plurality of outputs of the code-shuffling circuitry via a respective one of a plurality of sample and hold circuits (e.g., 113 _ 1 to 113 _N). One or more of the plurality of difference circuits may be an active subtractor (e.g., 106 _ 1 to 106 _N). One or more of the plurality of difference circuits may be a passive subtractor (e.g., 107 _ 1 shorted to Vin via 202 _ 1 ). The system may comprise dynamic element matching circuitry (e.g., 111 ) operable to control the code-shuffling circuitry based on one or more outputs of the plurality of latch circuits. The code-shuffling circuitry may be operable to shuffle the digital codes periodically (e.g., every N (an integer) cycles of a clock signal.
As utilized herein the terms “circuits” and “circuitry” refer to physical electronic components (i.e. hardware) and any software and/or firmware (“code”) which may configure the hardware, be executed by the hardware, and or otherwise be associated with the hardware. As used herein, for example, a particular processor and memory may comprise a first “circuit” when executing a first one or more lines of code and may comprise a second “circuit” when executing a second one or more lines of code. As utilized herein, “and/or” means any one or more of the items in the list joined by “and/or”. As an example, “x and/or y” means any element of the three-element set {(x), (y), (x, y)}. In other words, “x and/or y” means “one or both of x and y”. As another example, “x, y, and/or z” means any element of the seven-element set {(x), (y), (z), (x, y), (x, z), (y, z), (x, y, z)}. In other words, “x, y and/or z” means “one or more of x, y and z”. As utilized herein, the term “exemplary” means serving as a non-limiting example, instance, or illustration. As utilized herein, the terms “e.g.,” and “for example” set off lists of one or more non-limiting examples, instances, or illustrations. As utilized herein, circuitry is “operable” to perform a function whenever the circuitry comprises the necessary hardware and code (if any is necessary) to perform the function, regardless of whether performance of the function is disabled or not enabled (e.g., by a user-configurable setting, factory trim, etc.).
Other embodiments of the invention may provide a non-transitory computer readable medium and/or storage medium, and/or a non-transitory machine readable medium and/or storage medium, having stored thereon, a machine code and/or a computer program having at least one code section executable by a machine and/or a computer, thereby causing the machine and/or computer to perform the processes as described herein.
Accordingly, the present invention may be realized in hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software. The present invention may be realized in a centralized fashion in at least one computing system, or in a distributed fashion where different elements are spread across several interconnected computing systems. Any kind of computing system or other apparatus adapted for carrying out the methods described herein is suited. A typical combination of hardware and software may be a general-purpose computing system with a program or other code that, when being loaded and executed, controls the computing system such that it carries out the methods described herein. Another typical implementation may comprise an application specific integrated circuit or chip.
The present invention may also be embedded in a computer program product, which comprises all the features enabling the implementation of the methods described herein, and which when loaded in a computer system is able to carry out these methods. Computer program in the present context means any expression, in any language, code or notation, of a set of instructions intended to cause a system having an information processing capability to perform a particular function either directly or after either or both of the following: a) conversion to another language, code or notation; b) reproduction in a different material form.
›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION · 3 of 3
While the present invention has been described with reference to certain embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted without departing from the scope of the present invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the present invention without departing from its scope. Therefore, it is intended that the present invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed, but that the present invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
Claims as granted
20 claimsLog in to read the claims of this application.
Log in to unlockClassifications
3 codes- H03M1/06
- H03M3/00
- H03M1/36
Claim changes
SoonSee which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.
The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.
File wrapper
See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.
Log in to unlockDocuments
Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.
Log in to unlockChain of title
See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.
Log in to unlock