USPatent applicationPatented

Lifting desk control method

Granted 3 Mar 2020 · 1 office action

Current assignee: Loctek Inc. · originally Loctek Ergonomic Technology Corp.

Law firm: Law firm · Log in to unlock

Attorney: Attorney · Log in to unlock

Inventors: Xiangming Zheng, Lehong Xiang, Shu Liu · Examiner: Jose V Chen · AU 3637 · TC 3600

Life of the application

10 dated events
⤢ drag to zoom20202022202420262028203020322034203620382040ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & fees
ProsecutionOwnershipTerm & feeshover for detail · click to open

Abstract

The invention provides a lifting desk control method including a motor drive unit, a current detection unit and an arithmetic unit. The control method comprises the steps of: detecting current a at the current time t 1 and current b at time t 2 ; calculating the current change rate L=(b−a)/(t 2 −t 1 ); and comparing L with a set value, judging that an obstacle is encountered if the set value is exceeded, and issuing a stopping or retreating instruction to a motor by the motor drive unit. The scheme employed by the invention is to calculate the change rate of current, so judgment is made with higher accuracy and whether an obstacle is encountered is judged with high sensitivity.

Description

5 parts
›FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to the field of lifting desk control, and in particular to a lifting desk control method.

›BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Electric lifting desks are generally used in homes or offices. When a user adjusts the height, if there is an obstacle, damage may be caused to the obstacle or the structure of a lifting desk. If the human body is collided, personal injury may be caused. In order to improve the product safety, the lifting desk product in the prior art may be additionally provided with a function of stopping or retreating in case of an obstacle.

Most of the lifting desk products on the market achieve the function of stopping or retreating in case of an obstacle by the following approaches: 1. whether an obstacle is encountered is judged by checking for an abrupt change in current during collision; 2. an obstacle is detected by a mechanical sensor such as a piezoelectric sensor or a spring; and 3. a three-axis acceleration sensor is used to detect whether the lifting desk has a rising obstacle to judge whether an obstacle is encountered. Abrupt current change detection is generally used for fixed obstacle detection, but has low sensitivity for the detection of resistance with a smaller force, for example, when a user presses a desktop and if only the magnitude of a current value is judged, the current value is not accurately judged due to different service conditions under different working conditions. Mechanical sensors have high mounting requirements and are not easy to produce. Three-axis acceleration sensors have high cost and tend to misjudgment.

›SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A technical problem to be solved by the invention is to provide a lifting desk control method with high detection sensitivity and low cost for detecting whether a lifting desk encounters an obstacle.

To solve the above technical problem, the invention provides a lifting desk control method including a motor drive unit, a current detection unit and an arithmetic unit. The control method comprises the steps of:

step 1: detecting current a at the current time t 1 and current b at time t 2 after the current time by the current detection unit at a set time interval during normal operation, wherein the time t 2 is later than the time t 1 ;

step 2: calculating the current change value from t 2 to t 1 and the current change rate L=(b−a)/(t 2 −t 1 ) by the arithmetic unit; and

step 3: comparing the current change rate L with a set value, judging that an obstacle is encountered if the set value is exceeded, and issuing a stopping or retreating instruction to a motor by the motor drive unit.

With the above-described structure, the invention has the following advantages compared with the prior art:

the scheme employed by the invention is to calculate the change rate of current, without the need to consider the magnitude of a current value during normal operation and the influence of the current operating conditions on the normal operating current, so judgment is made with higher accuracy; and the change speed of current is detected and hence protection is not required when the current rises to a set value, so whether an obstacle is encountered is judged with high sensitivity; and thirdly, no additional sensor is required and the cost is relatively low.

Preferably, the lifting desk control method is executed after the lifting desk is started for a period of time. Since the current changes greatly when the lifting desk is started, the control method is stopped at (his time to avoid a false alarm using this step, and whether the lifting desk encounters an obstacle is judged during normal operation.

Preferably, the method further comprises the steps of; setting an upper threshold of a current value, and issuing a stopping or retreating instruction to the motor by the motor drive unit when the detected current value at any time exceeds the threshold. The overcurrent of the lifting desk can be protected by this step.

›BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The sole FIGURE is a flow diagram of a lifting desk control method of the invention.

›DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The invention will be further described below in detail with reference to particular embodiments.

As shown in the sole FIGURE, the invention provides a lifting desk control method including a motor drive unit, a current detection unit and an arithmetic unit, wherein the current detection unit is used for detecting the current of a motor and sending the value to the arithmetic unit, and the arithmetic unit is used for performing operation and sending a signal to the motor drive unit. The control method comprises the steps of:

step 1: detecting current a at the current time t 1 and current b at time t 2 after the current time by the current detection unit at a set time interval during normal operation, wherein the time t 2 is later than the time t 1 ;

step 2: calculating the current change value from t 2 to t 1 and the current change rate L=(b−a)/t 2 −t 1 ) by the arithmetic unit; and

step 3: comparing the current change rate L with a set value, judging that an obstacle is encountered if the set value is exceeded, and issuing a stopping or retreating instruction to a motor by the motor drive unit.

For example, in practical applications, the current at the current time t 1 is detected to be 6 A every one second, time t 2 is set to be later than the time t 1 by 0.5 second and the current at the time t 2 is 6.5 A, then the current change rate L at this time is calculated as (6.5−6)/0.5=1 A/s. The current change rate is greater than a set value of 0.3 A/s in the invention, then it is judged that an obstacle is encountered, and a stopping or retreating instruction is issued to the motor. Of course, the invention is not limited to the above set value. However, any method for judging whether the lifting desk encounters an obstacle by detecting the current change rate should fall within the protection scope of the invention.

The scheme employed by the invention is to calculate the change rate of current, without the need to consider the magnitude of a current value during normal operation and the influence of the current operating conditions on the normal operating current, so judgment is made with higher accuracy. For example, if the load of the lifting desk is small during normal operation, the normal operating current is also small; and if the load of the lifting desk is high during normal operation, the current value during normal operation is also high. Whether an obstacle is encountered is judged by a threshold of a current value for retreating in both cases, which may lead to misjudgment and affect normal use. However, when the current change rate is judged by the present method, normal operation is judged if the current change rate is below the threshold, which may not lead to misjudgment and provides higher accuracy.

Furthermore, in contrast, a method for directly detecting the current value requires the process in which the current rises to a set value, but the current rises rapidly when a fixed obstacle is encountered and a motor is stopped, while in case of an unfixed obstacle, e.g. a person, the lifting desk only has some resistance, but does not stop, and the current rises slowly at this time and hence it cannot be immediately judged that an obstacle is encountered. However, with the present method, as long as the rate at which the current changes exceeds the set value, it is judged that an obstacle is encountered, and the sensitivity far exceeds that of the method for directly detecting the current value.

Preferably, the lifting desk control method is executed after the lifting desk is started for a period of time. Since the current changes greatly when the lifting desk is started, the control method is stopped at this time to avoid a false alarm using this step, and whether the lifting desk encounters an obstacle is judged during normal operation. For example, in the invention, the lifting desk control method is set to be executed after the lifting desk is started for one second, thus avoiding a false alarm.

Preferably, the method further comprises the steps of: setting an upper threshold of a current value, and issuing a stopping or retreating instruction to the motor by the motor drive unit when the detected current value at any time exceeds the threshold. The overcurrent of the lifting desk can be protected by this step.

Claims as granted

2 claims

Log in to read the claims of this application.

Log in to unlock

Classifications

2 codes
IPC · International Patent Classification
Section A — Human necessities
  • A47B21/02
Section G — Physics
  • G05B17/02

Claim changes

Soon
Coming soonHow the claims changed between publication and grant

See which claims were amended, added or cancelled during examination, with every added and removed word marked.

AmendedAddedCancelledUnchanged

The published claims of this application are not paired with the granted ones in what we hold.

File wrapper

⤢ drag to zoomApr 2019Jul 2019Oct 2019Jan 2020Apr 2020USPTOApplicantNon-final rejectionResponse after non-final
USPTOApplicanthover for detail · click to open
Pendency
0.9 y
316 days filing → grant
Office actions
1
non-final + final
Responses
2
no RCE
Examiner
Jose V Chen
art unit 3637 · TC 3600
Citations: 22 back · 0 forward

See the full prosecution history — every USPTO and applicant action on this file, in order.

Log in to unlock

Documents

Log in to open the documents of this file: the application as filed, every office action and response, the notice of allowance.

Log in to unlock

Chain of title

⤢ drag to zoom20202022202420262028203020322034203620382040Owner 1Owner 2
Titlehover for detail · click to open

See the full assignment history — every owner this patent has passed through, with recordation dates and reel/frame numbers.

Log in to unlock